Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kentucky Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Capital Kidnapping and Murder Convictions: In-Depth Commentary on Ernst v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Affirmation of Capital Kidnapping and Murder Convictions: In-Depth Commentary on Ernst v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Apr 22, 2005
Affirmation of Capital Kidnapping and Murder Convictions: In-Depth Commentary on Ernst v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction Ernst v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 160 S.W.3d 744 (Ky. 2005), is a...
KALF Insurance Coverage Exclusion in Breach of Quasi-Contract Case

KALF Insurance Coverage Exclusion in Breach of Quasi-Contract Case

Date: Mar 18, 2005
KALF Insurance Coverage Exclusion in Breach of Quasi-Contract Case Introduction The case of Kentucky Association of Counties All Lines Fund Trust v. McClendon et al. addresses the crucial issue of...
Kentucky Supreme Court Affirms Defamation Liability in Employment Termination Case

Kentucky Supreme Court Affirms Defamation Liability in Employment Termination Case

Date: Jan 21, 2005
Kentucky Supreme Court Affirms Defamation Liability in Employment Termination Case Introduction In the case of Virginia Stringer, Reual E. Angel, Donnie H. Brummett, and Tina M. Sparks v. Wal-Mart...
Limiting Discovery and Protecting Trade Secrets: Grange Mutual Insurance Co. v. Trude

Limiting Discovery and Protecting Trade Secrets: Grange Mutual Insurance Co. v. Trude

Date: Jan 21, 2005
Limiting Discovery and Protecting Trade Secrets: Grange Mutual Insurance Co. v. Trude Introduction The case of Grange Mutual Insurance Company v. Hon. William W. Trude, Jr., Judge, and Dale Wilder...
Owner of Record Liability for Ad Valorem Taxes: Kentucky Supreme Court Establishes Clear Precedent

Owner of Record Liability for Ad Valorem Taxes: Kentucky Supreme Court Establishes Clear Precedent

Date: Jan 21, 2005
Owner of Record Liability for Ad Valorem Taxes: Kentucky Supreme Court Establishes Clear Precedent Introduction In the landmark decision of Revenue Cabinet, Commonwealth of Kentucky v. H.E. O'Daniel,...
Separation of Powers and Plea Agreements: Supreme Court of Kentucky's Decision in HOSKINS v. MARICLE

Separation of Powers and Plea Agreements: Supreme Court of Kentucky's Decision in HOSKINS v. MARICLE

Date: Dec 17, 2004
Separation of Powers and Plea Agreements: Supreme Court of Kentucky's Decision in HOSKINS v. MARICLE Introduction HOSKINS v. MARICLE, and Da v. Paul Smith, Appellants, 150 S.W.3d 1 (2004), is a...
Proper Application of Discretion Standards in Daubert Hearings: Miller v. Eldridge

Proper Application of Discretion Standards in Daubert Hearings: Miller v. Eldridge

Date: Oct 22, 2004
Proper Application of Discretion Standards in Daubert Hearings: Miller v. Eldridge Introduction Miller v. Eldridge, 146 S.W.3d 909 (Ky. 2004), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Consciousness of Guilt Through Identity Misrepresentation: Kentucky Supreme Court in Woodard v. Commonwealth

Consciousness of Guilt Through Identity Misrepresentation: Kentucky Supreme Court in Woodard v. Commonwealth

Date: Oct 22, 2004
Consciousness of Guilt Through Identity Misrepresentation: Kentucky Supreme Court in Woodard v. Commonwealth Introduction Background: In the case of James Clayton Woodard v. Commonwealth of Kentucky,...
Pursley v. Pursley: Enforcing Agreed-Upon Child Support Beyond Guidelines

Pursley v. Pursley: Enforcing Agreed-Upon Child Support Beyond Guidelines

Date: Sep 24, 2004
Pursley v. Pursley: Enforcing Agreed-Upon Child Support Beyond Guidelines Introduction Pursley v. Pursley, 144 S.W.3d 820 (Supreme Court of Kentucky, 2004), addresses critical issues surrounding the...
Affirmation of Rights to Self-Representation in Capital Cases: SOTO v. COMmonwealth

Affirmation of Rights to Self-Representation in Capital Cases: SOTO v. COMmonwealth

Date: Aug 27, 2004
Affirmation of Rights to Self-Representation in Capital Cases: SOTO v. COMmonwealth Introduction Miguel SOTO v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government v. Jurdana: Affirming Sovereign Immunity and Implications for Apportionment Under KRS 411.182

Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government v. Jurdana: Affirming Sovereign Immunity and Implications for Apportionment Under KRS 411.182

Date: Aug 27, 2004
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government v. Jurdana: Affirming Sovereign Immunity and Implications for Apportionment Under KRS 411.182 Introduction The case of Lexington-Fayette Urban County...
Mandatory Inclusion of Life Without Parole Sentencing Instruction upon Defendant's Consent: Michael D. ST. CLAIR v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky

Mandatory Inclusion of Life Without Parole Sentencing Instruction upon Defendant's Consent: Michael D. ST. CLAIR v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky

Date: Aug 27, 2004
Mandatory Inclusion of Life Without Parole Sentencing Instruction upon Defendant's Consent: Michael D. ST. CLAIR v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky Introduction The case of Michael D. ST. CLAIR v....
Application of 'Regarded As' Prong in Disability Discrimination Claims: Hallahan v. The Courier-Journal

Application of 'Regarded As' Prong in Disability Discrimination Claims: Hallahan v. The Courier-Journal

Date: Aug 4, 2004
Application of 'Regarded As' Prong in Disability Discrimination Claims: Hallahan v. The Courier-Journal Introduction The case of Dan Hallahan v. The Courier-Journal (138 S.W.3d 699) adjudicated by...
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Product Liability: Toyota v. Gregory

Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Product Liability: Toyota v. Gregory

Date: Jun 15, 2004
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Product Liability: Toyota v. Gregory Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky delivered a pivotal decision in the case of Toyota Motor Corporation et al. v. Yu...
Adoption of Restatement §552 for Negligent Misrepresentation and Clarification of the Economic Loss Rule in Kentucky: Presnell Construction Managers, Inc. v. EH Construction, LLC

Adoption of Restatement §552 for Negligent Misrepresentation and Clarification of the Economic Loss Rule in Kentucky: Presnell Construction Managers, Inc. v. EH Construction, LLC

Date: May 21, 2004
Adoption of Restatement §552 for Negligent Misrepresentation and Clarification of the Economic Loss Rule in Kentucky: Presnell Construction Managers, Inc. v. EH Construction, LLC Introduction In the...
Enhanced Protections Against Retaliation under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act

Enhanced Protections Against Retaliation under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act

Date: May 21, 2004
Enhanced Protections Against Retaliation under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act Introduction In the landmark case of Brooks v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Housing Authority, the Supreme Court of...
Establishing the Threshold for Disability under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act: Heavy Lifting Restrictions Do Not Constitute Disability

Establishing the Threshold for Disability under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act: Heavy Lifting Restrictions Do Not Constitute Disability

Date: Mar 19, 2004
Establishing the Threshold for Disability under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act: Heavy Lifting Restrictions Do Not Constitute Disability Introduction The case of Howard Baer, Inc., et al. v. Herbert D....
Establishing the Due Process Right to Present Alternative Perpetrator Defenses: Beaty v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Establishing the Due Process Right to Present Alternative Perpetrator Defenses: Beaty v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Feb 20, 2004
Establishing the Due Process Right to Present Alternative Perpetrator Defenses: Beaty v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction Beaty v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 125 S.W.3d 196 (2004), is a pivotal...
Sexton v. Sexton: Upholding Nonmarital Property Rights in Partnership Interests

Sexton v. Sexton: Upholding Nonmarital Property Rights in Partnership Interests

Date: Jan 23, 2004
Sexton v. Sexton: Upholding Nonmarital Property Rights in Partnership Interests Introduction The case of Jennifer Paige Sexton v. Larry Duane Sexton, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Kentucky on...
Punitive Damages Excluded in KCRA Retaliation Claims: Insights from McCullough v. Kentucky Dept. of Corrections

Punitive Damages Excluded in KCRA Retaliation Claims: Insights from McCullough v. Kentucky Dept. of Corrections

Date: Jan 23, 2004
Punitive Damages Excluded in KCRA Retaliation Claims: Insights from McCullough v. Kentucky Dept. of Corrections Introduction In the landmark case of Kentucky Department of Corrections and Dewey...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert