Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kansas Case Commentaries

Discretion of Prison Officials Upheld in Appellate Decision: Foster v. Maynard

Discretion of Prison Officials Upheld in Appellate Decision: Foster v. Maynard

Date: Jun 12, 1977
Discretion of Prison Officials Upheld in Appellate Decision: Foster v. Maynard Introduction Foster v. Maynard, 222 Kan. 506 (1977), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Kansas that...
Defining Bank Guaranty and Fraudulent Representations: Timi Brothers v. Prescott State Bank

Defining Bank Guaranty and Fraudulent Representations: Timi Brothers v. Prescott State Bank

Date: Jul 24, 1976
Defining Bank Guaranty and Fraudulent Representations: Timi Brothers v. Prescott State Bank Introduction In the landmark case of Gerald P. Timi and Tom Timi, d/b/a Timi Brothers and Pete Timi,...
Reaffirming Governmental Immunity: An Analysis of ROSE MALONE and GRANT MALONE v. THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER

Reaffirming Governmental Immunity: An Analysis of ROSE MALONE and GRANT MALONE v. THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER

Date: Jul 24, 1976
Reaffirming Governmental Immunity: An Analysis of ROSE MALONE and GRANT MALONE v. THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER Introduction In the landmark case of ROSE MALONE and GRANT MALONE v. THE...
At-Will Employment Confirmed in Lenard Johnson v. National Beef Packing Company

At-Will Employment Confirmed in Lenard Johnson v. National Beef Packing Company

Date: Jun 13, 1976
At-Will Employment Confirmed in Lenard Johnson v. National Beef Packing Company Introduction Lenard Johnson v. National Beef Packing Company, 220 Kan. 52 (1976), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Enforceability of Limitation of Liability Clauses in Advertising Contracts: FRANK WILLE v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Enforceability of Limitation of Liability Clauses in Advertising Contracts: FRANK WILLE v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Date: May 9, 1976
Enforceability of Limitation of Liability Clauses in Advertising Contracts: FRANK WILLE v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. Introduction The case of FRANK WILLE d/b/a FRANK WILLE COMPANY and FRANK...
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Criteria for 'Facilitate' in Kidnapping Under K.S.A. 21-3420

Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Criteria for 'Facilitate' in Kidnapping Under K.S.A. 21-3420

Date: Mar 7, 1976
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Criteria for 'Facilitate' in Kidnapping Under K.S.A. 21-3420 Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Charles L. Buggs, Jr., Appellant...
Supreme Court of Kansas Upholds Legislative Authority to Reimpose Governmental Immunity

Supreme Court of Kansas Upholds Legislative Authority to Reimpose Governmental Immunity

Date: Mar 7, 1976
Supreme Court of Kansas Upholds Legislative Authority to Reimpose Governmental Immunity Introduction In the landmark case of Marvin G. Brown, Sr., et al., Appellants v. Wichita State University, et...
State v. Bly: Admissibility of Prior Bank Robbery Conviction and Defendant's Right to Silence under K.S.A. 60-455

State v. Bly: Admissibility of Prior Bank Robbery Conviction and Defendant's Right to Silence under K.S.A. 60-455

Date: Jun 16, 1974
State v. Bly: Admissibility of Prior Bank Robbery Conviction and Defendant's Right to Silence under K.S.A. 60-455 Introduction The case of State of Kansas v. Aaron L. Bly (215 Kan. 168) adjudicated...
Kansas Supreme Court Validates Senate Bill 918: Upholding the Constitutionality of the No-Fault Insurance Act

Kansas Supreme Court Validates Senate Bill 918: Upholding the Constitutionality of the No-Fault Insurance Act

Date: May 8, 1974
Kansas Supreme Court Validates Senate Bill 918: Upholding the Constitutionality of the No-Fault Insurance Act Introduction In the landmark case of F.G. MANZANARES, et al. v. W. Fletcher Bell, et al....
Negligent Entrustment and Insurance Coverage: Analysis of Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. Noel

Negligent Entrustment and Insurance Coverage: Analysis of Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. Noel

Date: Mar 3, 1974
Negligent Entrustment and Insurance Coverage: Analysis of Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. Noel Introduction The case of Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. Noel, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Kansas Supreme Court Abolishes Discriminatory Guest Statute: A Landmark Equal Protection Ruling

Kansas Supreme Court Abolishes Discriminatory Guest Statute: A Landmark Equal Protection Ruling

Date: Jan 27, 1974
Kansas Supreme Court Abolishes Discriminatory Guest Statute: A Landmark Equal Protection Ruling Introduction The case of Terry A. Henry v. Thomas W. Bauder, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Kansas...
Duty to Defend in Insurance Contracts: Spruill Motors, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.

Duty to Defend in Insurance Contracts: Spruill Motors, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.

Date: Jul 15, 1973
Duty to Defend in Insurance Contracts: Spruill Motors, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. Introduction Spriull Motors, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. (212 Kan. 681, 1973) is a...
Maurice F. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual Insurance Company: Clarifying "Other Insurance" in Uninsured Motorist Coverage

Maurice F. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual Insurance Company: Clarifying "Other Insurance" in Uninsured Motorist Coverage

Date: Jul 18, 1969
Maurice F. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual Insurance Company: Clarifying "Other Insurance" in Uninsured Motorist Coverage Introduction In the case of Maurice F. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual Insurance Company (203...
Kansas Supreme Court Limits on Receiver Appointments During Redemption in Mortgage Foreclosures

Kansas Supreme Court Limits on Receiver Appointments During Redemption in Mortgage Foreclosures

Date: Mar 9, 1969
Kansas Supreme Court Limits on Receiver Appointments During Redemption in Mortgage Foreclosures Introduction In the landmark case of First Federal Savings Loan Association of Coffeyville,...
Judicial Limitations on Reviewing Medical License Revocations: Insights from THE KANSAS STATE BOARD OF HEALING ARTS v. JOHN J. FOOTE, M.D.

Judicial Limitations on Reviewing Medical License Revocations: Insights from THE KANSAS STATE BOARD OF HEALING ARTS v. JOHN J. FOOTE, M.D.

Date: Jan 28, 1968
Judicial Limitations on Reviewing Medical License Revocations: Insights from THE KANSAS STATE BOARD OF HEALING ARTS v. JOHN J. FOOTE, M.D. Introduction THE KANSAS STATE BOARD OF HEALING ARTS v. JOHN...
Enhancing Due Process in Tax Foreclosure: Personal Notice Requirement Established

Enhancing Due Process in Tax Foreclosure: Personal Notice Requirement Established

Date: Dec 10, 1967
Enhancing Due Process in Tax Foreclosure: Personal Notice Requirement Established Introduction The case of Claire M. Pierce and Hazel F. Pierce v. The Board of County Commissioners of Leavenworth...
Enhanced Obligations for Informed Consent and Respondeat Superior in Medical Malpractice: NATANSON v. KLINE and St. Francis Hospital

Enhanced Obligations for Informed Consent and Respondeat Superior in Medical Malpractice: NATANSON v. KLINE and St. Francis Hospital

Date: Apr 10, 1960
Enhanced Obligations for Informed Consent and Respondeat Superior in Medical Malpractice: NATANSON v. KLINE and St. Francis Hospital Introduction The case of Irma Natanson v. John R. Kline and St....
Bank’s Duty to Disclose True Financial Condition of Account Holder: SPARKS v. GUARANTY STATE BANK

Bank’s Duty to Disclose True Financial Condition of Account Holder: SPARKS v. GUARANTY STATE BANK

Date: Dec 8, 1957
Bank’s Duty to Disclose True Financial Condition of Account Holder: SPARKS v. GUARANTY STATE BANK Introduction SPARKS v. GUARANTY STATE BANK, 182 Kan. 165 (1957), is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Browning v. Blair et al.: Establishing Standards for Receiver Appointments and Sufficiency of Pleadings in Fraud and Conspiracy Claims

Browning v. Blair et al.: Establishing Standards for Receiver Appointments and Sufficiency of Pleadings in Fraud and Conspiracy Claims

Date: May 7, 1950
Browning v. Blair et al.: Establishing Standards for Receiver Appointments and Sufficiency of Pleadings in Fraud and Conspiracy Claims Introduction Browning v. Blair et al. is a pivotal 1950 decision...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert