Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kansas Case Commentaries

Clarifying Felony Murder Liability: Physical Presence Not Mandatory and Foreseeability as a Legal Mandate

Clarifying Felony Murder Liability: Physical Presence Not Mandatory and Foreseeability as a Legal Mandate

Date: Apr 24, 2004
Clarifying Felony Murder Liability: Physical Presence Not Mandatory and Foreseeability as a Legal Mandate Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Noah J. Gleason (277 Kan. 624, 2004),...
State v. Hebert: Establishing New Precedents on Miranda Rights and Custodial Interrogations

State v. Hebert: Establishing New Precedents on Miranda Rights and Custodial Interrogations

Date: Jan 17, 2004
State v. Hebert: Establishing New Precedents on Miranda Rights and Custodial Interrogations Introduction In State v. Jeffery Frank Hebert (277 Kan. 61), the Supreme Court of Kansas upheld Hebert's...
Kansas Supreme Court Enhances Scrutiny of Directors’ Defensive Measures in Corporate Governance

Kansas Supreme Court Enhances Scrutiny of Directors’ Defensive Measures in Corporate Governance

Date: Sep 27, 2003
Kansas Supreme Court Enhances Scrutiny of Directors’ Defensive Measures in Corporate Governance Introduction The case of J. Thomas Burcham et al. v. Unison Bancorp, Inc. et al. adjudicated by the...
Clarifying Miranda Requirements for Voluntary Self-Surrender: State v. Vandervort

Clarifying Miranda Requirements for Voluntary Self-Surrender: State v. Vandervort

Date: Jul 26, 2003
Clarifying Miranda Requirements for Voluntary Self-Surrender: State v. Vandervort Introduction State of Kansas v. Drew S. Vandervort, 276 Kan. 164 (2003), is a pivotal judgment by the Supreme Court...
Application of Jail Time Credit in Sentencing: STATE OF KANSAS v. DENNIS W. HARPER

Application of Jail Time Credit in Sentencing: STATE OF KANSAS v. DENNIS W. HARPER

Date: May 31, 2003
Application of Jail Time Credit in Sentencing: STATE OF KANSAS v. DENNIS W. HARPER Introduction STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DENNIS W. HARPER, Appellant (275 Kan. 888) is a pivotal case decided by...
State of Kansas v. Davis: Unanimity Requirements in Jury Instructions for Multiple Acts Cases

State of Kansas v. Davis: Unanimity Requirements in Jury Instructions for Multiple Acts Cases

Date: Jan 25, 2003
State of Kansas v. Davis: Unanimity Requirements in Jury Instructions for Multiple Acts Cases Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Quincy B. Davis, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Clear Contract Language Prevails in Insurance Coverage Disputes: Analysis of Liggatt v. Employers Mutual

Clear Contract Language Prevails in Insurance Coverage Disputes: Analysis of Liggatt v. Employers Mutual

Date: Jun 1, 2002
Clear Contract Language Prevails in Insurance Coverage Disputes: Analysis of Liggatt v. Employers Mutual Introduction In the landmark case Gale Liggatt v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company, the...
Enforceability of Choice of Law Provisions in Securities Agreements Under Kansas Public Policy

Enforceability of Choice of Law Provisions in Securities Agreements Under Kansas Public Policy

Date: Apr 20, 2002
Enforceability of Choice of Law Provisions in Securities Agreements Under Kansas Public Policy: Insights from Brenner and Klein v. Oppenheimer Co., Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Brenner and...
Inclusion of Juvenile Adjudications in Criminal History Scores: State of Kansas v. Travis T. Hitt

Inclusion of Juvenile Adjudications in Criminal History Scores: State of Kansas v. Travis T. Hitt

Date: Mar 16, 2002
Inclusion of Juvenile Adjudications in Criminal History Scores: State of Kansas v. Travis T. Hitt Introduction State of Kansas v. Travis T. Hitt, 273 Kan. 224 (2002), is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Retaliatory Discharge Standards Under Employment-at-Will: Bracken v. Dixon Industries

Retaliatory Discharge Standards Under Employment-at-Will: Bracken v. Dixon Industries

Date: Jan 26, 2002
Retaliatory Discharge Standards Under Employment-at-Will: Bracken v. Dixon Industries Introduction The case of Ruth A. Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc. (272 Kan. 1272) is a pivotal decision by the...
No Death at Equipoise: Kansas Reconstructs Its Capital Weighing Scheme in State v. Kleypas

No Death at Equipoise: Kansas Reconstructs Its Capital Weighing Scheme in State v. Kleypas

Date: Dec 29, 2001
No Death at Equipoise: Kansas Reconstructs Its Capital Weighing Scheme in State v. Kleypas Introduction State v. Kleypas, 272 Kan. 894 (2001), is the Kansas Supreme Court’s first comprehensive review...
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Preponderance of Evidence Standard in Retaliatory Discharge Actions

Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Preponderance of Evidence Standard in Retaliatory Discharge Actions

Date: Dec 8, 2001
Established Preponderance of Evidence Standard in Retaliatory Discharge Cases and Clarified Employer Liability Introduction In the landmark case of Rebarchek v. Farmers Cooperative Elevator and...
State of Kansas v. Ronald Graham: Establishing Standards for Probation Revocation

State of Kansas v. Ronald Graham: Establishing Standards for Probation Revocation

Date: Sep 15, 2001
State of Kansas v. Ronald Graham: Establishing Standards for Probation Revocation Introduction State of Kansas v. Ronald Graham, 272 Kan. 2 (2001), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Apprendi Mandates Jury Determination for Sentencing Enhancements: Kansas Upward Departure Sentencing Declared Unconstitutional

Apprendi Mandates Jury Determination for Sentencing Enhancements: Kansas Upward Departure Sentencing Declared Unconstitutional

Date: May 26, 2001
Apprendi Mandates Jury Determination for Sentencing Enhancements: Kansas Upward Departure Sentencing Declared Unconstitutional Introduction The case of State of Kansas v. Crystal D. Gould adjudicated...
Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Personal Rights Affirmed in State v. Meneley

Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Personal Rights Affirmed in State v. Meneley

Date: Apr 28, 2001
Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Personal Rights Affirmed in State of Kansas ex rel. Carla J. Stovall v. David R. Meneley Introduction In State of Kansas ex rel. Carla J. Stovall v. David R....
Premeditated Murder and Evidentiary Standards: Analysis of State v. Scott

Premeditated Murder and Evidentiary Standards: Analysis of State v. Scott

Date: Apr 21, 2001
Premeditated Murder and Evidentiary Standards: Analysis of State of Kansas v. Jeffrey L. Scott Introduction State of Kansas v. Jeffrey L. Scott, 271 Kan. 103 (2001), is a landmark decision by the...
Mandamus Standing in Legal Practice: Insights from Kansas Supreme Court in KBA v. Judges of Third Judicial District

Mandamus Standing in Legal Practice: Insights from Kansas Supreme Court in KBA v. Judges of Third Judicial District

Date: Dec 16, 2000
Mandamus Standing in Legal Practice: Insights from Kansas Supreme Court in KBA v. Judges of Third Judicial District Introduction The case of Kansas Bar Association, Jack R. Euler and Joel R. Euler v....
Upholding the Constitutionality of Kansas' "Hard 40" Sentencing Scheme: STATE OF KANSAS v. ANTHONY D. CONLEY

Upholding the Constitutionality of Kansas' "Hard 40" Sentencing Scheme: STATE OF KANSAS v. ANTHONY D. CONLEY

Date: Oct 28, 2000
Upholding the Constitutionality of Kansas' "Hard 40" Sentencing Scheme: STATE OF KANSAS v. ANTHONY D. CONLEY Introduction In the landmark case State of Kansas v. Anthony D. Conley, 270 Kan. 18...
Admissibility of Blood Alcohol Test Results Independent of Formal DC-27 Form Completion

Admissibility of Blood Alcohol Test Results Independent of Formal DC-27 Form Completion

Date: Jun 3, 2000
Admissibility of Blood Alcohol Test Results Independent of Formal DC-27 Form Completion Introduction In the landmark case State of Kansas v. Scott Baker, 269 Kan. 383 (2000), the Supreme Court of...
Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Feb 12, 2000
Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: Kansas Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of State of Kansas v. Tod Alan Pabst (268 Kan. 501) serves as a pivotal moment in Kansas...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert