Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kansas Case Commentaries

Premeditation and Prosecutorial Conduct: Insights from STATE v. Todd D. Schumacher

Premeditation and Prosecutorial Conduct: Insights from STATE v. Todd D. Schumacher

Date: Mar 8, 2014
Premeditation and Prosecutorial Conduct: Insights from STATE v. Todd D. Schumacher Introduction STATE of Kansas v. Todd D. Schumacher, 322 P.3d 1016 (2014), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Kansas Supreme Court Declares School Finance Statutes K.S.A.72–6434 and K.S.A.72–8814 Unconstitutional Under Article 6's Equity Mandate

Kansas Supreme Court Declares School Finance Statutes K.S.A.72–6434 and K.S.A.72–8814 Unconstitutional Under Article 6's Equity Mandate

Date: Mar 8, 2014
Kansas Supreme Court Declares School Finance Statutes K.S.A.72–6434 and K.S.A.72–8814 Unconstitutional Under Article 6's Equity Mandate Introduction In the landmark case of Luke GANNON, by his next...
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Procedural Standards for Restitution in Criminal Sentencing

Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Procedural Standards for Restitution in Criminal Sentencing

Date: Mar 1, 2014
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Procedural Standards for Restitution in Criminal Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Anthony Earl Hall, decided on February 28, 2014,...
Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas Post-Sentencing Under K.S.A. 22–3210(d)

Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas Post-Sentencing Under K.S.A. 22–3210(d)

Date: Feb 22, 2014
Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas Post-Sentencing Under K.S.A. 22–3210(d) Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Terrance J. Kelly, the Supreme...
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Jury Instruction Errors

Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Jury Instruction Errors

Date: Feb 15, 2014
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Jury Instruction Errors Introduction The case of Martin Miller v. State of Kansas (318 P.3d 155) presents a...
Kansas Supreme Court Affirms Abrogation of Vicarious and Independent Liability for Covered Health Care Providers under K.S.A. 40–3403(h)

Kansas Supreme Court Affirms Abrogation of Vicarious and Independent Liability for Covered Health Care Providers under K.S.A. 40–3403(h)

Date: Jan 25, 2014
Kansas Supreme Court Affirms Abrogation of Vicarious and Independent Liability for Covered Health Care Providers under K.S.A. 40–3403(h) Introduction In the landmark case of Angela Cady v. John...
Interpreting Statutory Time Limits for Motions for New Trial: Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Deadline

Interpreting Statutory Time Limits for Motions for New Trial: Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Deadline

Date: Dec 7, 2013
Interpreting Statutory Time Limits for Motions for New Trial: Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Deadline Introduction STATE of Kansas v. Stanton Holt, 313 P.3d 826 (Kansas Supreme Court,...
Res Judicata Reinforced in STATE v. ROBERTSON: Implications for Illegal Sentencing Corrections

Res Judicata Reinforced in STATE v. ROBERTSON: Implications for Illegal Sentencing Corrections

Date: Nov 9, 2013
Res Judicata Reinforced in STATE v. ROBERTSON: Implications for Illegal Sentencing Corrections Introduction State of Kansas v. Joshua Robertson, 312 P.3d 361 (Kan. 2013), is a pivotal case in Kansas...
Admissibility and Fair Trial Standards in Capital Murder: Insights from State v. Lowrance

Admissibility and Fair Trial Standards in Capital Murder: Insights from State v. Lowrance

Date: Nov 9, 2013
Admissibility and Fair Trial Standards in Capital Murder: Insights from State v. Lowrance Introduction State of Kansas v. Christopher M. Lowrance is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Sierra Club v. Moser: Affirmation of Associational Standing and Enforcement of New EPA Emission Standards in PSD Permits

Sierra Club v. Moser: Affirmation of Associational Standing and Enforcement of New EPA Emission Standards in PSD Permits

Date: Oct 5, 2013
Sierra Club v. Moser: Affirmation of Associational Standing and Enforcement of New EPA Emission Standards in PSD Permits Introduction In the landmark case Sierra Club, Appellant, v. Robert Moser, the...
Expanded Associational Standing in Historic Preservation: Friends of Bethany Place, Inc. v. City of Topeka

Expanded Associational Standing in Historic Preservation: Friends of Bethany Place, Inc. v. City of Topeka

Date: Aug 24, 2013
Expanded Associational Standing in Historic Preservation: Friends of Bethany Place, Inc. v. City of Topeka Introduction The landmark case Friends of Bethany Place, Inc. v. City of Topeka adjudicated...
Kansas Supreme Court: Single Communicated Threat as Unit of Prosecution in Criminal Threat Statute

Kansas Supreme Court: Single Communicated Threat as Unit of Prosecution in Criminal Threat Statute

Date: Aug 10, 2013
Single Communicated Threat as the Unit of Prosecution: Kansas Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in State v. King Introduction In the pivotal case of State of Kansas v. Kameron King, the Supreme Court...
State v. Friday: Refined Standards for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Aiding and Abetting Liability

State v. Friday: Refined Standards for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Aiding and Abetting Liability

Date: Aug 10, 2013
State v. Friday: Refined Standards for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Aiding and Abetting Liability Introduction State v. Friday is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Kansas that delves into...
Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of the Economic Loss Doctrine in Negligent Misrepresentation Cases

Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of the Economic Loss Doctrine in Negligent Misrepresentation Cases

Date: Jul 27, 2013
Kansas Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of the Economic Loss Doctrine in Negligent Misrepresentation Cases Introduction In the landmark decision of Kenneth Rinehart and Beverly Rinehart v. Morton...
Standing as a Component of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Insights from TERNES v. GALICHIA

Standing as a Component of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Insights from TERNES v. GALICHIA

Date: Jul 27, 2013
Standing as a Component of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Insights from TERNES v. GALICHIA Introduction The case of Herman M. Ternes v. Joseph P. Galichia, M.D., et al. (297 Kan. 918) adjudicated by...
Clarification on Admissibility of Sexual Orientation Evidence and Sentencing Standards in Kansas: STATE vs. Dean J. BOLEYN, Jr.

Clarification on Admissibility of Sexual Orientation Evidence and Sentencing Standards in Kansas: STATE vs. Dean J. BOLEYN, Jr.

Date: Jun 15, 2013
Clarification on Admissibility of Sexual Orientation Evidence and Sentencing Standards in Kansas: STATE vs. Dean J. BOLEYN, Jr. Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Kansas v. Dean J. BOLEYN,...
Procedural Requirements for Appellate Attorney Fees under K.S.A. 40-908: Insights from Snider v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Procedural Requirements for Appellate Attorney Fees under K.S.A. 40-908: Insights from Snider v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Date: Apr 20, 2013
Procedural Requirements for Appellate Attorney Fees under K.S.A. 40-908: Insights from Snider v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. Introduction The Supreme Court of Kansas, in the case of Eugene...
Kansas Supreme Court Limits Buyer Acknowledgment Protections in Real Estate Transactions

Kansas Supreme Court Limits Buyer Acknowledgment Protections in Real Estate Transactions

Date: Apr 13, 2013
Kansas Supreme Court Limits Buyer Acknowledgment Protections in Real Estate Transactions Introduction In the landmark case of STECHSCHULTE v. JENNINGS, decided by the Supreme Court of Kansas on April...
Kansas v. Herbel: Affirming Defendant's Right to Presence at Critical Trial Stages and Strict Preservation of Appellate Issues

Kansas v. Herbel: Affirming Defendant's Right to Presence at Critical Trial Stages and Strict Preservation of Appellate Issues

Date: Apr 6, 2013
Kansas v. Herbel: Affirming Defendant's Right to Presence at Critical Trial Stages and Strict Preservation of Appellate Issues Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Kansas v. Randy Herbel,...
Kansas Supreme Court Strengthens Right to Counsel During Police Interrogations

Kansas Supreme Court Strengthens Right to Counsel During Police Interrogations

Date: Apr 6, 2013
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice regarding specific legal issues, please consult a qualified attorney. Kansas...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert