Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Clarifying Post-Conviction Relief for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: The Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Gayden

Clarifying Post-Conviction Relief for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: The Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Gayden

Date: Feb 22, 2020
Clarifying Post-Conviction Relief for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: The Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Gayden Introduction People v. Gayden is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court...
Krankel Inquiry Expansion: Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Comprehensive Evaluation of Ineffective Assistance Claims

Krankel Inquiry Expansion: Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Comprehensive Evaluation of Ineffective Assistance Claims

Date: Jan 25, 2020
Krankel Inquiry Expansion: Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Comprehensive Evaluation of Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction In The People of the State of Illinois v. Ryan M. Roddis, 443 Ill....
Reversal of Conviction in Moore v. The People: Establishing Standards for Effective Counsel in Stipulating Felon Status

Reversal of Conviction in Moore v. The People: Establishing Standards for Effective Counsel in Stipulating Felon Status

Date: Jan 25, 2020
Reversal of Conviction in Moore v. The People: Establishing Standards for Effective Counsel in Stipulating Felon Status Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v....
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Clear Standards for True Threats in Stalking Cases

Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Clear Standards for True Threats in Stalking Cases

Date: Jan 25, 2020
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Clear Standards for True Threats in Stalking Cases Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Marshall Ashley (443 Ill. Dec. 566) represents a...
People v. King: Clarifying the Limits of Expert Witness Testimony in Illinois

People v. King: Clarifying the Limits of Expert Witness Testimony in Illinois

Date: Jan 25, 2020
People v. King: Clarifying the Limits of Expert Witness Testimony in Illinois Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Shadwick R. King (443 Ill. Dec. 19), the...
No Stacking of Liability Limits in Multivehicle Auto Insurance Policies: Hess v. Estate of Klamm

No Stacking of Liability Limits in Multivehicle Auto Insurance Policies: Hess v. Estate of Klamm

Date: Jan 25, 2020
No Stacking of Liability Limits in Multivehicle Auto Insurance Policies: Hess v. Estate of Klamm Introduction The case of Loretta Hess et al. v. The Estate of TJay Klamm, Deceased, et al.,...
Defendant-Initiated Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: A New Precedent Set by People v. Quentin Bates

Defendant-Initiated Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: A New Precedent Set by People v. Quentin Bates

Date: Nov 22, 2019
Defendant-Initiated Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: A New Precedent Set by People v. Quentin Bates Introduction People v. Quentin Bates is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the...
Clarifying the One-Act, One-Crime Rule: Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Separate Convictions for Robbery and Aggravated Battery

Clarifying the One-Act, One-Crime Rule: Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Separate Convictions for Robbery and Aggravated Battery

Date: Sep 20, 2019
Clarifying the One-Act, One-Crime Rule: Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Separate Convictions for Robbery and Aggravated Battery Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois...
Limits of Extending Krankel Proceedings to Postconviction Counsel Claims

Limits of Extending Krankel Proceedings to Postconviction Counsel Claims

Date: Sep 20, 2019
Limits of Extending Krankel Proceedings to Postconviction Counsel Claims Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. John Michael Custer (440 Ill. Dec. 604) addresses a pivotal...
Illinois Supreme Court Strikes Down Area Liability Provision in Drug Dealer Liability Act

Illinois Supreme Court Strikes Down Area Liability Provision in Drug Dealer Liability Act

Date: Mar 22, 2019
Illinois Supreme Court Strikes Down Area Liability Provision in Drug Dealer Liability Act Introduction In the landmark case of NOAH WINGERT, a Minor, by His Mother and Next Friend, Cassandra Lee...
Double Jeopardy Clause and Retrial: The People v. Gerald Drake

Double Jeopardy Clause and Retrial: The People v. Gerald Drake

Date: Mar 22, 2019
Double Jeopardy Clause and Retrial: The People v. Gerald Drake Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Gerald Drake, 433 Ill. Dec. 197 (2019), the Supreme Court of...
Beaman v. Freesmeyer: Refining the 'Commencement or Continuance' Standard in Malicious Prosecution

Beaman v. Freesmeyer: Refining the 'Commencement or Continuance' Standard in Malicious Prosecution

Date: Feb 8, 2019
Beaman v. Freesmeyer: Refining the 'Commencement or Continuance' Standard in Malicious Prosecution Introduction Beaman v. Freesmeyer et al., 433 Ill. Dec. 130 (2019), is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Expanded Rights under Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act: Defining "Aggrieved Person"

Expanded Rights under Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act: Defining "Aggrieved Person"

Date: Jan 26, 2019
Expanded Rights under Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act: Defining "Aggrieved Person" Introduction The landmark case Stacy Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation et al. (432 Ill....
Right to Reasonable Assistance of Counsel in Initial Postconviction Proceedings: People v. Johnson

Right to Reasonable Assistance of Counsel in Initial Postconviction Proceedings: People v. Johnson

Date: Nov 30, 2018
Right to Reasonable Assistance of Counsel in Initial Postconviction Proceedings: People v. Johnson Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Granville S. Johnson is a landmark decision by the...
Compliance with Updated Rules: The People v. Jordan Easton – A Landmark Decision on Rule 604(d) and Retroactivity

Compliance with Updated Rules: The People v. Jordan Easton – A Landmark Decision on Rule 604(d) and Retroactivity

Date: Nov 30, 2018
Compliance with Updated Rules: The People v. Jordan Easton – A Landmark Decision on Rule 604(d) and Retroactivity Introduction In The People of the State of Illinois v. Jordan Easton (429 Ill. Dec....
Dupree v. The People of Illinois: Clarifying Affidavit Requirements in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Dupree v. The People of Illinois: Clarifying Affidavit Requirements in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Date: Nov 2, 2018
Dupree v. The People of Illinois: Clarifying Affidavit Requirements in Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction Dupree v. The People of Illinois, 2018 IL 122307, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Accrual of Cause of Action in Negligent Insurance Procurement: American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Walter Krop et al.

Accrual of Cause of Action in Negligent Insurance Procurement: American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Walter Krop et al.

Date: Oct 19, 2018
Accrual of Cause of Action in Negligent Insurance Procurement: American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Walter Krop et al. Introduction The case of American Family Mutual Insurance Company v....
Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Age 18 as Threshold in Proportionate Penalties Clause: Harris v. The People of Illinois

Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Age 18 as Threshold in Proportionate Penalties Clause: Harris v. The People of Illinois

Date: Oct 19, 2018
Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Age 18 as Threshold in Proportionate Penalties Clause: Harris v. The People of Illinois Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois,...
Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Enhanced Drug Delivery Penalty Based on Apparent Use of Religious Property

Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Enhanced Drug Delivery Penalty Based on Apparent Use of Religious Property

Date: Oct 19, 2018
Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Enhanced Drug Delivery Penalty Based on Apparent Use of Religious Property Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Jafaria Deforrest Newton (427...
Reinstatement of Nonmanufacturer Defendants under Section 2-621(b)(4): A New Interpretation

Reinstatement of Nonmanufacturer Defendants under Section 2-621(b)(4): A New Interpretation

Date: Oct 19, 2018
Reinstatement of Nonmanufacturer Defendants under Section 2-621(b)(4): A New Interpretation Introduction The case of Martin Cassidy v. China Vitamins, LLC (427 Ill. Dec. 892) marks a significant...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert