Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Illinois Supreme Court Invalidates Section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act for Arbitrary Classification

Illinois Supreme Court Invalidates Section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act for Arbitrary Classification

Date: Mar 21, 1952
Illinois Supreme Court Invalidates Section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act for Arbitrary Classification Introduction In the landmark case of Paul C. Grasse vs. Dealer's Transport Company (412...
Custody Determination Primacy on Child's Best Interests: NYE v. NYE

Custody Determination Primacy on Child's Best Interests: NYE v. NYE

Date: Jan 25, 1952
Custody Determination Primacy on Child's Best Interests: NYE v. NYE Introduction Constance W. Nye vs. Herbert Nye is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Illinois on January 24, 1952....
Upholding Admissible Evidence and Mental Competency Standards in Murder Trials: People v. Jenko

Upholding Admissible Evidence and Mental Competency Standards in Murder Trials: People v. Jenko

Date: Nov 28, 1951
Upholding Admissible Evidence and Mental Competency Standards in Murder Trials: People v. Jenko Introduction People v. Jenko, 410 Ill. 478 (1951), is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court...
Deficiency Assessment under the Retailer's Occupation Tax Act: Insights from Miller v. Department of Revenue

Deficiency Assessment under the Retailer's Occupation Tax Act: Insights from Miller v. Department of Revenue

Date: Mar 23, 1951
Deficiency Assessment under the Retailer's Occupation Tax Act: Insights from Miller v. Department of Revenue Introduction The case of William Miller et al., Appellees, vs. The Department of Revenue,...
Establishing Product Defect Liability: Lindroth v. Walgreen Company

Establishing Product Defect Liability: Lindroth v. Walgreen Company

Date: Sep 22, 1950
Establishing Product Defect Liability: Lindroth v. Walgreen Company Introduction Case: Bruce Lindroth, Appellee, vs. Walgreen Company et al., Appellants. Court: Supreme Court of Illinois Date:...
Unauthorized Practice of Law: Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Contempt Conviction in Illinois Bar Association vs. Frank Schafer

Unauthorized Practice of Law: Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Contempt Conviction in Illinois Bar Association vs. Frank Schafer

Date: Sep 23, 1949
Unauthorized Practice of Law: Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Contempt Conviction in Illinois Bar Association vs. Frank Schafer Introduction The case of The People ex rel. Illinois State Bar...
Redlich v. The People: Reversing Civil Contempt in Light of Mental Health Statute

Redlich v. The People: Reversing Civil Contempt in Light of Mental Health Statute

Date: Jan 20, 1949
Redlich v. The People: Reversing Civil Contempt in Light of Mental Health Statute Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS vs. HERMAN E. REDLICH, decided by the...
Limitation of Recovery under the Dram Shop Act: Distinguishing Property and Pecuniary Injuries

Limitation of Recovery under the Dram Shop Act: Distinguishing Property and Pecuniary Injuries

Date: Jan 20, 1949
Limitation of Recovery under the Dram Shop Act: Distinguishing Property and Pecuniary Injuries Introduction The case of Hattie Howlett vs. Lena Doglio et al. (402 Ill. 311), adjudicated by the...
Res Judicata and Quo Warranto: Establishing Precedent in Illinois Education Governance

Res Judicata and Quo Warranto: Establishing Precedent in Illinois Education Governance

Date: Nov 21, 1947
Res Judicata and Quo Warranto: Establishing Precedent in Illinois Education Governance Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois vs. Harold E. Kidd et al. and Harry L. Swank et al....
Scope of Contractual Indemnity: Exclusion of Indemnification for Own Negligence

Scope of Contractual Indemnity: Exclusion of Indemnification for Own Negligence

Date: Sep 19, 1946
Scope of Contractual Indemnity: Exclusion of Indemnification for Own Negligence Introduction The case of Westinghouse Electric Elevator Company v. LaSalle Monroe Building Corporation, adjudicated by...
Schneiderman v. Interstate Transit Lines: Establishing Standards for Witness Competency and Negligence in Traffic Collision Cases

Schneiderman v. Interstate Transit Lines: Establishing Standards for Witness Competency and Negligence in Traffic Collision Cases

Date: Sep 19, 1946
Schneiderman v. Interstate Transit Lines: Establishing Standards for Witness Competency and Negligence in Traffic Collision Cases Introduction The case of Jack Schneiderman vs. Interstate Transit...
Clarifying Mootness in Appellate Review: Insights from Barnard v. Michael

Clarifying Mootness in Appellate Review: Insights from Barnard v. Michael

Date: Nov 22, 1945
Clarifying Mootness in Appellate Review: Insights from Barnard v. Michael Introduction The case of Cecile Barnard, Exrx., Appellee, vs. Hazel Michael et al., Appellants (392 Ill. 130) adjudicated by...
Duty of Care and Foreseeability in Railroad Station Safety: Agnes Neering v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

Duty of Care and Foreseeability in Railroad Station Safety: Agnes Neering v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

Date: May 21, 1943
Duty of Care and Foreseeability in Railroad Station Safety: Agnes Neering v. Illinois Central Railroad Company Introduction In the landmark case of Agnes Neering v. Illinois Central Railroad Company,...
BARTOLUCCI v. FALLETI: Establishing the Threshold for Wilful and Wanton Misconduct in Motor Vehicle Accidents

BARTOLUCCI v. FALLETI: Establishing the Threshold for Wilful and Wanton Misconduct in Motor Vehicle Accidents

Date: Jan 20, 1943
BARTOLUCCI v. FALLETI: Establishing the Threshold for Wilful and Wanton Misconduct in Motor Vehicle Accidents Introduction The case of Josephine Bartolucci vs. Peter Falleti (382 Ill. 168)...
Illinois Supreme Court Rules Against Recovery of Litigation Expenses in Subsequent Actions Without Statutory or Contractual Authorization

Illinois Supreme Court Rules Against Recovery of Litigation Expenses in Subsequent Actions Without Statutory or Contractual Authorization

Date: Jan 20, 1943
Illinois Supreme Court Rules Against Recovery of Litigation Expenses in Subsequent Actions Without Statutory or Contractual Authorization Introduction The case of AMANDA RITTER et al. v. LOUIS G....
Duty of Care and Proximate Cause in Electrocution Liability: Merlo v. Public Service Co. of Northern Illinois

Duty of Care and Proximate Cause in Electrocution Liability: Merlo v. Public Service Co. of Northern Illinois

Date: Nov 18, 1942
Duty of Care and Proximate Cause in Electrocution Liability: Merlo v. Public Service Co. of Northern Illinois Introduction In Marie Merlo, Administratrix, et al. v. Public Service Company of Northern...
State Prosecution Abandonment and Statute of Limitations in Conspiracy Cases: People v. Johnson

State Prosecution Abandonment and Statute of Limitations in Conspiracy Cases: People v. Johnson

Date: Jun 16, 1939
State Prosecution Abandonment and Statute of Limitations in Conspiracy Cases: People v. Johnson Introduction The case of People of the State of Illinois vs. Al Johnson et al. (372 Ill. 18),...
Reversal of Vested Tax Refund Rights: Analysis of THE PEOPLE ex rel. Emil Eitel et al. v. Horace G. Lindheimer

Reversal of Vested Tax Refund Rights: Analysis of THE PEOPLE ex rel. Emil Eitel et al. v. Horace G. Lindheimer

Date: Apr 15, 1939
Reversal of Vested Tax Refund Rights: Analysis of THE PEOPLE ex rel. Emil Eitel et al. v. Horace G. Lindheimer Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE ex rel. Emil Eitel et al. v. HORACE G....
Municipalities and Taxation: The Precedent Set by City of Chicago v. Ames

Municipalities and Taxation: The Precedent Set by City of Chicago v. Ames

Date: Feb 13, 1937
Municipalities and Taxation: The Precedent Set by City of Chicago v. Ames Introduction The landmark case of The City of Chicago vs. Knowlton L. Ames, Jr., decided by the Supreme Court of Illinois on...
Affirmation of Rule 18 of the Civil Practice Act: Taxation of Litigation Costs in Negligence Claims

Affirmation of Rule 18 of the Civil Practice Act: Taxation of Litigation Costs in Negligence Claims

Date: Jun 19, 1935
Affirmation of Rule 18 of the Civil Practice Act: Taxation of Litigation Costs in Negligence Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Ralph Wintersteen v. The National Cooperage and Woodenware...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert