Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Blumenshine v. The People of Illinois: Strengthening Due Process in Pretrial Identification Procedures

Blumenshine v. The People of Illinois: Strengthening Due Process in Pretrial Identification Procedures

Date: May 29, 1969
Blumenshine v. The People of Illinois: Strengthening Due Process in Pretrial Identification Procedures Introduction Blumenshine v. The People of Illinois, decided by the Supreme Court of Illinois on...
Expansion of Tortious Misrepresentation in Land Surveying: ROZNY v. MARNUL

Expansion of Tortious Misrepresentation in Land Surveying: ROZNY v. MARNUL

Date: May 27, 1969
Expansion of Tortious Misrepresentation in Land Surveying: ROZNY v. MARNUL Introduction In the landmark case of Raymond A. Rozny, Jr., et al. v. John Marnul, d/b/a Jens K. Doe Survey Service, 43 Ill....
Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Conviction: Affirming the Jury’s Role in Evaluating Corroborated Confessions

Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Conviction: Affirming the Jury’s Role in Evaluating Corroborated Confessions

Date: Jan 30, 1969
Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Conviction: Affirming the Jury’s Role in Evaluating Corroborated Confessions Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois vs. Charles Earnest...
Reaffirming Fair Trial and Juror Impartiality in Capital Cases: People v. Speck

Reaffirming Fair Trial and Juror Impartiality in Capital Cases: People v. Speck

Date: Nov 23, 1968
Reaffirming Fair Trial and Juror Impartiality in Capital Cases: People v. Speck Introduction People of Illinois vs. Richard Franklin Speck is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Illinois...
Rebuttable Presumption of Pecuniary Loss in Wrongful Death Cases Established in FLYNN v. VANCIL

Rebuttable Presumption of Pecuniary Loss in Wrongful Death Cases Established in FLYNN v. VANCIL

Date: Nov 23, 1968
Rebuttable Presumption of Pecuniary Loss in Wrongful Death Cases Established in FLYNN v. VANCIL Introduction FLYNN v. VANCIL, 41 Ill. 2d 236 (Supreme Court of Illinois, November 22, 1968), is a...
Waiver of Jury Trial by Counsel in Exchange for Charge Reduction: Novotny v. People

Waiver of Jury Trial by Counsel in Exchange for Charge Reduction: Novotny v. People

Date: Nov 23, 1968
Waiver of Jury Trial by Counsel in Exchange for Charge Reduction: Novotny v. People Introduction Case: The People of the State of Illinois vs. Ronald C. Novotny (41 Ill.2d 401) Court: Supreme Court...
Reaffirming the Boundaries of Disorderly Conduct and Resisting Arrest: Insights from The People of Illinois v. Albert A. Raby

Reaffirming the Boundaries of Disorderly Conduct and Resisting Arrest: Insights from The People of Illinois v. Albert A. Raby

Date: Sep 25, 1968
Reaffirming the Boundaries of Disorderly Conduct and Resisting Arrest: Insights from The People of Illinois v. Albert A. Raby 1. Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of...
Williams v. The People of Illinois: Upholding the Weight of Circumstantial Evidence in Murder Convictions

Williams v. The People of Illinois: Upholding the Weight of Circumstantial Evidence in Murder Convictions

Date: Sep 25, 1968
Williams v. The People of Illinois: Upholding the Weight of Circumstantial Evidence in Murder Convictions Introduction Williams v. The People of Illinois is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme...
Stoval v. Illinois: Conflict of Interest in Court-Appointed Counsel and the Right to Effective Assistance

Stoval v. Illinois: Conflict of Interest in Court-Appointed Counsel and the Right to Effective Assistance

Date: May 30, 1968
Stoval v. Illinois: Conflict of Interest in Court-Appointed Counsel and the Right to Effective Assistance Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Albert Stoval, 40 Ill. 2d 109...
Illinois v. Matthew Mills: Affirmation of Indictment in Narcotics Possession Case

Illinois v. Matthew Mills: Affirmation of Indictment in Narcotics Possession Case

Date: May 30, 1968
Illinois v. Matthew Mills: Affirmation of Indictment in Narcotics Possession Case Introduction In the landmark case of Illinois v. Matthew Mills, 40 Ill. 2d 4 (1968), the Supreme Court of Illinois...
Ensuring Adequate Legal Representation for Indigent Defendants: Insights from People v. Slaughter (39 Ill. 2d 278)

Ensuring Adequate Legal Representation for Indigent Defendants: Insights from People v. Slaughter (39 Ill. 2d 278)

Date: Mar 29, 1968
Ensuring Adequate Legal Representation for Indigent Defendants: Insights from People v. Slaughter (39 Ill. 2d 278) Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Daniel Slaughter (39 Ill. 2d 278) is...
Voluntariness of Juvenile Confessions: Insights from People v. Hester

Voluntariness of Juvenile Confessions: Insights from People v. Hester

Date: Mar 29, 1968
Voluntariness of Juvenile Confessions: Insights from People v. Hester Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Lee Arthur Hester (39 Ill. 2d 489, 1968) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme...
Supreme Court of Illinois Invalidates Section 29 of Limitations Act for Unconstitutional Immunity to Architects and Contractors

Supreme Court of Illinois Invalidates Section 29 of Limitations Act for Unconstitutional Immunity to Architects and Contractors

Date: Dec 1, 1967
Supreme Court of Illinois Invalidates Section 29 of Limitations Act for Unconstitutional Immunity to Architects and Contractors Introduction The case of Louise A. Skinner vs. John Vincent Anderson et...
Admissibility of Post-Trial Evidence in Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Crews

Admissibility of Post-Trial Evidence in Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Crews

Date: Dec 1, 1967
Admissibility of Post-Trial Evidence in Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Crews Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Veronica Crews, 38 Ill. 2d 331 (1967), is a pivotal decision by the...
Setting Reasonable Duration of Injunction in Trade Secret Cases: Supreme Court of Illinois in SCHULENBURG v. SIGNATROL, INC.

Setting Reasonable Duration of Injunction in Trade Secret Cases: Supreme Court of Illinois in SCHULENBURG v. SIGNATROL, INC.

Date: May 19, 1967
Setting Reasonable Duration of Injunction in Trade Secret Cases: Supreme Court of Illinois in SCHULENBURG v. SIGNATROL, INC. Introduction The case of Edward J. Schulenburg et al. v. Signatrol, Inc.,...
Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Directed Verdicts in Negligence Cases

Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Directed Verdicts in Negligence Cases

Date: May 19, 1967
Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Directed Verdicts in Negligence Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Raymond Pedrick et al. v. The Peoria and Eastern Railroad Company, the...
Balancing Discovery Flexibility and Due Process: Insights from People ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Nicholas J. Bua

Balancing Discovery Flexibility and Due Process: Insights from People ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Nicholas J. Bua

Date: Mar 30, 1967
Balancing Discovery Flexibility and Due Process: Insights from People ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Nicholas J. Bua Introduction The case of People ex rel. General Motors Corporation vs. Nicholas...
Enforceability of Non-Compete Covenants: Insights from House of Vision v. Hiyane

Enforceability of Non-Compete Covenants: Insights from House of Vision v. Hiyane

Date: Mar 30, 1967
Enforceability of Non-Compete Covenants: Insights from House of Vision v. Hiyane Introduction The case of The House of Vision, Inc. v. William M. Hiyane et al., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Interpretation of the 120-Day Rule in Speedy Trial Rights: PEOPLE v. FOSDICK

Interpretation of the 120-Day Rule in Speedy Trial Rights: PEOPLE v. FOSDICK

Date: Jan 20, 1967
Interpretation of the 120-Day Rule in Speedy Trial Rights: PEOPLE v. FOSDICK Introduction People v. Robert L. Fosdick, 36 Ill. 2d 524 (1967), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Illinois...
Architects' Duty of Oversight in Construction Safety: MILLER v. DeWITT

Architects' Duty of Oversight in Construction Safety: MILLER v. DeWITT

Date: Jan 20, 1967
Architects' Duty of Oversight in Construction Safety: MILLER v. DeWITT Introduction MILLER v. DeWITT et al. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Illinois in 1967. The plaintiffs,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert