Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Reversal Due to Trial Court's Failure to Consider Jury's Request for Defendant's Testimony in PEOPLE v. QUEEN

Reversal Due to Trial Court's Failure to Consider Jury's Request for Defendant's Testimony in PEOPLE v. QUEEN

Date: Mar 30, 1974
Reversal Due to Trial Court's Failure to Consider Jury's Request for Defendant's Testimony in PEOPLE v. QUEEN Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. William Queen is a landmark case...
Reaffirming Probable Cause and Search Incident to Arrest: Insights from People v. Nathan Wright

Reaffirming Probable Cause and Search Incident to Arrest: Insights from People v. Nathan Wright

Date: Mar 30, 1974
Reaffirming Probable Cause and Search Incident to Arrest: Insights from People v. Nathan Wright Introduction People v. Nathan Wright, 56 Ill.2d 523 (1974), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Foreseeability in Strict-Tort-Liability: Helix Corp. v. Winnett Establishes New Precedent

Foreseeability in Strict-Tort-Liability: Helix Corp. v. Winnett Establishes New Precedent

Date: Mar 30, 1974
Foreseeability in Strict-Tort-Liability: Helix Corp. v. Winnett Establishes New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case Teresa Kay Winnett v. Helix Corporation, the Supreme Court of Illinois...
Impact of MOORE v. ILLINOIS and FURMAN v. GEORGIA on Death Sentences: Analysis of The People v. Dukett

Impact of MOORE v. ILLINOIS and FURMAN v. GEORGIA on Death Sentences: Analysis of The People v. Dukett

Date: Jan 24, 1974
Impact of MOORE v. ILLINOIS and FURMAN v. GEORGIA on Death Sentences: Analysis of The People of the State of Illinois v. Robert Russell Dukett et al. Introduction The People of the State of Illinois...
Establishing Duty of Care in Municipal Maintenance: CUNIS v. BRENNAN

Establishing Duty of Care in Municipal Maintenance: CUNIS v. BRENNAN

Date: Jan 24, 1974
Establishing Duty of Care in Municipal Maintenance: CUNIS v. BRENNAN Introduction CUNIS v. BRENNAN, 56 Ill. 2d 372 (1974), is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Illinois. The case...
Duty of Care for Incompetent Adults vs. Children in Negligence: Barnes v. Illinois Central Railroad

Duty of Care for Incompetent Adults vs. Children in Negligence: Barnes v. Illinois Central Railroad

Date: Dec 1, 1973
Duty of Care for Incompetent Adults vs. Children in Negligence: Barnes v. Illinois Central Railroad Introduction Barnes v. Illinois Central Railroad Company is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Establishing Probable Cause Without Reliable Informants: Analysis of People v. Clay

Establishing Probable Cause Without Reliable Informants: Analysis of People v. Clay

Date: Nov 21, 1973
Establishing Probable Cause Without Reliable Informants: Analysis of People v. Clay Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Edward Clay, decided by the Supreme...
Equitable Jurisdiction Limited by Statutory Remedies in Tax Assessment Challenges: Clarendon Associates v. Korzen

Equitable Jurisdiction Limited by Statutory Remedies in Tax Assessment Challenges: Clarendon Associates v. Korzen

Date: Oct 2, 1973
Equitable Jurisdiction Limited by Statutory Remedies in Tax Assessment Challenges Clarendon Associates v. Korzen, Supreme Court of Illinois, 1973 Introduction Clarendon Associates, Appellee, v....
Exigent Circumstances Justifying Warrantless Seizure and Search of Automobile: People v. George H. Peter, Jr.

Exigent Circumstances Justifying Warrantless Seizure and Search of Automobile: People v. George H. Peter, Jr.

Date: Oct 2, 1973
Exigent Circumstances Justifying Warrantless Seizure and Search of Automobile: People v. George H. Peter, Jr. Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. George H. Peter, Jr., 55 Ill. 2d 443...
Limits of Manufacturer's Duty in Vehicle Collision Design: Mieher v. International Harvester

Limits of Manufacturer's Duty in Vehicle Collision Design: Mieher v. International Harvester

Date: Jun 5, 1973
Limits of Manufacturer's Duty in Vehicle Collision Design: Mieher v. International Harvester Introduction The case of Esther Mieher, Admr., Appellee, v. Kenneth L. Brown et al., heard by the Supreme...
Right to an Impartial Jury Reinforced: Analysis of People v. Cole

Right to an Impartial Jury Reinforced: Analysis of People v. Cole

Date: Jun 5, 1973
Right to an Impartial Jury Reinforced: Analysis of People v. Cole Introduction People v. Cole (54 Ill. 2d 401) is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Illinois on June 4, 1973. The...
Affirmation of Conviction in Reese v. The People: Upholding Due Process in Juvenile Transfers

Affirmation of Conviction in Reese v. The People: Upholding Due Process in Juvenile Transfers

Date: Mar 21, 1973
Affirmation of Conviction in Reese v. The People: Upholding Due Process in Juvenile Transfers Introduction Reese v. The People, 54 Ill.2d 51 (1973), is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Resentencing Under the Illinois Controlled Substances Act: The Supreme Court's Ruling in PEOPLE v. CHUPICH

Resentencing Under the Illinois Controlled Substances Act: The Supreme Court's Ruling in PEOPLE v. CHUPICH

Date: Jan 27, 1973
Resentencing Under the Illinois Controlled Substances Act: The Supreme Court's Ruling in PEOPLE v. CHUPICH Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Michael Chupich (53 Ill. 2d 572) is a...
Reaffirmation of Witness Identification Standards and Evidence Admissibility: PEOPLE v. RODGERS (1972)

Reaffirmation of Witness Identification Standards and Evidence Admissibility: PEOPLE v. RODGERS (1972)

Date: Dec 1, 1972
Reaffirmation of Witness Identification Standards and Evidence Admissibility: PEOPLE v. RODGERS (1972) Introduction People of the State of Illinois versus Ezell Rodgers is a landmark case adjudicated...
Miranda Waiver and Severance Rights in Joint Accountability: Analysis of People v. Ronald J. Burbank

Miranda Waiver and Severance Rights in Joint Accountability: Analysis of People v. Ronald J. Burbank

Date: Dec 1, 1972
Miranda Waiver and Severance Rights in Joint Accountability: Analysis of People v. Ronald J. Burbank Introduction People v. Ronald J. Burbank, 53 Ill.2d 261 (1972), is a landmark case decided by the...
Illinois Supreme Court Refines Jury Instruction Standards and Sentencing Guidelines in People v. Prim

Illinois Supreme Court Refines Jury Instruction Standards and Sentencing Guidelines in People v. Prim

Date: Oct 3, 1972
Illinois Supreme Court Refines Jury Instruction Standards and Sentencing Guidelines in People v. Prim Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Andrew V. Prim serves as a...
Affirmation of Conviction and Resentencing in Clark v. The People: Implications for Death Penalty Jurisprudence

Affirmation of Conviction and Resentencing in Clark v. The People: Implications for Death Penalty Jurisprudence

Date: Oct 3, 1972
Affirmation of Conviction and Resentencing in Clark v. The People: Implications for Death Penalty Jurisprudence Introduction Clark v. The People, 52 Ill. 2d 374 (Supreme Court of Illinois, 1972),...
Reaffirming the Independence of Witness Identification: Analysis of PEOPLE v. STRINGER

Reaffirming the Independence of Witness Identification: Analysis of PEOPLE v. STRINGER

Date: May 23, 1972
Reaffirming the Independence of Witness Identification: Analysis of PEOPLE v. STRINGER Introduction The People of the State of Illinois v. Arthur Stringer et al. is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Reaffirmation of Damages for Nuisance: Schatz v. Abbott Laboratories

Reaffirmation of Damages for Nuisance: Schatz v. Abbott Laboratories

Date: Mar 31, 1972
Reaffirmation of Damages for Nuisance: Schatz v. Abbott Laboratories Introduction SCHATZ v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Illinois on March 30,...
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Implied Warranty of Habitability in Forcible Entry and Detainer Actions

Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Implied Warranty of Habitability in Forcible Entry and Detainer Actions

Date: Jan 29, 1972
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Implied Warranty of Habitability in Forcible Entry and Detainer Actions Introduction In the landmark case of JACK SPRING, INC., Appellee, v. EMMA LITTLE, Appellant...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert