Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Illinois Supreme Court Limits Multiple Convictions Under Armed Violence Statute

Illinois Supreme Court Limits Multiple Convictions Under Armed Violence Statute

Date: Apr 17, 1982
Illinois Supreme Court Limits Multiple Convictions Under Armed Violence Statute Introduction In The People of the State of Illinois v. Byron Donaldson, reported as 91 Ill. 2d 164 (1982), the Supreme...
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Not Considered Final and Non-Appealable Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 301

Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Not Considered Final and Non-Appealable Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 301

Date: Apr 17, 1982
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Not Considered Final and Non-Appealable Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 301 Introduction The case of Roberto Flores et al., Appellants, v. Theresa Dugan, Appellee...
Extended-Term Sentencing for Repeat Offenders: Inclusion of Federal Convictions and Exclusion of Custody Time in Illinois

Extended-Term Sentencing for Repeat Offenders: Inclusion of Federal Convictions and Exclusion of Custody Time in Illinois

Date: Mar 17, 1982
Extended-Term Sentencing for Repeat Offenders: Inclusion of Federal Convictions and Exclusion of Custody Time in Illinois Introduction The People of the State of Illinois v. Burnell Robinson et al....
Establishing Probable Cause in Immediate Investigative Detentions: Insights from PEOPLE v. LIPPERT (1982)

Establishing Probable Cause in Immediate Investigative Detentions: Insights from PEOPLE v. LIPPERT (1982)

Date: Feb 20, 1982
Establishing Probable Cause in Immediate Investigative Detentions: Insights from PEOPLE v. LIPPERT (1982) Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Stanley A....
Limitation of Tort Liability for Economic Loss in Product Defects: Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.

Limitation of Tort Liability for Economic Loss in Product Defects: Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.

Date: Feb 20, 1982
Limitation of Tort Liability for Economic Loss in Product Defects: Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co. Introduction The Moorman Manufacturing Company v. National Tank Company et al. case,...
Fraudulent Concealment in Discovery: Ostendorf v. International Harvester Co.

Fraudulent Concealment in Discovery: Ostendorf v. International Harvester Co.

Date: Feb 20, 1982
Fraudulent Concealment in Discovery: Ostendorf v. International Harvester Co. Introduction Ostendorf v. International Harvester Company is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Illinois...
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Scienter Requirement in Securities Fraud and Mandates Fair Trial Standards

Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Scienter Requirement in Securities Fraud and Mandates Fair Trial Standards

Date: Feb 20, 1982
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Scienter Requirement in Securities Fraud and Mandates Fair Trial Standards Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Forest P. Whitlow...
Implied Private Right of Action Under the Real Estate Brokers and Salesmen License Act Established in Sawyer Realty Group v. Jarvis Corporation

Implied Private Right of Action Under the Real Estate Brokers and Salesmen License Act Established in Sawyer Realty Group v. Jarvis Corporation

Date: Feb 3, 1982
Implied Private Right of Action Under the Real Estate Brokers and Salesmen License Act Established in Sawyer Realty Group v. Jarvis Corporation Introduction Sawyer Realty Group, Inc., et al., v....
CONSOLIDATION COAL CO. v. BUCYRUS-ERIE CO.: Refining Attorney-Client Privilege and Work-Product Doctrine in Corporate Litigation

CONSOLIDATION COAL CO. v. BUCYRUS-ERIE CO.: Refining Attorney-Client Privilege and Work-Product Doctrine in Corporate Litigation

Date: Feb 3, 1982
CONSOLIDATION COAL CO. v. BUCYRUS-ERIE CO.: Refining Attorney-Client Privilege and Work-Product Doctrine in Corporate Litigation Introduction Consolidation Coal Company (hereafter "Consolidation")...
Corroboration Requirement for Confessions: Insights from PEOPLE v. WILLINGHAM

Corroboration Requirement for Confessions: Insights from PEOPLE v. WILLINGHAM

Date: Feb 3, 1982
Corroboration Requirement for Confessions: Insights from People of the State of Illinois v. Gary M. Willingham Introduction The case of People of the State of Illinois v. Gary M. Willingham, decided...
Supreme Court of Illinois Clarifies Application of Plain Error in Prosecutorial Remarks on Defendant's Silence

Supreme Court of Illinois Clarifies Application of Plain Error in Prosecutorial Remarks on Defendant's Silence

Date: Dec 19, 1981
Supreme Court of Illinois Clarifies Application of Plain Error in Prosecutorial Remarks on Defendant's Silence Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Russell J....
Exception to Estoppel in Insurer-Insured Conflicts: MURPHY v. URSO

Exception to Estoppel in Insurer-Insured Conflicts: MURPHY v. URSO

Date: Dec 19, 1981
Exception to Estoppel in Insurer-Insured Conflicts: MURPHY v. URSO Introduction The case of Joyce Ann Murphy v. Marilyn Urso et al. (88 Ill.2d 444), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Illinois on...
Affirmation of Insufficient Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Corporation Under Illinois Long-Arm Statute

Affirmation of Insufficient Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Corporation Under Illinois Long-Arm Statute

Date: Dec 5, 1981
Affirmation of Insufficient Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Corporation Under Illinois Long-Arm Statute Introduction The case of Cook Associates, Inc. v. Lexington United Corporation (87...
Reaffirmation of Witherspoon Standards and Admissibility of Surveillance Evidence in Gaines v. People

Reaffirmation of Witherspoon Standards and Admissibility of Surveillance Evidence in Gaines v. People

Date: Dec 5, 1981
Reaffirmation of Witherspoon Standards and Admissibility of Surveillance Evidence in Gaines v. People Introduction Gaines v. People (88 Ill. 2d 342, 1981) is a pivotal judgment by the Supreme Court...
Intent to Defraud: Establishing Essential Elements in Deceptive Practices under Illinois Law

Intent to Defraud: Establishing Essential Elements in Deceptive Practices under Illinois Law

Date: Dec 5, 1981
Intent to Defraud: Establishing Essential Elements in Deceptive Practices under Illinois Law Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Olubukola A. Ogunsola, decided...
Admissibility of Stipulated Polygraph Evidence in Illinois Criminal Trials: Reaffirming Strict Standards

Admissibility of Stipulated Polygraph Evidence in Illinois Criminal Trials: Reaffirming Strict Standards

Date: Dec 5, 1981
Admissibility of Stipulated Polygraph Evidence in Illinois Criminal Trials: Reaffirming Strict Standards Introduction The case The People of the State of Illinois v. Everett Baynes (88 Ill. 2d 225)...
Wilkerson v. The People of Illinois: Upholding Comprehensive Cross-Examination and Clear Jury Instructions

Wilkerson v. The People of Illinois: Upholding Comprehensive Cross-Examination and Clear Jury Instructions

Date: Nov 21, 1981
Wilkerson v. The People of Illinois: Upholding Comprehensive Cross-Examination and Clear Jury Instructions Introduction In the landmark case of Wilkerson v. The People of Illinois, the Supreme Court...
Clarifying Modus Operandi and Hostile Witness Impeachment in PEOPLE v. TATE (1981)

Clarifying Modus Operandi and Hostile Witness Impeachment in PEOPLE v. TATE (1981)

Date: Nov 21, 1981
Clarifying Modus Operandi and Hostile Witness Impeachment in PEOPLE v. TATE (1981) Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Charles Tate, 87 Ill. 2d 134 (1981), is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Clarifying the Scope of Administrative Investigations under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act

Clarifying the Scope of Administrative Investigations under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act

Date: Nov 21, 1981
Clarifying the Scope of Administrative Investigations under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act Introduction The case of William J. Scott, Attorney General, Appellant, v....
Appealability of Interlocutory Discovery Orders in Reporter’s Privilege Cases: Analysis of The PEOPLE EX REL. SCOTT v. SILVERSTEIN

Appealability of Interlocutory Discovery Orders in Reporter’s Privilege Cases: Analysis of The PEOPLE EX REL. SCOTT v. SILVERSTEIN

Date: Nov 21, 1981
Appealability of Interlocutory Discovery Orders in Reporter’s Privilege Cases: Analysis of THE PEOPLE EX REL. SCOTT v. SILVERSTEIN Introduction The case The People ex rel. William J. Scott, Attorney...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert