Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

PEOPLE v. BARTALL: Admissibility of Subsequent Crimes Evidence to Establish Intent

PEOPLE v. BARTALL: Admissibility of Subsequent Crimes Evidence to Establish Intent

Date: Oct 22, 1983
PEOPLE v. BARTALL: Admissibility of Subsequent Crimes Evidence to Establish Intent Introduction PEOPLE v. BARTALL is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Illinois on October 21, 1983. The...
Inclusion of Minimum Load Charges in Retailers' Occupation Tax: Material Service Corp. v. Department of Revenue

Inclusion of Minimum Load Charges in Retailers' Occupation Tax: Material Service Corp. v. Department of Revenue

Date: Oct 22, 1983
Inclusion of Minimum Load Charges in Retailers' Occupation Tax: Material Service Corp. v. Department of Revenue Introduction The case of Material Service Corporation v. The Department of Revenue (98...
People v. Darnell Payne: Reinforcing the 'Open the Door' Doctrine and Clarifying Sentencing under Illinois Armed-Violence Statute

People v. Darnell Payne: Reinforcing the 'Open the Door' Doctrine and Clarifying Sentencing under Illinois Armed-Violence Statute

Date: Oct 22, 1983
People v. Darnell Payne: Reinforcing the 'Open the Door' Doctrine and Clarifying Sentencing under Illinois Armed-Violence Statute Introduction Case: The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v....
Miller v. Lockett: Reinforcing Residency Exceptions in Borrowing Statutes

Miller v. Lockett: Reinforcing Residency Exceptions in Borrowing Statutes

Date: Oct 22, 1983
Miller v. Lockett: Reinforcing Residency Exceptions in Borrowing Statutes Introduction Miller v. Lockett, 98 Ill. 2d 478 (1983), addressed pivotal issues surrounding the interplay between state...
Reversing Precedents in Judicial Conduct: People v. Dennis Emerson

Reversing Precedents in Judicial Conduct: People v. Dennis Emerson

Date: Oct 5, 1983
Reversing Precedents in Judicial Conduct: People v. Dennis Emerson Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Dennis Emerson is a landmark decision delivered by the Supreme Court of Illinois on...
Illinois Supreme Court Excludes Voluntary Manslaughter from Armed-Violence Enhancements

Illinois Supreme Court Excludes Voluntary Manslaughter from Armed-Violence Enhancements

Date: Oct 5, 1983
Illinois Supreme Court Excludes Voluntary Manslaughter from Armed-Violence Enhancements Introduction The case of THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS v. EDWARD ALEJOS, JR. (97 Ill. 2d 502) addresses a...
The Landmark Decision in People v. Cobb et al.: Upholding Fair Trial Standards

The Landmark Decision in People v. Cobb et al.: Upholding Fair Trial Standards

Date: Oct 5, 1983
The Landmark Decision in People of Illinois v. Cobb et al.: Upholding Fair Trial Standards Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Perry Cobb et al. (97 Ill. 2d 465)...
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Intrastate Forum Non Conveniens Doctrine Under Common Law

Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Intrastate Forum Non Conveniens Doctrine Under Common Law

Date: Sep 17, 1983
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Intrastate Forum Non Conveniens Doctrine Under Common Law Introduction In Elias Torres et al. v. Alfred T. Walsh, Judge, et al. (98 Ill. 2d 338, 1983), the Supreme...
Reaffirmation of the Impact Rule in Emotional Distress Claims: RICKEY v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Reaffirmation of the Impact Rule in Emotional Distress Claims: RICKEY v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Date: Jun 18, 1983
Reaffirmation of the Impact Rule in Emotional Distress Claims: RICKEY v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY Introduction The case of Robert Rickey, a Minor, Appellee, v. Chicago Transit Authority et al.,...
Limitations on Prejudicial Evidence in Capital Sentencing: PEOPLE v. DAVIS

Limitations on Prejudicial Evidence in Capital Sentencing: PEOPLE v. DAVIS

Date: Jun 18, 1983
Limitations on Prejudicial Evidence in Capital Sentencing: PEOPLE v. DAVIS Introduction People of the State of Illinois vs. Girvies Davis (97 Ill. 2d 1) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Harmless Error in Aggravating Factors: Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Bourke's Sentencing

Harmless Error in Aggravating Factors: Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Bourke's Sentencing

Date: May 28, 1983
Harmless Error in Aggravating Factors: Illinois Supreme Court Affirms Bourke's Sentencing Introduction The People of the State of Illinois v. Bruce Bourke, 96 Ill. 2d 327 (1983), presents a pivotal...
Affirmation of Death Penalty Statute and Peremptory Challenge Standards in People v. Williams

Affirmation of Death Penalty Statute and Peremptory Challenge Standards in People v. Williams

Date: May 28, 1983
Affirmation of Death Penalty Statute and Peremptory Challenge Standards in People v. Williams Introduction People v. Williams, 97 Ill. 2d 252 (1983), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Illinois, is...
Comparative Fault in Strict Products Liability: Insights from Coney v. J.L.G. Industries

Comparative Fault in Strict Products Liability: Insights from Coney v. J.L.G. Industries

Date: May 19, 1983
Comparative Fault in Strict Products Liability: Insights from Coney v. J.L.G. Industries Introduction Coney v. J.L.G. Industries, Inc. (97 Ill. 2d 104) is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Admissibility of Prior Crimes for Establishing Criminal Intent and Impeachment: The McKibbins Decision

Admissibility of Prior Crimes for Establishing Criminal Intent and Impeachment: The McKibbins Decision

Date: May 19, 1983
Admissibility of Prior Crimes for Establishing Criminal Intent and Impeachment: The McKibbins Decision Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Johnny McKibbins, decided by the...
Strict Liability and Punitive Damages in Loss-of-Consortium Actions: Insights from Hammond v. North American Asbestos Corporation

Strict Liability and Punitive Damages in Loss-of-Consortium Actions: Insights from Hammond v. North American Asbestos Corporation

Date: May 19, 1983
Strict Liability and Punitive Damages in Loss-of-Consortium Actions: Insights from Charlotte Hammond v. North American Asbestos Corporation Introduction The case of Charlotte Hammond v. North...
Rebutting Presumptions of Undue Influence in Will Contests: Insights from Franciscan Sisters Health Care Corporation v. John R. Dean

Rebutting Presumptions of Undue Influence in Will Contests: Insights from Franciscan Sisters Health Care Corporation v. John R. Dean

Date: Apr 23, 1983
Rebutting Presumptions of Undue Influence in Will Contests: Insights from Franciscan Sisters Health Care Corporation v. John R. Dean Introduction The case of Franciscan Sisters Health Care...
Reevaluation of Disciplinary Sanctions for Police Misconduct Involving Psychiatric Conditions: Insights from Walsh v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of Orland Park

Reevaluation of Disciplinary Sanctions for Police Misconduct Involving Psychiatric Conditions: Insights from Walsh v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of Orland Park

Date: Apr 23, 1983
Reevaluation of Disciplinary Sanctions for Police Misconduct Involving Psychiatric Conditions: Insights from Walsh v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of Orland Park Introduction The case of...
Classification of Custody Orders under Supreme Court Rule 304(a): Insights from In re Marriage of Francine Leopando

Classification of Custody Orders under Supreme Court Rule 304(a): Insights from In re Marriage of Francine Leopando

Date: Apr 23, 1983
Classification of Custody Orders under Supreme Court Rule 304(a): Insights from In re Marriage of Francine Leopando Introduction The case of In re Marriage of Francine Leopando and Olivo Leopando (96...
Affirmation of Waiver of Original Claims and Ban on Recovery for Pure Economic Loss in Tort: Foxcroft v. Hoffman Rosner

Affirmation of Waiver of Original Claims and Ban on Recovery for Pure Economic Loss in Tort: Foxcroft v. Hoffman Rosner

Date: Apr 23, 1983
Affirmation of Waiver of Original Claims and Ban on Recovery for Pure Economic Loss in Tort: Foxcroft v. Hoffman Rosner Introduction Foxcroft Townhome Owners Association et al., Appellants, brought...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple Intentional Murders: Analyzing PEOPLE v. DAVIS

Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple Intentional Murders: Analyzing PEOPLE v. DAVIS

Date: Feb 19, 1983
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple Intentional Murders: Analyzing PEOPLE v. DAVIS Introduction PEOPLE v. DAVIS, 95 Ill. 2d 1 (1983), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Illinois, centers on the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert