Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Reinforcing Standards for Joint Legal Representation and Effective Counsel: Analysis of The People v. Emmaline Williams

Reinforcing Standards for Joint Legal Representation and Effective Counsel: Analysis of The People v. Emmaline Williams

Date: Sep 27, 1990
Reinforcing Standards for Joint Legal Representation and Effective Counsel: Analysis of The People v. Emmaline Williams Introduction The People of the State of Illinois v. Emmaline Williams et al.,...
Ensuring Corpus Delicti: Independent Corroboration of Confessions in Theft Cases

Ensuring Corpus Delicti: Independent Corroboration of Confessions in Theft Cases

Date: Sep 27, 1990
Ensuring Corpus Delicti: Independent Corroboration of Confessions in Theft Cases Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. James Furby et al. (138 Ill. 2d 434,...
KRAFT, INC. v. EDGAR: Clarifying the Statute of Limitations for Franchise Tax Adjustments under the Illinois Business Corporation Act

KRAFT, INC. v. EDGAR: Clarifying the Statute of Limitations for Franchise Tax Adjustments under the Illinois Business Corporation Act

Date: Sep 27, 1990
KRAFT, INC. v. EDGAR: Clarifying the Statute of Limitations for Franchise Tax Adjustments under the Illinois Business Corporation Act Introduction Kraft, Inc., Formerly Known as Dart Kraft, Inc.,...
Reaffirming the Requirement of Willful and Wanton Misconduct for Punitive Damages in Product Liability: LOITZ v. REMINGTON ARMS COmpany

Reaffirming the Requirement of Willful and Wanton Misconduct for Punitive Damages in Product Liability: LOITZ v. REMINGTON ARMS COmpany

Date: Sep 20, 1990
Reaffirming the Requirement of Willful and Wanton Misconduct for Punitive Damages in Product Liability: LOITZ v. REMINGTON ARMS COmpany Introduction Robert LOITZ v. REMINGTON ARMS COmpany, Inc. (138...
Affirmation of Death Penalty Eligibility in People v. Thomas

Affirmation of Death Penalty Eligibility in People v. Thomas

Date: Jul 4, 1990
Affirmation of Death Penalty Eligibility in People v. Thomas Introduction Case Name: The People of the State of Illinois v. Walter Thomas Court: Supreme Court of Illinois Date: July 3, 1990 In People...
Reaffirmation of Traditional Tort Principles: Illinois Supreme Court Rejects Market Share Liability in DES Litigation

Reaffirmation of Traditional Tort Principles: Illinois Supreme Court Rejects Market Share Liability in DES Litigation

Date: Jul 4, 1990
Reaffirmation of Traditional Tort Principles: Illinois Supreme Court Rejects Market Share Liability in DES Litigation Introduction In the landmark case of Sandra SMITH v. ELI LILLY COmpany et al.,...
Reaffirming Fourth Amendment Protections: Community Caretaking and Seizure Standards in Police Encounters

Reaffirming Fourth Amendment Protections: Community Caretaking and Seizure Standards in Police Encounters

Date: May 31, 1990
Reaffirming Fourth Amendment Protections: Community Caretaking and Seizure Standards in Police Encounters Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellant, v....
Application of Sufficient Evidence and Plain Error Doctrine in People v. Herrett

Application of Sufficient Evidence and Plain Error Doctrine in People v. Herrett

Date: May 24, 1990
Application of Sufficient Evidence and Plain Error Doctrine in People v. Herrett Introduction People v. Herrett, 137 Ill. 2d 195 (1990), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of Illinois Maintains Economic Loss Rule in Architectural Negligence Claims

Supreme Court of Illinois Maintains Economic Loss Rule in Architectural Negligence Claims

Date: May 24, 1990
Supreme Court of Illinois Maintains Economic Loss Rule in Architectural Negligence Claims Introduction The case of Lincoln Park West Condominium Association v. Mann, Gin, Ebel Frazier, Ltd. (136 Ill....
Rule 103(b) Dismissals and Reasonable Diligence: The SEGAL v. SACCO Decision

Rule 103(b) Dismissals and Reasonable Diligence: The SEGAL v. SACCO Decision

Date: May 24, 1990
Rule 103(b) Dismissals and Reasonable Diligence: The SEGAL v. SACCO Decision Introduction The case of William Segal v. Eugene Sacco, Deputy Sheriff, et al. (136 Ill. 2d 282) is a seminal decision by...
Clarifying Court Discretion in Jury Inquiries and Burden of Proof in Miranda Suppression Hearings – People v. Darryl Reid

Clarifying Court Discretion in Jury Inquiries and Burden of Proof in Miranda Suppression Hearings – People v. Darryl Reid

Date: Apr 19, 1990
Clarifying Court Discretion in Jury Inquiries and Burden of Proof in Miranda Suppression Hearings – People v. Darryl Reid Introduction Case Title: The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v....
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Strict Forum Non Conveniens Standards in Griffith v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International

Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Strict Forum Non Conveniens Standards in Griffith v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International

Date: Apr 19, 1990
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Strict Forum Non Conveniens Standards in Griffith v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International Introduction The case F. Lee Griffith et al., Co-executors of the Estate of F....
Duty of Care Beyond Obvious Conditions: Insights from George WARD v. K MART CORPoration

Duty of Care Beyond Obvious Conditions: Insights from George WARD v. K MART CORPoration

Date: Apr 19, 1990
Duty of Care Beyond Obvious Conditions: Insights from George WARD v. K MART CORPoration Introduction The case of George WARD v. K MART CORPoration, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Illinois on...
Balancing Defendant's Right to Presence and Court Procedures in Jury Selection: Bean v. The People of Illinois

Balancing Defendant's Right to Presence and Court Procedures in Jury Selection: Bean v. The People of Illinois

Date: Apr 19, 1990
Balancing Defendant's Right to Presence and Court Procedures in Jury Selection: Bean v. The People of Illinois Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS v. HAROLD BEAN,...
Establishing Limits on Warrantless Home Arrests and Upholding Confrontation Rights in PEOPLE v. FOSKEY

Establishing Limits on Warrantless Home Arrests and Upholding Confrontation Rights in PEOPLE v. FOSKEY

Date: Apr 19, 1990
Establishing Limits on Warrantless Home Arrests and Upholding Confrontation Rights in PEOPLE v. FOSKEY Introduction PEOPLE v. FOSKEY, 136 Ill. 2d 66 (1990), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme...
Application of the Excited Utterance Exception to Hearsay: Analysis of Nevitt v. Illinois

Application of the Excited Utterance Exception to Hearsay: Analysis of Nevitt v. Illinois

Date: Mar 30, 1990
Application of the Excited Utterance Exception to Hearsay: Analysis of Nevitt v. Illinois Introduction The People of the State of Illinois v. Tommy Nevitt (135 Ill. 2d 423) is a pivotal case...
Establishing Retroactive Application of Unconstitutional Jury Waiver Statutes: The People v. Gersch Decision

Establishing Retroactive Application of Unconstitutional Jury Waiver Statutes: The People v. Gersch Decision

Date: Mar 23, 1990
Establishing Retroactive Application of Unconstitutional Jury Waiver Statutes: The People v. Gersch Decision Introduction In The People of the State of Illinois v. William F. Gersch (135 Ill. 2d 384,...
Admissibility of Prior Inconsistent Statements Under Section 115-10.1: Insights from People v. Frank Redd

Admissibility of Prior Inconsistent Statements Under Section 115-10.1: Insights from People v. Frank Redd

Date: Mar 23, 1990
Admissibility of Prior Inconsistent Statements Under Section 115-10.1: Insights from People v. Frank Redd Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Frank Redd (135 Ill. 2d 252, 1990) is a...
Affirmation of Death Sentences Amid Conflicting Eyewitness Testimony and Prosecutorial Assertions in People v. Fields and Hawkins

Affirmation of Death Sentences Amid Conflicting Eyewitness Testimony and Prosecutorial Assertions in People v. Fields and Hawkins

Date: Feb 17, 1990
Affirmation of Death Sentences Amid Conflicting Eyewitness Testimony and Prosecutorial Assertions in People v. Fields and Hawkins Introduction In the case of THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS v....
Due Process and the Scope of Certiorari in School Expulsion: Stratton v. Wenona Community Unit District No. 1

Due Process and the Scope of Certiorari in School Expulsion: Stratton v. Wenona Community Unit District No. 1

Date: Feb 17, 1990
Due Process and the Scope of Certiorari in School Expulsion: Stratton v. Wenona Community Unit District No. 1 Introduction Stratton v. Wenona Community Unit District No. 1 is a landmark case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert