Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Waiver of Jury Rights in Fitness Hearings: Insights from The People v. Jonathan Haynes

Waiver of Jury Rights in Fitness Hearings: Insights from The People v. Jonathan Haynes

Date: Oct 25, 1996
Waiver of Jury Rights in Fitness Hearings: Insights from The People v. Jonathan Haynes Introduction In The People of the State of Illinois v. Jonathan Haynes, 174 Ill. 2d 204 (1996), the Supreme...
Reversing Dismissals in Defamation and False Light Claims: Insights from Kimberly Bryson v. News America Publications

Reversing Dismissals in Defamation and False Light Claims: Insights from Kimberly Bryson v. News America Publications

Date: Oct 25, 1996
Reversing Dismissals in Defamation and False Light Claims: Insights from Kimberly Bryson v. News America Publications Introduction Kimberly Bryson v. News America Publications, Inc., et al., 174 Ill....
Enforcement of Policy Limitations on Fraud Actions: Insights from CRAMER v. INSURANCE EXCHANGE AGENCY

Enforcement of Policy Limitations on Fraud Actions: Insights from CRAMER v. INSURANCE EXCHANGE AGENCY

Date: Oct 25, 1996
Enforcement of Policy Limitations on Fraud Actions: Insights from CRAMER v. INSURANCE EXCHANGE AGENCY Introduction Steven CRAMER v. INSURANCE EXCHANGE AGENCY et al. is a landmark decision by the...
Enhancing Consumer Protection: Illinois Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in Connick v. Suzuki Motor Company

Enhancing Consumer Protection: Illinois Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in Connick v. Suzuki Motor Company

Date: Oct 19, 1996
Enhancing Consumer Protection: Illinois Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in Connick v. Suzuki Motor Company Introduction In the seminal case of Connick et al. v. Suzuki Motor Company, Ltd. (174 Ill....
Affirmation of Illinois School Financing Scheme Under Equal Protection and Education Article

Affirmation of Illinois School Financing Scheme Under Equal Protection and Education Article

Date: Oct 19, 1996
Affirmation of Illinois School Financing Scheme Under Equal Protection and Education Article Introduction Committee for Educational Rights et al. v. Jim Edgar, Governor of Illinois, 174 Ill. 2d 1...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Felony Murder: The People v. Shatner

Affirmation of Death Penalty in Felony Murder: The People v. Shatner

Date: Sep 20, 1996
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Felony Murder: The People v. Shatner Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Darrin W. Shatner (174 Ill. 2d 133) involves the Supreme Court of...
Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 604(d) Applicability to Negotiated Guilty Pleas

Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 604(d) Applicability to Negotiated Guilty Pleas

Date: Sep 20, 1996
Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 604(d) Applicability to Negotiated Guilty Pleas Introduction The Illinois Supreme Court, in the landmark cases of People v. Meeks and People v. Evans, addressed...
Judicial Review Constraints on Illinois Parole Board Decisions: HANRAHAN v. WILLIAMS

Judicial Review Constraints on Illinois Parole Board Decisions: HANRAHAN v. WILLIAMS

Date: Sep 20, 1996
Judicial Review Constraints on Illinois Parole Board Decisions: HANRAHAN v. WILLIAMS Introduction In the landmark case of Homer E. Hanrahan v. James K. Williams et al., the Supreme Court of Illinois...
Public Policy Overrides Arbitration Awards in Child Welfare Employment Cases: AFSCME v. DCMS

Public Policy Overrides Arbitration Awards in Child Welfare Employment Cases: AFSCME v. DCMS

Date: Sep 20, 1996
Public Policy Overrides Arbitration Awards in Child Welfare Employment Cases: AFSCME v. DCMS Introduction The case of American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO v. The...
Admissibility of DNA Evidence and Death Penalty Sentencing: Insights from People v. Miller

Admissibility of DNA Evidence and Death Penalty Sentencing: Insights from People v. Miller

Date: Aug 3, 1996
Admissibility of DNA Evidence and Death Penalty Sentencing: Insights from People v. Miller Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Joseph Miller (173 Ill. 2d 167, 1996) is a landmark case...
Simultaneous Custody and In-Custody Credit: Insights from PEOPLE v. ROBINSON

Simultaneous Custody and In-Custody Credit: Insights from PEOPLE v. ROBINSON

Date: Jun 21, 1996
Simultaneous Custody and In-Custody Credit: Insights from PEOPLE v. ROBINSON Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Frank Robinson et al. (172 Ill. 2d 452, 1996),...
Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Death Sentence and Reaffirms Batson Application in Williams v. The People

Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Death Sentence and Reaffirms Batson Application in Williams v. The People

Date: Jun 1, 1996
Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Death Sentence and Reaffirms Batson Application in Williams v. The People Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Frank Williams, adjudicated...
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing and Confession Voluntariness in People v. Gilliam

Affirmation of Capital Sentencing and Confession Voluntariness in People v. Gilliam

Date: May 24, 1996
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing and Confession Voluntariness in People v. Gilliam (172 Ill. 2d 484) Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Oasby Gilliam is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Intentional Interference and Defamation in Employment Litigation: ANDERSON v. VANDEN DORPEL

Intentional Interference and Defamation in Employment Litigation: ANDERSON v. VANDEN DORPEL

Date: Apr 19, 1996
Intentional Interference and Defamation in Employment Litigation: ANDERSON v. VANDEN DORPEL Introduction The case of Elisabeth Anderson v. Ronald Vanden Dorpel et al. (172 Ill. 2d 399) adjudicated by...
Due Process and Actual Innocence: Insights from PEOPLE v. WASHINGTON

Due Process and Actual Innocence: Insights from PEOPLE v. WASHINGTON

Date: Apr 19, 1996
Due Process and Actual Innocence: Insights from PEOPLE v. WASHINGTON Introduction In the landmark case The People of the State of Illinois v. Kurtis Washington, 171 Ill. 2d 475 (1996), the Supreme...
Immunity under Section 3-108 of the Tort Immunity Act Affirmed in Rebecca BARNETT v. ZION PARK DISTRICT

Immunity under Section 3-108 of the Tort Immunity Act Affirmed in Rebecca BARNETT v. ZION PARK DISTRICT

Date: Apr 19, 1996
Immunity under Section 3-108 of the Tort Immunity Act Affirmed in Rebecca BARNETT v. ZION PARK DISTRICT Introduction In the landmark case of Rebecca Barnett, as Special Administrator of the Estate of...
Reaffirmation of the Open and Obvious Doctrine: Supreme Court of Illinois Rules Against Chicago Park District in Diving Accident Liability

Reaffirmation of the Open and Obvious Doctrine: Supreme Court of Illinois Rules Against Chicago Park District in Diving Accident Liability

Date: Apr 19, 1996
Reaffirmation of the Open and Obvious Doctrine: Supreme Court of Illinois Rules Against Chicago Park District in Diving Accident Liability Introduction In the landmark decision of Bucheleres et al....
Duty to Rescue in Premises Liability: Analysis of Cora Lee Rhodes v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad

Duty to Rescue in Premises Liability: Analysis of Cora Lee Rhodes v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad

Date: Mar 29, 1996
Duty to Rescue in Premises Liability: Analysis of Cora Lee Rhodes v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Introduction Cora Lee Rhodes, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Carl Rhodes, Deceased, v....
Accomplice Liability Without Active Participation: Analysis of People v. Corey Batchelor

Accomplice Liability Without Active Participation: Analysis of People v. Corey Batchelor

Date: Mar 22, 1996
Establishing Accomplice Liability Without Active Participation: People v. Corey Batchelor Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Corey Batchelor, the Supreme...
Res Judicata and the Rule Against Claim-Splitting in Securities Fraud Litigation: Rein v. Noyes Co.

Res Judicata and the Rule Against Claim-Splitting in Securities Fraud Litigation: Rein v. Noyes Co.

Date: Mar 22, 1996
Res Judicata and the Rule Against Claim-Splitting in Securities Fraud Litigation: Rein v. Noyes Co. Introduction Arlie J. Rein et al. v. David A. Noyes Company et al. (172 Ill. 2d 325, 1996) is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert