Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Voyles v. Sandia Mortgage: Affirmation of Negligent Credit Reporting and Limitations on Tort Claims

Voyles v. Sandia Mortgage: Affirmation of Negligent Credit Reporting and Limitations on Tort Claims

Date: May 25, 2001
Voyles v. Sandia Mortgage: Affirmation of Negligent Credit Reporting and Limitations on Tort Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Graceia M. VOYLES v. SANDIA MORTGAGE CORPoration, decided by...
Appellate Court Concurrence and Double Jeopardy: Ensuring Validity in Ortiz v. Illinois

Appellate Court Concurrence and Double Jeopardy: Ensuring Validity in Ortiz v. Illinois

Date: May 25, 2001
Appellate Court Concurrence and Double Jeopardy: Ensuring Validity in Ortiz v. Illinois Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Edwin Ortiz (196 Ill. 2d 236, 2001) presents a...
Ensuring Due Process: Mandatory Factual Basis for Parental Unfitness Admissions in Illinois

Ensuring Due Process: Mandatory Factual Basis for Parental Unfitness Admissions in Illinois

Date: May 25, 2001
Ensuring Due Process: Mandatory Factual Basis for Parental Unfitness Admissions in Illinois Introduction The case of IN RE M.H. et al., Minors (2001) serves as a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court...
Equitable Estoppel Bars Nuisance Claims in Property Development Agreements: Geddes v. Mill Creek Country Club

Equitable Estoppel Bars Nuisance Claims in Property Development Agreements: Geddes v. Mill Creek Country Club

Date: May 25, 2001
Equitable Estoppel Bars Nuisance Claims in Property Development Agreements: Geddes v. Mill Creek Country Club Introduction The case of Geddes v. Mill Creek Country Club, Inc., decided by the Supreme...
Retroactive Application of Tax Amendments: Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Will County Collector

Retroactive Application of Tax Amendments: Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Will County Collector

Date: May 4, 2001
Retroactive Application of Tax Amendments: Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Will County Collector Introduction In the landmark case Commonwealth Edison Company, Appellant, v. Will County Collector,...
Res Judicata and Procedural Barriers in Post-Conviction Relief: Analysis of People v. Leroy Orange

Res Judicata and Procedural Barriers in Post-Conviction Relief: Analysis of People v. Leroy Orange

Date: Apr 20, 2001
Res Judicata and Procedural Barriers in Post-Conviction Relief: Analysis of People v. Leroy Orange Introduction People v. Leroy Orange is a significant decision by the Supreme Court of Illinois,...
Overruling Callis I: Strengthening the Standards for Injunctive Relief in Tortious Interference with Attorney-Client Relationships in Illinois

Overruling Callis I: Strengthening the Standards for Injunctive Relief in Tortious Interference with Attorney-Client Relationships in Illinois

Date: Apr 20, 2001
Overruling Callis I: Strengthening the Standards for Injunctive Relief in Tortious Interference with Attorney-Client Relationships in Illinois Introduction The case of Callis, Papa, Jackstadt...
Presumption of Adequate Trial Court Record and Appellant's Burden: WEBSTER v. HARTMAN

Presumption of Adequate Trial Court Record and Appellant's Burden: WEBSTER v. HARTMAN

Date: Apr 20, 2001
Presumption of Adequate Trial Court Record and Appellant's Burden: WEBSTER v. HARTMAN Introduction The case of Robert Eugene Webster v. Edwin Hartman, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Illinois on...
Supreme Court of Illinois Reaffirms Prohibition of Mere-Fact Impeachment in Criminal Trials: Cox v. People

Supreme Court of Illinois Reaffirms Prohibition of Mere-Fact Impeachment in Criminal Trials: Cox v. People

Date: Apr 20, 2001
Supreme Court of Illinois Reaffirms Prohibition of Mere-Fact Impeachment in Criminal Trials: Cox v. People Introduction In The People of the State of Illinois v. Derick A. Cox, 195 Ill. 2d 378...
Strict Compliance for Sanctions and Contempt Orders: Insights from Twardowski v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising

Strict Compliance for Sanctions and Contempt Orders: Insights from Twardowski v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising

Date: Mar 31, 2001
Strict Compliance for Sanctions and Contempt Orders: Insights from Twardowski v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising Introduction The case of John Twardowski v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc....
Defining "Sexual Penetration" in Illinois Criminal Law: Insights from PEOPLE v. MAGGETTE

Defining "Sexual Penetration" in Illinois Criminal Law: Insights from PEOPLE v. MAGGETTE

Date: Mar 30, 2001
Defining "Sexual Penetration" in Illinois Criminal Law: Insights from PEOPLE v. MAGGETTE Introduction In PEOPLE v. MAGGETTE, 195 Ill. 2d 336 (2001), the Supreme Court of Illinois addressed pivotal...
Affirming the Unfitness Standard: Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Section 1(D)(p) of the Adoption Act

Affirming the Unfitness Standard: Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Section 1(D)(p) of the Adoption Act

Date: Mar 3, 2001
Affirming the Unfitness Standard: Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Section 1(D)(p) of the Adoption Act Introduction The case of In re R.C., a Minor (R.W. et al., Appellants, v. D.C., Appellee) was...
Statute of Limitations Enforces Finality in Refund Actions: Sundance Homes, Inc. v. County of Du Page

Statute of Limitations Enforces Finality in Refund Actions: Sundance Homes, Inc. v. County of Du Page

Date: Feb 17, 2001
Statute of Limitations Enforces Finality in Refund Actions: Sundance Homes, Inc. v. County of Du Page Introduction In Sundance Homes, Inc., et al., v. County of Du Page et al. (195 Ill. 2d 257,...
Consolidation of Multiple Convictions from a Single Act: The Crespo Case Explained

Consolidation of Multiple Convictions from a Single Act: The Crespo Case Explained

Date: Feb 17, 2001
Consolidation of Multiple Convictions from a Single Act: The Crespo Case Explained Introduction The case of People of the State of Illinois v. Hector Crespo (788 N.E.2d 1117) adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Capital Sentence and Procedural Safeguards in Post-Conviction Relief: Edwards v. The People of Illinois

Affirmation of Capital Sentence and Procedural Safeguards in Post-Conviction Relief: Edwards v. The People of Illinois

Date: Jan 30, 2001
Affirmation of Capital Sentence and Procedural Safeguards in Post-Conviction Relief: Edwards v. The People of Illinois Introduction Edwards v. The People of Illinois is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in PEOPLE v. BARROW: Res Judicata and Effective Assistance of Counsel

Affirmation of Death Sentence in PEOPLE v. BARROW: Res Judicata and Effective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Jan 30, 2001
Affirmation of Death Sentence in PEOPLE v. BARROW: Res Judicata and Effective Assistance of Counsel Introduction Case: The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Ronald Barrow, Appellant. (195...
Expansion of Collateral Estoppel to Include Legal Determinations: Du Page Forklift Service, Inc. v. Material Handling Services, Inc.

Expansion of Collateral Estoppel to Include Legal Determinations: Du Page Forklift Service, Inc. v. Material Handling Services, Inc.

Date: Jan 30, 2001
Expansion of Collateral Estoppel to Include Legal Determinations Introduction In the landmark case Du Page Forklift Service, Inc. v. Material Handling Services, Inc. (195 Ill. 2d 71), the Supreme...
Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Constitutional Speedy Retrial: PEOPLE v. CRANE

Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Constitutional Speedy Retrial: PEOPLE v. CRANE

Date: Jan 20, 2001
Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Constitutional Speedy Retrial: PEOPLE v. CRANE Introduction In The People of the State of Illinois v. Anthony Crane, 195 Ill. 2d 42 (2001), the Supreme...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Post-Conviction Relief: Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases

Affirmation of Dismissal in Post-Conviction Relief: Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Dec 2, 2000
Affirmation of Dismissal in Post-Conviction Relief: Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. David Smith,...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Kirchner: Juror Impartiality and Pretrial Publicity

Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Kirchner: Juror Impartiality and Pretrial Publicity

Date: Dec 2, 2000
Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Kirchner: Juror Impartiality and Pretrial Publicity Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. William Bradley Kirchner (194...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert