Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Speedy Trial Rights: Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Cordell

Reaffirming Speedy Trial Rights: Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Cordell

Date: Dec 1, 2006
Reaffirming Speedy Trial Rights: Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Cordell Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Ronnie E. Cordell, 223 Ill. 2d 380 (2006), the...
Illinois Supreme Court Recognizes Duty to Defend Under "Advertising Injury" for TCPA Fax-Ad Claims

Illinois Supreme Court Recognizes Duty to Defend Under "Advertising Injury" for TCPA Fax-Ad Claims

Date: Dec 1, 2006
Illinois Supreme Court Recognizes Duty to Defend Under "Advertising Injury" for TCPA Fax-Ad Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Valley Forge Insurance Company et al. v. Swiderski Electronics,...
Cause Theory Determines Multiple Occurrences: Illinois Supreme Court in Nicor, Inc. v. Associated Electric and Gas Insurance Services Ltd.

Cause Theory Determines Multiple Occurrences: Illinois Supreme Court in Nicor, Inc. v. Associated Electric and Gas Insurance Services Ltd.

Date: Dec 1, 2006
Cause Theory Determines Multiple Occurrences: Illinois Supreme Court in Nicor, Inc. v. Associated Electric and Gas Insurance Services Ltd. Introduction The case of Nicor, Inc., et al. v. Associated...
Comprehensive Analysis of Parental Unfitness and Best Interests in Termination of Parental Rights: In re Daphnie E. Case

Comprehensive Analysis of Parental Unfitness and Best Interests in Termination of Parental Rights: In re Daphnie E. Case

Date: Nov 18, 2006
Comprehensive Analysis of Parental Unfitness and Best Interests in Termination of Parental Rights: In re Daphnie E. Case Introduction The case In re DAPHNIE E., a Minor (The People of the State of...
Comprehensive Commentary on "The People of the State of Illinois v. Roger McCarty and Jeanyne Reynolds"

Comprehensive Commentary on "The People of the State of Illinois v. Roger McCarty and Jeanyne Reynolds"

Date: Oct 20, 2006
Interpretation of "Substance Containing Methamphetamine": A Landmark Decision in Illinois Introduction In the case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Roger McCarty and Jeanyne Reynolds (223...
Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Post-Judgment Relief: Insights from Promila Daman Paul v. Gerald Adelman Associates

Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Post-Judgment Relief: Insights from Promila Daman Paul v. Gerald Adelman Associates

Date: Oct 20, 2006
Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Post-Judgment Relief: Insights from Promila Daman Paul v. Gerald Adelman Associates Introduction The case of Promila Daman Paul, as Trustee for S. Daman Paul, M.D.,...
Durand v. RLI Insurance Company: Defining the Manifestation Date in Repetitive Trauma Workers' Compensation Claims

Durand v. RLI Insurance Company: Defining the Manifestation Date in Repetitive Trauma Workers' Compensation Claims

Date: Oct 20, 2006
Durand v. RLI Insurance Company: Defining the Manifestation Date in Repetitive Trauma Workers' Compensation Claims Introduction Durand v. RLI Insurance Company (224 Ill. 2d 53, 2006) is a landmark...
Judicial Deference and Fiduciary Duty in Pension Disability Claims: MARCONI v. CHICAGO HEIGHTS POLICE PENSION Board

Judicial Deference and Fiduciary Duty in Pension Disability Claims: MARCONI v. CHICAGO HEIGHTS POLICE PENSION Board

Date: Oct 20, 2006
Judicial Deference and Fiduciary Duty in Pension Disability Claims: MARCONI v. CHICAGO HEIGHTS POLICE PENSION Board Introduction MARCONI v. CHICAGO HEIGHTS POLICE PENSION Board et al. is a seminal...
Unconstitutional Mandatory Presumption in Illinois Child Abduction Statute: Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Court in PEOPLE v. WOODRUM

Unconstitutional Mandatory Presumption in Illinois Child Abduction Statute: Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Court in PEOPLE v. WOODRUM

Date: Oct 6, 2006
Unconstitutional Mandatory Presumption in Illinois Child Abduction Statute: Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Court in PEOPLE v. WOODRUM Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v....
Unconscionability of Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Clauses: Insights from Donna M. KINKEL v. CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC

Unconscionability of Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Clauses: Insights from Donna M. KINKEL v. CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC

Date: Oct 6, 2006
Unconscionability of Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Clauses: Insights from Donna M. KINKEL v. CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC Introduction Donna M. Kinkel, Appellee, v. Cingular Wireless, LLC, Appellant....
Revisiting Seizure Standards in Police Encounters: Analysis of PEOPLE v. LUEDEMANN

Revisiting Seizure Standards in Police Encounters: Analysis of PEOPLE v. LUEDEMANN

Date: Oct 6, 2006
Revisiting Seizure Standards in Police Encounters: Analysis of PEOPLE v. LUEDEMANN Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Derek M. Luedemann is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Legal Malpractice and Statute of Repose: Insights from DeLUNA v. BURCIAGA

Legal Malpractice and Statute of Repose: Insights from DeLUNA v. BURCIAGA

Date: Oct 6, 2006
Legal Malpractice and Statute of Repose: Insights from DeLUNA v. BURCIAGA Introduction The case of SONIA DeLUNA et al. v. ELOY BURCIAGA et al. examined critical aspects of legal malpractice within...
Sutherland v. Illinois: Establishing Collateral Estoppel in Search Warrant Suppression

Sutherland v. Illinois: Establishing Collateral Estoppel in Search Warrant Suppression

Date: Sep 22, 2006
Sutherland v. Illinois: Establishing Collateral Estoppel in Search Warrant Suppression Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Cecil S. Sutherland (223 Ill. 2d...
Manifest Weight Standard Established for Abuse Findings Under Illinois Domestic Violence Act

Manifest Weight Standard Established for Abuse Findings Under Illinois Domestic Violence Act

Date: Sep 22, 2006
Manifest Weight Standard Established for Abuse Findings Under Illinois Domestic Violence Act Introduction The case of Angela K. Farlow Best v. Steven R. Devore Best, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Fair Report Privilege and Actual Malice in Defamation: Insights from SOLAIA TECHNOLOGY v. SPECIALTY PUBLISHING CO.

Fair Report Privilege and Actual Malice in Defamation: Insights from SOLAIA TECHNOLOGY v. SPECIALTY PUBLISHING CO.

Date: Jun 23, 2006
Fair Report Privilege and Actual Malice in Defamation: Insights from SOLAIA TECHNOLOGY v. SPECIALTY PUBLISHING COMPANY Introduction In SOLAIA TECHNOLOGY, LLC, et al. v. SPECIALTY PUBLISHING COMPANY...
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Non-Recoverability of Lost Punitive Damages in Legal Malpractice Actions

Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Non-Recoverability of Lost Punitive Damages in Legal Malpractice Actions

Date: Jun 23, 2006
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Non-Recoverability of Lost Punitive Damages in Legal Malpractice Actions Introduction The landmark case TRI-G, Inc., et al. v. Burke, Bosselman Weaver et al., 222...
Establishing Duty of Care for Business Owners Against Third-Party Negligence: Detroy Marshall Jr. v. Burger King Corporation

Establishing Duty of Care for Business Owners Against Third-Party Negligence: Detroy Marshall Jr. v. Burger King Corporation

Date: Jun 23, 2006
Establishing Duty of Care for Business Owners Against Third-Party Negligence: Detroy Marshall Jr. v. Burger King Corporation Introduction Detroy Marshall Jr. as Personal Representative v. Burger King...
Expanding Vicarious Liability: Apparent Agency in Medical Malpractice Confirmed in Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's v. York

Expanding Vicarious Liability: Apparent Agency in Medical Malpractice Confirmed in Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's v. York

Date: Jun 23, 2006
Expanding Vicarious Liability: Apparent Agency in Medical Malpractice Confirmed in Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's v. York Introduction The case of James M. York, M.D., et al., Appellees, v....
Use of Electronic Stun Belts as Restraining Devices in Trials: Due Process Implications

Use of Electronic Stun Belts as Restraining Devices in Trials: Due Process Implications

Date: Jun 3, 2006
Use of Electronic Stun Belts as Restraining Devices in Trials: Due Process Implications Introduction The People of the State of Illinois vs. Peri Allen (222 Ill. 2d 340) presents a pivotal case...
Defendant's Right to Decide on Lesser-Included Offense Instructions: The Medina v. People Judgment

Defendant's Right to Decide on Lesser-Included Offense Instructions: The Medina v. People Judgment

Date: Jun 3, 2006
Defendant's Right to Decide on Lesser-Included Offense Instructions: The Medina v. People Judgment Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Poncho Medina, 851...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert