Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Establishing Employer Liability for Misrepresentation: Illinois Supreme Court Decision in Jane Doe v. McLean County

Establishing Employer Liability for Misrepresentation: Illinois Supreme Court Decision in Jane Doe v. McLean County

Date: Aug 10, 2012
Establishing Employer Liability for Misrepresentation: Illinois Supreme Court Decision in Jane Doe v. McLean County Introduction In the landmark case of Jane Doe–3 et al. v. McLean County Unit...
Reaffirming Reasonable Suspicion Standards in Traffic Stops: Analysis of PEOPLE v. HACKETT

Reaffirming Reasonable Suspicion Standards in Traffic Stops: Analysis of PEOPLE v. HACKETT

Date: Jul 7, 2012
Reaffirming Reasonable Suspicion Standards in Traffic Stops: Analysis of PEOPLE v. HACKETT (361 Ill. Dec. 536) Introduction Case Citation: The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Dennis...
Evaluation of Postconviction Counsel's Compliance with Rule 651(c) in People v. Profit

Evaluation of Postconviction Counsel's Compliance with Rule 651(c) in People v. Profit

Date: Jun 29, 2012
Evaluation of Postconviction Counsel's Compliance with Rule 651(c) in People v. Profit Introduction Case: The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Shaun Profit,...
Colorable Actual Innocence Claims Necessary for Successive Postconviction Petitions: Insights from People v. Edwards

Colorable Actual Innocence Claims Necessary for Successive Postconviction Petitions: Insights from People v. Edwards

Date: May 30, 2012
Colorable Actual Innocence Claims Necessary for Successive Postconviction Petitions: Insights from People v. Edwards Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Walter Edwards (360 Ill. Dec. 784,...
Reinforcing the Waiver Rule and Limiting Fraudulent Misrepresentation to Commercial Contexts – BONHOMME v. ST. JAMES

Reinforcing the Waiver Rule and Limiting Fraudulent Misrepresentation to Commercial Contexts – BONHOMME v. ST. JAMES

Date: May 25, 2012
Reinforcing the Waiver Rule and Limiting Fraudulent Misrepresentation to Commercial Contexts – BONHOMME v. ST. JAMES Introduction In the landmark case of Paula Bonhomme v. Janna St. James, decided by...
Rigorous Compliance with Appellate Brief Requirements: The Hall v. Naper Gold Hospitality LLC Decision

Rigorous Compliance with Appellate Brief Requirements: The Hall v. Naper Gold Hospitality LLC Decision

Date: May 15, 2012
Rigorous Compliance with Appellate Brief Requirements: The Hall v. Naper Gold Hospitality LLC Decision Introduction The case of Peggy Lee Hall v. Naper Gold Hospitality LLC, adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of the Identical Elements Test in Illinois Sentencing: PEOPLE v. CLEMONS

Affirmation of the Identical Elements Test in Illinois Sentencing: PEOPLE v. CLEMONS

Date: Apr 20, 2012
Affirmation of the Identical Elements Test in Illinois Sentencing: PEOPLE v. CLEMONS Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Corey D. Clemons, decided on April 19,...
Cook County's Assault Weapons Ban Partially Upheld; Second Amendment Claims Remanded

Cook County's Assault Weapons Ban Partially Upheld; Second Amendment Claims Remanded

Date: Apr 6, 2012
Cook County's Assault Weapons Ban Partially Upheld; Second Amendment Claims Remanded Introduction The case of Matthew D. Wilson et al. v. The County of Cook et al. challenges the constitutionality of...
Duty of Care in 'Take-Home Asbestos' Cases: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Simpkins

Duty of Care in 'Take-Home Asbestos' Cases: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Simpkins

Date: Mar 23, 2012
Duty of Care in 'Take-Home Asbestos' Cases: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Simpkins Introduction The case of Cynthia Simpkins v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2012 IL 110662) addresses the pivotal issue of...
Admissibility of Prior Domestic Battery Convictions as Propensity Evidence in Murder Trials: Insights from The People v. Chapman (2012)

Admissibility of Prior Domestic Battery Convictions as Propensity Evidence in Murder Trials: Insights from The People v. Chapman (2012)

Date: Mar 23, 2012
Admissibility of Prior Domestic Battery Convictions as Propensity Evidence in Murder Trials: Insights from The People v. Chapman (2012) Introduction The People of the State of Illinois v. Robert J....
Enhancing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Post-Conviction Reviews: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. CATHEY

Enhancing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Post-Conviction Reviews: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. CATHEY

Date: Mar 23, 2012
Enhancing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Post-Conviction Reviews: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. CATHEY Introduction People v. Elron Cathey (965 N.E.2d 1109), adjudicated...
Clarifying Cause and Prejudice Requirements for Successive Postconviction Petitions: Insights from People v. Guerrero

Clarifying Cause and Prejudice Requirements for Successive Postconviction Petitions: Insights from People v. Guerrero

Date: Feb 18, 2012
Clarifying Cause and Prejudice Requirements for Successive Postconviction Petitions: Insights from People v. Guerrero Introduction In the realm of criminal law, postconviction relief serves as a...
People v. Baskerville: Affirming False Statements as Obstruction of a Peace Officer Under Section 31-1(a)

People v. Baskerville: Affirming False Statements as Obstruction of a Peace Officer Under Section 31-1(a)

Date: Feb 18, 2012
People v. Baskerville: Affirming False Statements as Obstruction of a Peace Officer Under Section 31-1(a) Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Joseph...
Clarifying Citizen Suit Limitations Under Section 8.05(a) of the Surface Coal Mining Act

Clarifying Citizen Suit Limitations Under Section 8.05(a) of the Surface Coal Mining Act

Date: Feb 3, 2012
Clarifying Citizen Suit Limitations Under Section 8.05(a) of the Surface Coal Mining Act Introduction In the landmark case CITIZENS OPPOSING POLLUTION v. EXXONMOBIL COAL U.S.A., the Supreme Court of...
Illinois Supreme Court Affirms 'No Harmless Error' Rule for Physically Coerced Confessions in Successive Postconviction Petitions

Illinois Supreme Court Affirms 'No Harmless Error' Rule for Physically Coerced Confessions in Successive Postconviction Petitions

Date: Feb 3, 2012
Illinois Supreme Court Affirms 'No Harmless Error' Rule for Physically Coerced Confessions in Successive Postconviction Petitions Introduction In the landmark decision of The PEOPLE of the State of...
Mandatory Second Degree Murder Instructions in Self-Defense Cases: An Analysis of People v. Mal

Mandatory Second Degree Murder Instructions in Self-Defense Cases: An Analysis of People v. Mal

Date: Jan 21, 2012
Mandatory Second Degree Murder Instructions in Self-Defense Cases: An Analysis of People v. Mal Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Malvin Washington (357 Ill. Dec. 1)...
Vacuating Improperly Imposed Public Defender Fees by Circuit Clerks

Vacuating Improperly Imposed Public Defender Fees by Circuit Clerks

Date: Jan 21, 2012
Vacuating Improperly Imposed Public Defender Fees by Circuit Clerks Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Elias Gutierrez, decided by the Supreme Court of Illinois on...
Reaffirming the Scope of the Illinois Citizen Participation Act: Limiting Anti-SLAPP Protections to Meritless Litigation

Reaffirming the Scope of the Illinois Citizen Participation Act: Limiting Anti-SLAPP Protections to Meritless Litigation

Date: Jan 21, 2012
Reaffirming the Scope of the Illinois Citizen Participation Act: Limiting Anti-SLAPP Protections to Meritless Litigation Introduction The case of Ste v. Sandholm, decided on January 20, 2012, by the...
Indeterminate Mandatory Supervised Release Terms in Criminal Sexual Assault Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis

Indeterminate Mandatory Supervised Release Terms in Criminal Sexual Assault Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Jan 21, 2012
Indeterminate Mandatory Supervised Release Terms in Criminal Sexual Assault Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The landmark decision in The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois v. Thomas S....
Prosecutorial Limitations on Arguing Law Enforcement Credibility: Insights from People v. Romney Adams

Prosecutorial Limitations on Arguing Law Enforcement Credibility: Insights from People v. Romney Adams

Date: Jan 21, 2012
Prosecutorial Limitations on Arguing Law Enforcement Credibility: Insights from People v. Romney Adams Introduction People v. Romney Adams is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert