Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Hawaii Case Commentaries

Expanding Relief under HRCP Rule 60(b)(3): Affirmative Sanctions for Discovery Fraud in Products Liability Litigation

Expanding Relief under HRCP Rule 60(b)(3): Affirmative Sanctions for Discovery Fraud in Products Liability Litigation

Date: Dec 12, 1997
Expanding Relief under HRCP Rule 60(b)(3): Affirmative Sanctions for Discovery Fraud in Products Liability Litigation Introduction The case of Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri Products before the...
Duty to Disclose Medical Qualifications: Insights from DITTO v. McCURDY

Duty to Disclose Medical Qualifications: Insights from DITTO v. McCURDY

Date: Nov 18, 1997
Duty to Disclose Medical Qualifications: Insights from DITTO v. McCURDY Introduction The case of Janie Ditto v. John A. McCurdy, Jr., M.D. before the Supreme Court of Hawaii serves as a pivotal...
Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in Principal vs Accomplice Liability: State v. Fukusaku

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in Principal vs Accomplice Liability: State v. Fukusaku

Date: Oct 17, 1997
Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in Principal vs Accomplice Liability: State v. Fukusaku Introduction State of Hawai‘i v. Raita Fukusaku is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Hawaii...
Duty to Retrofit: Supreme Court of Hawaii Establishes No Continuing Obligation for Manufacturers

Duty to Retrofit: Supreme Court of Hawaii Establishes No Continuing Obligation for Manufacturers

Date: Sep 16, 1997
Duty to Retrofit: Supreme Court of Hawaii Establishes No Continuing Obligation for Manufacturers Introduction In the landmark case of Sosimo B. Tabieros and Mitsuko H. Wilson v. Clark Equipment...
Broader Interpretation of "Similarly Situated" Employees in Hawaii Employment Discrimination Cases

Broader Interpretation of "Similarly Situated" Employees in Hawaii Employment Discrimination Cases

Date: May 7, 1997
Broader Interpretation of "Similarly Situated" Employees in Hawaii Employment Discrimination Cases Introduction In the landmark case of George H. Furukawa v. Honolulu Zoological Society (85 Haw. 7),...
Hawaii Supreme Court Upholds Double Jeopardy Protection Against Retrial After Prosecution's Strategic Withdrawal

Hawaii Supreme Court Upholds Double Jeopardy Protection Against Retrial After Prosecution's Strategic Withdrawal

Date: Apr 29, 1997
Hawaii Supreme Court Upholds Double Jeopardy Protection Against Retrial After Prosecution's Strategic Withdrawal Introduction The Supreme Court of Hawaii addressed a pivotal issue in State of Hawaii...
Equitable Reformation and Tortious Interference: Insights from Lee v. Dixon (85 Haw. 19)

Equitable Reformation and Tortious Interference: Insights from Lee v. Dixon (85 Haw. 19)

Date: Apr 16, 1997
Equitable Reformation and Tortious Interference: Insights from Lee v. Dixon (85 Haw. 19) Introduction Elizabeth Ann Lee, a single woman, initiated legal action against Edwin I. Aiu and Steven B....
Lifetime Driver's License Revocation: Definitive Ruling Under Hawaii's Administrative Revocation of Driver's License Act (HARDLA)

Lifetime Driver's License Revocation: Definitive Ruling Under Hawaii's Administrative Revocation of Driver's License Act (HARDLA)

Date: Jan 31, 1997
Lifetime Driver's License Revocation: Definitive Ruling Under Hawaii's Administrative Revocation of Driver's License Act (HARDLA) Introduction In the landmark case of Bradford L. Gray v....
Protecting Unanimous Verdict Rights in Aggregated Sexual Assault Indictments

Protecting Unanimous Verdict Rights in Aggregated Sexual Assault Indictments

Date: Nov 19, 1996
Protecting Unanimous Verdict Rights in Aggregated Sexual Assault Indictments Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Haw., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Arceo, Defendant-Appellant, the Supreme...
State of Hawai'i v. Clark: Admissibility of Prior Statements and Domestic Violence Evidence

State of Hawai'i v. Clark: Admissibility of Prior Statements and Domestic Violence Evidence

Date: Nov 1, 1996
State of Hawai'i v. Clark: Admissibility of Prior Statements and Domestic Violence Evidence Introduction State of Hawai'i v. Francis Eugene Clark is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
ROH §8-7.1(a) Enforces Market Data and Cost Approaches, Excluding Income Approach in Property Valuation

ROH §8-7.1(a) Enforces Market Data and Cost Approaches, Excluding Income Approach in Property Valuation

Date: Sep 4, 1996
ROH §8-7.1(a) Enforces Market Data and Cost Approaches, Excluding Income Approach in Property Valuation Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of William Weinberg, successor in...
Limits on Interlocutory Appeals in DUI Cases: The Ontiveros Decision

Limits on Interlocutory Appeals in DUI Cases: The Ontiveros Decision

Date: Aug 31, 1996
Limits on Interlocutory Appeals in DUI Cases: The Ontiveros Decision Introduction In the landmark case of State of Hawaii v. Frankie A. Ontiveros, decided on August 30, 1996, the Supreme Court of...
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Contexts: Alabanza v. KFC

Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Contexts: Alabanza v. KFC

Date: Aug 28, 1996
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Contexts: Alabanza v. KFC Introduction The landmark case of Alabanza v. KFC National Management Company addressed critical issues surrounding...
Clarification of the Economic Loss Rule in Negligent Misrepresentation Claims: State of Hawaii v. U.S. Steel Corporation

Clarification of the Economic Loss Rule in Negligent Misrepresentation Claims: State of Hawaii v. U.S. Steel Corporation

Date: Jun 25, 1996
Clarification of the Economic Loss Rule in Negligent Misrepresentation Claims: State of Hawaii v. U.S. Steel Corporation Introduction The landmark decision in State of Hawaii v. U.S. Steel...
Recognition of the Tort of Bad Faith in First-Party Insurance Claims in Hawaii

Recognition of the Tort of Bad Faith in First-Party Insurance Claims in Hawaii

Date: Jun 22, 1996
Recognition of the Tort of Bad Faith in First-Party Insurance Claims in Hawaii Introduction The case of The Best Place, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Company (82 Haw. 120) represents a pivotal...
Expansion of "Wilful and Wanton Misconduct" in Workers' Compensation: Iddings v. Mee-Lee

Expansion of "Wilful and Wanton Misconduct" in Workers' Compensation: Iddings v. Mee-Lee

Date: Jun 21, 1996
Expansion of "Wilful and Wanton Misconduct" in Workers' Compensation: Iddings v. Mee-Lee Introduction Iddings v. Mee-Lee is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Hawaii on June 20, 1996....
Statutory Merger of First Degree Murder and Attempted First Degree Murder Established in State v. Ganal

Statutory Merger of First Degree Murder and Attempted First Degree Murder Established in State v. Ganal

Date: May 9, 1996
Statutory Merger of First Degree Murder and Attempted First Degree Murder Established in State of Hawaii v. Orlando Ganal, Sr. Introduction In the landmark case of State of Hawaii v. Orlando Ganal,...
STATE of Haw. v. Merino: Affirming Discretion in No Contest Pleas and Plea Withdrawal under HRPP

STATE of Haw. v. Merino: Affirming Discretion in No Contest Pleas and Plea Withdrawal under HRPP

Date: Apr 12, 1996
STATE of Haw. v. Merino: Affirming Discretion in No Contest Pleas and Plea Withdrawal under HRPP Introduction The case of STATE of Haw. v. William Merino (81 Haw. 198) presents a significant...
Affirmation of Physical Abuse Conviction under HRS §709-906(1): State of Haw. v. Thomas Eastman

Affirmation of Physical Abuse Conviction under HRS §709-906(1): State of Haw. v. Thomas Eastman

Date: Mar 16, 1996
Affirmation of Physical Abuse Conviction under HRS §709-906(1): State of Haw. v. Thomas Eastman Introduction In the landmark case State of Haw., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Eastman,...
Clarification of the Plain View Doctrine in the Context of Transparent Containers: Wallace v. State of Hawaii

Clarification of the Plain View Doctrine in the Context of Transparent Containers: Wallace v. State of Hawaii

Date: Jan 11, 1996
Clarification of the Plain View Doctrine in the Context of Transparent Containers: Wallace v. State of Hawaii Introduction In the landmark case of State of Hawaii v. Len Kanoi Wallace, decided on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert