Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Florida Case Commentaries

Strict Interpretation of Section 550.05: Prohibition on Issuing Harness Racing Permits Within 100 Miles of Dog Racing Plants

Strict Interpretation of Section 550.05: Prohibition on Issuing Harness Racing Permits Within 100 Miles of Dog Racing Plants

Date: May 3, 1958
Strict Interpretation of Section 550.05: Prohibition on Issuing Harness Racing Permits Within 100 Miles of Dog Racing Plants Introduction The case of Florida State Racing Commission and Seminole Park...
Initials as Binding Signatures: Gendzier v. Bielecki Establishes Legal Precedent

Initials as Binding Signatures: Gendzier v. Bielecki Establishes Legal Precedent

Date: Nov 14, 1957
Initials as Binding Signatures: Gendzier v. Bielecki Establishes Legal Precedent Introduction The case of HARRY GENDZIER AND SHELDON GENDZIER, AS CO-PARTNERS, TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS AS FLORIDA...
Overruling Municipal Immunity: The Landmark Decision in Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach

Overruling Municipal Immunity: The Landmark Decision in Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach

Date: Jun 29, 1957
Overruling Municipal Immunity: The Landmark Decision in Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach Introduction The case of Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa Beach, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida on June...
DeGroot v. Sheffield: Establishing Mandamus as a Remedy for Unauthorized Abolition of Classified Positions

DeGroot v. Sheffield: Establishing Mandamus as a Remedy for Unauthorized Abolition of Classified Positions

Date: Jun 27, 1957
DeGroot v. Sheffield: Establishing Mandamus as a Remedy for Unauthorized Abolition of Classified Positions Introduction DeGroot v. Sheffield, 95 So. 2d 912 (1957), is a landmark decision by the...
Reinforcing Requirements for Joint Adventurer Claims: Kislak v. Kreedian Analysis

Reinforcing Requirements for Joint Adventurer Claims: Kislak v. Kreedian Analysis

Date: May 30, 1957
Reinforcing Requirements for Joint Adventurer Claims: Kislak v. Kreedian Analysis Introduction The case of Jay I. Kislak and Ira A. Hotchkiss, and Mona Hotchkiss, his wife, Petitioners v. Koren...
Shamrock Village, Inc. v. Griffith (1957): Prejudicial Counsel Conduct and Standards for Punitive Damages in Gross Negligence Cases

Shamrock Village, Inc. v. Griffith (1957): Prejudicial Counsel Conduct and Standards for Punitive Damages in Gross Negligence Cases

Date: May 2, 1957
Shamrock Village, Inc. v. Griffith (1957): Prejudicial Counsel Conduct and Standards for Punitive Damages in Gross Negligence Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Shamrock Village, Inc. v....
Adverse Possession and Dedication of Public Alleys: Waterman & Sharp v. Smith Estate

Adverse Possession and Dedication of Public Alleys: Waterman & Sharp v. Smith Estate

Date: Apr 25, 1957
Adverse Possession and Dedication of Public Alleys: Waterman & Sharp v. Smith Estate Introduction The case of Waterman & Frank J. Sharp, Appellants versus Walter E. Smith and Margaret M. Smith, as an...
Reinforcing the Burden of Proof: Hoyt Dan Davis v. State of Florida

Reinforcing the Burden of Proof: Hoyt Dan Davis v. State of Florida

Date: Nov 17, 1956
Reinforcing the Burden of Proof: Hoyt Dan Davis v. State of Florida Introduction Hoyt Dan Davis v. State of Florida is a landmark 1956 decision by the Supreme Court of Florida, Division A. The...
Establishing Constructive Trusts in Equitable Remedies: Analysis of Roberts v. Roberts

Establishing Constructive Trusts in Equitable Remedies: Analysis of Roberts v. Roberts

Date: Mar 28, 1956
Establishing Constructive Trusts in Equitable Remedies: Analysis of Roberts v. Roberts Introduction The case of Christine R. Roberts, personally and as administratrix of the estate of F.E. Roberts,...
Braddock v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.: Future Pain and Suffering Not Subject to Present Value Reduction

Braddock v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.: Future Pain and Suffering Not Subject to Present Value Reduction

Date: Jun 21, 1955
Braddock v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.: Future Pain and Suffering Not Subject to Present Value Reduction Introduction In the landmark case of Braddock v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company,...
Interest on Workmen's Compensation Awards: Parker v. Brinson Establishes Key Precedent

Interest on Workmen's Compensation Awards: Parker v. Brinson Establishes Key Precedent

Date: Mar 26, 1955
Interest on Workmen's Compensation Awards: Parker v. Brinson Establishes Key Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Theresa Pharr Parker v. Brinson Construction Company and Florida Industrial...
Voelker v. Combined Insurance Co. of America and Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee: A Judicial Analysis

Voelker v. Combined Insurance Co. of America and Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee: A Judicial Analysis

Date: Jun 26, 1954
Voelker v. Combined Insurance Co. of America and Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee: Establishing Standards for Circumstantial Evidence in Insurance Claims Introduction The case of Voelker v....
Mayo v. State: Emphasizing the Necessity of Non-Speculative Evidence in Homicide Convictions

Mayo v. State: Emphasizing the Necessity of Non-Speculative Evidence in Homicide Convictions

Date: May 5, 1954
Mayo v. State: Emphasizing the Necessity of Non-Speculative Evidence in Homicide Convictions Introduction Mayo v. State, 71 So. 2d 899 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954), is a pivotal case that...
Lithgow v. Hamilton: Framework for Assessing Wrongful Death Damages

Lithgow v. Hamilton: Framework for Assessing Wrongful Death Damages

Date: Feb 14, 1954
Lithgow v. Hamilton: Framework for Assessing Wrongful Death Damages Introduction Lithgow v. Hamilton et al. (69 So. 2d 776), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida's Special Division A on...
Limitations on Compensatory Damages for Pain and Suffering: Insights from Loftin v. Wilson Mills

Limitations on Compensatory Damages for Pain and Suffering: Insights from Loftin v. Wilson Mills

Date: Sep 22, 1953
Limitations on Compensatory Damages for Pain and Suffering: Insights from Loftin v. Wilson Mills Introduction The case of Loftin et al. v. Wilson. Mills et al., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of Florida Upholds Public Policy Against Closed Shop Agreements in Local No. 234 v. Henley Beckwith, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida Upholds Public Policy Against Closed Shop Agreements in Local No. 234 v. Henley Beckwith, Inc.

Date: Aug 1, 1953
Supreme Court of Florida Upholds Public Policy Against Closed Shop Agreements in Local No. 234 v. Henley Beckwith, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Local No. 234 of United Association of...
Underwood v. Underwood: Establishing Property Settlements Over Traditional Alimony in Divorce Proceedings

Underwood v. Underwood: Establishing Property Settlements Over Traditional Alimony in Divorce Proceedings

Date: Apr 11, 1953
Underwood v. Underwood: Establishing Property Settlements Over Traditional Alimony in Divorce Proceedings Introduction Underwood v. Underwood, 64 So.2d 281 (Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division...
Declaratory Judgment in Boundary Disputes: Insights from May v. Holley

Declaratory Judgment in Boundary Disputes: Insights from May v. Holley

Date: Jul 17, 1952
Declaratory Judgment in Boundary Disputes: Insights from May v. Holley Introduction The case of May v. Holley et al. (59 So. 2d 636) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida's Special Division B...
Res Adjudicata and Constructive Desertion in Divorce Proceedings: An In-Depth Analysis of GORDON v. GORDON

Res Adjudicata and Constructive Desertion in Divorce Proceedings: An In-Depth Analysis of GORDON v. GORDON

Date: May 22, 1952
Res Adjudicata and Constructive Desertion in Divorce Proceedings: An In-Depth Analysis of GORDON v. GORDON Introduction GORDON v. GORDON, 59 So. 2d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, Division A, 1952), is...
Interpretation of Contractual Terms: The Scope of "Purchased" in FRIEDMAN ET AL. v. VIRGINIA METAL PRODUCTS CORP.

Interpretation of Contractual Terms: The Scope of "Purchased" in FRIEDMAN ET AL. v. VIRGINIA METAL PRODUCTS CORP.

Date: Feb 24, 1952
Interpretation of Contractual Terms: The Scope of "Purchased" in FRIEDMAN ET AL. v. VIRGINIA METAL PRODUCTS CORP. Introduction The case of FRIEDMAN ET AL. v. VIRGINIA METAL PRODUCTS CORP. (56 So. 2d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert