Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Florida Case Commentaries

Reaffirmation of Summary Judgment Standards in Negligence Cases: Wills v. Sears, Roebuck Company

Reaffirmation of Summary Judgment Standards in Negligence Cases: Wills v. Sears, Roebuck Company

Date: Nov 15, 1977
Reaffirmation of Summary Judgment Standards in Negligence Cases: Wills v. Sears, Roebuck Company Introduction The case of Helen E. Wills and Howard A. Wills v. Sears, Roebuck Company addresses...
Punitive Damages Must Not Shock Judicial Conscience: Florida Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Punitive Damages Must Not Shock Judicial Conscience: Florida Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Sep 21, 1977
Punitive Damages Must Not Shock Judicial Conscience: Florida Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of Earl Lowell Lassitter v. International Union of Operating Engineers, decided by...
Jury Discretion in Punitive Damages Affirmed: Florida Supreme Court Overturns Fixed Relation Rule

Jury Discretion in Punitive Damages Affirmed: Florida Supreme Court Overturns Fixed Relation Rule

Date: Sep 14, 1977
Jury Discretion in Punitive Damages Affirmed: Florida Supreme Court Overturns Fixed Relation Rule Introduction The case of Dorthy Bould and Edward Simonson, Jr., as Administrators of the Estates of...
Elimination of Assumption of Risk as a Distinct Defense in Florida Tort Law

Elimination of Assumption of Risk as a Distinct Defense in Florida Tort Law

Date: Jul 28, 1977
Elimination of Assumption of Risk as a Distinct Defense in Florida Tort Law Introduction The case of Blackburn, Jr., et al. v. Dorta, et al. adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida on July 27,...
Defining the Scope of Prohibition Writ in Media Access: Florida Supreme Court in Carey English v. McCrary

Defining the Scope of Prohibition Writ in Media Access: Florida Supreme Court in Carey English v. McCrary

Date: Jul 14, 1977
Defining the Scope of Prohibition Writ in Media Access: Florida Supreme Court in Carey English v. McCrary Introduction The case of Carey English v. Robert L. McCrary, Jr., reported in 348 So. 2d 293...
Elledge v. State of Florida: Clarifying the Scope of Aggravating Factors in Death Penalty Sentencing

Elledge v. State of Florida: Clarifying the Scope of Aggravating Factors in Death Penalty Sentencing

Date: Jul 1, 1977
Elledge v. State of Florida: Clarifying the Scope of Aggravating Factors in Death Penalty Sentencing Introduction The case of William Duane Elledge versus the State of Florida represents a pivotal...
Florida Supreme Court Establishes Procedural Safeguards in Criminal Contempt Proceedings

Florida Supreme Court Establishes Procedural Safeguards in Criminal Contempt Proceedings

Date: Jun 10, 1977
Florida Supreme Court Establishes Procedural Safeguards in Criminal Contempt Proceedings Introduction The case of Rocco Pugliese v. Tina Pugliese (347 So. 2d 422, Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)...
Judicial Review of Administrative Findings: Substantial Evidence and Agency Discretion in Banking Charters - McDonald v. Department of Banking and Finance

Judicial Review of Administrative Findings: Substantial Evidence and Agency Discretion in Banking Charters - McDonald v. Department of Banking and Finance

Date: Jun 1, 1977
Judicial Review of Administrative Findings: Substantial Evidence and Agency Discretion in Banking Charters Introduction In the landmark case of Raymond O. McDonald, Jr., et al. v. Department of...
Limitations on Judicial Discretion in Capital Sentencing: Provence v. State of Florida

Limitations on Judicial Discretion in Capital Sentencing: Provence v. State of Florida

Date: Oct 12, 1976
Limitations on Judicial Discretion in Capital Sentencing: Provence v. State of Florida Introduction Provence v. State of Florida, 337 So. 2d 783 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976), is a pivotal case...
Establishing Precedent on Capital Punishment under Florida Statute 921.141

Establishing Precedent on Capital Punishment under Florida Statute 921.141

Date: Sep 29, 1976
Establishing Precedent on Capital Punishment under Florida Statute 921.141 Introduction The Supreme Court of Florida, in the landmark case of Vernon Ray Cooper v. State of Florida (336 So. 2d 1133,...
Establishment of Strict Liability for Manufacturers in Florida Products Liability: West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company

Establishment of Strict Liability for Manufacturers in Florida Products Liability: West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company

Date: Jul 22, 1976
Establishment of Strict Liability for Manufacturers in Florida Products Liability: West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company Introduction WEST v. CATERPILLAR TRACTOR COMPANY, INC. is a seminal case decided...
Appellate Review of Alimony and Marital Asset Division: Gerald B. Shaw v. Jean A. Shaw

Appellate Review of Alimony and Marital Asset Division: Gerald B. Shaw v. Jean A. Shaw

Date: Jul 17, 1976
Appellate Review of Alimony and Marital Asset Division: Gerald B. Shaw v. Jean A. Shaw Introduction In the landmark case of Gerald B. Shaw v. Jean A. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976), the Supreme...
Limitations on Impeaching Witness Credibility with Pending Charges: Insights from FULTON v. STATE of Florida

Limitations on Impeaching Witness Credibility with Pending Charges: Insights from FULTON v. STATE of Florida

Date: Jul 9, 1976
Limitations on Impeaching Witness Credibility with Pending Charges: Insights from FULTON v. STATE of Florida Introduction The case of Fred FULTON v. STATE of Florida, adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Statute of Limitations in Medical Malpractice: Insights from Nardone v. Reynolds

Statute of Limitations in Medical Malpractice: Insights from Nardone v. Reynolds

Date: May 20, 1976
Statute of Limitations in Medical Malpractice: Insights from Nardone v. Reynolds Introduction Nicholas Nardone v. David H. Reynolds et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Florida on May 19, 1976, is...
Ensuring Due Process in Interim Rate Decisions: Analysis of CITIZENS OF FLORIDA v. MAYO

Ensuring Due Process in Interim Rate Decisions: Analysis of CITIZENS OF FLORIDA v. MAYO

Date: May 6, 1976
Ensuring Due Process in Interim Rate Decisions: Analysis of CITIZENS OF FLORIDA v. MAYO Introduction The case of The Citizens of the State of Florida, Petitioners, v. William T. Mayo, Chairman, et...
Florida Supreme Court Defines Trial Court Authority in Split Sentence Probation Cases

Florida Supreme Court Defines Trial Court Authority in Split Sentence Probation Cases

Date: Mar 10, 1976
Florida Supreme Court Defines Trial Court Authority in Split Sentence Probation Cases Introduction The case of State of Florida v. Johnnie Lee Jones, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida on...
WILLIAMS v. STATE of Florida: Jurisdiction Vesting Through Timely Notice of Appeal Independent of Filing Fee Payment

WILLIAMS v. STATE of Florida: Jurisdiction Vesting Through Timely Notice of Appeal Independent of Filing Fee Payment

Date: Dec 4, 1975
WILLIAMS v. STATE of Florida: Jurisdiction Vesting Through Timely Notice of Appeal Independent of Filing Fee Payment Introduction WILLIAMS v. STATE of Florida, 324 So.2d 74 (Fla. 1975), is a landmark...
BAILEY v. STATE of Florida: Redefining Consent in Illegal Searches and Seizures

BAILEY v. STATE of Florida: Redefining Consent in Illegal Searches and Seizures

Date: Oct 18, 1975
BAILEY v. STATE of Florida: Redefining Consent in Illegal Searches and Seizures Introduction BAILEY v. STATE of Florida, 319 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 1975), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
WILLIAMS v. STATE: Affirming Prejudice Requirement in Rule 3.170(j) Guilty Plea Procedures

WILLIAMS v. STATE: Affirming Prejudice Requirement in Rule 3.170(j) Guilty Plea Procedures

Date: Aug 29, 1975
WILLIAMS v. STATE: Affirming Prejudice Requirement in Rule 3.170(j) Guilty Plea Procedures Introduction WILLIAMS v. STATE is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Florida on August 28,...
Miranda Protections Reinforced: BENNETT v. STATE Establishes Strict Adherence to Self-Incrimination Rights

Miranda Protections Reinforced: BENNETT v. STATE Establishes Strict Adherence to Self-Incrimination Rights

Date: Aug 1, 1975
Miranda Protections Reinforced: BENNETT v. STATE Establishes Strict Adherence to Self-Incrimination Rights Introduction BENNETT v. STATE of Florida (316 So. 2d 41, Supreme Court of Florida, 1975) is...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert