Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Florida Case Commentaries

Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence in Capital Cases: Zack v. State of Florida

Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence in Capital Cases: Zack v. State of Florida

Date: Jan 7, 2000
Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence in Capital Cases: Zack v. State of Florida Introduction In the landmark case of Michael Duane Zack, III v. State of Florida (753 So.2d 9, 2000), the Supreme...
Florida Supreme Court Invalidates Chapter 95-182 for Breaching the Single Subject Rule

Florida Supreme Court Invalidates Chapter 95-182 for Breaching the Single Subject Rule

Date: Dec 23, 1999
Florida Supreme Court Invalidates Chapter 95-182 for Breaching the Single Subject Rule Introduction The case of State of Florida v. Carol Leigh Thompson (750 So. 2d 643) presented a pivotal question...
Enhancing Sanctions for Cumulative Drug-Related Misconduct Among Attorneys

Enhancing Sanctions for Cumulative Drug-Related Misconduct Among Attorneys

Date: Dec 17, 1999
Enhancing Sanctions for Cumulative Drug-Related Misconduct Among Attorneys 1. Introduction The case of The Florida Bar vs. Taryn Xenia Temmer represents a pivotal moment in the enforcement of ethical...
Reaffirmation of Harmless Error Analysis under Section 924.051(7): Goodwin and JONES v. STATE of Florida

Reaffirmation of Harmless Error Analysis under Section 924.051(7): Goodwin and JONES v. STATE of Florida

Date: Dec 17, 1999
Reaffirmation of Harmless Error Analysis under Section 924.051(7): Goodwin and JONES v. STATE of Florida Introduction The cases of David GOODWIN v. STATE of Florida and Herbert JONES v. STATE of...
Enhancing Appellate Review Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The STATE v. STEPHENS Decision

Enhancing Appellate Review Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The STATE v. STEPHENS Decision

Date: Nov 25, 1999
Enhancing Appellate Review Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The STATE v. STEPHENS Decision Introduction STATE v. STEPHENS, 748 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 1999), is a landmark decision by the...
Limits on Arbitration Clauses for Independent Tort Claims: Insights from Seifert v. U.S. Home

Limits on Arbitration Clauses for Independent Tort Claims: Insights from Seifert v. U.S. Home

Date: Nov 19, 1999
Limits on Arbitration Clauses for Independent Tort Claims: Insights from Seifert v. U.S. Home Introduction Seifert v. U.S. Home Corporation is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Florida that...
Clarification of Drug Trafficking Statute Applicability: Schedule III Hydrocodone Exemption

Clarification of Drug Trafficking Statute Applicability: Schedule III Hydrocodone Exemption

Date: Oct 8, 1999
Clarification of Drug Trafficking Statute Applicability: Schedule III Hydrocodone Exemption Introduction The case of Kathyrn Hayes v. State of Florida, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida on...
Safeguarding Jury Integrity: Insights from THOMAS v. STATE of Florida

Safeguarding Jury Integrity: Insights from THOMAS v. STATE of Florida

Date: Oct 1, 1999
Safeguarding Jury Integrity: Insights from THOMAS v. STATE of Florida Introduction THOMAS v. STATE of Florida, 748 So. 2d 970 (1999), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida, serves as a pivotal...
Electric Chair Execution Upheld as Constitutional in Provenzano v. Moore, 744 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 1999)

Electric Chair Execution Upheld as Constitutional in Provenzano v. Moore, 744 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 1999)

Date: Sep 25, 1999
Electric Chair Execution Upheld as Constitutional in Provenzano v. Moore 744 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 1999) Introduction Thomas H. Provenzano, a defendant under a death warrant, challenged the...
Unconscionability of Arbitration Clauses in Consumer Contracts: Powertel v. Bexley

Unconscionability of Arbitration Clauses in Consumer Contracts: Powertel v. Bexley

Date: Sep 2, 1999
Unconscionability of Arbitration Clauses in Consumer Contracts: Powertel v. Bexley Introduction The case of Powertel, Inc. and Powertel/Jacksonville, Inc. v. Dana C. Bexley serves as a pivotal...
Broad Discretion Standard Affirmed in Estate of STUCKEY v. BROWN

Broad Discretion Standard Affirmed in Estate of STUCKEY v. BROWN

Date: Aug 27, 1999
Broad Discretion Standard Affirmed in Estate of STUCKEY v. BROWN Introduction The case of Estate of A.P. Stuckey, Sr. v. Rupert B. Brown et ux., decided by the Supreme Court of Florida on August 26,...
Clarifying Evidentiary Hearing Standards in Brady and Ineffective Assistance Claims: PEEDE v. STATE of Florida

Clarifying Evidentiary Hearing Standards in Brady and Ineffective Assistance Claims: PEEDE v. STATE of Florida

Date: Aug 20, 1999
Clarifying Evidentiary Hearing Standards in Brady and Ineffective Assistance Claims: PEEDE v. STATE of Florida Introduction In Robert Ira PEEDE v. STATE of Florida, 748 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 1999), the...
Proportionality in Death Penalty Sentencing: Analysis of ROBERT LARKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Proportionality in Death Penalty Sentencing: Analysis of ROBERT LARKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Date: Jul 9, 1999
Proportionality in Death Penalty Sentencing: Analysis of ROBERT LARKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA Introduction ROBERT LARKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Miranda Compliance and Juvenile Rights in NATHAN JOE RAMIREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Miranda Compliance and Juvenile Rights in NATHAN JOE RAMIREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Date: Jul 9, 1999
Miranda Compliance and Juvenile Rights in NATHAN JOE RAMIREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA Introduction NATHAN JOE RAMIREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA (739 So. 2d 568), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida on...
Affirmation and Remand in Postconviction Relief: GASKIN v. STATE of Florida

Affirmation and Remand in Postconviction Relief: GASKIN v. STATE of Florida

Date: Jul 2, 1999
A Comprehensive Analysis of GASKIN v. STATE of Florida: Establishing the Need for Evidentiary Hearings in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Introduction GASKIN v. STATE of Florida (737 So. 2d...
Florida Supreme Court Establishes Liability Beyond Economic Loss Rule in Professional Negligence Cases

Florida Supreme Court Establishes Liability Beyond Economic Loss Rule in Professional Negligence Cases

Date: Jul 2, 1999
Florida Supreme Court Establishes Liability Beyond Economic Loss Rule in Professional Negligence Cases Introduction In the landmark case of MORANSAIS v. HEATHMAN, 744 So.2d 973 (Fla. 1999), the...
Affirmation of Procedural Bars and Standards for Effective Counsel in TEFFETELLER v. DUGGER

Affirmation of Procedural Bars and Standards for Effective Counsel in TEFFETELLER v. DUGGER

Date: Jun 18, 1999
Affirmation of Procedural Bars and Standards for Effective Counsel in TEFFETELLER v. DUGGER Introduction TEFFETELLER v. DUGGER, 734 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. Supreme Court, 1999), is a pivotal case that...
Recognition of Intentional Interference with Custodial Parent-Child Relationships in Florida: STONE v. WALL (1999)

Recognition of Intentional Interference with Custodial Parent-Child Relationships in Florida: STONE v. WALL (1999)

Date: Jun 18, 1999
Recognition of Intentional Interference with Custodial Parent-Child Relationships in Florida: STONE v. WALL (1999) Introduction STONE v. WALL is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Belated Postconviction Relief and Legal Malpractice in STEELE v. KEHOE

Belated Postconviction Relief and Legal Malpractice in STEELE v. KEHOE

Date: May 28, 1999
Belated Postconviction Relief and Legal Malpractice in STEELE v. KEHOE Introduction STEELE v. KEHOE (747 So. 2d 931, Supreme Court of Florida, 1999) addresses critical issues concerning legal...
Limiting Writ of Error Coram Nobis to Florida Rule 3.850 Timeframes: WOOD v. STATE

Limiting Writ of Error Coram Nobis to Florida Rule 3.850 Timeframes: WOOD v. STATE

Date: May 28, 1999
Limiting Writ of Error Coram Nobis to Florida Rule 3.850 Timeframes: WOOD v. STATE Introduction Robert Earl WOOD v. STATE of Florida is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Florida on May...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert