Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Federal Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying Patent Claim Construction: Federal Circuit Vacates Noninfringement Stipulation in Thorner v. Sony

Clarifying Patent Claim Construction: Federal Circuit Vacates Noninfringement Stipulation in Thorner v. Sony

Date: Feb 2, 2012
Clarifying Patent Claim Construction: Federal Circuit Vacates Noninfringement Stipulation in Thorner v. Sony Introduction In the landmark case of Thorner and Virtual Reality Feedback Corporation v....
Establishing Standards for Mandamus Relief in Venue Transfer Cases: In re Genentech, Inc. and Biogen Idec Inc.

Establishing Standards for Mandamus Relief in Venue Transfer Cases: In re Genentech, Inc. and Biogen Idec Inc.

Date: May 23, 2009
Establishing Standards for Mandamus Relief in Venue Transfer Cases: In re Genentech, Inc. and Biogen Idec Inc. Introduction The case In re Genentech, Inc. and Biogen Idec Inc., Petitioners (566 F.3d...
Federal Circuit Sets Precedent on Claim Construction and Doctrine of Equivalents in O2 Micro v. Beyond Innovation Technology

Federal Circuit Sets Precedent on Claim Construction and Doctrine of Equivalents in O2 Micro v. Beyond Innovation Technology

Date: Jun 12, 2008
Federal Circuit Sets Precedent on Claim Construction and Doctrine of Equivalents in O2 Micro v. Beyond Innovation Technology Introduction The case of O2 Micro International Limited v. Beyond...
Revamping Willful Infringement Standards and Privilege Waiver in Patent Litigation: Insights from IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC

Revamping Willful Infringement Standards and Privilege Waiver in Patent Litigation: Insights from IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC

Date: Aug 21, 2007
Revamping Willful Infringement Standards and Privilege Waiver in Patent Litigation: Insights from IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC Introduction In the landmark decision of IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC,...
Federal Circuit Establishes Priority of Intrinsic Evidence in Claim Construction: PHILLIPS v. AWH CORP.

Federal Circuit Establishes Priority of Intrinsic Evidence in Claim Construction: PHILLIPS v. AWH CORP.

Date: Jul 13, 2005
Federal Circuit Establishes Priority of Intrinsic Evidence in Claim Construction: PHILLIPS v. AWH CORP. Introduction In the landmark case of Edward H. PHILLIPS v. AWH CORPoration, decided by the...
Precedent on Intrinsic Evidence in Patent Claim Construction: C.R. Bard, Inc. v. U.S. Surgical Corp.

Precedent on Intrinsic Evidence in Patent Claim Construction: C.R. Bard, Inc. v. U.S. Surgical Corp.

Date: Oct 30, 2004
Intrinsic Evidence Prevails in Patent Claim Construction: Insights from C.R. Bard, Inc. v. U.S. Surgical Corp. Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit delivered a...
Claim Construction and Ordinary Meaning in Patent Infringement: Insights from Innova/Pure Water v. Safari Water Filtration Systems

Claim Construction and Ordinary Meaning in Patent Infringement: Insights from Innova/Pure Water v. Safari Water Filtration Systems

Date: Aug 12, 2004
Claim Construction and Ordinary Meaning in Patent Infringement: Insights from Innova/Pure Water v. Safari Water Filtration Systems Introduction The case of Innova/Pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water...
Impact of Claim Construction on Patent Infringement: Insights from Liebel-Flarsheim Co. v. Medrad, Inc.

Impact of Claim Construction on Patent Infringement: Insights from Liebel-Flarsheim Co. v. Medrad, Inc.

Date: Feb 12, 2004
Impact of Claim Construction on Patent Infringement: Insights from Liebel-Flarsheim Co. v. Medrad, Inc. Introduction The case of Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc. (358...
Clarifying Prosecution Disclaimer and Means-Plus-Function Claim Interpretation: Omega Engineering v. Raytek Decision

Clarifying Prosecution Disclaimer and Means-Plus-Function Claim Interpretation: Omega Engineering v. Raytek Decision

Date: Jul 8, 2003
Clarifying Prosecution Disclaimer and Means-Plus-Function Claim Interpretation: Omega Engineering v. Raytek Decision Introduction The case of Omega Engineering, Inc. v. Raytek Corporation adjudicated...
Teleflex Inc. v. Ficosa: Affirmation of Infringement and Validity under Proper Claim Construction

Teleflex Inc. v. Ficosa: Affirmation of Infringement and Validity under Proper Claim Construction

Date: Jun 22, 2002
Teleflex Inc. v. Ficosa: Affirmation of Infringement and Validity under Proper Claim Construction Introduction The case of Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., adjudicated by the United...
Federal Circuit Establishes Broad Interpretation of "Reciprocating Member" in Patent Claims

Federal Circuit Establishes Broad Interpretation of "Reciprocating Member" in Patent Claims

Date: May 31, 2002
Federal Circuit Establishes Broad Interpretation of "Reciprocating Member" in Patent Claims Introduction The case of CCS Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Division Life Fitness adjudicated...
Limiting Claim Scope Through Specification: The Coaxial Lumen Precedent in SciMed v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems

Limiting Claim Scope Through Specification: The Coaxial Lumen Precedent in SciMed v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems

Date: Mar 15, 2001
Limiting Claim Scope Through Specification: The Coaxial Lumen Precedent in SciMed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Introduction The legal landscape of patent infringement...
Intrinsic Evidence Prevails in Patent Claim Construction: Pitney Bowes v. Hewlett-Packard

Intrinsic Evidence Prevails in Patent Claim Construction: Pitney Bowes v. Hewlett-Packard

Date: Jun 24, 1999
Intrinsic Evidence Prevails in Patent Claim Construction: Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company Introduction Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company is a landmark case decided by the...
Strict Claim Construction and Non-Infringement Standard in Renishaw v. Marposs

Strict Claim Construction and Non-Infringement Standard in Renishaw v. Marposs

Date: Sep 17, 1998
Strict Claim Construction and Non-Infringement Standard in Renishaw plc v. Marposs Introduction The case of Renishaw plc v. Marposs Societa' per Azioni and Marposs Corporation, decided by the United...
Willful Infringement and Doctrine of Equivalents: Insights from Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris Corporation

Willful Infringement and Doctrine of Equivalents: Insights from Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris Corporation

Date: Sep 10, 1998
Willful Infringement and Doctrine of Equivalents: Insights from Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris Corporation Introduction In the realm of patent law, the delineation between literal infringement...
De Novo Review Affirmed in Cybor Corp. v. FAS Technologies: Implications for Patent Claim Construction

De Novo Review Affirmed in Cybor Corp. v. FAS Technologies: Implications for Patent Claim Construction

Date: Mar 26, 1998
De Novo Review Affirmed in Cybor Corp. v. FAS Technologies: Implications for Patent Claim Construction Introduction In the landmark case of Cybor Corporation v. FAS Technologies, Inc., and FASTAR...
Vitronics v. Conceptronic: Federal Circuit Clarifies Claim Construction Prioritization

Vitronics v. Conceptronic: Federal Circuit Clarifies Claim Construction Prioritization

Date: Jul 26, 1996
Vitronics v. Conceptronic: Federal Circuit Clarifies Claim Construction Prioritization Introduction The case of Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc., 90 F.3d 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1996), addresses...
Limitations on Doctrine of Equivalents: Southwall Technologies v. Cardinal IG Company

Limitations on Doctrine of Equivalents: Southwall Technologies v. Cardinal IG Company

Date: Jun 22, 1995
Limitations on Doctrine of Equivalents: Southwall Technologies v. Cardinal IG Company Introduction Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal IG Company, 54 F.3d 1570 (Fed. Cir. 1995), is a pivotal...
Claim Construction as a Matter of Law: The Markman Decision and Its Implications

Claim Construction as a Matter of Law: The Markman Decision and Its Implications

Date: Apr 6, 1995
Claim Construction as a Matter of Law: The Markman Decision and Its Implications Introduction Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. initiated a patent infringement lawsuit against Westview Instruments,...
SRI International v. Matsushita Electric: Reversal on Reverse Doctrine of Equivalents and Upholding Jury Trial Rights

SRI International v. Matsushita Electric: Reversal on Reverse Doctrine of Equivalents and Upholding Jury Trial Rights

Date: Oct 17, 1985
SRI International v. Matsushita Electric: Reversal on Reverse Doctrine of Equivalents and Upholding Jury Trial Rights Introduction The case of SRI International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.