Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Delaware Case Commentaries

Enhanced Director Indemnification Under Delaware Law: Insights from Hibbett v. Hollywood Park, Inc.

Enhanced Director Indemnification Under Delaware Law: Insights from Hibbett v. Hollywood Park, Inc.

Date: Feb 16, 1983
Enhanced Director Indemnification Under Delaware Law: Insights from Hibbett v. Hollywood Park, Inc. Introduction The case of Robert E. Hibbett et al. v. Hollywood Park, Inc., decided on February 15,...
Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Multiple First-Degree Murder Convictions in Flamer v. State

Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Multiple First-Degree Murder Convictions in Flamer v. State

Date: Feb 8, 1983
Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Multiple First-Degree Murder Convictions in Flamer v. State Introduction In the case of William Henry Flamer, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware,...
Revisiting Fairness and Appraisal Remedies in Cash-Out Mergers: Insights from WEINBERGER v. UOP, INC.

Revisiting Fairness and Appraisal Remedies in Cash-Out Mergers: Insights from WEINBERGER v. UOP, INC.

Date: Feb 2, 1983
Revisiting Fairness and Appraisal Remedies in Cash-Out Mergers: Insights from WEINBERGER v. UOP, INC. Introduction WEINBERGER v. UOP, INC. is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Delaware...
State's Duty to Preserve Exculpatory Evidence Under Brady: Insights from Deberry v. State

State's Duty to Preserve Exculpatory Evidence Under Brady: Insights from Deberry v. State

Date: Jan 28, 1983
State's Duty to Preserve Exculpatory Evidence Under Brady: Insights from Deberry v. State 1. Introduction Deberry v. State, 457 A.2d 744 (Del. 1983), is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of...
Safeguarding Defendant's Confrontation Rights and Witness Credibility: Paul E. Weber v. State of Delaware

Safeguarding Defendant's Confrontation Rights and Witness Credibility: Paul E. Weber v. State of Delaware

Date: Jan 18, 1983
Safeguarding Defendant's Confrontation Rights and Witness Credibility: Paul E. Weber v. State of Delaware Introduction The case of Paul E. Weber v. State of Delaware (457 A.2d 674, 1983) represents a...
Interlocutory Appeal Standards Established in DiSabatino Brothers, Inc. v. Charles J. Wortman

Interlocutory Appeal Standards Established in DiSabatino Brothers, Inc. v. Charles J. Wortman

Date: Nov 27, 1982
Interlocutory Appeal Standards Established in DiSabatino Brothers, Inc. v. Charles J. Wortman Introduction In the landmark case of DiSabatino Brothers, Inc. v. Charles J. Wortman, decided by the...
Duty to Mitigate Loss in P.I.P. Insurance Claims: Casson v. Nationwide Insurance Co.

Duty to Mitigate Loss in P.I.P. Insurance Claims: Casson v. Nationwide Insurance Co.

Date: Sep 21, 1982
Duty to Mitigate Loss in P.I.P. Insurance Claims: Casson v. Nationwide Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Mark A. Casson v. Nationwide Insurance Company (455 A.2d 361), adjudicated by the...
Delaware Supreme Court Rules Non-Claim Statute Non-Applicable to Resulting and Constructive Trust Claims in Estate Proceedings

Delaware Supreme Court Rules Non-Claim Statute Non-Applicable to Resulting and Constructive Trust Claims in Estate Proceedings

Date: Sep 16, 1982
Delaware Supreme Court Rules Non-Claim Statute Non-Applicable to Resulting and Constructive Trust Claims in Estate Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of Adams et al. v. Jankouskas, the...
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Custodian Appointment in Shareholder Deadlocks Under 8 Del. C. § 226(a)(1)

Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Custodian Appointment in Shareholder Deadlocks Under 8 Del. C. § 226(a)(1)

Date: Jul 31, 1982
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Custodian Appointment in Shareholder Deadlocks Under 8 Del. C. § 226(a)(1) Introduction In the landmark case of Nicholas L. Giuricich and Bodo Kalen, Indi v. EMTROL...
Establishing the Conspiracy Theory of Jurisdiction in Quasi In Rem Actions: IBI SpA v. Hunter Engineering Co.

Establishing the Conspiracy Theory of Jurisdiction in Quasi In Rem Actions: IBI SpA v. Hunter Engineering Co.

Date: Jul 21, 1982
Establishing the Conspiracy Theory of Jurisdiction in Quasi In Rem Actions: IBI SpA v. Hunter Engineering Co. Introduction The case of Istituto Bancario Italiano SpA (IBI) v. Hunter Engineering...
Rescission Rights for Innocent Misrepresentation in Real Property Transactions: Norton v. Poplos

Rescission Rights for Innocent Misrepresentation in Real Property Transactions: Norton v. Poplos

Date: Mar 12, 1982
Rescission Rights for Innocent Misrepresentation in Real Property Transactions: Norton v. Poplos Introduction Norton v. Poplos (443 A.2d 1) is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Delaware Supreme Court Reinforces Clear Policy Language Over "Reasonable Expectations" Doctrine in Uninsured Motorist Coverage

Delaware Supreme Court Reinforces Clear Policy Language Over "Reasonable Expectations" Doctrine in Uninsured Motorist Coverage

Date: Mar 3, 1982
Delaware Supreme Court Reinforces Clear Policy Language Over "Reasonable Expectations" Doctrine in Uninsured Motorist Coverage Introduction The case of William E. Hallowell, individually, and William...
Delaware Supreme Court Reinforces Exclusivity of Workmen's Compensation Law in Occupational Disease Claims

Delaware Supreme Court Reinforces Exclusivity of Workmen's Compensation Law in Occupational Disease Claims

Date: Jan 7, 1982
Delaware Supreme Court Reinforces Exclusivity of Workmen's Compensation Law in Occupational Disease Claims Introduction The Delaware Supreme Court, in the landmark cases of Lewis Kofron, et al. v....
Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Right to a Fair Trial: Analysis of Robert D. Hughes v. State of Delaware

Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Right to a Fair Trial: Analysis of Robert D. Hughes v. State of Delaware

Date: Nov 19, 1981
Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Right to a Fair Trial: Analysis of Robert D. Hughes v. State of Delaware Introduction The case of Robert D. Hughes v. State of Delaware (437 A.2d 559, 1981) serves as...
Establishing 'Just Cause' for Employment Termination under 19 Del. C. § 3315(2)

Establishing 'Just Cause' for Employment Termination under 19 Del. C. § 3315(2)

Date: Jun 17, 1981
Establishing 'Just Cause' for Employment Termination under 19 Del. C. § 3315(2) Introduction The case of UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEAL BOARD and Globe Union, Inc., Defendants Below, Appellants, v....
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Corporate Committee Power to Dismiss Derivative Suits

Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Corporate Committee Power to Dismiss Derivative Suits

Date: May 14, 1981
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Corporate Committee Power to Dismiss Derivative Suits Introduction In the landmark case of Zapata Corporation v. Maldonado, 430 A.2d 779 (Del. 1981), the...
Rescissory Damages Standard for Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Tender Offers: LYNCH v. VICKERS ENERGY CORP.

Rescissory Damages Standard for Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Tender Offers: LYNCH v. VICKERS ENERGY CORP.

Date: Apr 4, 1981
Rescissory Damages Standard for Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Tender Offers Introduction Libby G. LYNCH v. VICKERS ENERGY CORPoration et al., 429 A.2d 497 (Del. 1981), is a landmark case...
Administrative Discretion in Siting Permits Under the Delaware Beach Preservation Act: Insights from Austin P. Olney v. Environmental Control (1981)

Administrative Discretion in Siting Permits Under the Delaware Beach Preservation Act: Insights from Austin P. Olney v. Environmental Control (1981)

Date: Jan 20, 1981
Administrative Discretion in Siting Permits Under the Delaware Beach Preservation Act: Insights from Austin P. Olney v. Environmental Control (1981) Introduction The case of Austin P. Olney,...
Affirmation of 'Death-Qualified' Jury Standards and Upholding of Convictions in Delaware Supreme Court

Affirmation of 'Death-Qualified' Jury Standards and Upholding of Convictions in Delaware Supreme Court

Date: May 31, 1980
Affirmation of 'Death-Qualified' Jury Standards and Upholding of Convictions in Delaware Supreme Court Introduction In the landmark case of Clarence Hooks et al. v. State of Delaware (416 A.2d 189),...
Determining Attorney Fee Awards in Delaware Derivative Actions: Insights from Sugarland Industries v. Thomas

Determining Attorney Fee Awards in Delaware Derivative Actions: Insights from Sugarland Industries v. Thomas

Date: May 30, 1980
Determining Attorney Fee Awards in Delaware Derivative Actions: Insights from Sugarland Industries, Inc. v. Thomas Introduction Sugarland Industries, Inc., Defendant, Appellant, and United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert