Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Delaware Case Commentaries

Reaffirmed Standards for Capital Sentencing and Guilty Plea Validity in Sullivan v. State of Delaware

Reaffirmed Standards for Capital Sentencing and Guilty Plea Validity in Sullivan v. State of Delaware

Date: Feb 11, 1994
Reaffirmed Standards for Capital Sentencing and Guilty Plea Validity in Sullivan v. State of Delaware Introduction In Sullivan v. State of Delaware, 636 A.2d 931 (Del. 1994), the Supreme Court of...
Enhanced Judicial Scrutiny in Corporate Control Transactions: Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.

Enhanced Judicial Scrutiny in Corporate Control Transactions: Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.

Date: Feb 5, 1994
Enhanced Judicial Scrutiny in Corporate Control Transactions: Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc. Introduction Paramount Communications Inc., Viacom Inc., Martin S. Davis, et al. v. QVC...
Delaware Supreme Court Sets Strict Standards for Standing in Environmental Permit Appeals

Delaware Supreme Court Sets Strict Standards for Standing in Environmental Permit Appeals

Date: Jan 27, 1994
Delaware Supreme Court Sets Strict Standards for Standing in Environmental Permit Appeals Introduction The landmark case Oceanport Industries, Inc. v. Environmental Appeals Board addresses the...
Demand Excusal in Double Derivative Suits: Insights from Ste v. Rales

Demand Excusal in Double Derivative Suits: Insights from Ste v. Rales

Date: Dec 23, 1993
Demand Excusal in Double Derivative Suits: Insights from Ste v. Rales Introduction The case of Ste v. n M. Rales serves as a pivotal decision in Delaware corporate law, particularly concerning the...
Reinforcing the Duty of Loyalty and Entire Fairness in Majority-Controlled Corporate Combinations: Insights from In re Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. Litigation

Reinforcing the Duty of Loyalty and Entire Fairness in Majority-Controlled Corporate Combinations: Insights from In re Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. Litigation

Date: Nov 25, 1993
Reinforcing the Duty of Loyalty and Entire Fairness in Majority-Controlled Corporate Combinations: Insights from In re Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. Litigation 1. Introduction In re Tri-Star Pictures,...
Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Consent to Search and Chain of Custody for Controlled Substances Evidence

Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Consent to Search and Chain of Custody for Controlled Substances Evidence

Date: Nov 6, 1993
Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Consent to Search and Chain of Custody for Controlled Substances Evidence Introduction The case of Mark Murphy v. State of Delaware addressed pivotal issues surrounding...
Revisiting the Business Judgment Rule: Balancing Duty of Care and Loyalty in Director Self-Interest – CEDE CO. v. TECHNICOLOR, INC.

Revisiting the Business Judgment Rule: Balancing Duty of Care and Loyalty in Director Self-Interest – CEDE CO. v. TECHNICOLOR, INC.

Date: Oct 23, 1993
Revisiting the Business Judgment Rule: Balancing Duty of Care and Loyalty in Director Self-Interest – CEDE CO. v. TECHNICOLOR, INC. Introduction The case of Cede Co. and Cinerama, Inc. v....
Limitations on Standing Under Delaware’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act: Grand Ventures v. Whaley and Holcomb Salter Insurance Agency

Limitations on Standing Under Delaware’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act: Grand Ventures v. Whaley and Holcomb Salter Insurance Agency

Date: Oct 20, 1993
Limitations on Standing Under Delaware’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act: Grand Ventures v. Whaley and Holcomb Salter Insurance Agency Introduction In the landmark case of Grand Ventures, Inc. v. Terry...
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Parameters for Fiduciary Duties in ESOP and Minority Shareholder Protection – Blackwell v. Nixon

Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Parameters for Fiduciary Duties in ESOP and Minority Shareholder Protection – Blackwell v. Nixon

Date: Jun 23, 1993
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Parameters for Fiduciary Duties in ESOP and Minority Shareholder Protection – Blackwell v. Nixon Introduction The landmark case Blackwell v. Nixon, decided by the...
Desert Equities Inc. v. Morgan Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund II, L.P.: Reinforcing Pleading Standards for Bad Faith in Partnership Agreements

Desert Equities Inc. v. Morgan Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund II, L.P.: Reinforcing Pleading Standards for Bad Faith in Partnership Agreements

Date: Jun 2, 1993
Desert Equities Inc. v. Morgan Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund II, L.P.: Reinforcing Pleading Standards for Bad Faith in Partnership Agreements Introduction Desert Equities, Inc., a Nevada corporation,...
Extension of Claims Against Dissolved Corporations through Liquidating Trusts: Insights from City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust v. Continental Casualty Co.

Extension of Claims Against Dissolved Corporations through Liquidating Trusts: Insights from City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust v. Continental Casualty Co.

Date: May 27, 1993
Extension of Claims Against Dissolved Corporations through Liquidating Trusts: Insights from City Investing Company Liquidating Trust v. Continental Casualty Co. Introduction City Investing Company...
State v. Maxwell: Establishing Probable Cause in DUI Cases Under the Totality of Circumstances

State v. Maxwell: Establishing Probable Cause in DUI Cases Under the Totality of Circumstances

Date: May 22, 1993
State v. Maxwell: Establishing Probable Cause in DUI Cases Under the Totality of Circumstances Introduction State of Delaware v. Richard Maxwell is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Delaware Supreme Court Recognizes 'Special Errand' Exception in Workers' Compensation – Histed v. DuPont

Delaware Supreme Court Recognizes 'Special Errand' Exception in Workers' Compensation – Histed v. DuPont

Date: Mar 11, 1993
Delaware Supreme Court Recognizes 'Special Errand' Exception in Workers' Compensation – Histed v. DuPont Introduction The landmark case, Ara Marie Histed v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours Co., adjudicated...
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes 'But For' Causation Standard for Psychological Injuries in Workers' Compensation Claims

Delaware Supreme Court Establishes 'But For' Causation Standard for Psychological Injuries in Workers' Compensation Claims

Date: Dec 24, 1992
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes 'But For' Causation Standard for Psychological Injuries in Workers' Compensation Claims Introduction In the landmark case Joseph Reese v. Home Budget Center (619...
Interpretation of Mitigation Provisions in CGL Policies: Rhone-Poulenc v. AMICO

Interpretation of Mitigation Provisions in CGL Policies: Rhone-Poulenc v. AMICO

Date: Nov 19, 1992
Interpretation of Mitigation Provisions in CGL Policies: Rhone-Poulenc v. AMICO Introduction The Supreme Court of Delaware, in the landmark case Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Company v. American...
Prohibition of Non-Refundable Redecorating Fees in Delaware Landlord-Tenant Law: Stoltz Management Co., Inc. v. Consumer Affairs Board

Prohibition of Non-Refundable Redecorating Fees in Delaware Landlord-Tenant Law: Stoltz Management Co., Inc. v. Consumer Affairs Board

Date: Oct 20, 1992
Prohibition of Non-Refundable Redecorating Fees in Delaware Landlord-Tenant Law: Stoltz Management Co., Inc. v. Consumer Affairs Board Introduction The case of Stoltz Management Co., Inc. v. Consumer...
Gaffin v. Teledyne Inc.: Limiting Class Actions in Common Law Fraud Litigation

Gaffin v. Teledyne Inc.: Limiting Class Actions in Common Law Fraud Litigation

Date: Aug 27, 1992
Gaffin v. Teledyne Inc.: Limiting Class Actions in Common Law Fraud Litigation Introduction Gaffin v. Teledyne Inc. is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Delaware on August 26, 1992....
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Through Conspiratorial Conduct: Insights from Hercules Inc. v. Bank Leu

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Through Conspiratorial Conduct: Insights from Hercules Inc. v. Bank Leu

Date: Aug 21, 1992
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Through Conspiratorial Conduct: Insights from Hercules Inc. v. Bank Leu Introduction Hercules Incorporated v. Leu Trust and Banking (Bahamas) Limited, 611 A.2d 476...
Heineman v. Datapoint Corporation: Strengthening Demand Futility Standards in Derivative Suits

Heineman v. Datapoint Corporation: Strengthening Demand Futility Standards in Derivative Suits

Date: Aug 6, 1992
Heineman v. Datapoint Corporation: Strengthening Demand Futility Standards in Derivative Suits Introduction Heineman v. Datapoint Corporation is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Insolvency Triggers Fiduciary Duties to Creditors: Analysis of Geyer v. Ingersoll Publications Company

Insolvency Triggers Fiduciary Duties to Creditors: Analysis of Geyer v. Ingersoll Publications Company

Date: Jun 19, 1992
Insolvency Triggers Fiduciary Duties to Creditors: Analysis of Geyer v. Ingersoll Publications Company Introduction The case of Thomas P. Geyer v. Ingersoll Publications Company, decided on June 18,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert