Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Delaware Case Commentaries

Establishing Vicarious Liability for Independent Contractors: Fisher v. Townsends, Inc.

Establishing Vicarious Liability for Independent Contractors: Fisher v. Townsends, Inc.

Date: Jun 12, 1997
Establishing Vicarious Liability for Independent Contractors: Fisher v. Townsends, Inc. Introduction Fisher v. Townsends, Inc. (695 A.2d 53) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Delaware...
Kahn v. Tremont Corporation: Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Interested Transactions

Kahn v. Tremont Corporation: Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Interested Transactions

Date: Jun 11, 1997
Kahn v. Tremont Corporation: Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Interested Transactions Introduction The case of Kahn v. Tremont Corporation addresses critical issues surrounding corporate...
Impact of Judicial Actions on Shareholder Benefits: United Vanguard Fund v. TakeCare Inc.

Impact of Judicial Actions on Shareholder Benefits: United Vanguard Fund v. TakeCare Inc.

Date: May 23, 1997
Impact of Judicial Actions on Shareholder Benefits: United Vanguard Fund v. TakeCare Inc. Introduction The case of United Vanguard Fund, Inc. et al. v. TakeCare, Inc. et al. adjudicated by the...
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Parole Revocation Authority in Concurrent Supervision Situations

Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Parole Revocation Authority in Concurrent Supervision Situations

Date: Apr 10, 1997
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Parole Revocation Authority in Concurrent Supervision Situations Introduction The case of Cecil La'Roy HALL v. Warden Sherese Brewington CARR, adjudicated by the...
Security First Corp. v. U.S. Die Casting: Defining the Threshold for Stockholder Records Inspection under Section 220

Security First Corp. v. U.S. Die Casting: Defining the Threshold for Stockholder Records Inspection under Section 220

Date: Jan 15, 1997
Security First Corp. v. U.S. Die Casting: Defining the Threshold for Stockholder Records Inspection under Section 220 Introduction The case of Security First Corporation v. U.S. Die Casting and...
Limitation on External Documents in Rule 12(b)(6) Motions: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Standards

Limitation on External Documents in Rule 12(b)(6) Motions: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Standards

Date: Dec 13, 1996
Limitation on External Documents in Rule 12(b)(6) Motions: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Standards Introduction The Supreme Court of Delaware, in the case of Vanderbilt Income and Growth...
Establishing Director Oversight: The Caremark Standard

Establishing Director Oversight: The Caremark Standard

Date: Sep 26, 1996
Establishing Director Oversight: The Caremark Standard Introduction The case In re CAREMARK INTERNATIONAL INC. Derivative Litigation (698 A.2d 959) adjudicated by the Court of Chancery of Delaware on...
Interpretation of Conversion Rights in Corporate Recapitalization: PRIDES Holders’ Protections Affirmed

Interpretation of Conversion Rights in Corporate Recapitalization: PRIDES Holders’ Protections Affirmed

Date: Aug 30, 1996
Interpretation of Conversion Rights in Corporate Recapitalization: PRIDES Holders’ Protections Affirmed Introduction The case of KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION, Maxxam, Inc., et al. v. Donald Matheson...
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Equitable Common Fund Doctrine in Class Action Settlement: Goodrich v. E.F. Hutton

Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Equitable Common Fund Doctrine in Class Action Settlement: Goodrich v. E.F. Hutton

Date: Aug 27, 1996
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Equitable Common Fund Doctrine in Class Action Settlement: Goodrich v. E.F. Hutton Introduction In the landmark case of Edward O. GOODRICH v. E.F. HUTTON GROUP, INC.,...
Material Misleading Partial Disclosures in Tender Offers and Director Immunity under Delaware Law: Insights from ZIRN v. VLI CORPoration

Material Misleading Partial Disclosures in Tender Offers and Director Immunity under Delaware Law: Insights from ZIRN v. VLI CORPoration

Date: Aug 24, 1996
Material Misleading Partial Disclosures in Tender Offers and Director Immunity under Delaware Law: Insights from ZIRN v. VLI CORPoration Introduction The case of Marilyn ZIRN v. VLI CORPoration...
Affirmation of Limited Inspection Rights Under Section 220: Thomas Betts Corp. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.

Affirmation of Limited Inspection Rights Under Section 220: Thomas Betts Corp. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.

Date: Aug 3, 1996
Affirmation of Limited Inspection Rights Under Section 220: Thomas Betts Corp. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co. Introduction The case of Thomas Betts Corporation v. Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc., 681...
Limiting Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporate Entities: An Analysis of Outokumpu Engineering Enterprises v. Kvaerner EnviroPower, AB

Limiting Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporate Entities: An Analysis of Outokumpu Engineering Enterprises v. Kvaerner EnviroPower, AB

Date: Jul 11, 1996
Limiting Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporate Entities: An Analysis of Outokumpu Engineering Enterprises v. Kvaerner EnviroPower, AB Introduction The case of Outokumpu Engineering...
Strict Application of Procedural Bar Under Rule 61 in Postconviction Relief: Analysis of Maxion v. State of Delaware

Strict Application of Procedural Bar Under Rule 61 in Postconviction Relief: Analysis of Maxion v. State of Delaware

Date: Jul 3, 1996
Strict Application of Procedural Bar Under Rule 61 in Postconviction Relief: Analysis of Maxion v. State of Delaware Introduction In the landmark case of Maxion v. State of Delaware, decided by the...
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Directors' Immunity from Personal Liability for Good Faith Disclosure Violations in Corporate Mergers under 8 Del. C. §102(b)(7)

Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Directors' Immunity from Personal Liability for Good Faith Disclosure Violations in Corporate Mergers under 8 Del. C. §102(b)(7)

Date: Jun 26, 1996
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Directors' Immunity from Personal Liability for Good Faith Disclosure Violations in Corporate Mergers under 8 Del. C. §102(b)(7) Introduction The case of Ste v. n...
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Time-Barred Breach of Contract Claim in Cellular Limited Partnership Dispute

Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Time-Barred Breach of Contract Claim in Cellular Limited Partnership Dispute

Date: May 30, 1996
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Time-Barred Breach of Contract Claim in Cellular Limited Partnership Dispute Introduction In the landmark case of United States Cellular Investment Company of Allentown...
Reaffirming Employment-At-Will with a Narrow Application of the Covenant of Good Faith: DuPont v. Pressman

Reaffirming Employment-At-Will with a Narrow Application of the Covenant of Good Faith: DuPont v. Pressman

Date: May 3, 1996
Reaffirming Employment-At-Will with a Narrow Application of the Covenant of Good Faith: DuPont v. Pressman Introduction In the landmark case of E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company v. Norman J....
Da v. Dawson: Upholding Procedural Standards in Capital Postconviction Relief

Da v. Dawson: Upholding Procedural Standards in Capital Postconviction Relief

Date: Apr 18, 1996
Da v. Dawson: Upholding Procedural Standards in Capital Postconviction Relief Introduction In the landmark case of Da v. Dawson, Defendant Below, Appellant, the Supreme Court of Delaware addressed a...
Defining Direct and Derivative Claims: Delaware's Stance in Grimes v. Donald

Defining Direct and Derivative Claims: Delaware's Stance in Grimes v. Donald

Date: Apr 12, 1996
Defining Direct and Derivative Claims: Delaware's Stance in Grimes v. Donald Introduction The Supreme Court of Delaware, in Grimes v. Donald, addresses critical issues surrounding shareholder...
Duty of Loyalty and Shareholder Rights: Insights from THORPE v. CERBCO, INC.

Duty of Loyalty and Shareholder Rights: Insights from THORPE v. CERBCO, INC.

Date: Apr 11, 1996
Duty of Loyalty and Shareholder Rights: Insights from THORPE v. CERBCO, INC. Introduction In the landmark case of Merle Thorpe, Jr., by the Executor of his estate, Peter M. Castlemann, and Foundation...
Indemnification under Hold Harmless Agreements: Delaware Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Esmark, Inc.

Indemnification under Hold Harmless Agreements: Delaware Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Esmark, Inc.

Date: Feb 15, 1996
Indemnification under Hold Harmless Agreements: Delaware Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Esmark, Inc. Introduction The case of Northwestern National...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert