Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Rubin v. Green: Upholding Judicial Access by Dismissing Retaliatory Attorney Solicitation Claims

Rubin v. Green: Upholding Judicial Access by Dismissing Retaliatory Attorney Solicitation Claims

Date: Apr 6, 1993
Rubin v. Green: Upholding Judicial Access by Dismissing Retaliatory Attorney Solicitation Claims Introduction Gerald S. Rubin, the plaintiff and appellant, initiated legal action against Norma Green...
Limitation of the General Verdict Rule in Light of Special Interrogatories: Tavaglione v. BillingSetal.

Limitation of the General Verdict Rule in Light of Special Interrogatories: Tavaglione v. BillingSetal.

Date: Mar 26, 1993
Limitation of the General Verdict Rule in Light of Special Interrogatories: Tavaglione v. BillingSetal. Introduction The case of Nicholas E. Tavaglione v. Michael C. BillingSetal. (1993) 4 Cal.4th...
Harmonizing the Griffin and Green Rules: A New Precedent in Verdict Sufficiency

Harmonizing the Griffin and Green Rules: A New Precedent in Verdict Sufficiency

Date: Mar 19, 1993
Harmonizing the Griffin and Green Rules: A New Precedent in Verdict Sufficiency Introduction The case of The People v. Ronald Guiton, decided by the Supreme Court of California on March 18, 1993,...
Lying in Wait: Establishing First-Degree Murder Standards in California

Lying in Wait: Establishing First-Degree Murder Standards in California

Date: Mar 19, 1993
Lying in Wait: Establishing First-Degree Murder Standards in California Introduction The People v. Enrique Chavez Ceja is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California in 1993 that clarifies...
Comprehensive Commentary on JOSE ORNELAS v. CLINTON RANDOLPH (4 Cal.4th 1095)

Comprehensive Commentary on JOSE ORNELAS v. CLINTON RANDOLPH (4 Cal.4th 1095)

Date: Mar 16, 1993
Immunity of Private Landowners under Civil Code Section 846: Insights from JOSE ORNELAS v. CLINTON RANDOLPH Introduction Case: JOSE ORNELAS, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CLINTON...
Defining Insurer’s Duty to Defend in Mixed Allegations of Sexual and Non-Sexual Misconduct: Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Barbara B.

Defining Insurer’s Duty to Defend in Mixed Allegations of Sexual and Non-Sexual Misconduct: Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Barbara B.

Date: Mar 12, 1993
Defining Insurer’s Duty to Defend in Mixed Allegations of Sexual and Non-Sexual Misconduct: Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Barbara B. Introduction The case of Horace Mann Insurance Company v. Barbara...
Affirmation of Death Sentence: Upholding Faretta Rights and Judicial Discretion in People v. Stansbury

Affirmation of Death Sentence: Upholding Faretta Rights and Judicial Discretion in People v. Stansbury

Date: Mar 9, 1993
Affirmation of Death Sentence: Upholding Faretta Rights and Judicial Discretion in People v. Stansbury Introduction People v. Robert Edward Stansbury (4 Cal.4th 1017, 1993) is a landmark decision by...
Admissibility of Multiple Hearsay and Prosecutorial Conduct in Capital Cases: Analysis of People v. Zapien

Admissibility of Multiple Hearsay and Prosecutorial Conduct in Capital Cases: Analysis of People v. Zapien

Date: Mar 5, 1993
Admissibility of Multiple Hearsay and Prosecutorial Conduct in Capital Cases: Analysis of People v. Zapien Introduction People v. Conrad Jess Zapien, 4 Cal.4th 929 (1993), adjudicated by the Supreme...
State Law Does Not Preempt Local Retail Display Regulations of Aerosol Paint – Sherwin-Williams v. City of Los Angeles

State Law Does Not Preempt Local Retail Display Regulations of Aerosol Paint – Sherwin-Williams v. City of Los Angeles

Date: Feb 5, 1993
State Law Does Not Preempt Local Retail Display Regulations of Aerosol Paint – Sherwin-Williams v. City of Los Angeles Introduction The case of Sherwin-Williams Company et al. v. City of Los Angeles,...
Limitation on Res Ipsa Loquitur in Public Entity Liability: Brown v. Poway Unified School District

Limitation on Res Ipsa Loquitur in Public Entity Liability: Brown v. Poway Unified School District

Date: Jan 22, 1993
Limitation on Res Ipsa Loquitur in Public Entity Liability: Brown v. Poway Unified School District Introduction In the landmark case Francis Brown v. Poway Unified School District (4 Cal.4th 820),...
Educational Equality and Separation of Powers: A Commentary on Thomas K. Butt v. State of California

Educational Equality and Separation of Powers: A Commentary on Thomas K. Butt v. State of California

Date: Jan 1, 1993
Educational Equality and Separation of Powers: A Commentary on Thomas K. Butt v. State of California Introduction The landmark case of Thomas K. Butt et al. v. The State of California et al., decided...
Affirmation of Rodney Alcala's Conviction and Death Sentence: Legal Standards on Hypnotized Witnesses and Prior Bad Acts

Affirmation of Rodney Alcala's Conviction and Death Sentence: Legal Standards on Hypnotized Witnesses and Prior Bad Acts

Date: Jan 1, 1993
Affirmation of Rodney Alcala's Conviction and Death Sentence: Legal Standards on Hypnotized Witnesses and Prior Bad Acts Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Rodney James Alcala (4...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Proctor v. People: Implications for Capital Punishment and Venue Management

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Proctor v. People: Implications for Capital Punishment and Venue Management

Date: Dec 29, 1992
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Proctor v. People: Implications for Capital Punishment and Venue Management Introduction Proctor v. People (4 Cal.4th 499) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Tuilaepa v. The People: Upholding Standards for Death Penalty Sentencing and Admissibility of Aggravating Factors

Tuilaepa v. The People: Upholding Standards for Death Penalty Sentencing and Admissibility of Aggravating Factors

Date: Dec 29, 1992
Tuilaepa v. The People: Upholding Standards for Death Penalty Sentencing and Admissibility of Aggravating Factors Introduction The case of The People v. Paul Palalaua Tuilaepa, 4 Cal.4th 569 (1992),...
People v. Noguera: Upholding a Capital Murder Conviction Amid Evidentiary Challenges

People v. Noguera: Upholding a Capital Murder Conviction Amid Evidentiary Challenges

Date: Dec 29, 1992
People v. Noguera: Upholding a Capital Murder Conviction Amid Evidentiary Challenges Introduction In People v. Noguera (4 Cal.4th 599, 1992), the Supreme Court of California affirmed the conviction...
Temporary Courtroom Closures During Closing Arguments Do Not Infringe Public Trial Rights: Insights from People v. Woodward

Temporary Courtroom Closures During Closing Arguments Do Not Infringe Public Trial Rights: Insights from People v. Woodward

Date: Dec 22, 1992
Temporary Courtroom Closures During Closing Arguments Do Not Infringe Public Trial Rights: Insights from People v. Woodward Introduction In the landmark case People v. Johnie Monroe Woodward, 4...
Retention of Sentencing Jurisdiction Prior to Execution: THE PEOPLE v. KARAMAN

Retention of Sentencing Jurisdiction Prior to Execution: THE PEOPLE v. KARAMAN

Date: Dec 22, 1992
Retention of Sentencing Jurisdiction Prior to Execution: THE PEOPLE v. KARAMAN Introduction In The People v. Nabil Karaman (4 Cal.4th 335, 1992-12-21), the Supreme Court of California addressed a...
Refining the Mayberry Instruction: Insights from The People v. Wash Jones Williams

Refining the Mayberry Instruction: Insights from The People v. Wash Jones Williams

Date: Dec 22, 1992
Refining the Mayberry Instruction: Insights from The People v. Wash Jones Williams Introduction The People v. Wash Jones Williams, 4 Cal.4th 354 (1992), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Hearsay Limitations on Misdemeanor Convictions for Impeachment Post Proposition 8

Hearsay Limitations on Misdemeanor Convictions for Impeachment Post Proposition 8

Date: Dec 18, 1992
Hearsay Limitations on Misdemeanor Convictions for Impeachment Post Proposition 8 Introduction The landmark decision in The People v. Jennifer Wheeler, 4 Cal.4th 284 (1992) addresses significant...
Reasonable Work Regimen as Basis for Earning Capacity in Support Determinations

Reasonable Work Regimen as Basis for Earning Capacity in Support Determinations

Date: Dec 18, 1992
Reasonable Work Regimen as Basis for Earning Capacity in Support Determinations Introduction The case of In re the Marriage of Richard O. and Barbara J. Simpson (4 Cal.4th 225, 1992) addresses a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert