Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Appellate Review of Due Process Claims under Penal Code §170.3(d): Analysis of PEOPLE v. BROWN

Appellate Review of Due Process Claims under Penal Code §170.3(d): Analysis of PEOPLE v. BROWN

Date: Dec 3, 1993
Appellate Review of Due Process Claims under Penal Code §170.3(d): Analysis of PEOPLE v. BROWN Introduction PEOPLE v. BROWN (1993) 6 Cal.4th 322 is a seminal decision by the Supreme Court of...
Erroneous Parole Advisement in Guilty Pleas: Establishing Precedent in In re Sandy Lee Moser

Erroneous Parole Advisement in Guilty Pleas: Establishing Precedent in In re Sandy Lee Moser

Date: Dec 3, 1993
Erroneous Parole Advisement in Guilty Pleas: Establishing Precedent in In re Sandy Lee Moser Introduction In re Sandy Lee Moser on Habeas Corpus is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Montrose Chemical Corporation v. Superior Court: Defining the Scope of Insurer's Duty to Defend

Montrose Chemical Corporation v. Superior Court: Defining the Scope of Insurer's Duty to Defend

Date: Nov 23, 1993
Montrose Chemical Corporation v. Superior Court: Defining the Scope of Insurer's Duty to Defend Introduction The case of Montrose Chemical Corporation of California v. The Superior Court of Los...
Limitation on Direct Victim Claims for Emotional Distress in Pharmacy Negligence Cases

Limitation on Direct Victim Claims for Emotional Distress in Pharmacy Negligence Cases

Date: Nov 19, 1993
Limitation on Direct Victim Claims for Emotional Distress in Pharmacy Negligence Cases Introduction The case of Barbie Huggins et al. v. Longs Drug Stores California, Inc. (6 Cal.4th 124, 1993)...
People v. Wash (6 Cal.4th 215): Upholding the Death Penalty Amidst Claims of Prosecutorial Misconduct

People v. Wash (6 Cal.4th 215): Upholding the Death Penalty Amidst Claims of Prosecutorial Misconduct

Date: Nov 19, 1993
People v. Wash (6 Cal.4th 215): Upholding the Death Penalty Amidst Claims of Prosecutorial Misconduct Introduction People v. Wash, 6 Cal.4th 215 (1993), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirmation of Jury Selection and Evidence Admissibility Standards: People v. Robert Frederick Garceau

Reaffirmation of Jury Selection and Evidence Admissibility Standards: People v. Robert Frederick Garceau

Date: Nov 19, 1993
Reaffirmation of Jury Selection and Evidence Admissibility Standards: People v. Robert Frederick Garceau Introduction In The People v. Robert Frederick Garceau (6 Cal.4th 140, 1993), the Supreme...
Establishing Juror Misconduct Standards: The Keith Sanford Hitchings Habeas Corpus Case

Establishing Juror Misconduct Standards: The Keith Sanford Hitchings Habeas Corpus Case

Date: Nov 5, 1993
Establishing Juror Misconduct Standards: The Keith Sanford Hitchings Habeas Corpus Case Introduction The case of In re KEITH SANFORD HITCHINGS on Habeas Corpus (6 Cal.4th 97) serves as a pivotal...
Abusive Nonparent De Facto Parents Barred from Participation in Juvenile Dependency Proceedings: In re KIESHIA E.

Abusive Nonparent De Facto Parents Barred from Participation in Juvenile Dependency Proceedings: In re KIESHIA E.

Date: Oct 29, 1993
Abusive Nonparent De Facto Parents Barred from Participation in Juvenile Dependency Proceedings: In re KIESHIA E. Introduction In re KIESHIA E. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
PEOPLE v. JOHNSON: California Supreme Court Affirmation on Jury Conduct, Miranda Waivers, and Harmless Error in Death Penalty Cases

PEOPLE v. JOHNSON: California Supreme Court Affirmation on Jury Conduct, Miranda Waivers, and Harmless Error in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Oct 19, 1993
PEOPLE v. JOHNSON: California Supreme Court Affirmation on Jury Conduct, Miranda Waivers, and Harmless Error in Death Penalty Cases Introduction People v. Laverne Johnson (6 Cal.4th 1, 1993) is a...
Protection of Medical Staff Committee Records Under Evidence Code Section 1157: Analysis of Shirley Alexander v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Protection of Medical Staff Committee Records Under Evidence Code Section 1157: Analysis of Shirley Alexander v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Date: Oct 15, 1993
Protection of Medical Staff Committee Records Under Evidence Code Section 1157: Analysis of Shirley Alexander v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Introduction The case of Shirley Alexander et al....
Affirmation of the "Neal Test" in Penal Code Section 654: Implications for Multiple Punishment under California Law

Affirmation of the "Neal Test" in Penal Code Section 654: Implications for Multiple Punishment under California Law

Date: Oct 5, 1993
Affirmation of the "Neal Test" in Penal Code Section 654: Implications for Multiple Punishment under California Law Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE v. DEREK LATIMER (5 Cal.4th 1203),...
Arato v. Avedon: Defining the Bounds of Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice

Arato v. Avedon: Defining the Bounds of Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice

Date: Oct 1, 1993
Arato v. Avedon: Defining the Bounds of Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice Introduction The case of Miriam Arato et al. v. Melvin Avedon et al. (5 Cal.4th 1172, 1993) stands as a pivotal Supreme...
Expansion of Section 667(a) Enhancements to Foreign Convictions: Myers v. The People

Expansion of Section 667(a) Enhancements to Foreign Convictions: Myers v. The People

Date: Oct 1, 1993
Expansion of Section 667(a) Enhancements to Foreign Convictions: Myers v. The People Introduction The People v. Victor Craddock Myers (5 Cal.4th 1193, 1993) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme...
California Supreme Court Rules Against Cumulative Sentence Enhancements for the Same Prior Conviction

California Supreme Court Rules Against Cumulative Sentence Enhancements for the Same Prior Conviction

Date: Sep 14, 1993
California Supreme Court Rules Against Cumulative Sentence Enhancements for the Same Prior Conviction Introduction In THE PEOPLE v. MONROE JONES (5 Cal.4th 1142, 1993), the Supreme Court of...
Actual Reliance Required for Deceit Claims in Securities Class Actions: Mirkin v. Wasserman

Actual Reliance Required for Deceit Claims in Securities Class Actions: Mirkin v. Wasserman

Date: Sep 10, 1993
Actual Reliance Required for Deceit Claims in Securities Class Actions: Mirkin v. Wasserman Introduction In the landmark case of Mirkin et al. v. Wasserman et al. (5 Cal.4th 1082), the Supreme Court...
Affirming Comprehensive Restitution Rights for Crime Victims: Analysis of People v. Broussard

Affirming Comprehensive Restitution Rights for Crime Victims: Analysis of People v. Broussard

Date: Sep 3, 1993
Affirming Comprehensive Restitution Rights for Crime Victims: Analysis of People v. Broussard Introduction In the landmark case People v. Marc Edward Broussard (5 Cal.4th 1067, 1993), the Supreme...
Affirmation of Conviction in People v. Richard Clark: Upholding Third-Party Consent and Miranda Compliance in Capital Cases

Affirmation of Conviction in People v. Richard Clark: Upholding Third-Party Consent and Miranda Compliance in Capital Cases

Date: Aug 31, 1993
Affirmation of Conviction in People v. Richard Clark: Upholding Third-Party Consent and Miranda Compliance in Capital Cases Introduction People v. Richard Dean Clark, 5 Cal.4th 950 (1993), is a...
Bay Cities Paving Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual Insurance Co.: Defining "Claim" in Professional Liability Policies

Bay Cities Paving Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual Insurance Co.: Defining "Claim" in Professional Liability Policies

Date: Aug 13, 1993
Bay Cities Paving Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual Insurance Co.: Defining "Claim" in Professional Liability Policies Introduction In the landmark case of Bay Cities Paving Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers'...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in PEOPLE v. MONTIEL: Implications for Capital Sentencing in California

Affirmation of Death Sentence in PEOPLE v. MONTIEL: Implications for Capital Sentencing in California

Date: Aug 13, 1993
Affirmation of Death Sentence in PEOPLE v. MONTIEL: Implications for Capital Sentencing in California Introduction People v. Richard Galvan Montiel is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing 'Fundamental Miscarriage of Justice' in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of In re William John Clark

Establishing 'Fundamental Miscarriage of Justice' in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of In re William John Clark

Date: Jul 30, 1993
Establishing 'Fundamental Miscarriage of Justice' in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of In re William John Clark Introduction In the landmark case In re William John Clark (5 Cal.4th 750), the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert