Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in People v. Bennett: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections

Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in People v. Bennett: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections

Date: Feb 3, 1998
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in People v. Bennett: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections Introduction People v. Edwin Winslow Bennett is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Limitation of Civil Code Section 52.1 in Private Interference Cases: FLOYZELL JONES v. KMART CORPORATION

Limitation of Civil Code Section 52.1 in Private Interference Cases: FLOYZELL JONES v. KMART CORPORATION

Date: Jan 30, 1998
Limitation of Civil Code Section 52.1 in Private Interference Cases: Floydell Jones v. Kmart Corporation Introduction The case of Floydell Jones et al. v. Kmart Corporation et al. (17 Cal.4th 329)...
Supreme Court of California Establishes State Representation of District Attorneys in Section 1983 Liability

Supreme Court of California Establishes State Representation of District Attorneys in Section 1983 Liability

Date: Jan 30, 1998
Supreme Court of California Establishes State Representation of District Attorneys in Section 1983 Liability Introduction In the landmark case of Ricky Lynn Pitts et al. v. County of Kern et al....
Reaffirmation of the Corpus Delicti Rule and Its Application in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Ronald Anthony Jones

Reaffirmation of the Corpus Delicti Rule and Its Application in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Ronald Anthony Jones

Date: Jan 30, 1998
Reaffirmation of the Corpus Delicti Rule and Its Application in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Ronald Anthony Jones Introduction In the landmark case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v....
Discretionary Authority in Three Strikes Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Ramirez Rodriguez

Discretionary Authority in Three Strikes Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Ramirez Rodriguez

Date: Jan 16, 1998
Discretionary Authority in Three Strikes Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Ramirez Rodriguez Introduction People v. Ramirez Rodriguez, 17 Cal.4th 253 (1998), is a pivotal case in California's legal...
Implied Miranda Waiver in the Context of Minimal Mental Impairment: Insights from People v. Whitson

Implied Miranda Waiver in the Context of Minimal Mental Impairment: Insights from People v. Whitson

Date: Jan 16, 1998
Implied Miranda Waiver in the Context of Minimal Mental Impairment: Insights from People v. Whitson Introduction People v. Scott Alden Whitson, 17 Cal.4th 229 (1998), adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Good Faith Standard in Wrongful Termination: Ralph Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc.

Good Faith Standard in Wrongful Termination: Ralph Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc.

Date: Jan 6, 1998
Good Faith Standard in Wrongful Termination: Ralph Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc. Introduction Ralph Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc. is a landmark case decided by...
Enhancing the Boundaries of Three Strikes: PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS

Enhancing the Boundaries of Three Strikes: PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS

Date: Jan 6, 1998
Enhancing the Boundaries of Three Strikes: PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS Introduction PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS, 17 Cal.4th 148 (1998), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that delves into the...
Severability of Fee Agreements in Unauthorized Practice of Law: Birbrower v. Superior Court

Severability of Fee Agreements in Unauthorized Practice of Law: Birbrower v. Superior Court

Date: Jan 6, 1998
Severability of Fee Agreements in Unauthorized Practice of Law: Birbrower v. Superior Court Introduction The landmark decision in Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon Frank, P.C., et al. v. Superior Court...
Establishing the Child Dependency Hearsay Exception: A Comprehensive Analysis of In re Cindy L.

Establishing the Child Dependency Hearsay Exception: A Comprehensive Analysis of In re Cindy L.

Date: Dec 30, 1997
Establishing the Child Dependency Hearsay Exception: A Comprehensive Analysis of In re Cindy L. 1. Introduction The case of In re Cindy L. addressed a critical issue within juvenile law: the...
Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.: Defining Defense Costs in Commercial General Liability Insurance

Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.: Defining Defense Costs in Commercial General Liability Insurance

Date: Dec 30, 1997
Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.: Defining Defense Costs in Commercial General Liability Insurance Introduction Aerojet-General Corporation et al., Cross-complainants and Appellants,...
Establishing Pattern of Criminal Gang Activity Through Concurrent Offenses: Insights from People v. Loeun

Establishing Pattern of Criminal Gang Activity Through Concurrent Offenses: Insights from People v. Loeun

Date: Dec 23, 1997
Establishing Pattern of Criminal Gang Activity Through Concurrent Offenses: Insights from People v. Loeun Introduction People v. Chanda John Loeun, 17 Cal.4th 1 (1997), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Fairbank v. The People: Affirmation of Death Sentence under California's Death Penalty Law

Fairbank v. The People: Affirmation of Death Sentence under California's Death Penalty Law

Date: Dec 23, 1997
Fairbank v. The People: Affirmation of Death Sentence under California's Death Penalty Law 1. Introduction Fairbank v. The People (16 Cal.4th 1223, 1997) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
People v. Snook: Affirming Enhanced DUI Penalties Without Sequential Conviction Requirement

People v. Snook: Affirming Enhanced DUI Penalties Without Sequential Conviction Requirement

Date: Dec 19, 1997
People v. Snook: Affirming Enhanced DUI Penalties Without Sequential Conviction Requirement Introduction In People v. Snook, decided on December 18, 1997, the Supreme Court of California addressed a...
Successor Trustee's Authority to Assert Attorney-Client Privilege Over Predecessor's Communications

Successor Trustee's Authority to Assert Attorney-Client Privilege Over Predecessor's Communications

Date: Dec 5, 1997
Successor Trustee's Authority to Assert Attorney-Client Privilege Over Predecessor's Communications Introduction In the landmark case of Roger D. Moeller v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, the...
Restricting Sentence Modification on Probation Revocation: The People v. Howard

Restricting Sentence Modification on Probation Revocation: The People v. Howard

Date: Dec 2, 1997
Restricting Sentence Modification on Probation Revocation: The People v. Howard Introduction The People v. Cadelia Louise Howard is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Waiver of Statutory Time Limits under the Permit Streamlining Act: Branden Bickel v. City of Piedmont

Waiver of Statutory Time Limits under the Permit Streamlining Act: Branden Bickel v. City of Piedmont

Date: Nov 21, 1997
Waiver of Statutory Time Limits under the Permit Streamlining Act: Branden Bickel v. City of Piedmont Introduction Branden Bickel et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants v. City of Piedmont et al.,...
Determining Deadly Weapons: California Supreme Court Revises Interpretation of Penal Code section 245(a)(1)

Determining Deadly Weapons: California Supreme Court Revises Interpretation of Penal Code section 245(a)(1)

Date: Nov 18, 1997
Determining Deadly Weapons: California Supreme Court Revises Interpretation of Penal Code section 245(a)(1) Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE v. RAYmond Aguilar et al. (16 Cal.4th...
Voluntary Intoxication and Premeditation in First-Degree Murder: The People v. Adam Castillo

Voluntary Intoxication and Premeditation in First-Degree Murder: The People v. Adam Castillo

Date: Nov 14, 1997
Voluntary Intoxication and Premeditation in First-Degree Murder: The People v. Adam Castillo Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Adam Castillo (1997), the Supreme Court of California...
Eliminating Burden-Shifting Instructions in Asbestos-Related Cancer Cases: A Detailed Analysis of Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois

Eliminating Burden-Shifting Instructions in Asbestos-Related Cancer Cases: A Detailed Analysis of Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois

Date: Aug 29, 1997
Eliminating Burden-Shifting Instructions in Asbestos-Related Cancer Cases: A Detailed Analysis of Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois 1. Introduction The case of Thelma L. Rutherford et al. v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert