Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Ellena Starr Nesler v. The People: Establishing the Substantial Likelihood of Juror Bias from Extrajudicial Information

Ellena Starr Nesler v. The People: Establishing the Substantial Likelihood of Juror Bias from Extrajudicial Information

Date: Aug 22, 1997
Ellena Starr Nesler v. The People: Establishing the Substantial Likelihood of Juror Bias from Extrajudicial Information Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Ellena Starr Nesler, the...
Discretion in Sentencing under California's Three Strikes Law: People v. Hendrix

Discretion in Sentencing under California's Three Strikes Law: People v. Hendrix

Date: Aug 19, 1997
Discretion in Sentencing under California's Three Strikes Law: People v. Hendrix Introduction People v. Hendrix (1997) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that delves into the...
Enhancement Terms Under California's Three Strikes Law: Clarifying Separate Determinate Sentences

Enhancement Terms Under California's Three Strikes Law: Clarifying Separate Determinate Sentences

Date: Aug 19, 1997
Enhancement Terms Under California's Three Strikes Law: Clarifying Separate Determinate Sentences Introduction In The People v. Tyrone Craig Dotson, 16 Cal.4th 547 (1997), the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court Limits Judicial Dismissal for Counsel's Procedural Lapses under Section 575.2(b)

Supreme Court Limits Judicial Dismissal for Counsel's Procedural Lapses under Section 575.2(b)

Date: Aug 15, 1997
Supreme Court Limits Judicial Dismissal for Counsel's Procedural Lapses under Section 575.2(b) Introduction The case of Danny Garcia v. Charles McCutchen et al. (16 Cal.4th 469, 1997) addresses the...
Supreme Court Upholds Use of Unsworn Evidence in DUI Administrative License Suspension Hearings

Supreme Court Upholds Use of Unsworn Evidence in DUI Administrative License Suspension Hearings

Date: Aug 8, 1997
Supreme Court Upholds Use of Unsworn Evidence in DUI Administrative License Suspension Hearings Introduction In the landmark case of Richard Lake v. Sally R. Reed, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Stricter Standards for Parental Consent in Abortion Cases: A Comprehensive Commentary on American Academy of Pediatrics v. Lungren

Establishing Stricter Standards for Parental Consent in Abortion Cases: A Comprehensive Commentary on American Academy of Pediatrics v. Lungren

Date: Aug 6, 1997
Establishing Stricter Standards for Parental Consent in Abortion Cases: A Comprehensive Commentary on American Academy of Pediatrics v. Lungren, 16 Cal.4th 307 (1997) Introduction American Academy of...
Williams v. The People: Affirmation of Death Penalty Based on Prior First-Degree Murder Conviction

Williams v. The People: Affirmation of Death Penalty Based on Prior First-Degree Murder Conviction

Date: Aug 5, 1997
Williams v. The People: Affirmation of Death Penalty Based on Prior First-Degree Murder Conviction Introduction In the landmark case of Williams v. The People (16 Cal.4th 153), the Supreme Court of...
California Supreme Court Upholds Harmonization of CESA with CEQA in Mojave Ground Squirrel Delisting

California Supreme Court Upholds Harmonization of CESA with CEQA in Mojave Ground Squirrel Delisting

Date: Aug 1, 1997
California Supreme Court Upholds Harmonization of CESA with CEQA in Mojave Ground Squirrel Delisting Introduction The case of Mountain Lion Foundation et al. v. Fish and Game Commission (16 Cal.4th...
Mandatory Imposition of Firearm Use Enhancement in Assault Cases: Analysis of People v. Ledesma

Mandatory Imposition of Firearm Use Enhancement in Assault Cases: Analysis of People v. Ledesma

Date: Aug 1, 1997
Mandatory Imposition of Firearm Use Enhancement in Assault Cases: Analysis of People v. Ledesma Introduction People v. Ledesma, 16 Cal.4th 90 (1997), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Limits on Insurer Reimbursement for Defense Costs in Mixed Actions Under California Law

Limits on Insurer Reimbursement for Defense Costs in Mixed Actions Under California Law

Date: Jul 25, 1997
Limits on Insurer Reimbursement for Defense Costs in Mixed Actions Under California Law Introduction In the landmark case of Jerry H. Buss et al. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, decided by...
Interplay Between CCP §1141.21(a)(ii) and Labor Code §3856 in Trial De Novo Context

Interplay Between CCP §1141.21(a)(ii) and Labor Code §3856 in Trial De Novo Context

Date: Jul 22, 1997
Interplay Between CCP §1141.21(a)(ii) and Labor Code §3856 in Trial De Novo Context Introduction The case of Charles Phelps IV, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Gertrude Stostad, Defendant and Respondent,...
Reaffirming the Admissibility of Crime Scene Photographs: Insights from People v. Scheid

Reaffirming the Admissibility of Crime Scene Photographs: Insights from People v. Scheid

Date: Jul 18, 1997
Reaffirming the Admissibility of Crime Scene Photographs: Insights from People v. Scheid Introduction People v. Scheid is a pivotal 1997 decision by the Supreme Court of California that delves into...
Rethinking Section 388 Modifications: Ensuring Best Interests Based on Genuine Changes - In re Kimberly F. et al.

Rethinking Section 388 Modifications: Ensuring Best Interests Based on Genuine Changes - In re Kimberly F. et al.

Date: Jul 16, 1997
Rethinking Section 388 Modifications: Ensuring Best Interests Based on Genuine Changes In re Kimberly F. et al. (56 Cal.App.4th 519, Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Three,...
Double Jeopardy Exception in Subsequent Murder Prosecution – People v. Scott

Double Jeopardy Exception in Subsequent Murder Prosecution – People v. Scott

Date: Jul 15, 1997
Double Jeopardy Exception in Subsequent Murder Prosecution – People v. Scott Introduction Case Overview: In People v. James Robert Scott, the Supreme Court of California addressed significant issues...
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Clarification of Search Warrant Scope in People v. Bradford

Affirmation of Death Penalty and Clarification of Search Warrant Scope in People v. Bradford

Date: Jul 15, 1997
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Clarification of Search Warrant Scope in People v. Bradford Introduction People v. Bill Bradford (15 Cal.4th 1229, 1997) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Establishing Intent for Special Circumstances in Robbery-Related Death: PEOPLE v. RAMOS (1997)

Establishing Intent for Special Circumstances in Robbery-Related Death: PEOPLE v. RAMOS (1997)

Date: Jul 8, 1997
Establishing Intent for Special Circumstances in Robbery-Related Death: PEOPLE v. RAMOS (1997) Introduction PEOPLE v. RAMOS is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California in 1997. The case...
Affirming the Protection of Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege in Pretrial Proceedings: People v. Hammon

Affirming the Protection of Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege in Pretrial Proceedings: People v. Hammon

Date: Jul 8, 1997
Affirming the Protection of Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege in Pretrial Proceedings: People v. Hammon Introduction People v. Jerry Duane Hammon, 15 Cal.4th 1117 (1997), is a landmark decision by...
Fraudulent Inducement and Waiver in Arbitration: Nida Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group

Fraudulent Inducement and Waiver in Arbitration: Nida Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group

Date: Jul 1, 1997
Fraudulent Inducement and Waiver in Arbitration: Nida Engalla et al. v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc., et al. Introduction The California Supreme Court case Nida Engalla et al. v. Permanente Medical...
Regulatory Fees vs. Taxes: Clarifying Proposition 13 in Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of Equalization

Regulatory Fees vs. Taxes: Clarifying Proposition 13 in Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of Equalization

Date: Jun 27, 1997
Regulatory Fees vs. Taxes: Clarifying Proposition 13 in Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of Equalization Introduction Sinclair Paint Company v. State Board of Equalization is a pivotal 1997 decision...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Gary Dale Hines: Procedural Defenses and Capital Sentencing

Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Gary Dale Hines: Procedural Defenses and Capital Sentencing

Date: Jun 27, 1997
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Gary Dale Hines: Procedural Defenses and Capital Sentencing Introduction People v. Gary Dale Hines (15 Cal.4th 997) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert