Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Revising the Asportation Standard in Kidnapping Cases: People v. Martinez

Revising the Asportation Standard in Kidnapping Cases: People v. Martinez

Date: Apr 9, 1999
Revising the Asportation Standard in Kidnapping Cases: People v. Martinez Introduction In The People v. Samuel Martinez (20 Cal.4th 225), the Supreme Court of California addressed pivotal questions...
Establishing Non-Retroactive Application of Penal Code Section 288.5 in Continuous Sexual Abuse Cases

Establishing Non-Retroactive Application of Penal Code Section 288.5 in Continuous Sexual Abuse Cases

Date: Apr 2, 1999
Establishing Non-Retroactive Application of Penal Code Section 288.5 in Continuous Sexual Abuse Cases Introduction The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Floyd Love Grant, Defendant and Appellant...
Preclusion of Unexpected Expert Testimony: Analysis of Bonds v. Roy

Preclusion of Unexpected Expert Testimony: Analysis of Bonds v. Roy

Date: Mar 30, 1999
Preclusion of Unexpected Expert Testimony: Analysis of Bonds v. Roy Introduction Bonds v. Roy is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court of California on March 29, 1999. The case revolves...
Enhanced Specificity Requirements for Motions to Suppress Evidence: Analysis of PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS

Enhanced Specificity Requirements for Motions to Suppress Evidence: Analysis of PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS

Date: Mar 30, 1999
Enhanced Specificity Requirements for Motions to Suppress Evidence: Analysis of PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS Introduction The case of The People v. John David Williams (20 Cal.4th 119) represents a significant...
Application of MICRA's Damages Cap to EMTALA Claims: Dawnelle Barris v. County of Los Angeles

Application of MICRA's Damages Cap to EMTALA Claims: Dawnelle Barris v. County of Los Angeles

Date: Mar 26, 1999
Application of MICRA's Damages Cap to EMTALA Claims: Dawnelle Barris v. County of Los Angeles Introduction The case of Dawnelle Barris v. County of Los Angeles addresses the intersection of federal...
The Powell Rule Reaffirmed: Upholding Voluntary Manslaughter Convictions Despite Provocation Issues

The Powell Rule Reaffirmed: Upholding Voluntary Manslaughter Convictions Despite Provocation Issues

Date: Mar 5, 1999
The Powell Rule Reaffirmed: Upholding Voluntary Manslaughter Convictions Despite Provocation Issues Introduction The People v. Steven B. Lee, 20 Cal.4th 47 (1999), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Reckless Neglect in Elder Care: Clarifying Remedies under California's Elder Abuse and Dependent Adults Civil Protection Act

Reckless Neglect in Elder Care: Clarifying Remedies under California's Elder Abuse and Dependent Adults Civil Protection Act

Date: Mar 5, 1999
Reckless Neglect in Elder Care: Clarifying Remedies under California's Elder Abuse and Dependent Adults Civil Protection Act Introduction In the landmark case of Kay Delaney v. Calvin Baker, Sr., et...
Admissibility of Impeachment Evidence and Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Convictions: People v. Carlos Rodriguez

Admissibility of Impeachment Evidence and Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Convictions: People v. Carlos Rodriguez

Date: Feb 26, 1999
Admissibility of Impeachment Evidence and Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Convictions: People v. Carlos Rodriguez Introduction The case of The People v. Carlos Rodriguez (20...
Establishing Rigorous Standards for Termination of Parental Rights in Juvenile Dependency Cases: Insights from In re Casey D.

Establishing Rigorous Standards for Termination of Parental Rights in Juvenile Dependency Cases: Insights from In re Casey D.

Date: Feb 23, 1999
Establishing Rigorous Standards for Termination of Parental Rights in Juvenile Dependency Cases: Insights from In re Casey D. Introduction The case of In re Casey D., adjudicated by the Court of...
Oral Argument Not Mandatory Before Issuance of Peremptory Writs in California Appellate Courts

Oral Argument Not Mandatory Before Issuance of Peremptory Writs in California Appellate Courts

Date: Feb 9, 1999
Oral Argument Not Mandatory Before Issuance of Peremptory Writs in California Appellate Courts Introduction In the landmark case of James T. Lewis, Petitioner, v. The Superior Court of San Bernardino...
General Criminal Intent Suffices for Felony Child Abuse under Penal Code § 273a(1)

General Criminal Intent Suffices for Felony Child Abuse under Penal Code § 273a(1)

Date: Feb 2, 1999
General Criminal Intent Suffices for Felony Child Abuse under Penal Code § 273a(1) Introduction In the landmark decision of The People v. Michael Daniel Sargent, Sr. (19 Cal.4th 1206, 1999), the...
California Supreme Court Expands Anti-SLAPP Protections: Briggs v. Eden Council

California Supreme Court Expands Anti-SLAPP Protections: Briggs v. Eden Council

Date: Jan 22, 1999
California Supreme Court Expands Anti-SLAPP Protections: Briggs v. Eden Council Introduction Dan Briggs et al. v. Eden Council for Hope Opportunity was a significant case decided by the Supreme Court...
Upheld Standards for Involuntary Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators under California's SVPA

Upheld Standards for Involuntary Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators under California's SVPA

Date: Jan 22, 1999
Upheld Standards for Involuntary Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators under California's SVPA Introduction In the landmark case of Christopher Evans Hubbart v. The Superior Court of Santa Clara...
Strict Compliance Required for Appeal: People v. Trino Villa Mendez Sets Clear Precedent in Appellate Procedures

Strict Compliance Required for Appeal: People v. Trino Villa Mendez Sets Clear Precedent in Appellate Procedures

Date: Jan 15, 1999
Strict Compliance Required for Appeal: People v. Trino Villa Mendez Sets Clear Precedent in Appellate Procedures Introduction People v. Trino Villa Mendez (19 Cal.4th 1084, 1999) is a landmark...
Broadening the Reach of California's Corporate Securities Law: Out-of-State Investor Remedies Affirmed in Diamond Multimedia v. Superior Court

Broadening the Reach of California's Corporate Securities Law: Out-of-State Investor Remedies Affirmed in Diamond Multimedia v. Superior Court

Date: Jan 5, 1999
Broadening the Reach of California's Corporate Securities Law: Out-of-State Investor Remedies Affirmed in Diamond Multimedia v. Superior Court Introduction The case of Diamond Multimedia Systems,...
Judicial Accountability: The Removal of Judge Thomas B. Fletcher for Pervasive Misconduct

Judicial Accountability: The Removal of Judge Thomas B. Fletcher for Pervasive Misconduct

Date: Jan 1, 1999
Judicial Accountability: The Removal of Judge Thomas B. Fletcher for Pervasive Misconduct Introduction Thomas B. Fletcher, a Judge of the Superior Court in Madera County, California, faced...
Supervisory Liability Limitations for School Districts: Insights from Hoff v. Vacaville Unified School District

Supervisory Liability Limitations for School Districts: Insights from Hoff v. Vacaville Unified School District

Date: Jan 1, 1999
Supervisory Liability Limitations for School Districts: Insights from Hoff v. Vacaville Unified School District Introduction Hoff v. Vacaville Unified School District is a seminal decision by the...
Kobzoff v. Los Angeles County: Clarifying Recovery of Defense Costs Under CCP §1038

Kobzoff v. Los Angeles County: Clarifying Recovery of Defense Costs Under CCP §1038

Date: Dec 29, 1998
Kobzoff v. Los Angeles County: Clarifying Recovery of Defense Costs Under CCP §1038 Introduction Kobzoff et al. v. Los Angeles County Harbor/UCLA Medical Center et al. (19 Cal.4th 851, 1998) is a...
Multiplicity of Convictions in Robbery and Carjacking: Supreme Court of California’s Ruling in THE PEOPLE v. ERNESTO ORTEGA et al.

Multiplicity of Convictions in Robbery and Carjacking: Supreme Court of California’s Ruling in THE PEOPLE v. ERNESTO ORTEGA et al.

Date: Dec 18, 1998
Multiplicity of Convictions in Robbery and Carjacking: Supreme Court of California’s Ruling in THE PEOPLE v. ERNESTO ORTEGA et al. Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and...
Civil Code Section 847 Immunity for Negligent and Justifiable Intentional Conduct: Analysis of SALVADOR CALVILLO-SILVA v. HOME GROCERY

Civil Code Section 847 Immunity for Negligent and Justifiable Intentional Conduct: Analysis of SALVADOR CALVILLO-SILVA v. HOME GROCERY

Date: Dec 18, 1998
Civil Code Section 847 Immunity for Negligent and Justifiable Intentional Conduct: Analysis of SALVADOR CALVILLO-SILVA v. HOME GROCERY Introduction In the landmark case of SALVADOR CALVILLO-SILVA et...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert