Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Section 226.7 Payments Classified as Wages: Implications from Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions

Section 226.7 Payments Classified as Wages: Implications from Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions

Date: Apr 17, 2007
Section 226.7 Payments Classified as Wages: Implications from Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions Introduction The landmark case, John Paul Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., adjudicated by the...
California Supreme Court Affirms Implied Repeal of Private Contracting Statutes Under Proposition 35

California Supreme Court Affirms Implied Repeal of Private Contracting Statutes Under Proposition 35

Date: Apr 13, 2007
California Supreme Court Affirms Implied Repeal of Private Contracting Statutes Under Proposition 35 Introduction The case of Professional Engineers in California Government et al. v. Will Kempton et...
Defining Testimonial Hearsay under the Confrontation Clause: Analysis of People v. Cage

Defining Testimonial Hearsay under the Confrontation Clause: Analysis of People v. Cage

Date: Apr 10, 2007
Defining Testimonial Hearsay under the Confrontation Clause: Analysis of People v. Cage Introduction People v. Lisa Marie Cage (40 Cal.4th 965), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on...
Expansion of Litigation Privilege under Civil Code Section 47(b): Jacob B. v. County of Shasta

Expansion of Litigation Privilege under Civil Code Section 47(b): Jacob B. v. County of Shasta

Date: Apr 6, 2007
Expansion of Litigation Privilege under Civil Code Section 47(b): Jacob B. v. County of Shasta Introduction The case of Jacob B. v. County of Shasta et al. (40 Cal.4th 948) marks a significant...
Affirmation of Death Sentence Upholding Fair Trial Procedures and Jury Impartiality in California Supreme Court

Affirmation of Death Sentence Upholding Fair Trial Procedures and Jury Impartiality in California Supreme Court

Date: Mar 23, 2007
Affirmation of Death Sentence Upholding Fair Trial Procedures and Jury Impartiality in California Supreme Court Introduction The case of The People v. John Michael Beames (40 Cal.4th 907) adjudicated...
Supreme Court of California Refines Notice of Entry Requirements for Timely Appeals

Supreme Court of California Refines Notice of Entry Requirements for Timely Appeals

Date: Mar 16, 2007
Supreme Court of California Refines Notice of Entry Requirements for Timely Appeals Introduction In the case of Keith Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2007), the Supreme Court of California...
Clarifying the Forfeiture Rule: Applicability to Constitutional Challenges in Probation Conditions

Clarifying the Forfeiture Rule: Applicability to Constitutional Challenges in Probation Conditions

Date: Mar 16, 2007
Clarifying the Forfeiture Rule: Applicability to Constitutional Challenges in Probation Conditions Introduction In the case of In re SHEENA K., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law (The...
Price Certainty in Statute of Frauds: California Supreme Court Reaffirms Necessity for Clear Terms in Real Estate Memoranda

Price Certainty in Statute of Frauds: California Supreme Court Reaffirms Necessity for Clear Terms in Real Estate Memoranda

Date: Mar 2, 2007
Price Certainty in Statute of Frauds: California Supreme Court Reaffirms Necessity for Clear Terms in Real Estate Memoranda Introduction The case of Rochelle Sterling et al. v. Lawrence N. Taylor et...
Affirmed: Trial Courts May Weigh Evidence in Assessing Vexatious Litigant Claims

Affirmed: Trial Courts May Weigh Evidence in Assessing Vexatious Litigant Claims

Date: Mar 2, 2007
Affirmed: Trial Courts May Weigh Evidence in Assessing Vexatious Litigant Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Gene Moran v. Murtaugh Miller Meyer Nelson, LLP, et al., adjudicated by the...
Supreme Court of California Establishes New Precedence on Anti-SLAPP Protections in Privacy Invasion Cases

Supreme Court of California Establishes New Precedence on Anti-SLAPP Protections in Privacy Invasion Cases

Date: Feb 27, 2007
Supreme Court of California Establishes New Precedence on Anti-SLAPP Protections in Privacy Invasion Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Nicole Taus v. Elizabeth Loftus et al. (40 Cal.4th 683,...
Appellate Court Limitation: Single Lesser Included Offense Modification

Appellate Court Limitation: Single Lesser Included Offense Modification

Date: Feb 27, 2007
Appellate Court Limitation: Single Lesser Included Offense Modification Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Horacio Navarro (40 Cal.4th 668, 2007), the Supreme Court of California...
Clarifying Prima Facie Juror Discrimination Standards in People v. Bell

Clarifying Prima Facie Juror Discrimination Standards in People v. Bell

Date: Feb 16, 2007
Clarifying Prima Facie Juror Discrimination Standards in People v. Bell Introduction People v. Steven M. Bell (40 Cal.4th 582) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, issued on...
Rebuttable Presumptions and Statute of Limitations in Smoking-Related Personal Injury Cases: Insights from Grisham v. Philip Morris

Rebuttable Presumptions and Statute of Limitations in Smoking-Related Personal Injury Cases: Insights from Grisham v. Philip Morris

Date: Feb 16, 2007
Rebuttable Presumptions and Statute of Limitations in Smoking-Related Personal Injury Cases: Insights from Grisham v. Philip Morris Introduction GRISHAM v. PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A., Inc. et al. (2007) is...
Reversal of Receiving Stolen Property Conviction in People v. Robert Lee Smith

Reversal of Receiving Stolen Property Conviction in People v. Robert Lee Smith

Date: Feb 6, 2007
Reversal of Receiving Stolen Property Conviction in People v. Robert Lee Smith (40 Cal.4th 483) Introduction People v. Robert Lee Smith, decided by the Supreme Court of California on February 5,...
Supreme Court of California Affirms Limited Applicability of Anders/Wende Procedures in LPS Conservatorship Appeals

Supreme Court of California Affirms Limited Applicability of Anders/Wende Procedures in LPS Conservatorship Appeals

Date: Feb 6, 2007
Supreme Court of California Affirms Limited Applicability of Anders/Wende Procedures in LPS Conservatorship Appeals Introduction The case of Conservatorship of the Person of BEN C. SAN DIEGO COUNTY...
Vineyard Area Citizens v. City of Rancho Cordova: Reinforcing CEQA Standards for Long-term Water Supply and Environmental Impact

Vineyard Area Citizens v. City of Rancho Cordova: Reinforcing CEQA Standards for Long-term Water Supply and Environmental Impact

Date: Feb 2, 2007
Vineyard Area Citizens v. City of Rancho Cordova: Reinforcing CEQA Standards for Long-term Water Supply and Environmental Impact Introduction The case of Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible...
Reaffirmation of Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Anonymous 911 Tips in Violent Crime Reporting

Reaffirmation of Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Anonymous 911 Tips in Violent Crime Reporting

Date: Feb 2, 2007
Reaffirmation of Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Anonymous 911 Tips in Violent Crime Reporting Introduction In the case of People v. Norman J. Dolly (40 Cal.4th 458), the Supreme Court of...
Enhancements for Aiders and Abettors and Recognition of Multiple Victims in Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Calhoun (2007) 40 Cal.4th 398

Enhancements for Aiders and Abettors and Recognition of Multiple Victims in Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Calhoun (2007) 40 Cal.4th 398

Date: Jan 30, 2007
Enhancements for Aiders and Abettors and Recognition of Multiple Victims in Sentencing People v. Calhoun (2007) 40 Cal.4th 398 Introduction In The People v. Calhoun et al., 40 Cal.4th 398 (2007), the...
Affirmative Consent Not Necessary for Disclosing Consumer Information in Class Actions: Pioneer Electronics v. Superior Court

Affirmative Consent Not Necessary for Disclosing Consumer Information in Class Actions: Pioneer Electronics v. Superior Court

Date: Jan 26, 2007
Affirmative Consent Not Necessary for Disclosing Consumer Information in Class Actions: Pioneer Electronics v. Superior Court Introduction Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. v. Superior Court of Los...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS: Standards for Jury Selection, Evidentiary Admissibility, and Prosecutorial Conduct

Affirmation of Death Sentence in PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS: Standards for Jury Selection, Evidentiary Admissibility, and Prosecutorial Conduct

Date: Dec 29, 2006
Affirmation of Death Sentence in PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS: Standards for Jury Selection, Evidentiary Admissibility, and Prosecutorial Conduct Introduction The case of The People v. Bob Russell Williams,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert