Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Harte-Hanks Shoppers v. Gattuso: Pioneering Reimbursement Through Enhanced Compensation under Labor Code Section 2802

Harte-Hanks Shoppers v. Gattuso: Pioneering Reimbursement Through Enhanced Compensation under Labor Code Section 2802

Date: Nov 6, 2007
Harte-Hanks Shoppers v. Gattuso: Pioneering Reimbursement Through Enhanced Compensation under Labor Code Section 2802 Introduction The California Supreme Court's decision in Gattuso et al. v....
Expanding Liability Under CCP § 340.1(b)(2): Insights from Doe v. City of Los Angeles

Expanding Liability Under CCP § 340.1(b)(2): Insights from Doe v. City of Los Angeles

Date: Nov 2, 2007
Expanding Liability Under CCP § 340.1(b)(2): Insights from Doe v. City of Los Angeles Introduction In the landmark case of John Doe and John Doe 2 v. City of Los Angeles et al., the Supreme Court of...
Enhanced Requirements for Felony Gun Charges under the STEP Act

Enhanced Requirements for Felony Gun Charges under the STEP Act

Date: Oct 26, 2007
Enhanced Requirements for Felony Gun Charges under the STEP Act Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Robert Anthony Lamas, Jr., 42 Cal.4th 516 (2007), the Supreme Court of California...
Limitation Period Not Tolling for Former Firm Upon Attorney Departure: Beal Bank v. Arter Hadden, LLP

Limitation Period Not Tolling for Former Firm Upon Attorney Departure: Beal Bank v. Arter Hadden, LLP

Date: Sep 28, 2007
Limitation Period Not Tolling for Former Firm Upon Attorney Departure: Beal Bank v. Arter Hadden, LLP Introduction In Beal Bank, SSB, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Arter Hadden, LLP, et al., Defendants...
Harmless Error Doctrine in the Context of Penal Code Section 29: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Halvorsen

Harmless Error Doctrine in the Context of Penal Code Section 29: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Halvorsen

Date: Aug 31, 2007
Harmless Error Doctrine in the Context of Penal Code Section 29: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Halvorsen Introduction People v. Arthur Hans Halvorsen (42 Cal.4th 379) is a pivotal decision by...
Class Arbitration Waivers in Employment Contracts Must Yield to Unwaivable Statutory Rights Under California Law

Class Arbitration Waivers in Employment Contracts Must Yield to Unwaivable Statutory Rights Under California Law

Date: Aug 31, 2007
Class Arbitration Waivers in Employment Contracts Must Yield to Unwaivable Statutory Rights Under California Law Introduction In Robert Gentry v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Circuit City...
Establishing Primary Assumption of Risk in Golf: Analysis of Shin v. Ahn (42 Cal.4th 482)

Establishing Primary Assumption of Risk in Golf: Analysis of Shin v. Ahn (42 Cal.4th 482)

Date: Aug 31, 2007
Establishing Primary Assumption of Risk in Golf: Analysis of Shin v. Ahn (42 Cal.4th 482) Introduction The case of Johnny Shin v. Jack Ahn (42 Cal.4th 482), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Disclosure of Peace Officer Employment Data under the California Public Records Act: POST v. Superior Court

Disclosure of Peace Officer Employment Data under the California Public Records Act: POST v. Superior Court

Date: Aug 28, 2007
Disclosure of Peace Officer Employment Data under the California Public Records Act: Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) v. Superior Court of Sacramento County Introduction The...
Disclosure of Public Employees' Names and Salaries under California Public Records Act Affirmed as Not Exempt

Disclosure of Public Employees' Names and Salaries under California Public Records Act Affirmed as Not Exempt

Date: Aug 28, 2007
Disclosure of Public Employees' Names and Salaries under California Public Records Act Affirmed as Not Exempt Introduction The case of International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers...
Affirming Plaintiff's Burden to Prove Qualification under FEHA in Disability Discrimination Cases

Affirming Plaintiff's Burden to Prove Qualification under FEHA in Disability Discrimination Cases

Date: Aug 24, 2007
Affirming Plaintiff's Burden to Prove Qualification under FEHA in Disability Discrimination Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Dwight D. Green v. State of California (42 Cal.4th 254, 2007),...
Revival of Childhood Sexual Abuse Claims Excludes Public Entities Without Timely Government Claims Presentation: Shirk v. Vista Unified School District

Revival of Childhood Sexual Abuse Claims Excludes Public Entities Without Timely Government Claims Presentation: Shirk v. Vista Unified School District

Date: Aug 21, 2007
Revival of Childhood Sexual Abuse Claims Excludes Public Entities Without Timely Government Claims Presentation: Shirk v. Vista Unified School District Introduction Linda Shirk v. Vista Unified...
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Denial of Severance in Joint Capital Murder Trial: People v. Arriola Tafoya

Affirmation of Death Penalty and Denial of Severance in Joint Capital Murder Trial: People v. Arriola Tafoya

Date: Aug 21, 2007
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Denial of Severance in Joint Capital Murder Trial: People v. Arriola Tafoya Introduction In the landmark case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ignacio...
Reaffirmation of Statutory Elements Test in Multiple Convictions: People v. Sloan

Reaffirmation of Statutory Elements Test in Multiple Convictions: People v. Sloan

Date: Aug 17, 2007
Reaffirmation of Statutory Elements Test in Multiple Convictions: People v. Sloan Introduction People v. Aaron Patrick Sloan is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, rendered on...
Enhancements Not Considered Under Multiple Conviction Rule: People v. Izaguirre

Enhancements Not Considered Under Multiple Conviction Rule: People v. Izaguirre

Date: Aug 17, 2007
Enhancements Not Considered Under Multiple Conviction Rule: People v. Izaguirre Introduction People v. Izaguirre (42 Cal.4th 126), decided by the Supreme Court of California on August 16, 2007,...
Mandatory Time Limits for Recommitment Petitions under the Mentally Disordered Offenders Act - People v. Gregory Sean Allen

Mandatory Time Limits for Recommitment Petitions under the Mentally Disordered Offenders Act - People v. Gregory Sean Allen

Date: Aug 14, 2007
Mandatory Time Limits for Recommitment Petitions under the Mentally Disordered Offenders Act People v. Gregory Sean Allen, 42 Cal.4th 91 (2007) Introduction In People v. Gregory Sean Allen, the...
Sealing Pitchess Declarations: Garcia v. Superior Court of Orange County

Sealing Pitchess Declarations: Garcia v. Superior Court of Orange County

Date: Aug 10, 2007
Sealing Pitchess Declarations: Garcia v. Superior Court of Orange County Introduction In Garcia v. Superior Court of Orange County, 42 Cal.4th 63 (2007), the Supreme Court of California addressed the...
Affirmation of Capital Convictions Under Robbery and Attempted Rape Circumstances in People v. DePriest

Affirmation of Capital Convictions Under Robbery and Attempted Rape Circumstances in People v. DePriest

Date: Aug 10, 2007
Affirmation of Capital Convictions Under Robbery and Attempted Rape Circumstances in People v. DePriest Introduction People v. Timothy Lee DePriest, 42 Cal.4th 1 (2007), is a significant case decided...
Affirmation of Consent Requirement in Capital Cases: People v. Alfaro

Affirmation of Consent Requirement in Capital Cases: People v. Alfaro

Date: Aug 7, 2007
Affirmation of Consent Requirement in Capital Cases: People v. Alfaro Introduction People v. Maria Del Rosio Alfaro (41 Cal.4th 1277) is a significant decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Trial by Declaration in Marital Dissolution: Reaffirming the Necessity of Oral Testimony

Trial by Declaration in Marital Dissolution: Reaffirming the Necessity of Oral Testimony

Date: Aug 7, 2007
Trial by Declaration in Marital Dissolution: Reaffirming the Necessity of Oral Testimony Introduction In the landmark case of Jeffrey Elkins v. The Superior Court of Contra Costa County (41 Cal.4th...
Federal Preemption of State Unfair Competition Claims in Tobacco Advertising: In re TOBACCO CASES II

Federal Preemption of State Unfair Competition Claims in Tobacco Advertising: In re TOBACCO CASES II

Date: Aug 3, 2007
Federal Preemption of State Unfair Competition Claims in Tobacco Advertising: In re TOBACCO CASES II Introduction The landmark case of In re TOBACCO CASES II (41 Cal.4th 1257) addressed the intricate...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert