Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Verdin v. Superior Court of Riverside County: Restricting Prosecution's Access to Defendant's Mental Examinations Introduction In the landmark case of Verdin v. Superior Court of Riverside County (43...
Clarifying Serious Felony Classification Under Penal Code 245(a)(1) Introduction In The People v. Jesse Joe Delgado, 43 Cal.4th 1059 (2008), the Supreme Court of California affirmed a lower court's...
Affirmation of Serious Felony Conviction Under "Three Strikes" Law Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Richard Alex Miles (43 Cal.4th 1074, 2008), the Supreme Court of California...
Clarifying Standards for Postconviction DNA Testing under Penal Code §1405 in PEOPLE v. RICHARDSON Introduction PEOPLE v. RICHARDSON (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1040 is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Clarification on Restitution under Penal Code §1202.4 in People v. Richardson Introduction In People v. Charles Keith Richardson (43 Cal.4th 959), the Supreme Court...
Limits of HECK v. HUMPHREY: Challenging Excessive Force Without Invalidating Criminal Conviction Introduction Steven Yount v. City of Sacramento et al., 43 Cal.4th 885 (2008), is a pivotal case...
Substantial Compliance Affirmed in Receiver Appointment for Substandard Housing: Gonzalez v. City of Santa Monica Introduction In City of Santa Monica v. Guillermo Gonzalez (43 Cal.4th 905, 2008),...
California Supreme Court Establishes Constitutional Right to Same-Sex Marriage Introduction On May 15, 2008, the Supreme Court of California rendered a landmark decision in In re Marriage Cases,...
Prosecutorial Recusal and Literary Pursuits: Haraguchi v. Superior Court of Santa Barbara County (43 Cal.4th 706) Introduction The case of Haraguchi v. Superior Court of Santa Barbara County...
Recusal Standards for Prosecutors in Third-Party Discovery: The People v. Humberto S. Introduction The People v. Humberto S. (43 Cal.4th 737, 2008) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Racial Non-Discrimination in Jury Selection and Transferred Intent in Capital Murder: Comprehensive Review of PEOPLE v. WATSON Introduction The People v. Paul Gregory Watson, 43 Cal.4th 652 (2008),...
Privilege and Witness Availability: Insights from The People v. Dexter Williams (43 Cal.4th 584) Introduction The People v. Dexter Williams (43 Cal.4th 584) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Reinforcement of 'Lying in Wait' Standards: People v. John Irvin Lewis II - Comprehensive Commentary Introduction In the landmark case of People v. John Irvin Lewis II, decided by the Supreme Court...
No Automatic Fiduciary Duty in Royalty-Based Agreements: City of Hope v. Genentech Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc. (43 Cal.4th...
Supreme Court of California Establishes Standards for Consent in Searches: People v. Samuel Zamudio Introduction The case of People v. Samuel Zamudio (43 Cal.4th 327) represents a significant...
Mays v. City of Los Angeles: Interpretation of POBRA's Notification Requirements Introduction In the landmark case Jon Mays v. City of Los Angeles et al. (43 Cal.4th 313), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Penalty: Evidentiary and Procedural Standards Upheld in People v. Valencia Introduction People v. Alfredo Valencia (43 Cal.4th 268) is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court...
Robbery as a Continuing Offense: Insights from The People v. Gomez Introduction The People v. Alfonso Gomez (43 Cal.4th 249) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, delivered on...
Sophisticated User Defense Established in California Product Liability Law Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark case William Keith Johnson v. American Standard, Inc. (43...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple First-Degree Murders: People v. Rundle Introduction People v. David Allen Rundle is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on April 3,...