Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Verdin v. Superior Court of Riverside County: Restricting Prosecution's Access to Defendant's Mental Examinations

Verdin v. Superior Court of Riverside County: Restricting Prosecution's Access to Defendant's Mental Examinations

Date: Jun 3, 2008
Verdin v. Superior Court of Riverside County: Restricting Prosecution's Access to Defendant's Mental Examinations Introduction In the landmark case of Verdin v. Superior Court of Riverside County (43...
Clarifying Serious Felony Classification Under Penal Code 245(a)(1)

Clarifying Serious Felony Classification Under Penal Code 245(a)(1)

Date: May 30, 2008
Clarifying Serious Felony Classification Under Penal Code 245(a)(1) Introduction In The People v. Jesse Joe Delgado, 43 Cal.4th 1059 (2008), the Supreme Court of California affirmed a lower court's...
Affirmation of Serious Felony Conviction Under "Three Strikes" Law

Affirmation of Serious Felony Conviction Under "Three Strikes" Law

Date: May 30, 2008
Affirmation of Serious Felony Conviction Under "Three Strikes" Law Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Richard Alex Miles (43 Cal.4th 1074, 2008), the Supreme Court of California...
Clarifying Standards for Postconviction DNA Testing under Penal Code §1405 in PEOPLE v. RICHARDSON

Clarifying Standards for Postconviction DNA Testing under Penal Code §1405 in PEOPLE v. RICHARDSON

Date: May 23, 2008
Clarifying Standards for Postconviction DNA Testing under Penal Code §1405 in PEOPLE v. RICHARDSON Introduction PEOPLE v. RICHARDSON (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1040 is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Clarification on Restitution under Penal Code §1202.4 in People v. Richardson

Affirmation of Death Sentence and Clarification on Restitution under Penal Code §1202.4 in People v. Richardson

Date: May 23, 2008
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Clarification on Restitution under Penal Code §1202.4 in People v. Richardson Introduction In People v. Charles Keith Richardson (43 Cal.4th 959), the Supreme Court...
Limits of HECK v. HUMPHREY: Challenging Excessive Force Without Invalidating Criminal Conviction

Limits of HECK v. HUMPHREY: Challenging Excessive Force Without Invalidating Criminal Conviction

Date: May 20, 2008
Limits of HECK v. HUMPHREY: Challenging Excessive Force Without Invalidating Criminal Conviction Introduction Steven Yount v. City of Sacramento et al., 43 Cal.4th 885 (2008), is a pivotal case...
Substantial Compliance Affirmed in Receiver Appointment for Substandard Housing: Gonzalez v. City of Santa Monica

Substantial Compliance Affirmed in Receiver Appointment for Substandard Housing: Gonzalez v. City of Santa Monica

Date: May 20, 2008
Substantial Compliance Affirmed in Receiver Appointment for Substandard Housing: Gonzalez v. City of Santa Monica Introduction In City of Santa Monica v. Guillermo Gonzalez (43 Cal.4th 905, 2008),...
California Supreme Court Establishes Constitutional Right to Same-Sex Marriage

California Supreme Court Establishes Constitutional Right to Same-Sex Marriage

Date: May 16, 2008
California Supreme Court Establishes Constitutional Right to Same-Sex Marriage Introduction On May 15, 2008, the Supreme Court of California rendered a landmark decision in In re Marriage Cases,...
Prosecutorial Recusal and Literary Pursuits: Haraguchi v. Superior Court of Santa Barbara County

Prosecutorial Recusal and Literary Pursuits: Haraguchi v. Superior Court of Santa Barbara County

Date: May 13, 2008
Prosecutorial Recusal and Literary Pursuits: Haraguchi v. Superior Court of Santa Barbara County (43 Cal.4th 706) Introduction The case of Haraguchi v. Superior Court of Santa Barbara County...
Recusal Standards for Prosecutors in Third-Party Discovery: The People v. Humberto S.

Recusal Standards for Prosecutors in Third-Party Discovery: The People v. Humberto S.

Date: May 13, 2008
Recusal Standards for Prosecutors in Third-Party Discovery: The People v. Humberto S. Introduction The People v. Humberto S. (43 Cal.4th 737, 2008) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Racial Non-Discrimination in Jury Selection and Transferred Intent in Capital Murder: Comprehensive Review of PEOPLE v. WATSON

Racial Non-Discrimination in Jury Selection and Transferred Intent in Capital Murder: Comprehensive Review of PEOPLE v. WATSON

Date: May 9, 2008
Racial Non-Discrimination in Jury Selection and Transferred Intent in Capital Murder: Comprehensive Review of PEOPLE v. WATSON Introduction The People v. Paul Gregory Watson, 43 Cal.4th 652 (2008),...
Privilege and Witness Availability: Insights from The People v. Dexter Williams (43 Cal.4th 584)

Privilege and Witness Availability: Insights from The People v. Dexter Williams (43 Cal.4th 584)

Date: May 6, 2008
Privilege and Witness Availability: Insights from The People v. Dexter Williams (43 Cal.4th 584) Introduction The People v. Dexter Williams (43 Cal.4th 584) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Reinforcement of 'Lying in Wait' Standards: People v. John Irvin Lewis II - Comprehensive Commentary

Reinforcement of 'Lying in Wait' Standards: People v. John Irvin Lewis II - Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Apr 29, 2008
Reinforcement of 'Lying in Wait' Standards: People v. John Irvin Lewis II - Comprehensive Commentary Introduction In the landmark case of People v. John Irvin Lewis II, decided by the Supreme Court...
No Automatic Fiduciary Duty in Royalty-Based Agreements: City of Hope v. Genentech Analysis

No Automatic Fiduciary Duty in Royalty-Based Agreements: City of Hope v. Genentech Analysis

Date: Apr 25, 2008
No Automatic Fiduciary Duty in Royalty-Based Agreements: City of Hope v. Genentech Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc. (43 Cal.4th...
Supreme Court of California Establishes Standards for Consent in Searches: People v. Samuel Zamudio

Supreme Court of California Establishes Standards for Consent in Searches: People v. Samuel Zamudio

Date: Apr 22, 2008
Supreme Court of California Establishes Standards for Consent in Searches: People v. Samuel Zamudio Introduction The case of People v. Samuel Zamudio (43 Cal.4th 327) represents a significant...
Mays v. City of Los Angeles: Interpretation of POBRA's Notification Requirements

Mays v. City of Los Angeles: Interpretation of POBRA's Notification Requirements

Date: Apr 18, 2008
Mays v. City of Los Angeles: Interpretation of POBRA's Notification Requirements Introduction In the landmark case Jon Mays v. City of Los Angeles et al. (43 Cal.4th 313), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Penalty: Evidentiary and Procedural Standards Upheld in People v. Valencia

Affirmation of Death Penalty: Evidentiary and Procedural Standards Upheld in People v. Valencia

Date: Apr 15, 2008
Affirmation of Death Penalty: Evidentiary and Procedural Standards Upheld in People v. Valencia Introduction People v. Alfredo Valencia (43 Cal.4th 268) is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court...
Robbery as a Continuing Offense: Insights from The People v. Gomez

Robbery as a Continuing Offense: Insights from The People v. Gomez

Date: Apr 11, 2008
Robbery as a Continuing Offense: Insights from The People v. Gomez Introduction The People v. Alfonso Gomez (43 Cal.4th 249) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, delivered on...
Sophisticated User Defense Established in California Product Liability Law

Sophisticated User Defense Established in California Product Liability Law

Date: Apr 4, 2008
Sophisticated User Defense Established in California Product Liability Law Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark case William Keith Johnson v. American Standard, Inc. (43...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple First-Degree Murders: People v. Rundle

Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple First-Degree Murders: People v. Rundle

Date: Apr 4, 2008
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Multiple First-Degree Murders: People v. Rundle Introduction People v. David Allen Rundle is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on April 3,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert