Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Gang Enhancements and Admissibility of Hearsay in Murder Convictions: The People v. Gutierrez

Affirmation of Gang Enhancements and Admissibility of Hearsay in Murder Convictions: The People v. Gutierrez

Date: Feb 20, 2009
Affirmation of Gang Enhancements and Admissibility of Hearsay in Murder Convictions: The People v. Gutierrez Introduction The People v. Alfred Anthony Gutierrez is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Upheld Joinder of Murder Charges: Judicial Efficiency and Cross-Admissibility Standards in People v. Soper

Upheld Joinder of Murder Charges: Judicial Efficiency and Cross-Admissibility Standards in People v. Soper

Date: Feb 20, 2009
Upheld Joinder of Murder Charges: Judicial Efficiency and Cross-Admissibility Standards in People v. Soper, 45 Cal.4th 759 (2009) Introduction In the landmark case of People v. James Daniel Soper, 45...
Affirmation of Death Sentence Amidst Atkins Defense Delays: PEOPLE v. JACKSON

Affirmation of Death Sentence Amidst Atkins Defense Delays: PEOPLE v. JACKSON

Date: Feb 6, 2009
Affirmation of Death Sentence Amidst Atkins Defense Delays: PEOPLE v. JACKSON Introduction People v. Michael Anthony Jackson, 45 Cal.4th 662 (2009), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Standing Requirements under California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act: Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.

Standing Requirements under California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act: Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.

Date: Jan 30, 2009
Standing Requirements under California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act: Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum L.P. Introduction Meyer et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Sprint Spectrum L.P., Defendant and...
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction: Reinforcing Standards on Prosecutorial Misconduct and Juror Impartiality in People v. Bennett

Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction: Reinforcing Standards on Prosecutorial Misconduct and Juror Impartiality in People v. Bennett

Date: Jan 30, 2009
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction: Reinforcing Standards on Prosecutorial Misconduct and Juror Impartiality in People v. Bennett Introduction People v. Eric Wayne Bennett is a landmark...
Impact of Medical Marijuana Use on Child Welfare: Insights from In re Alexis E. et al.

Impact of Medical Marijuana Use on Child Welfare: Insights from In re Alexis E. et al.

Date: Jan 24, 2009
Impact of Medical Marijuana Use on Child Welfare: Insights from In re Alexis E. et al. Introduction The case In re ALEXIS E. et al. addresses the complex intersection of parental substance use,...
Interpreting Liability Insurance in Foster Care Maintenance: Analysis of In re Corrine W., 45 Cal.4th 522

Interpreting Liability Insurance in Foster Care Maintenance: Analysis of In re Corrine W., 45 Cal.4th 522

Date: Jan 23, 2009
Interpreting Liability Insurance in Foster Care Maintenance: Analysis of In re Corrine W., 45 Cal.4th 522 Introduction In the landmark case of In re Corrine W., 45 Cal.4th 522 (2009), the Supreme...
Conflict of Interest in Defense Fee Agreements: Implications from People v. Doolin

Conflict of Interest in Defense Fee Agreements: Implications from People v. Doolin

Date: Jan 22, 2009
Conflict of Interest in Defense Fee Agreements: Implications from People v. Doolin Introduction In the landmark case People v. Keith Zon Doolin (45 Cal.4th 390), decided by the Supreme Court of...
Limits on Sanctions under CCP §128.7: Self-Represented Attorneys Excluded from Attorney Fee Awards

Limits on Sanctions under CCP §128.7: Self-Represented Attorneys Excluded from Attorney Fee Awards

Date: Jan 16, 2009
Limits on Sanctions under CCP §128.7: Self-Represented Attorneys Excluded from Attorney Fee Awards Introduction The case of Mary Musaelian v. William L. Adams et al. (45 Cal.4th 512) presents a...
The People v. Olguin: Validation of Pet Notification as a Probation Condition

The People v. Olguin: Validation of Pet Notification as a Probation Condition

Date: Dec 30, 2008
The People v. Olguin: Validation of Pet Notification as a Probation Condition Introduction The case of The People v. Olguin (45 Cal.4th 375) addresses a pivotal issue in probation law: the extent to...
Enforceability of Real Estate Option Contracts with Implied Terms: Patel v. Liebermensch

Enforceability of Real Estate Option Contracts with Implied Terms: Patel v. Liebermensch

Date: Dec 23, 2008
Enforceability of Real Estate Option Contracts with Implied Terms: Patel v. Liebermensch Introduction Sunil Patel v. Morris Liebermensch et al. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Defining the Bounds of "Primary Caregiver" Under the Compassionate Use Act: Insights from People v. Mentch

Defining the Bounds of "Primary Caregiver" Under the Compassionate Use Act: Insights from People v. Mentch

Date: Dec 18, 2008
Defining the Bounds of "Primary Caregiver" Under the Compassionate Use Act: Insights from People v. Mentch Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Roger William Mentch (45 Cal.4th 274), the...
VASQUEZ v. STATE of California: Clarifying Attorney Fee Awards Under CCP §1021.5

VASQUEZ v. STATE of California: Clarifying Attorney Fee Awards Under CCP §1021.5

Date: Dec 18, 2008
VASQUEZ v. STATE of California: Clarifying Attorney Fee Awards Under CCP §1021.5 1. Introduction In VASQUEZ v. STATE of California (45 Cal.4th 243), the Supreme Court of California revisited the...
Narrow Interpretation of Public Interest Exception in California Anti-SLAPP Statute

Narrow Interpretation of Public Interest Exception in California Anti-SLAPP Statute

Date: Dec 16, 2008
Strict Application of Public Interest Exception under California's Anti-SLAPP Law Established in Club Members for an Honest Election v. Sierra Club Introduction Club Members for an Honest Election...
Requiring Particularized Suspicion for Traffic Stops Involving Temporary Operating Permits

Requiring Particularized Suspicion for Traffic Stops Involving Temporary Operating Permits

Date: Dec 12, 2008
Requiring Particularized Suspicion for Traffic Stops Involving Temporary Operating Permits Introduction The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. George Lee Hernandez is a landmark decision by the...
CEQA Compliance and Conditional Development Agreements: SAVE TARA v. City of West Hollywood

CEQA Compliance and Conditional Development Agreements: SAVE TARA v. City of West Hollywood

Date: Dec 11, 2008
CEQA Compliance and Conditional Development Agreements: SAVE TARA v. City of West Hollywood Introduction The case of SAVE TARA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD, Defendant and...
Attenuation of Unlawful Traffic Stop Taint through Discovery of Outstanding Arrest Warrant: PEOPLE v. BRENDLIN

Attenuation of Unlawful Traffic Stop Taint through Discovery of Outstanding Arrest Warrant: PEOPLE v. BRENDLIN

Date: Nov 25, 2008
Attenuation of Unlawful Traffic Stop Taint through Discovery of Outstanding Arrest Warrant: PEOPLE v. BRENDLIN Introduction People v. Bruce Edward Brendlin, 45 Cal.4th 262 (2008), is a seminal...
California Supreme Court Establishes Finality and Statute of Limitations Standards for Recognition of Foreign Judgments

California Supreme Court Establishes Finality and Statute of Limitations Standards for Recognition of Foreign Judgments

Date: Nov 18, 2008
California Supreme Court Establishes Finality and Statute of Limitations Standards for Recognition of Foreign Judgments Introduction The case of MANCO CONTRACTING COMPANY (W.L.L.) v. KRIKORBEZDIKIAN...
Interpreting "False Compartment" Under Health and Safety Code §11366.8(d): Exclusion of Unmodified Original Factory Equipment

Interpreting "False Compartment" Under Health and Safety Code §11366.8(d): Exclusion of Unmodified Original Factory Equipment

Date: Nov 7, 2008
Interpreting "False Compartment" Under Health and Safety Code §11366.8(d): Exclusion of Unmodified Original Factory Equipment Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. John R. Arias (45...
Conflict of Interest in Successive Legal Representations: Insights from In RE CHARLISSE C.

Conflict of Interest in Successive Legal Representations: Insights from In RE CHARLISSE C.

Date: Oct 31, 2008
Conflict of Interest in Successive Legal Representations: Insights from In RE CHARLISSE C. Introduction The case of In RE CHARLISSE C. addressed pivotal questions surrounding conflict of interest...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert