Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Limitation of Challenges to Static Criteria in MDO Commitments: Lopez v. Superior Court of San Bernardino County Introduction Daniel Lopez v. The Superior Court of San Bernardino County, Respondent;...
California Supreme Court Establishes Standard for Arbitrator Disclosure of Public Censure Introduction In the landmark case of Randal D. Haworth et al. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County...
Collateral Estoppel Standards Reinforced in MURRAY v. ALASKA Airlines, Inc. Introduction Case: Kevin Murray, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., Defendant and Respondent. (50 Cal.4th...
Binding Arbitration of Wrongful Death Claims Under Section 1295: Ruiz v. Podolsky Introduction The case of Ruiz v. Podolsky (50 Cal.4th 838, 2010) addresses the critical issue of whether arbitration...
Limiting Conduct Credit for Murder Convictions: THE PEOPLE v. JAMES EDWARD DUFF, JR. Introduction The People v. James Edward Duff, Jr. (50 Cal.4th 787, 2010) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Reaffirming Timeliness Standards for Faretta Motions in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Franklin Lynch Introduction People v. Franklin Lynch (50 Cal.4th 693, 2010) is a landmark decision by the...
PEOPLE v. JENNINGS: Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction and the Application of Adoptive Admissions Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Martin Carl Jennings, the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in the Murder of a Police Officer: Insights from People v. Roger Hoan Brady Introduction People v. Roger Hoan Brady (50 Cal.4th 547, 2010) is a landmark decision by the...
Section 351 Does Not Confer a Private Right of Action: Analysis of Louie Hung Kwei Lu v. Hawaiian Gardens Casino Introduction In the landmark case of Louie Hung Kwei Lu v. Hawaiian Gardens Casino,...
Affirmation of California's Death Penalty Statute Under Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Robert Wesley Cowan (50 Cal.4th 401), adjudicated by the...
Reaffirming the Totality of Evidence Approach in Discrimination Summary Judgments Introduction The case of Brian Reid v. Google, Inc. represents a pivotal moment in employment discrimination law,...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Law Firms in Legal Malpractice Cases Introduction The case of Club Vista Financial Services, LLC et al. v. Maslon, Edelman, Borman Brand, LLP...
California Supreme Court Upholds Section 31: Prohibition of Race and Gender Preferences in Public Contracting Introduction In the landmark case of Coral Construction, Inc. v. City and County of San...
Single Shot, Single Conviction: Supreme Court of California Limits Multiple Attempted Murder Charges in People v. Rodrigo Perez (2010) Introduction The case of People v. Rodrigo Perez (50 Cal.4th...
California Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Judicial Review in Parole Habeas Corpus Cases Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in its 2010 decision In re Michael B. Prather on Habeas Corpus...
Harmless Error Doctrine Applied to Unconstitutional Traffic Stops in Letner v. State Introduction The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Richard Lacy Letner and Christopher Allan Tobin, Defendants...
Civil Code Section 846 Does Not Immunize Landowners from Vehicular Negligence Claims: Supreme Court of California Ruling Introduction In the landmark case of ALAN RICHARD KLEIN et al. v. UNITED...
Restitution Orders Under Penal Code Section 1203.1: Expanding Discretion Beyond Direct Victims Introduction The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Eli Jordan Anderson, Defendant and Appellant, (235...
Refining Death-Qualified Jury Standards: Insights from People v. Solomon Introduction People v. Solomon, Jr. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California rendered on July 15, 2010. The...
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Due Process in People v. Andre Stephen Alexander Introduction People v. Andre Stephen Alexander (49 Cal.4th 846, 2010) is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of...