Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Standing to Appeal Child Placement Orders After Parental Rights Termination: Analysis of In re K.C. (2011) Introduction In the landmark case of In re K.C., 52 Cal.4th 231 (2011), the Supreme Court of...
Public Interest Standing and CEQA Compliance in SAVE THE PLASTIC BAG COALITION v. CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH Introduction The landmark case Save the Plastic Bag Coalition, Plaintiff and Respondent, v....
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Trials: Insights from In re Mark Christopher Crew Introduction The Supreme Court of California delivered a pivotal judgment in In re Mark Christopher Crew...
Affirmation of Admissibility of Prior Juvenile Violent Conduct in Capital Sentencing: People v. Bivert Introduction People v. Kenneth Ray Bivert is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Specific Misdemeanor Statute Precludes General Felony in False Vehicle Theft Reporting Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Melissa Kay Murphy, the Supreme Court of California addressed...
California Labor Code's Overtime Provisions Apply to Nonresident Employees Working in California: Sullivan v. Oracle Introduction The case of Donald Sullivan et al. v. Oracle Corporation et al. (51...
Refusal to Appoint Cocounsel in Self-Representation Cases: PEOPLE v. MOORE (2011) Commentary Introduction The People v. Charles Edward Moore (51 Cal.4th 1104) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
California Supreme Court Upholds State Medical Privacy Remedies Against Preemption by FCRA in Brown v. Mortensen 1. Introduction Brown v. Mortensen (51 Cal.4th 1052, 2011) is a landmark decision by...
Admissibility of Separate Offenses as Predicate in Criminal Street Gang Activity: Insights from People v. Tran Introduction The case of The People v. Quang Minh Tran (51 Cal.4th 1040, 253 P.3d 242)...
Clarifying Arson's Malice Requirement in Juvenile Law: In re V.V. and In re J.H. Introduction In the landmark case of In re V.V., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law; The People, Plaintiff...
Clarifying the Intent Element in Robbery: Insights from People v. Anderson Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Paul D. Anderson, Defendant and Appellant. Court: Supreme Court...
Pandering Statute Interpretation Expanded: People v. Zambia Introduction People v. Zambia (51 Cal.4th 965, 2011) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that clarifies the scope of...
California Supreme Court Upholds Fiduciary Duties Over Anti-SLAPP in Attorney-Client Dispute: Oasis West Realty v. Goldman Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in Oasis West Realty, LLC v....
Separate Statutes of Limitations for Distinct Smoking-Related Diseases: Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. Introduction Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al. is a landmark case decided by the...
People v. Hernandez: Establishing the Need for Individualized Justification in Courtroom Security Practices Introduction People v. Hernandez, 51 Cal.4th 733 (2011), is a landmark decision by the...
Affirmation of Capital Conviction in the Context of Attempted Forcible Rape: People v. Philian Eugene Lee Introduction People v. Philian Eugene Lee, 51 Cal.4th 620 (2011), is a significant decision...
Clarifying the Death Knell Doctrine in California: In re BAYCOL CASES I and II Introduction The landmark decision in In re BAYCOL CASES I and II by the Supreme Court of California addresses the...
Complete vs. Partial Stays Under CCP 583.340: California Supreme Court Clarifies Five-Year Trial Requirement Introduction In the landmark case of Dana Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc., the Supreme...
Duty of Care in Freeway Parking: Insights from Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Company Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in Maria Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Company (51 Cal.4th 764,...
Emergency Aid Exception in Warrantless Home Entry: The People v. Troyer Introduction The case of The People v. Albert Troyer (51 Cal.4th 599) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California in 2011,...