Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Standing to Appeal Child Placement Orders After Parental Rights Termination: Analysis of In re K.C. (2011)

Standing to Appeal Child Placement Orders After Parental Rights Termination: Analysis of In re K.C. (2011)

Date: Jul 22, 2011
Standing to Appeal Child Placement Orders After Parental Rights Termination: Analysis of In re K.C. (2011) Introduction In the landmark case of In re K.C., 52 Cal.4th 231 (2011), the Supreme Court of...
Public Interest Standing and CEQA Compliance in SAVE THE PLASTIC BAG COALITION v. CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH

Public Interest Standing and CEQA Compliance in SAVE THE PLASTIC BAG COALITION v. CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH

Date: Jul 15, 2011
Public Interest Standing and CEQA Compliance in SAVE THE PLASTIC BAG COALITION v. CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH Introduction The landmark case Save the Plastic Bag Coalition, Plaintiff and Respondent, v....
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Trials: Insights from In re Mark Christopher Crew

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Trials: Insights from In re Mark Christopher Crew

Date: Jul 12, 2011
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Trials: Insights from In re Mark Christopher Crew Introduction The Supreme Court of California delivered a pivotal judgment in In re Mark Christopher Crew...
Affirmation of Admissibility of Prior Juvenile Violent Conduct in Capital Sentencing: People v. Bivert

Affirmation of Admissibility of Prior Juvenile Violent Conduct in Capital Sentencing: People v. Bivert

Date: Jul 12, 2011
Affirmation of Admissibility of Prior Juvenile Violent Conduct in Capital Sentencing: People v. Bivert Introduction People v. Kenneth Ray Bivert is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Specific Misdemeanor Statute Precludes General Felony in False Vehicle Theft Reporting

Specific Misdemeanor Statute Precludes General Felony in False Vehicle Theft Reporting

Date: Jul 8, 2011
Specific Misdemeanor Statute Precludes General Felony in False Vehicle Theft Reporting Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Melissa Kay Murphy, the Supreme Court of California addressed...
California Labor Code's Overtime Provisions Apply to Nonresident Employees Working in California: Sullivan v. Oracle

California Labor Code's Overtime Provisions Apply to Nonresident Employees Working in California: Sullivan v. Oracle

Date: Jul 1, 2011
California Labor Code's Overtime Provisions Apply to Nonresident Employees Working in California: Sullivan v. Oracle Introduction The case of Donald Sullivan et al. v. Oracle Corporation et al. (51...
Refusal to Appoint Cocounsel in Self-Representation Cases: PEOPLE v. MOORE (2011) Commentary

Refusal to Appoint Cocounsel in Self-Representation Cases: PEOPLE v. MOORE (2011) Commentary

Date: Jun 24, 2011
Refusal to Appoint Cocounsel in Self-Representation Cases: PEOPLE v. MOORE (2011) Commentary Introduction The People v. Charles Edward Moore (51 Cal.4th 1104) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
California Supreme Court Upholds State Medical Privacy Remedies Against Preemption by FCRA in Brown v. Mortensen

California Supreme Court Upholds State Medical Privacy Remedies Against Preemption by FCRA in Brown v. Mortensen

Date: Jun 17, 2011
California Supreme Court Upholds State Medical Privacy Remedies Against Preemption by FCRA in Brown v. Mortensen 1. Introduction Brown v. Mortensen (51 Cal.4th 1052, 2011) is a landmark decision by...
Admissibility of Separate Offenses as Predicate in Criminal Street Gang Activity: Insights from People v. Tran

Admissibility of Separate Offenses as Predicate in Criminal Street Gang Activity: Insights from People v. Tran

Date: Jun 14, 2011
Admissibility of Separate Offenses as Predicate in Criminal Street Gang Activity: Insights from People v. Tran Introduction The case of The People v. Quang Minh Tran (51 Cal.4th 1040, 253 P.3d 242)...
Clarifying Arson's Malice Requirement in Juvenile Law: In re V.V. and In re J.H.

Clarifying Arson's Malice Requirement in Juvenile Law: In re V.V. and In re J.H.

Date: Jun 7, 2011
Clarifying Arson's Malice Requirement in Juvenile Law: In re V.V. and In re J.H. Introduction In the landmark case of In re V.V., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law; The People, Plaintiff...
Clarifying the Intent Element in Robbery: Insights from People v. Anderson

Clarifying the Intent Element in Robbery: Insights from People v. Anderson

Date: Jun 3, 2011
Clarifying the Intent Element in Robbery: Insights from People v. Anderson Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Paul D. Anderson, Defendant and Appellant. Court: Supreme Court...
Pandering Statute Interpretation Expanded: People v. Zambia

Pandering Statute Interpretation Expanded: People v. Zambia

Date: Jun 3, 2011
Pandering Statute Interpretation Expanded: People v. Zambia Introduction People v. Zambia (51 Cal.4th 965, 2011) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that clarifies the scope of...
California Supreme Court Upholds Fiduciary Duties Over Anti-SLAPP in Attorney-Client Dispute: Oasis West Realty v. Goldman

California Supreme Court Upholds Fiduciary Duties Over Anti-SLAPP in Attorney-Client Dispute: Oasis West Realty v. Goldman

Date: May 17, 2011
California Supreme Court Upholds Fiduciary Duties Over Anti-SLAPP in Attorney-Client Dispute: Oasis West Realty v. Goldman Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in Oasis West Realty, LLC v....
Separate Statutes of Limitations for Distinct Smoking-Related Diseases: Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

Separate Statutes of Limitations for Distinct Smoking-Related Diseases: Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

Date: May 6, 2011
Separate Statutes of Limitations for Distinct Smoking-Related Diseases: Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. Introduction Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al. is a landmark case decided by the...
People v. Hernandez: Establishing the Need for Individualized Justification in Courtroom Security Practices

People v. Hernandez: Establishing the Need for Individualized Justification in Courtroom Security Practices

Date: Apr 21, 2011
People v. Hernandez: Establishing the Need for Individualized Justification in Courtroom Security Practices Introduction People v. Hernandez, 51 Cal.4th 733 (2011), is a landmark decision by the...
Affirmation of Capital Conviction in the Context of Attempted Forcible Rape: People v. Philian Eugene Lee

Affirmation of Capital Conviction in the Context of Attempted Forcible Rape: People v. Philian Eugene Lee

Date: Apr 14, 2011
Affirmation of Capital Conviction in the Context of Attempted Forcible Rape: People v. Philian Eugene Lee Introduction People v. Philian Eugene Lee, 51 Cal.4th 620 (2011), is a significant decision...
Clarifying the Death Knell Doctrine in California: In re BAYCOL CASES I and II

Clarifying the Death Knell Doctrine in California: In re BAYCOL CASES I and II

Date: Mar 1, 2011
Clarifying the Death Knell Doctrine in California: In re BAYCOL CASES I and II Introduction The landmark decision in In re BAYCOL CASES I and II by the Supreme Court of California addresses the...
Complete vs. Partial Stays Under CCP 583.340: California Supreme Court Clarifies Five-Year Trial Requirement

Complete vs. Partial Stays Under CCP 583.340: California Supreme Court Clarifies Five-Year Trial Requirement

Date: Mar 1, 2011
Complete vs. Partial Stays Under CCP 583.340: California Supreme Court Clarifies Five-Year Trial Requirement Introduction In the landmark case of Dana Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc., the Supreme...
Duty of Care in Freeway Parking: Insights from Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Company

Duty of Care in Freeway Parking: Insights from Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Company

Date: Mar 1, 2011
Duty of Care in Freeway Parking: Insights from Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Company Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in Maria Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Company (51 Cal.4th 764,...
Emergency Aid Exception in Warrantless Home Entry: The People v. Troyer

Emergency Aid Exception in Warrantless Home Entry: The People v. Troyer

Date: Feb 23, 2011
Emergency Aid Exception in Warrantless Home Entry: The People v. Troyer Introduction The case of The People v. Albert Troyer (51 Cal.4th 599) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California in 2011,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert