Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Appellate Forfeiture of Sentencing Fees: Insights from People v. Octa (60 Cal.4th 862)

Appellate Forfeiture of Sentencing Fees: Insights from People v. Octa (60 Cal.4th 862)

Date: Jan 13, 2015
Appellate Forfeiture of Sentencing Fees: Insights from People v. Octa (60 Cal.4th 862) Introduction In People v. Octa (60 Cal.4th 862, 2015), the Supreme Court of California addressed a pivotal issue...
Reaffirming the Forfeiture Rule in Appeal Challenges to Probation-Related Fees Under Penal Code 1203.1b

Reaffirming the Forfeiture Rule in Appeal Challenges to Probation-Related Fees Under Penal Code 1203.1b

Date: Jan 13, 2015
Reaffirming the Forfeiture Rule in Appeal Challenges to Probation-Related Fees Under Penal Code 1203.1b Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Donna Marie Trujillo, the Supreme Court of...
Reevaluation of Juror Misconduct and Presumption of Prejudice: Insights from People v. Lavender

Reevaluation of Juror Misconduct and Presumption of Prejudice: Insights from People v. Lavender

Date: Dec 9, 2014
Reevaluation of Juror Misconduct and Presumption of Prejudice: Insights from People v. Lavender Introduction People v. Lavender (60 Cal.4th 679), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on...
Misuse of Visual Aids in Prosecutorial Arguments: Centeno v. The People

Misuse of Visual Aids in Prosecutorial Arguments: Centeno v. The People

Date: Dec 5, 2014
Misuse of Visual Aids in Prosecutorial Arguments: Centeno v. The People Introduction Centeno v. The People (60 Cal.4th 659, 2014) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Supreme Court of California Affirms Administrative Bodies' Authority in Pitchess Motions

Supreme Court of California Affirms Administrative Bodies' Authority in Pitchess Motions

Date: Dec 2, 2014
Supreme Court of California Affirms Administrative Bodies' Authority in Pitchess Motions Introduction In the case of Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. Jan Stiglitz et al., the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Liability under Natural and Probable Consequence Doctrine in People v. Smith

Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Liability under Natural and Probable Consequence Doctrine in People v. Smith

Date: Nov 21, 2014
Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Liability under Natural and Probable Consequence Doctrine in People v. Smith Introduction People v. Vince Bryan Smith (60 Cal.4th 603) is a landmark decision by the...
Appealability of Denial of Sentence Recall Under Section 1170.126: Teal v. Superior Court

Appealability of Denial of Sentence Recall Under Section 1170.126: Teal v. Superior Court

Date: Nov 7, 2014
Appealability of Denial of Sentence Recall Under Section 1170.126: Teal v. Superior Court Introduction In Bennie Jay Teal v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (60 Cal.4th 595, 2014), the Supreme...
Affirmation of Prosecution's Conduct and Evidence Admissibility in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Marcus Dorwin Adams

Affirmation of Prosecution's Conduct and Evidence Admissibility in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Marcus Dorwin Adams

Date: Oct 31, 2014
Affirmation of Prosecution's Conduct and Evidence Admissibility in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Marcus Dorwin Adams Introduction In the case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Marcus...
Standards for Recusal, Restraints, and Evidence Admissibility in Multi-Defendant Death Penalty Cases: The People v. Bryant et al. Decision

Standards for Recusal, Restraints, and Evidence Admissibility in Multi-Defendant Death Penalty Cases: The People v. Bryant et al. Decision

Date: Oct 2, 2014
Standards for Recusal, Restraints, and Evidence Admissibility in Multi-Defendant Death Penalty Cases: The People v. Bryant et al. Decision Introduction The case of The People, Plaintiff and...
Enhanced Standards for Attempted Criminal Threats: People v. Chandler

Enhanced Standards for Attempted Criminal Threats: People v. Chandler

Date: Aug 29, 2014
Enhanced Standards for Attempted Criminal Threats: People v. Chandler Introduction People v. Ben Chandler, Jr. (60 Cal.4th 508, 2014-08-28) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Franchisor Vicarious Liability Determined by Control Over Day-to-Day Operations

Franchisor Vicarious Liability Determined by Control Over Day-to-Day Operations

Date: Aug 29, 2014
Franchisor Vicarious Liability Determined by Control Over Day-to-Day Operations Introduction The landmark case of Taylor Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLC addressed a pivotal question in employment...
The PEOPLE v. Lucas: Setting New Precedents in Criminal Consolidation and Cross-Admissibility

The PEOPLE v. Lucas: Setting New Precedents in Criminal Consolidation and Cross-Admissibility

Date: Aug 22, 2014
The PEOPLE v. Lucas: Setting New Precedents in Criminal Consolidation and Cross-Admissibility Introduction In The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. David Allen Lucas, Defendant and Appellant (60...
The People v. Merriman (2014): Affirmation of Death Sentence and Evidentiary Standards

The People v. Merriman (2014): Affirmation of Death Sentence and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Aug 19, 2014
The People v. Merriman (2014): Affirmation of Death Sentence and Evidentiary Standards Introduction The People v. Justin James Merriman, 60 Cal.4th 1 (2014), is a seminal case from the Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Upholds SVP Commitment Standards and Addresses Prosecutorial Misconduct: Analysis of PEOPLE v. SHAZIER

Supreme Court Upholds SVP Commitment Standards and Addresses Prosecutorial Misconduct: Analysis of PEOPLE v. SHAZIER

Date: Aug 19, 2014
Supreme Court Upholds SVP Commitment Standards and Addresses Prosecutorial Misconduct: Analysis of PEOPLE v. SHAZIER Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Dariel Shazier (60 Cal.4th...
Defining 'Willful, Deliberate, and Premeditated' in Sentencing: People v. Kel Commentary

Defining 'Willful, Deliberate, and Premeditated' in Sentencing: People v. Kel Commentary

Date: Aug 15, 2014
Defining 'Willful, Deliberate, and Premeditated' in Sentencing: People v. Kel Commentary Introduction People v. Kel, 59 Cal.4th 1113 (2014), is a significant decision by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Change of Venue and Admissibility of Prior Sexual Conduct in Capital Cases: People v. McCurdy

Affirmation of Change of Venue and Admissibility of Prior Sexual Conduct in Capital Cases: People v. McCurdy

Date: Aug 15, 2014
Affirmation of Change of Venue and Admissibility of Prior Sexual Conduct in Capital Cases: People v. McCurdy Introduction People v. Gene Estel McCurdy is a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme...
Direct Adoption of Voter Initiatives Not Subject to Comprehensive CEQA Review: Insights from Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. Superior Court

Direct Adoption of Voter Initiatives Not Subject to Comprehensive CEQA Review: Insights from Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. Superior Court

Date: Aug 8, 2014
Direct Adoption of Voter Initiatives Not Subject to Comprehensive CEQA Review: Insights from Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. Superior Court Introduction The case of Tuolumne Jobs & Small...
Clarity Required for Special Circumstances in Death Penalty Cases: The People v. Carrasco Decision

Clarity Required for Special Circumstances in Death Penalty Cases: The People v. Carrasco Decision

Date: Aug 5, 2014
Clarity Required for Special Circumstances in Death Penalty Cases: The People v. Carrasco Decision Introduction The People v. Robert Carrasco (59 Cal.4th 924) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
People v. Capistrano: Reinforcing Standards for Death Penalty Jury Qualification and Voir Dire

People v. Capistrano: Reinforcing Standards for Death Penalty Jury Qualification and Voir Dire

Date: Aug 5, 2014
People v. Capistrano: Reinforcing Standards for Death Penalty Jury Qualification and Voir Dire Introduction The case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John Leo Capistrano, Defendant and...
Reversal of Death Penalty Due to Juror Misconduct: The People v. Hensley

Reversal of Death Penalty Due to Juror Misconduct: The People v. Hensley

Date: Aug 1, 2014
Reversal of Death Penalty Due to Juror Misconduct: The People v. Hensley Introduction The People v. Hensley is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of California on July 31, 2014. In...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert