Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Burden of Proof and Evidentiary Standards in Workers' Compensation Claims: Insights from Caroline V. MALINSKI v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona Introduction The case of Caroline V. MALINSKI v....
Comprehensive Elements of Fraud and Punitive Damages Affirmed in F.P. Nielson v. Flashberg Introduction The case F.P. Nielson, dba F.P. Nielson and Sons v. Jack Flashberg (101 Ariz. 335) adjudicated...
Affirmation of Directors' Fiduciary Duties under Business Competition and Opportunity Doctrines Introduction The case of Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. Otto H. Linsenmeyer et al. (100 Ariz. 107)...
STATE v. Schantz: Upholding the M'Naghten Standard and Limiting Insanity Defense in Arizona Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Joseph Alvin Schantz (98 Ariz. 200), the Supreme...
Vesting of Pension Rights as Contractual Obligations: Yeazell v. Copins et al. Introduction The case of Kenneth C. Yeazell v. Hyman Copins and others, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arizona on...
Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Distinct Tax Structures for Motor Vehicle Fuels Introduction The case of City of Mesa, et al. v. Clyde Killingsworth delves into the complexities of tax legislation...
Adverse Inference in Evidence Destruction: Analyzing The STATE of Arizona v. Roy Da (96 Ariz. 184) Introduction The STATE of Arizona v. Roy Da is a pivotal 1964 Supreme Court of Arizona decision that...
Ernest Stone v. Dually and as Sur: Overruling Governmental Immunity from Tort Liability in Arizona Introduction The case of Ernest Stone, individually and as surviving spouse of Hathaway Stone,...
Admissibility of Terminated Leases in Eminent Domain Valuations: Analysis of STATE of Arizona v. Hollis Introduction STATE of Arizona v. Frank E. Hollis and Eva Marie Hollis, decided on April 16,...
Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence in Arizona: State v. Valdez Establishes New Precedent Introduction State of Arizona v. Fernando E. Valdez, 91 Ariz. 274 (1962), marks a significant judicial...
Reversing Conviction Due to Jury Selection and Admissibility of Prior Offenses: STATE of Arizona v. Edward Little (87 Ariz. 295) Introduction State of Arizona v. Edward Little is a pivotal case...
Arizona Supreme Court Invalidates Anti-Picketing Statute in Baldwin v. Arizona Flame Restaurant, Inc. Introduction The case of Don A. Baldwin, et al. v. Arizona Flame Restaurant, Inc., et al....
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Forcible Detainer Actions: OLDS BROS. LUMBER CO. v. RUSHING et al. Introduction The landmark case OLDS BROS. LUMBER CO. v. RUSHING et al. (64 Ariz. 199), adjudicated by...