Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arizona Case Commentaries

Gertz Standard Applied in Arizona: Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers

Gertz Standard Applied in Arizona: Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers

Date: Feb 5, 1977
Gertz Standard Applied in Arizona: Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers Introduction In the landmark case of Julian Peagler and Dodge City Motors, Inc. v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., decided by the Supreme...
STATE v. RICHMOND (1976): Affirmation of Felony-Murder Rule and Procedural Standards in Capital Sentencing

STATE v. RICHMOND (1976): Affirmation of Felony-Murder Rule and Procedural Standards in Capital Sentencing

Date: Dec 21, 1976
STATE v. RICHMOND (1976): Affirmation of Felony-Murder Rule and Procedural Standards in Capital Sentencing Introduction STATE v. RICHMOND is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Arizona,...
Valley National Bank's Use of Impound Funds: Establishing No Trust Relationship

Valley National Bank's Use of Impound Funds: Establishing No Trust Relationship

Date: Apr 27, 1976
Valley National Bank's Use of Impound Funds: Establishing No Trust Relationship Introduction The case of Charles R. Brooks v. The Valley National Bank (113 Ariz. 169) adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Oral Acceptances in Construction Contracts Require Comprehensive Terms – Savoca Masonry v. Homes and Son Construction

Oral Acceptances in Construction Contracts Require Comprehensive Terms – Savoca Masonry v. Homes and Son Construction

Date: Nov 13, 1975
Oral Acceptances in Construction Contracts Require Comprehensive Terms – Savoca Masonry v. Homes and Son Construction Introduction The case of Savoca Masonry Company, Inc. v. Homes and Son...
Establishment of Private Right of Action under Arizona Consumer Fraud Act: Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales

Establishment of Private Right of Action under Arizona Consumer Fraud Act: Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales

Date: May 7, 1974
Establishment of Private Right of Action under Arizona Consumer Fraud Act: Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales Introduction In the landmark case of SELLINGER v. FREEWAY MOBILE HOME SALES, INC.,...
DEL RIO LAND, INC. v. HAUMONT: Interpretation of "Subject to Mortgage" and Mootness in Appellate Proceedings

DEL RIO LAND, INC. v. HAUMONT: Interpretation of "Subject to Mortgage" and Mootness in Appellate Proceedings

Date: Nov 14, 1973
DEL RIO LAND, INC. v. HAUMONT: Interpretation of "Subject to Mortgage" and Mootness in Appellate Proceedings Introduction Del Rio Land, Inc. v. Pierre H. Haumont, Jr. and Vernece Haumont is a...
Upheld Constitutionality of Arizona's Implied Consent Law in Da v. Campbell

Upheld Constitutionality of Arizona's Implied Consent Law in Da v. Campbell

Date: Jan 16, 1971
Upheld Constitutionality of Arizona's Implied Consent Law in Da v. Campbell Introduction The case of Da v. d H. Campbell, Superintendent, Motor Vehicle Division (106 Ariz. 542), adjudicated by the...
Equal Weight of Circumstantial and Direct Evidence Established in STATE v. Harvill

Equal Weight of Circumstantial and Direct Evidence Established in STATE v. Harvill

Date: Nov 17, 1970
Equal Weight of Circumstantial and Direct Evidence Established in STATE v. Harvill Introduction In the landmark case STATE of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Harvill (106 Ariz. 386, 1970), the Supreme Court...
Harmonizing Statutory Provisions: Jurisdictional Limits on Enhanced Fines

Harmonizing Statutory Provisions: Jurisdictional Limits on Enhanced Fines

Date: Sep 16, 1970
Harmonizing Statutory Provisions: Jurisdictional Limits on Enhanced Fines Introduction The Supreme Court of Arizona, in the landmark case of State of Arizona ex rel. E. Leigh Larson v. Gordon Farley,...
Preservation of Common Law Negligence Action under Arizona’s Workmen’s Compensation Law

Preservation of Common Law Negligence Action under Arizona’s Workmen’s Compensation Law

Date: Feb 28, 1970
Preservation of Common Law Negligence Action under Arizona’s Workmen’s Compensation Law Introduction The case of Kilpatrick et al. v. Superior Court of Arizona concerns the intersection of Arizona's...
Non-Collusive Prejudgment Assignments and Voluntary Dismissals with Prejudice: Insights from Damron v. Sledge and Polk

Non-Collusive Prejudgment Assignments and Voluntary Dismissals with Prejudice: Insights from Damron v. Sledge and Polk

Date: Nov 7, 1969
Non-Collusive Prejudgment Assignments and Voluntary Dismissals with Prejudice: Insights from Damron v. Sledge and Polk Introduction In Damron v. Sledge and Polk, the Supreme Court of Arizona...
Burden of Proof and Evidentiary Standards in Workers' Compensation Claims: Insights from Caroline V. MALINSKI v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona

Burden of Proof and Evidentiary Standards in Workers' Compensation Claims: Insights from Caroline V. MALINSKI v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona

Date: Apr 24, 1968
Burden of Proof and Evidentiary Standards in Workers' Compensation Claims: Insights from Caroline V. MALINSKI v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona Introduction The case of Caroline V. MALINSKI v....
Comprehensive Elements of Fraud and Punitive Damages Affirmed in F.P. Nielson v. Flashberg

Comprehensive Elements of Fraud and Punitive Damages Affirmed in F.P. Nielson v. Flashberg

Date: Oct 28, 1966
Comprehensive Elements of Fraud and Punitive Damages Affirmed in F.P. Nielson v. Flashberg Introduction The case F.P. Nielson, dba F.P. Nielson and Sons v. Jack Flashberg (101 Ariz. 335) adjudicated...
Affirmation of Directors' Fiduciary Duties under Business Competition and Opportunity Doctrines

Affirmation of Directors' Fiduciary Duties under Business Competition and Opportunity Doctrines

Date: May 18, 1966
Affirmation of Directors' Fiduciary Duties under Business Competition and Opportunity Doctrines Introduction The case of Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. Otto H. Linsenmeyer et al. (100 Ariz. 107)...
STATE v. Schantz: Upholding the M'Naghten Standard and Limiting Insanity Defense in Arizona

STATE v. Schantz: Upholding the M'Naghten Standard and Limiting Insanity Defense in Arizona

Date: Jul 14, 1965
STATE v. Schantz: Upholding the M'Naghten Standard and Limiting Insanity Defense in Arizona Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Joseph Alvin Schantz (98 Ariz. 200), the Supreme...
Vesting of Pension Rights as Contractual Obligations: Yeazell v. Copins et al.

Vesting of Pension Rights as Contractual Obligations: Yeazell v. Copins et al.

Date: Jun 4, 1965
Vesting of Pension Rights as Contractual Obligations: Yeazell v. Copins et al. Introduction The case of Kenneth C. Yeazell v. Hyman Copins and others, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arizona on...
Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Distinct Tax Structures for Motor Vehicle Fuels

Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Distinct Tax Structures for Motor Vehicle Fuels

Date: Sep 23, 1964
Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Distinct Tax Structures for Motor Vehicle Fuels Introduction The case of City of Mesa, et al. v. Clyde Killingsworth delves into the complexities of tax legislation...
Adverse Inference in Evidence Destruction: Analyzing The STATE of Arizona v. Roy Da

Adverse Inference in Evidence Destruction: Analyzing The STATE of Arizona v. Roy Da

Date: Jul 1, 1964
Adverse Inference in Evidence Destruction: Analyzing The STATE of Arizona v. Roy Da (96 Ariz. 184) Introduction The STATE of Arizona v. Roy Da is a pivotal 1964 Supreme Court of Arizona decision that...
Ernest Stone v. Dually and as Sur: Overruling Governmental Immunity from Tort Liability in Arizona

Ernest Stone v. Dually and as Sur: Overruling Governmental Immunity from Tort Liability in Arizona

Date: May 29, 1963
Ernest Stone v. Dually and as Sur: Overruling Governmental Immunity from Tort Liability in Arizona Introduction The case of Ernest Stone, individually and as surviving spouse of Hathaway Stone,...
Admissibility of Terminated Leases in Eminent Domain Valuations: Analysis of STATE of Arizona v. Hollis

Admissibility of Terminated Leases in Eminent Domain Valuations: Analysis of STATE of Arizona v. Hollis

Date: Apr 17, 1963
Admissibility of Terminated Leases in Eminent Domain Valuations: Analysis of STATE of Arizona v. Hollis Introduction STATE of Arizona v. Frank E. Hollis and Eva Marie Hollis, decided on April 16,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert