Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arizona Case Commentaries

Supreme Court of Arizona Upholds Mandatory Life Sentence for Dangerous Assault Under A.R.S. § 13-1206

Supreme Court of Arizona Upholds Mandatory Life Sentence for Dangerous Assault Under A.R.S. § 13-1206

Date: Nov 22, 1984
Supreme Court of Arizona Upholds Mandatory Life Sentence for Dangerous Assault Under A.R.S. § 13-1206 Introduction In State of Arizona v. Johnny Travis Goswick, the Supreme Court of Arizona addressed...
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Confession Standards in State of Arizona v. Scott Drake Clabourne

Affirmation of Death Penalty and Confession Standards in State of Arizona v. Scott Drake Clabourne

Date: Nov 1, 1984
Affirmation of Death Penalty and Confession Standards in State of Arizona v. Scott Drake Clabourne Introduction In State of Arizona v. Scott Drake Clabourne, the Supreme Court of Arizona upheld the...
Arizona Supreme Court Adopts Strickland Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: STATE v. LEE

Arizona Supreme Court Adopts Strickland Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: STATE v. LEE

Date: Sep 26, 1984
Arizona Supreme Court Adopts Strickland Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: STATE v. LEE Introduction In State of Arizona v. Billy Don Lee, 142 Ariz. 210 (1984), the Arizona Supreme Court...
KENYON v. HAMMER: Upholding Constitutional Protections in Medical Malpractice

KENYON v. HAMMER: Upholding Constitutional Protections in Medical Malpractice

Date: Sep 20, 1984
KENYON v. HAMMER: Upholding Constitutional Protections in Medical Malpractice Introduction In KENYON v. HAMMER, 142 Ariz. 69 (Supreme Court of Arizona, 1984), the Arizona Supreme Court addressed...
Attorney Communications and Defamation Privileges: Insights from GREEN ACRES TRUST v. LONDON

Attorney Communications and Defamation Privileges: Insights from GREEN ACRES TRUST v. LONDON

Date: Sep 12, 1984
Attorney Communications and Defamation Privileges: Insights from GREEN ACRES TRUST v. LONDON Introduction In Green Acres Trust, an Arizona corporation, and Green Acres Memorial Gardens, Inc. v. May...
Arizona Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Emergency Care Duty for Hospitals

Arizona Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Emergency Care Duty for Hospitals

Date: Sep 12, 1984
Arizona Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Emergency Care Duty for Hospitals Introduction In the landmark case Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc., decided by the Supreme Court of Arizona...
Clarifying the Emergency Aid Exception in Warrantless Entries: Insights from State of Arizona v. James Clifford Fisher

Clarifying the Emergency Aid Exception in Warrantless Entries: Insights from State of Arizona v. James Clifford Fisher

Date: Jul 18, 1984
Clarifying the Emergency Aid Exception in Warrantless Entries: Insights from State of Arizona v. James Clifford Fisher Introduction In the landmark case State of Arizona v. James Clifford Fisher (141...
Shattuck v. State of Arizona: Limits on Appellate Review for Aggravated Sentencing

Shattuck v. State of Arizona: Limits on Appellate Review for Aggravated Sentencing

Date: Jun 21, 1984
Shattuck v. State of Arizona: Limits on Appellate Review for Aggravated Sentencing Introduction Shattuck v. State of Arizona, 140 Ariz. 582 (1984), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Substantial Evidence and Admissibility of Prior Conduct in Repeat Trials: State of Arizona v. Rufus Junior Mincey

Affirmation of Substantial Evidence and Admissibility of Prior Conduct in Repeat Trials: State of Arizona v. Rufus Junior Mincey

Date: May 23, 1984
Affirmation of Substantial Evidence and Admissibility of Prior Conduct in Repeat Trials: State of Arizona v. Rufus Junior Mincey Introduction In State of Arizona v. Rufus Junior Mincey (141 Ariz....
Estoppel in Standardized Insurance Contracts: Darner Motor Sales v. Universal Underwriters

Estoppel in Standardized Insurance Contracts: Darner Motor Sales v. Universal Underwriters

Date: May 23, 1984
Estoppel in Standardized Insurance Contracts: Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Introduction Darner Motor Sales, Inc., d/b/a Darner Leasing Co., an Arizona corporation, filed a...
Incorporating Personnel Manuals into Employment Contracts: Insights from LEIKVOLD v. VALLEY VIEW COMMUNITY HOSPital

Incorporating Personnel Manuals into Employment Contracts: Insights from LEIKVOLD v. VALLEY VIEW COMMUNITY HOSPital

Date: Apr 26, 1984
Incorporating Personnel Manuals into Employment Contracts: Insights from LEIKVOLD v. VALLEY VIEW COMMUNITY HOSPital Introduction Joan LEIKVOLD v. VALLEY VIEW COMMUNITY HOSPital is a seminal case...
Perez v. Arizona: Establishing Criteria for Severance and Willits Instructions in Cases of Evidence Destruction

Perez v. Arizona: Establishing Criteria for Severance and Willits Instructions in Cases of Evidence Destruction

Date: Apr 24, 1984
Perez v. Arizona: Establishing Criteria for Severance and Willits Instructions in Cases of Evidence Destruction Introduction State of Arizona v. Fred Jose Perez is a landmark case decided by the...
Affirmation of Superior Court Jurisdiction in Medical Malpractice Default Judgments: Daou v. Harris

Affirmation of Superior Court Jurisdiction in Medical Malpractice Default Judgments: Daou v. Harris

Date: Mar 7, 1984
Affirmation of Superior Court Jurisdiction in Medical Malpractice Default Judgments: Daou v. Harris Introduction Patricia M. Daou filed a medical malpractice complaint against Albert J. Harris, M.D....
Strict Compliance Required for Breathalyzer Evidence: Insights from Kelly Richard Fuenning v. Superior Court of Arizona

Strict Compliance Required for Breathalyzer Evidence: Insights from Kelly Richard Fuenning v. Superior Court of Arizona

Date: Feb 28, 1984
Strict Compliance Required for Breathalyzer Evidence: Insights from Kelly Richard Fuenning v. Superior Court of Arizona Introduction In the landmark case of Kelly Richard Fuenning v. Superior Court...
Pool v. State: Defining Double Jeopardy Protections Against Prosecutorial Misconduct in Arizona

Pool v. State: Defining Double Jeopardy Protections Against Prosecutorial Misconduct in Arizona

Date: Feb 23, 1984
Pool v. State: Defining Double Jeopardy Protections Against Prosecutorial Misconduct in Arizona Introduction The case of Steven Randall Pool and Bruce Kevin Phillips versus the State of Arizona...
Arizona Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Capital Sentencing and Evidentiary Standards in McCall Case

Arizona Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Capital Sentencing and Evidentiary Standards in McCall Case

Date: Feb 15, 1984
Arizona Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Capital Sentencing and Evidentiary Standards in McCall Case Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Arizona v. Edward Lonzo McCALL, the Arizona Supreme...
Overruling Privity Requirement in Negligence Claims Against Design Professionals: Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland

Overruling Privity Requirement in Negligence Claims Against Design Professionals: Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland

Date: Feb 9, 1984
Overruling Privity Requirement in Negligence Claims Against Design Professionals: Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland Introduction The case Donnelly Construction Company v....
STATE of Arizona v. Ray Girdler, Jr.: Upholding Third-Party Consent and Clarifying Double Jeopardy in Consecutive Sentencing

STATE of Arizona v. Ray Girdler, Jr.: Upholding Third-Party Consent and Clarifying Double Jeopardy in Consecutive Sentencing

Date: Jan 25, 1984
STATE of Arizona v. Ray Girdler, Jr.: Upholding Third-Party Consent and Clarifying Double Jeopardy in Consecutive Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Arizona v. Ray Girdler, Jr....
Arizona Supreme Court Expands Consumer Fraud and RICO Remedies in Corbin v. Pickrell

Arizona Supreme Court Expands Consumer Fraud and RICO Remedies in Corbin v. Pickrell

Date: Oct 27, 1983
Arizona Supreme Court Expands Consumer Fraud and RICO Remedies in Corbin v. Pickrell Introduction In STATE of Arizona, ex rel. Robert K. CORBIN, Attorney General, and the Arizona Corporation...
Establishing Standards for Attorneys' Fee Applications in Appellate Proceedings: Commentary on Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant

Establishing Standards for Attorneys' Fee Applications in Appellate Proceedings: Commentary on Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant

Date: Oct 19, 1983
Establishing Standards for Attorneys' Fee Applications in Appellate Proceedings: Commentary on Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant Introduction The case of Seymour Schweiger and Jimmie Komatsu,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert