Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alabama Case Commentaries

ICN Medical Alliance v. Pritchett: A New Precedent on Vicarious Liability and Negligent Supervision

ICN Medical Alliance v. Pritchett: A New Precedent on Vicarious Liability and Negligent Supervision

Date: Mar 11, 2006
ICN Medical Alliance v. Pritchett: A New Precedent on Vicarious Liability and Negligent Supervision Introduction In the landmark case of Teresa Pritchett v. ICN Medical Alliance, Inc., decided by the...
Strict Adherence to Formalities in LLC Membership: Insights from Brant Steele v. Rosenfeld, LLC

Strict Adherence to Formalities in LLC Membership: Insights from Brant Steele v. Rosenfeld, LLC

Date: Feb 11, 2006
Strict Adherence to Formalities in LLC Membership: Insights from Brant Steele v. Rosenfeld, LLC Introduction The case of Brant Steele v. Rosenfeld, LLC, and Lance Elkins, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Judicial Reassignment Procedures Affirmed in Atchley v. Fuller

Judicial Reassignment Procedures Affirmed in Atchley v. Fuller

Date: Feb 11, 2006
Judicial Reassignment Procedures Affirmed in Atchley v. Fuller Introduction The case of James Kenneth Atchley, Sr. v. Lawton Dale Fuller, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Alabama on February 10,...
Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies State-Agent Immunity Standards in Mandamus Relief: In re Patricia Arnold v. City of Tuskegee

Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies State-Agent Immunity Standards in Mandamus Relief: In re Patricia Arnold v. City of Tuskegee

Date: Dec 31, 2005
Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies State-Agent Immunity Standards in Mandamus Relief Introduction In the landmark case of In re Patricia Arnold v. City of Tuskegee, John Moon, Theodore Moon, Willie Dean...
Clarification of Venue Rules in Divisional Courts: Ex Parte The Children's Hospital of Alabama

Clarification of Venue Rules in Divisional Courts: Ex Parte The Children's Hospital of Alabama

Date: Dec 10, 2005
Clarification of Venue Rules in Divisional Courts: Ex Parte The Children's Hospital of Alabama Introduction The case of Ex parte The Children's Hospital of Alabama and Martha Pszyk serves as a...
Alabama Supreme Court Sets New Precedent on Insurer's Duty to Defend: Hartford v. Merchants Farmers Bank

Alabama Supreme Court Sets New Precedent on Insurer's Duty to Defend: Hartford v. Merchants Farmers Bank

Date: Nov 19, 2005
Alabama Supreme Court Sets New Precedent on Insurer's Duty to Defend: Hartford v. Merchants Farmers Bank Introduction In the landmark case of Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Merchants Farmers...
Limits on Deed Reformation Due to Mutual Mistake: Analysis of Fadalla v. Fadalla's Auto Air and Detail, Inc.

Limits on Deed Reformation Due to Mutual Mistake: Analysis of Fadalla v. Fadalla's Auto Air and Detail, Inc.

Date: Nov 19, 2005
Limits on Deed Reformation Due to Mutual Mistake: Analysis of Fadalla v. Fadalla's Auto Air and Detail, Inc. Introduction Vincent Fadalla and Fadalla's Auto Air and Detail, Inc. v. George Fadalla and...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in 'Abnormal' Bad-Faith Insurance Claims: Singleton v. State Farm

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in 'Abnormal' Bad-Faith Insurance Claims: Singleton v. State Farm

Date: Nov 11, 2005
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in 'Abnormal' Bad-Faith Insurance Claims: Singleton v. State Farm Introduction In Henry Singleton and Shelby Singleton v. State Farm Fire Casualty Company, 928 So. 2d...
Corridor Enterprises v. Robbins: Allocation of Damages in Shareholder-Derivative Actions and Limits on Punitive Damages

Corridor Enterprises v. Robbins: Allocation of Damages in Shareholder-Derivative Actions and Limits on Punitive Damages

Date: Oct 22, 2005
Corridor Enterprises v. Robbins: Allocation of Damages in Shareholder-Derivative Actions and Limits on Punitive Damages Introduction The case of Pete M. Robbins v. Terrill W. Sanders represents a...
Clarifying Constitutional Malice in Public Official Defamation Claims: GARY v. CROUCH

Clarifying Constitutional Malice in Public Official Defamation Claims: GARY v. CROUCH

Date: Sep 3, 2005
Clarifying Constitutional Malice in Public Official Defamation Claims: GARY v. CROUCH Case: Faye Gary v. Richard Crouch, Court: Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama Date: September 2, 2005 Citation: 923...
D.M. and M.M. v. Walker County DHR: Affirming Standards for Termination of Parental Rights and Custodial Alternatives

D.M. and M.M. v. Walker County DHR: Affirming Standards for Termination of Parental Rights and Custodial Alternatives

Date: Jul 9, 2005
D.M. and M.M. v. Walker County DHR: Affirming Standards for Termination of Parental Rights and Custodial Alternatives Introduction The case of D.M. and M.M. v. Walker County Department of Human...
Strict Enforcement of Rule 32 Preservation Requirements in Postconviction Petitions: BOYD v. STATE

Strict Enforcement of Rule 32 Preservation Requirements in Postconviction Petitions: BOYD v. STATE

Date: May 28, 2005
Strict Enforcement of Rule 32 Preservation Requirements in Postconviction Petitions: BOYD v. STATE Introduction Anthony BOYD v. STATE is a seminal decision by the Court of Criminal Appeals of...
Strict Adherence to Voter Residency Requirements Affirmed in Rowell v. Waltman

Strict Adherence to Voter Residency Requirements Affirmed in Rowell v. Waltman

Date: May 21, 2005
Strict Adherence to Voter Residency Requirements Affirmed in Rowell v. Waltman Introduction In the case of Michael Waltman v. William Robert Rowell, decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama on May 20,...
Clarifying 'Forcible Entry' in Automobile Insurance Claims: Supreme Court of Alabama Establishes Precedent

Clarifying 'Forcible Entry' in Automobile Insurance Claims: Supreme Court of Alabama Establishes Precedent

Date: May 14, 2005
Clarifying 'Forcible Entry' in Automobile Insurance Claims: Supreme Court of Alabama Establishes Precedent Introduction The case of Safeway Insurance Company of Alabama, Inc. v. Gregorio Herrera (912...
Establishing Wantonness in Medical Malpractice: Analysis of Ferguson v. Baptist Health System, Inc.

Establishing Wantonness in Medical Malpractice: Analysis of Ferguson v. Baptist Health System, Inc.

Date: Apr 9, 2005
Establishing Wantonness in Medical Malpractice: Analysis of Ferguson v. Baptist Health System, Inc. Introduction The case of Robert Ferguson v. Baptist Health System, Inc., adjudicated by the Supreme...
Alabama Supreme Court Rules Relation-Back Doctrine Does Not Apply to Rule 32 Postconviction Petitions

Alabama Supreme Court Rules Relation-Back Doctrine Does Not Apply to Rule 32 Postconviction Petitions

Date: Apr 9, 2005
Alabama Supreme Court Rules Relation-Back Doctrine Does Not Apply to Rule 32 Postconviction Petitions Introduction In the landmark case of Ex parte Mark Allen Jenkins (In re Mark Allen JENKINS v....
Alabama Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Set-Off in Underinsured Motorist Coverage

Alabama Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Set-Off in Underinsured Motorist Coverage

Date: Mar 26, 2005
Alabama Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Set-Off in Underinsured Motorist Coverage Introduction In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Debra W. Motley, the Alabama Supreme Court...
Preservation of Sufficiency-of-Evidence Issues in Nonjury Trials under Rule 52(b)

Preservation of Sufficiency-of-Evidence Issues in Nonjury Trials under Rule 52(b)

Date: Jan 15, 2005
Preservation of Sufficiency-of-Evidence Issues in Nonjury Trials under Rule 52(b) Introduction The case of New Properties, L.L.C., and Lewis F. Webb v. Harold Stewart, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reinforcing the Burden of Prosecutorial Proof in Capital Murder: Insights from In re Dennis McGRIFF v. STATE of Alabama

Reinforcing the Burden of Prosecutorial Proof in Capital Murder: Insights from In re Dennis McGRIFF v. STATE of Alabama

Date: Jan 15, 2005
Reinforcing the Burden of Prosecutorial Proof in Capital Murder: Insights from In re Dennis McGRIFF v. STATE of Alabama Introduction In the landmark case of In re Dennis Demetrius McGRIFF v. STATE of...
Physician Assistant Act Applies to Title 10 Insurers: A New Precedent Established in BCBS v. Hodurski

Physician Assistant Act Applies to Title 10 Insurers: A New Precedent Established in BCBS v. Hodurski

Date: Oct 23, 2004
Physician Assistant Act Applies to Title 10 Insurers: A New Precedent Established in BCBS v. Hodurski Introduction The case of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama (BCBS) v. Donald Hodurski, M.D.;...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert