Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alabama Case Commentaries

Mere Presence Insufficient: Alabama Court Reverses Robbery Conviction in Ben Thomas III v. State

Mere Presence Insufficient: Alabama Court Reverses Robbery Conviction in Ben Thomas III v. State

Date: Nov 1, 1978
Mere Presence Insufficient: Alabama Court Reverses Robbery Conviction in Ben Thomas III v. State Introduction Ben Thomas III v. State is a landmark case adjudicated by the Court of Criminal Appeals...
Conversion and Wrongful Repossession: Insights from James OTT v. Phyllis FOX

Conversion and Wrongful Repossession: Insights from James OTT v. Phyllis FOX

Date: Sep 30, 1978
Conversion and Wrongful Repossession: Insights from James OTT v. Phyllis FOX Introduction The case of James OTT v. Phyllis FOX, decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama on September 29, 1978, delves...
Duty of Engineers to Third Parties: Insights from R.L. Reid, Inc. v. Mildred Plant et al.

Duty of Engineers to Third Parties: Insights from R.L. Reid, Inc. v. Mildred Plant et al.

Date: Nov 5, 1977
Duty of Engineers to Third Parties: Insights from R.L. Reid, Inc. v. Mildred Plant et al. Introduction The case of R.L. Reid, Inc. v. Mildred Plant et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama on...
Defining "Occurrence" in Insurance Policy: Exclusion of Intentional Acts in Insurer’s Duty to Defend

Defining "Occurrence" in Insurance Policy: Exclusion of Intentional Acts in Insurer’s Duty to Defend

Date: Jun 4, 1977
Defining "Occurrence" in Insurance Policy: Exclusion of Intentional Acts in Insurer’s Duty to Defend Introduction The case of Ladner and Company, Inc. et al. v. Southern Guaranty Insurance Co., a...
Negligence-Based Products Liability Established Under Alabama Law in Atkins v. American Motors

Negligence-Based Products Liability Established Under Alabama Law in Atkins v. American Motors

Date: Jul 17, 1976
Negligence-Based Products Liability Established Under Alabama Law in Atkins v. American Motors Introduction The case of Carol Powers ATKINS, as Administratrix of the Estate of James Samalone Atkins,...
Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine Established in Casrell v. Altec Industries

Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine Established in Casrell v. Altec Industries

Date: May 22, 1976
Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine Established in Casrell v. Altec Industries Introduction The case of Florence Casrell, Administratrix v. Altec Industries, Inc. and Mobile Aerial Towers,...
Abolition of Municipal Immunity Under Alabama Law: Jackson v. City of Florence (294 Ala. 592)

Abolition of Municipal Immunity Under Alabama Law: Jackson v. City of Florence (294 Ala. 592)

Date: Oct 3, 1975
Abolition of Municipal Immunity Under Alabama Law: Jackson v. City of Florence (294 Ala. 592) Introduction In Cecil D. Jackson v. The City of Florence, a Municipal Corporation, et al. (294 Ala. 592,...
Independent Contractor Liability in Construction Negligence: B. H. Klein Realty Corp. v. Mr. Transmission, Inc.

Independent Contractor Liability in Construction Negligence: B. H. Klein Realty Corp. v. Mr. Transmission, Inc.

Date: Aug 22, 1975
Independent Contractor Liability in Construction Negligence: B. H. Klein Realty Corp. v. Mr. Transmission, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of B. H. Klein Realty Corp. and/or B. H. Klein Realty...
Da v. d WHITE: Upholding Fair Trial Procedures and the Admissibility of Expert Testimony

Da v. d WHITE: Upholding Fair Trial Procedures and the Admissibility of Expert Testimony

Date: Jul 11, 1975
Da v. d WHITE: Upholding Fair Trial Procedures and the Admissibility of Expert Testimony Introduction The case of Da v. d WHITE, reported at 294 Ala. 265 and decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama...
Strict Adherence to Counterclaim Protocols: Insights from Corona v. Southern Guaranty Insurance Company

Strict Adherence to Counterclaim Protocols: Insights from Corona v. Southern Guaranty Insurance Company

Date: May 30, 1975
Strict Adherence to Counterclaim Protocols: Insights from Corona v. Southern Guaranty Insurance Company Introduction Corona v. Southern Guaranty Insurance Company, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Minimal Due Process for Probation Revocation: In re W. C. Armstrong, Jr.

Minimal Due Process for Probation Revocation: In re W. C. Armstrong, Jr.

Date: Mar 14, 1975
Minimal Due Process for Probation Revocation: In re W. C. Armstrong, Jr. Introduction The case of In re W. C. Armstrong, Jr. v. State of Alabama (294 Ala. 100) addresses critical issues surrounding...
Reaffirmation of the 'Scintilla of Evidence' Doctrine in Negligence Cases: Alabama Power Co. v. I

Reaffirmation of the 'Scintilla of Evidence' Doctrine in Negligence Cases: Alabama Power Co. v. I

Date: Jan 10, 1975
Reaffirmation of the 'Scintilla of Evidence' Doctrine in Negligence Cases: Alabama Power Co. v. I Introduction Alabama Power Company v. I (293 Ala. 484), decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama on...
Establishing Unmodifiable Rights in Alimony: Insights from In re Herbert HAGER v. Clotyle S. HAGER (Stead)

Establishing Unmodifiable Rights in Alimony: Insights from In re Herbert HAGER v. Clotyle S. HAGER (Stead)

Date: Aug 9, 1974
Establishing Unmodifiable Rights in Alimony: Insights from In re Herbert HAGER v. Clotyle S. HAGER (Stead) Introduction The landmark case of In re Herbert HAGER v. Clotyle S. HAGER (Stead) (293 Ala....
Saturday Closures as Legal Holidays: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS v. RENFRO Establishes Harmonious Statutory Interpretation

Saturday Closures as Legal Holidays: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS v. RENFRO Establishes Harmonious Statutory Interpretation

Date: Feb 15, 1974
Saturday Closures as Legal Holidays: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS v. RENFRO Establishes Harmonious Statutory Interpretation Introduction The case of League of Women Voters of Alabama v. Hugh Renfro et al....
Void Exclusion of Government-Owned Vehicles in Uninsured Motorist Coverage under Alabama Law

Void Exclusion of Government-Owned Vehicles in Uninsured Motorist Coverage under Alabama Law

Date: Aug 31, 1973
Void Exclusion of Government-Owned Vehicles in Uninsured Motorist Coverage under Alabama Law Introduction The case In re Gwen HIGGINS, a minor v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. Ex parte NATIONWIDE...
Legitimate Scope of Warrantless Vehicle Searches: Insights from In re James B. DANIELS v. STATE of Alabama

Legitimate Scope of Warrantless Vehicle Searches: Insights from In re James B. DANIELS v. STATE of Alabama

Date: Apr 6, 1973
Legitimate Scope of Warrantless Vehicle Searches: Insights from In re James B. DANIELS v. STATE of Alabama Introduction The case of In re James B. DANIELS v. STATE of Alabama (290 Ala. 316)...
Burden of Proof on Creditors in Usury Claims: Brockway v. United States Finance Co.

Burden of Proof on Creditors in Usury Claims: Brockway v. United States Finance Co.

Date: Sep 29, 1972
Burden of Proof on Creditors in Usury Claims: Brockway v. United States Finance Co. Introduction Brockway v. United States Finance Co. (289 Ala. 198) is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
State Sovereign Immunity Upholds Constitutional Protections Against Suits Affecting Public Property Rights

State Sovereign Immunity Upholds Constitutional Protections Against Suits Affecting Public Property Rights

Date: Aug 6, 1971
State Sovereign Immunity Upholds Constitutional Protections Against Suits Affecting Public Property Rights Introduction Leon Aland v. Joe W. Graham, etc. et al. is a seminal case decided by the...
Ensuring Due Process in Alcoholic Beverage Control: Mandamus Writs Upheld

Ensuring Due Process in Alcoholic Beverage Control: Mandamus Writs Upheld

Date: Nov 20, 1970
Ensuring Due Process in Alcoholic Beverage Control: Mandamus Writs Upheld Introduction The case of Norwood Hodges and James E. Caldwell versus the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board brings to light...
Freeman v. Hall: Establishing Probable Prejudice Standard for Juror Voir Dire Responses

Freeman v. Hall: Establishing Probable Prejudice Standard for Juror Voir Dire Responses

Date: Aug 7, 1970
Freeman v. Hall: Establishing Probable Prejudice Standard for Juror Voir Dire Responses Introduction The Supreme Court of Alabama, in the landmark case of Mrs. Irene H. FREEMAN and Ideal Mutual...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert