Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alabama Case Commentaries

Waddell Reed, Inc. v. United Investors Life Insurance Company: Establishing the ‘Participant’ Doctrine in Tortious Interference

Waddell Reed, Inc. v. United Investors Life Insurance Company: Establishing the ‘Participant’ Doctrine in Tortious Interference

Date: Jul 4, 2003
Waddell Reed, Inc. v. United Investors Life Insurance Company: Establishing the ‘Participant’ Doctrine in Tortious Interference Introduction In the landmark case Waddell Reed, Inc., et al. v. United...
Affirmative Defense of Legislative Privilege and Strict Standards in Defamation Claims: Kim Butler v. Town of Argo

Affirmative Defense of Legislative Privilege and Strict Standards in Defamation Claims: Kim Butler v. Town of Argo

Date: Jul 1, 2003
Affirmative Defense of Legislative Privilege and Strict Standards in Defamation Claims: Kim Butler v. Town of Argo Introduction Kim Butler v. Town of Argo, Paul Jennings et al. is a seminal case...
Reaffirmation of the Year-and-a-Day Rule in Alabama: KEY v. STATE of Alabama Analysis

Reaffirmation of the Year-and-a-Day Rule in Alabama: KEY v. STATE of Alabama Analysis

Date: Jun 28, 2003
Reaffirmation of the Year-and-a-Day Rule in Alabama: KEY v. STATE of Alabama Analysis Introduction Ex parte Ralph Lynn KEY. (In re Ralph Lynn KEY v. STATE of Alabama). (890 So. 2d 1056) The Supreme...
Ambiguity in Utility Contracts: Interpreting 'Discount' and 'Penalty' in Billing Practices

Ambiguity in Utility Contracts: Interpreting 'Discount' and 'Penalty' in Billing Practices

Date: May 10, 2003
Ambiguity in Utility Contracts: Interpreting 'Discount' and 'Penalty' in Billing Practices Introduction The case of John Michael Tucker v. Cullman-Jefferson Counties Gas District, adjudicated by the...
Voyager Insurance Co. v. Whitson and Hall: Enhancing Standards for Class Certification in Unjust Enrichment and Negligent Supervision Claims

Voyager Insurance Co. v. Whitson and Hall: Enhancing Standards for Class Certification in Unjust Enrichment and Negligent Supervision Claims

Date: May 10, 2003
Voyager Insurance Co. v. Whitson and Hall: Enhancing Standards for Class Certification in Unjust Enrichment and Negligent Supervision Claims Introduction Voyager Insurance Companies et al. v. Jackie...
Exclusive Remedy of Workers' Compensation Act Limits Uninsured Motorist Benefits: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Carlton

Exclusive Remedy of Workers' Compensation Act Limits Uninsured Motorist Benefits: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Carlton

Date: Apr 12, 2003
Exclusive Remedy of Workers' Compensation Act Limits Uninsured Motorist Benefits: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Carlton Introduction The case of State Farm Mutual Automobile...
Establishing Strict Standards for Mandamus in Discovery Proceedings: Analysis of Ex parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB

Establishing Strict Standards for Mandamus in Discovery Proceedings: Analysis of Ex parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB

Date: Mar 29, 2003
Establishing Strict Standards for Mandamus in Discovery Proceedings: Analysis of Ex parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB Introduction The case of Ex parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB (In re: Lee Dowdle and...
Affirmation of Judicial Override in Alabama's Capital Sentencing Post-Apprendi and Ring

Affirmation of Judicial Override in Alabama's Capital Sentencing Post-Apprendi and Ring

Date: Mar 15, 2003
Affirmation of Judicial Override in Alabama's Capital Sentencing Post-Apprendi and Ring Introduction The case Ex parte Melvin G. Hodges represents a pivotal moment in Alabama's judicial landscape,...
Timeliness of Mandamus Petitions in Interlocutory Orders: Insights from Ex parte Troutman Sanders, LLP

Timeliness of Mandamus Petitions in Interlocutory Orders: Insights from Ex parte Troutman Sanders, LLP

Date: Feb 22, 2003
Timeliness of Mandamus Petitions in Interlocutory Orders: Insights from Ex parte Troutman Sanders, LLP. Introduction Ex parte Troutman Sanders, LLP. (In re: Mary A. Champion et al. v. Dill, Dill,...
Defining Dredging Operations as Interstate Commerce for Sales Tax Exemption: Bean Dredging v. Alabama Department of Revenue

Defining Dredging Operations as Interstate Commerce for Sales Tax Exemption: Bean Dredging v. Alabama Department of Revenue

Date: Feb 15, 2003
Defining Dredging Operations as Interstate Commerce for Sales Tax Exemption: Bean Dredging v. Alabama Department of Revenue Introduction In the case of Bean Dredging, L.L.C., and Midstream Fuel...
Reinstatement of Jury Verdict and Mandamus Relief in EX PARTE THIRD GENERATION v. Wilson

Reinstatement of Jury Verdict and Mandamus Relief in EX PARTE THIRD GENERATION v. Wilson

Date: Feb 8, 2003
Reinstatement of Jury Verdict and Mandamus Relief in EX PARTE THIRD GENERATION, Inc. v. Wilson Introduction The case of EX PARTE THIRD GENERATION, Inc. v. Wilson (855 So. 2d 489) adjudicated by the...
Alabama Supreme Court Establishes Uniform Venue Rules for Domestic and Foreign Corporate Defendants in Civil Actions

Alabama Supreme Court Establishes Uniform Venue Rules for Domestic and Foreign Corporate Defendants in Civil Actions

Date: Feb 1, 2003
Alabama Supreme Court Establishes Uniform Venue Rules for Domestic and Foreign Corporate Defendants in Civil Actions Introduction The case of Ex parte Fontaine Trailer Company and Ex parte...
Enforcing Restrictive Stock Transfer Agreements: Insights from Michael David Bruce v. Harry Cole, Jr.

Enforcing Restrictive Stock Transfer Agreements: Insights from Michael David Bruce v. Harry Cole, Jr.

Date: Jan 25, 2003
Enforcing Restrictive Stock Transfer Agreements: Insights from Michael David Bruce v. Harry Cole, Jr. Introduction In the case of Michael David Bruce v. Harry Cole, Jr., decided on January 24, 2003,...
Reaffirming the Requirement of Present Injury for Emotional Distress Claims in Fraud Actions: Southern Bakeries, Inc. v. Knipp & Branyon

Reaffirming the Requirement of Present Injury for Emotional Distress Claims in Fraud Actions: Southern Bakeries, Inc. v. Knipp & Branyon

Date: Dec 14, 2002
Reaffirming the Requirement of Present Injury for Emotional Distress Claims in Fraud Actions: Southern Bakeries, Inc. v. Knipp & Branyon Introduction Southern Bakeries, Inc. v. Ray Knipp and David...
Alabama Supreme Court Reaffirms Threshold for State-Agent Immunity in Ex parte J. Walter Wood, Jr.

Alabama Supreme Court Reaffirms Threshold for State-Agent Immunity in Ex parte J. Walter Wood, Jr.

Date: Dec 7, 2002
Alabama Supreme Court Reaffirms Threshold for State-Agent Immunity in Ex parte J. Walter Wood, Jr. Introduction In the landmark case Ex parte J. Walter Wood, Jr., decided on December 6, 2002, the...
Alabama Supreme Court Affirms Death Sentence in Absence of Mental Retardation under ATKINS v. VIRGINIA

Alabama Supreme Court Affirms Death Sentence in Absence of Mental Retardation under ATKINS v. VIRGINIA

Date: Nov 23, 2002
Alabama Supreme Court Affirms Death Sentence in Absence of Mental Retardation under ATKINS v. VIRGINIA Introduction In the landmark case Ex parte Roy Edward Perkins (In re: Roy Edward PERKINS v....
WALDROP v. STATE of Alabama: Reinforcing Jury's Role in Capital Sentencing Post-RING v. ARIZONA

WALDROP v. STATE of Alabama: Reinforcing Jury's Role in Capital Sentencing Post-RING v. ARIZONA

Date: Nov 23, 2002
WALDROP v. STATE of Alabama: Reinforcing Jury's Role in Capital Sentencing Post-RING v. ARIZONA Introduction Ex parte Bobby Wayne Waldrop, officially cited as In re: Bobby Wayne WALDROP v. STATE of...
Alabama Supreme Court Holds Absolute Pollution-Exclusion Clause Does Not Bar Coverage for Lead Paint Injuries

Alabama Supreme Court Holds Absolute Pollution-Exclusion Clause Does Not Bar Coverage for Lead Paint Injuries

Date: Nov 23, 2002
Alabama Supreme Court Holds Absolute Pollution-Exclusion Clause Does Not Bar Coverage for Lead Paint Injuries Introduction In the landmark case of Janice Denise Porterfield, et al. v. Audubon...
Reasonable Reliance and Fraud Claims in Dual Agency: An Analysis of Potter v. First Real Estate, Inc.

Reasonable Reliance and Fraud Claims in Dual Agency: An Analysis of Potter v. First Real Estate, Inc.

Date: Sep 7, 2002
Reasonable Reliance and Fraud Claims in Dual Agency: An Analysis of Potter v. First Real Estate, Inc. Introduction The case of Joseph Potter and Jamie Potter v. First Real Estate Company, Inc., and...
Finality of Trust Settlements and Res Judicata Confirmed in Neal v. Neal

Finality of Trust Settlements and Res Judicata Confirmed in Neal v. Neal

Date: Sep 7, 2002
Finality of Trust Settlements and Res Judicata Confirmed in Neal v. Neal Introduction In the landmark case of John Stewart Neal v. Terrill Neal and James Willett Neal, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert