Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Indictment Omissions of Knowledge-of-Status Do Not Void Jurisdiction: Insights from United States v. Hobbs

Indictment Omissions of Knowledge-of-Status Do Not Void Jurisdiction: Insights from United States v. Hobbs

Date: Mar 21, 2020
Indictment Omissions of Knowledge-of-Status Do Not Void Jurisdiction: Insights from United States v. Hobbs Introduction United States v. Hobbs is a seminal case decided by the United States Court of...
Sixth Circuit Affirms ALJ’s Proper Discounting of Post-Last Insured Medical Evidence in Disability Claims: Emard v. SSA

Sixth Circuit Affirms ALJ’s Proper Discounting of Post-Last Insured Medical Evidence in Disability Claims: Emard v. SSA

Date: Mar 20, 2020
Sixth Circuit Affirms ALJ’s Proper Discounting of Post-Last Insured Medical Evidence in Disability Claims: Emard v. SSA Introduction In Emard v. Commissioner of Social Security, the United States...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claim: Howse v. Hodous & Middaugh

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claim: Howse v. Hodous & Middaugh

Date: Mar 19, 2020
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claim: Howse v. Hodous & Middaugh Introduction In the case of Shase Howse v. Thomas Hodous and Brian Middaugh, the United States Court of Appeals...
Strict Construction Against the Insurer: Depreciation Excludes Labor Costs in ACV Under Ambiguous Ohio Insurance Policies

Strict Construction Against the Insurer: Depreciation Excludes Labor Costs in ACV Under Ambiguous Ohio Insurance Policies

Date: Mar 19, 2020
Strict Construction Against the Insurer: Depreciation Excludes Labor Costs in ACV Under Ambiguous Ohio Insurance Policies Introduction The case of Andrea Perry v. Allstate Indemnity Company addresses...
Age Discrimination in Employment: Sixth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Willard v. Huntington Ford

Age Discrimination in Employment: Sixth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Willard v. Huntington Ford

Date: Mar 12, 2020
Age Discrimination in Employment: Sixth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Willard v. Huntington Ford Introduction In the case of Dennis J. Willard v. Huntington Ford, Inc., the United States Court...
Affirmation of the Good-Faith Exception in U.S. v. Gilbert

Affirmation of the Good-Faith Exception in U.S. v. Gilbert

Date: Mar 12, 2020
Affirmation of the Good-Faith Exception in U.S. v. Gilbert Introduction United States of America v. Tyrone Gilbert, 952 F.3d 759 (6th Cir. 2020), addresses the critical issue of the good-faith...
Viet v. Victor Le: Establishing the Threshold for Overtime Claims Under the FLSA

Viet v. Victor Le: Establishing the Threshold for Overtime Claims Under the FLSA

Date: Mar 11, 2020
Viet v. Victor Le: Establishing the Threshold for Overtime Claims Under the FLSA Introduction The case of Quoc Viet v. Victor Le; Copier Victor, Inc. (951 F.3d 818) addressed pivotal issues...
Reversing Dismissal: Establishing Standards for Deliberate Indifference and Retaliation in Prison Litigation

Reversing Dismissal: Establishing Standards for Deliberate Indifference and Retaliation in Prison Litigation

Date: Mar 11, 2020
Reversing Dismissal: Establishing Standards for Deliberate Indifference and Retaliation in Prison Litigation Introduction The case of Kevin Briggs v. Unknown Westcomb, et al. adjudicated by the...
Ascena Retail Group v. Tchankpa: Clarifying the Direct Evidence Test for ADA Accommodations

Ascena Retail Group v. Tchankpa: Clarifying the Direct Evidence Test for ADA Accommodations

Date: Mar 7, 2020
Ascena Retail Group v. Tchankpa: Clarifying the Direct Evidence Test for ADA Accommodations Introduction In the landmark case Kassi Tchankpa v. Ascena Retail Group, Inc., adjudicated by the United...
Clarifying Pinkerton Liability in Sentencing Enhancements: United States v. Hamm & Shields

Clarifying Pinkerton Liability in Sentencing Enhancements: United States v. Hamm & Shields

Date: Mar 7, 2020
Clarifying Pinkerton Liability in Sentencing Enhancements: United States v. Hamm & Shields Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Wesley Scott Hamm and Robert Lee Shields, the United...
Qualified Immunity and Police Use of Canines: Insights from Ashford v. Raby

Qualified Immunity and Police Use of Canines: Insights from Ashford v. Raby

Date: Mar 6, 2020
Qualified Immunity and Police Use of Canines: Insights from Ashford v. Raby Introduction The case of Keyonte Ashford, Sr. v. Michael Raby, decided on March 5, 2020, by the United States Court of...
Recognition of Statutory Changes as Extraordinary and Compelling Circumstances for Compassionate Release Under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(1)(A): United States v. R.V. Young

Recognition of Statutory Changes as Extraordinary and Compelling Circumstances for Compassionate Release Under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(1)(A): United States v. R.V. Young

Date: Mar 5, 2020
Recognition of Statutory Changes as Extraordinary and Compelling Circumstances for Compassionate Release Under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(1)(A): United States v. R.V. Young Introduction United States of...
Ohio's Disparate Treatment of Jail-Confined Electors Upheld: Insights from Mays v. LaRose

Ohio's Disparate Treatment of Jail-Confined Electors Upheld: Insights from Mays v. LaRose

Date: Mar 4, 2020
Ohio's Disparate Treatment of Jail-Confined Electors Upheld: Insights from Mays v. LaRose Introduction In the landmark case TOMMY RAY MAYS, II and QUINTON NELSON SR., indi v. LaRose, the United...
Siefert v. Hamilton County: Affirming Parental Due Process Rights in Custody Cases

Siefert v. Hamilton County: Affirming Parental Due Process Rights in Custody Cases

Date: Mar 4, 2020
Siefert v. Hamilton County: Affirming Parental Due Process Rights in Custody Cases Introduction In Siefert v. Hamilton County, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit addressed...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Plaintiff's Right to Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissal Without Triggering Two-Dismissal Bar

Sixth Circuit Affirms Plaintiff's Right to Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissal Without Triggering Two-Dismissal Bar

Date: Mar 4, 2020
Sixth Circuit Affirms Plaintiff's Right to Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissal Without Triggering Two-Dismissal Bar Introduction The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals delivered a pivotal decision in Wellfount...
Sixth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Malicious Prosecution Claim Due to Conflicting Evidence: Davis v. Gallagher

Sixth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Malicious Prosecution Claim Due to Conflicting Evidence: Davis v. Gallagher

Date: Feb 29, 2020
Sixth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Malicious Prosecution Claim Due to Conflicting Evidence: Davis v. Gallagher Introduction In the case of Chris Davis v. James Gallagher, the United States...
Failure to Accommodate Disability Under ADA: The Fisher v. Nissan North America Decision

Failure to Accommodate Disability Under ADA: The Fisher v. Nissan North America Decision

Date: Feb 28, 2020
Failure to Accommodate Disability Under ADA: The Fisher v. Nissan North America Decision Introduction The case of Michael Fisher v. Nissan North America, Inc. (951 F.3d 409) addresses significant...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Juvenile Solitary Confinement: An Analysis of J.H. v. Williamson County

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Juvenile Solitary Confinement: An Analysis of J.H. v. Williamson County

Date: Feb 28, 2020
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Juvenile Solitary Confinement: An Analysis of J.H. v. Williamson County Introduction J.H., by Conservator Betty Harris v. Williamson County, 951 F.3d 709 (6th...
Reversing Rooker-Feldman: Sixth Circuit Establishes Federal Jurisdiction in FDCPA-Based Class Actions

Reversing Rooker-Feldman: Sixth Circuit Establishes Federal Jurisdiction in FDCPA-Based Class Actions

Date: Feb 27, 2020
Reversing Rooker-Feldman: Sixth Circuit Establishes Federal Jurisdiction in FDCPA-Based Class Actions Introduction The case of Daniel Vanderkodde et al. v. Mary Jane M. Elliott, P.C. et al....
Reinforcement of Daubert Standards in ADA and Fair Housing Practices: Madej v. Maiden

Reinforcement of Daubert Standards in ADA and Fair Housing Practices: Madej v. Maiden

Date: Feb 25, 2020
Reinforcement of Daubert Standards in ADA and Fair Housing Practices: Madej v. Maiden Introduction The case of Cynthia Madej and Robert Madej v. Jeff Maiden revolves around the plaintiffs' attempt to...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert