Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Standards for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under AEDPA: Stermer v. Warren

Establishing Standards for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under AEDPA: Stermer v. Warren

Date: May 16, 2020
Establishing Standards for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under AEDPA: Stermer v. Warren Introduction The case of Linda Stermer v. Millicent Warren (959 F.3d 704),...
Enchant Christmas Lighting v. Glowco: Upholding Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Copyright Infringement

Enchant Christmas Lighting v. Glowco: Upholding Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Copyright Infringement

Date: May 15, 2020
Enchant Christmas Lighting v. Glowco: Upholding Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Copyright Infringement Introduction The case of Enchant Christmas Light Maze & Market Ltd. v. Glowco, LLC (958...
Double Jeopardy Protections in Mistrial Contexts: An Analysis of Wooten v. Warren

Double Jeopardy Protections in Mistrial Contexts: An Analysis of Wooten v. Warren

Date: May 15, 2020
Double Jeopardy Protections in Mistrial Contexts: An Analysis of Wooten v. Warren Introduction The case of John Oliver Wooten v. Patrick Warren was adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Limited Resentencing Does Not Constitute a New Judgment Under AEDPA: Analysis of Freeman v. Wainwright

Limited Resentencing Does Not Constitute a New Judgment Under AEDPA: Analysis of Freeman v. Wainwright

Date: May 13, 2020
Limited Resentencing Does Not Constitute a New Judgment Under AEDPA: Analysis of Freeman v. Wainwright Introduction Freeman v. Wainwright, 959 F.3d 226 (6th Cir. 2020), is a pivotal case addressing...
Permissive Intervention in Constitutional Disputes: Sixth Circuit’s Ruling in Buck v. Gordon

Permissive Intervention in Constitutional Disputes: Sixth Circuit’s Ruling in Buck v. Gordon

Date: May 12, 2020
Permissive Intervention in Constitutional Disputes: Sixth Circuit’s Ruling in Buck v. Gordon Introduction The case of MELISSA BUCK, et al. v. ROBERT GORDON, et al. (959 F.3d 219) adjudicated by the...
6th Circuit Establishes Equal Treatment for Religious and Secular Gatherings under the Free Exercise Clause in COVID-19 Restrictions

6th Circuit Establishes Equal Treatment for Religious and Secular Gatherings under the Free Exercise Clause in COVID-19 Restrictions

Date: May 10, 2020
6th Circuit Establishes Equal Treatment for Religious and Secular Gatherings under the Free Exercise Clause in COVID-19 Restrictions Introduction In the landmark case of Theodore Joseph Roberts,...
First Step Act Sentence Reductions: No Requirement for Plenary Resentencing and Affirmation of Reasonableness Review

First Step Act Sentence Reductions: No Requirement for Plenary Resentencing and Affirmation of Reasonableness Review

Date: May 8, 2020
First Step Act Sentence Reductions: No Requirement for Plenary Resentencing and Affirmation of Reasonableness Review Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Benjamin Preston Foreman,...
Affirmation of Limited Sentence Modification under the First Step Act in United States v. Smith

Affirmation of Limited Sentence Modification under the First Step Act in United States v. Smith

Date: May 7, 2020
Affirmation of Limited Sentence Modification under the First Step Act in United States v. Smith Introduction In United States of America v. Lakento Brian Smith, 958 F.3d 494 (6th Cir. 2020), the...
Reaffirming the Gatekeeping Role of Certificates of Appealability in Federal Habeas Corpus Appeals

Reaffirming the Gatekeeping Role of Certificates of Appealability in Federal Habeas Corpus Appeals

Date: May 7, 2020
Reaffirming the Gatekeeping Role of Certificates of Appealability in Federal Habeas Corpus Appeals: A Comprehensive Analysis of Moody v. United States Introduction In the case of Christopher Moody v....
Affirmation of Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Benefit Denials: Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security

Affirmation of Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Benefit Denials: Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: May 6, 2020
Affirmation of Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Benefit Denials: Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction In the case of Morgan Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security,...
Express Repudiation Triggers Statute of Limitations in Copyright Authorship Disputes

Express Repudiation Triggers Statute of Limitations in Copyright Authorship Disputes

Date: May 5, 2020
Express Repudiation Triggers Statute of Limitations in Copyright Authorship Disputes: Everly Brothers Case Introduction The dispute between Isaac Donald Everly (Don Everly) and the successors of his...
Sixth Circuit Upholds County Jail's Self-Medication Policy and Dismisses §1983 Claims of Deliberate Indifference

Sixth Circuit Upholds County Jail's Self-Medication Policy and Dismisses §1983 Claims of Deliberate Indifference

Date: May 5, 2020
Sixth Circuit Upholds County Jail's Self-Medication Policy and Dismisses §1983 Claims of Deliberate Indifference Introduction The case of Jacob Andrews v. Wayne County centers on the tragic death of...
Enhancing Clarity on Debt Collector Definitions: Bates v. Green Farms and Associates

Enhancing Clarity on Debt Collector Definitions: Bates v. Green Farms and Associates

Date: May 5, 2020
Enhancing Clarity on Debt Collector Definitions: Bates v. Green Farms and Associates Introduction In Bates v. Green Farms Condominium Association et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Balancing Faith and Health: Sixth Circuit Allows Drive-In Worship Under Strict RFRA Standards

Balancing Faith and Health: Sixth Circuit Allows Drive-In Worship Under Strict RFRA Standards

Date: May 3, 2020
Balancing Faith and Health: Sixth Circuit Allows Drive-In Worship Under Strict RFRA Standards Introduction The case of Maryville Baptist Church, Inc.; Dr. Jack Roberts, Plaintiffs-Appellants versus...
Qualified Immunity Denied in Unlawful Entry Claims: Hicks v. City of Cincinnati

Qualified Immunity Denied in Unlawful Entry Claims: Hicks v. City of Cincinnati

Date: May 2, 2020
Qualified Immunity Denied in Unlawful Entry Claims: Hicks v. City of Cincinnati Introduction Ruby Hicks, as the administrator of the estate of Quandavier K. Hicks, filed a lawsuit against Cincinnati...
Knowledge of Felony Status in Firearm Possession Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1): Analysis of United States v. Leon Ward

Knowledge of Felony Status in Firearm Possession Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1): Analysis of United States v. Leon Ward

Date: May 1, 2020
Knowledge of Felony Status in Firearm Possession Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1): Analysis of United States v. Leon Ward Introduction In United States v. Leon Ward (957 F.3d 691, 6th Cir. 2020), the...
Reaffirming Tennessee Aggravated Burglary as a Violent Felony Under the Armed Career Criminal Act

Reaffirming Tennessee Aggravated Burglary as a Violent Felony Under the Armed Career Criminal Act

Date: Apr 25, 2020
Reaffirming Tennessee Aggravated Burglary as a Violent Felony Under the Armed Career Criminal Act Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. David Earl Brown, 957 F.3d 679 (6th...
Tennessee's Temporary Abortion Ban During COVID-19: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis

Tennessee's Temporary Abortion Ban During COVID-19: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis

Date: Apr 25, 2020
Tennessee's Temporary Abortion Ban During COVID-19: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis Introduction The intersection of public health emergencies and individual constitutional rights has long been a...
Certificate of Appealability Mandated for State Pretrial Detainees under Habeas Corpus §2241: Sixth Circuit's Landmark Decision in Winburn v. Nagy

Certificate of Appealability Mandated for State Pretrial Detainees under Habeas Corpus §2241: Sixth Circuit's Landmark Decision in Winburn v. Nagy

Date: Apr 24, 2020
Certificate of Appealability Mandated for State Pretrial Detainees under Habeas Corpus §2241: Sixth Circuit's Landmark Decision in Winburn v. Nagy Introduction In the pivotal case of Robert Winburn...
Affirmation of Denied Qualified Immunity in KCRA Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation Claims

Affirmation of Denied Qualified Immunity in KCRA Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation Claims

Date: Apr 23, 2020
Affirmation of Denied Qualified Immunity in KCRA-Based Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation Claims Introduction In the case of Jeffrey Queen v. City of Bowling Green, Kentucky; Dustin Rockrohr,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert