Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Implied First Amendment Bivens Claims Against Federal Prison Officials Not Recognized

Implied First Amendment Bivens Claims Against Federal Prison Officials Not Recognized

Date: Jul 17, 2020
Implied First Amendment Bivens Claims Against Federal Prison Officials Not Recognized Introduction The case of Scott O. Callahan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al. (965 F.3d 520) presents a pivotal...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in **Weser v. Goodson & Anderson** Establishes Clear Standards for False Arrest Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in **Weser v. Goodson & Anderson** Establishes Clear Standards for False Arrest Claims

Date: Jul 16, 2020
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Weser v. Goodson & Anderson Establishes Clear Standards for False Arrest Claims Introduction The appellate decision in Joan Elizabeth Weser v. Kimberly Goodson;...
Mandate for Jurisdictional Discovery in Personal Jurisdiction Analysis: Malone v. Rexon

Mandate for Jurisdictional Discovery in Personal Jurisdiction Analysis: Malone v. Rexon

Date: Jul 16, 2020
Mandate for Jurisdictional Discovery in Personal Jurisdiction Analysis: Malone v. Rexon Introduction The case of Kevin Malone and Colleen Malone versus Rexon Industrial Corporation Limited,...
Controlled-Substance Offense Classification in Sentencing Enhancements: United States v. Garth

Controlled-Substance Offense Classification in Sentencing Enhancements: United States v. Garth

Date: Jul 15, 2020
Controlled-Substance Offense Classification in Sentencing Enhancements: United States v. Garth Introduction The case of United States of America v. Willie Garth, adjudicated in the United States...
Upholding Felon in Possession Conviction and Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Raymore

Upholding Felon in Possession Conviction and Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Raymore

Date: Jul 14, 2020
Upholding Felon in Possession Conviction and Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Raymore Introduction The case of United States of America v. Gregory C. Raymore, adjudicated by the United...
Sixth Circuit Establishes Strict Standards for §212(h) Waivers and Convention Against Torture Deferrals in Deportation Cases

Sixth Circuit Establishes Strict Standards for §212(h) Waivers and Convention Against Torture Deferrals in Deportation Cases

Date: Jul 11, 2020
Sixth Circuit Establishes Strict Standards for §212(h) Waivers and Convention Against Torture Deferrals in Deportation Cases Introduction The case of Dijana Kilic v. William P. Barr, Attorney General...
Sixth Circuit Establishes Precedent Against Improper Labor Depreciation in ACV Insurance Claims

Sixth Circuit Establishes Precedent Against Improper Labor Depreciation in ACV Insurance Claims

Date: Jul 11, 2020
Sixth Circuit Establishes Precedent Against Improper Labor Depreciation in ACV Insurance Claims Introduction In the case of Hicks; Williams v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, decided by the...
Enhanced Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. McReynollds: A New Precedent

Enhanced Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. McReynollds: A New Precedent

Date: Jul 10, 2020
Enhanced Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. McReynollds: A New Precedent Introduction The case of United States of America v. Calvin Earl McReynollds, Jr. (964 F.3d 555) adjudicated by the...
Clarifying the Treatment of Co-Signed Functional Capacity Evaluations under the Treating Physician Rule: Hargett v. Commissioner of Social Security

Clarifying the Treatment of Co-Signed Functional Capacity Evaluations under the Treating Physician Rule: Hargett v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Jul 9, 2020
Clarifying the Treatment of Co-Signed Functional Capacity Evaluations under the Treating Physician Rule: Hargett v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction David R. Hargett, the...
Religious Accommodation and Equal Protection in Correctional Facilities: Cecil Koger v. Mohr

Religious Accommodation and Equal Protection in Correctional Facilities: Cecil Koger v. Mohr

Date: Jul 8, 2020
Religious Accommodation and Equal Protection in Correctional Facilities: Cecil Koger v. Mohr Introduction Cecil Koger v. Gary C. Mohr, et al. (964 F.3d 532, 6th Cir. 2020) is a pivotal case...
Establishing Proximate Causation in Arson-Caused Deaths: Pritchard v. United States

Establishing Proximate Causation in Arson-Caused Deaths: Pritchard v. United States

Date: Jul 8, 2020
Establishing Proximate Causation in Arson-Caused Deaths: Pritchard v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. Steve Allen Pritchard (964 F.3d 513) adjudicated by the United...
Retaliation in Employment: Insights from Kenney v. Aspen Technologies

Retaliation in Employment: Insights from Kenney v. Aspen Technologies

Date: Jul 7, 2020
Retaliation in Employment: Insights from Kenney v. Aspen Technologies Introduction The case of Karen Kenney, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aspen Technologies, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, reported at 965 F.3d...
Affirmation of Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Hugueley v. Mays

Affirmation of Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Hugueley v. Mays

Date: Jul 2, 2020
Affirmation of Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Hugueley v. Mays Introduction Stephen Hugueley, a death-row inmate at Tennessee's Riverbend Maximum Security Institution, appealed the denial of...
Affirmation of Discretionary Denial Under the First Step Act in United States v. Ware

Affirmation of Discretionary Denial Under the First Step Act in United States v. Ware

Date: Jul 1, 2020
Affirmation of Discretionary Denial Under the First Step Act in United States v. Ware Introduction United States v. Ware is a significant appellate decision from the United States Court of Appeals...
Recognition of BRCA1 Genetic Mutation as a Disability Under the ADA

Recognition of BRCA1 Genetic Mutation as a Disability Under the ADA

Date: Jul 1, 2020
Recognition of BRCA1 Genetic Mutation as a Disability Under the ADA Introduction In Sherryl Darby v. Childvine, Inc., Tyler Mayhugh, Samantha Blizzard, 964 F.3d 440 (6th Cir. 2020), the United States...
Revisiting Title IX: The 'Erroneous Outcome' Doctrine in Doe v. Oberlin College

Revisiting Title IX: The 'Erroneous Outcome' Doctrine in Doe v. Oberlin College

Date: Jun 30, 2020
Revisiting Title IX: The 'Erroneous Outcome' Doctrine in Doe v. Oberlin College Introduction Doe v. Oberlin College (963 F.3d 580) marks a pivotal moment in the interpretation of Title IX within the...
Establishing Eighth Amendment Protections Against Unprovoked Threats in Prison Settings

Establishing Eighth Amendment Protections Against Unprovoked Threats in Prison Settings

Date: Jun 27, 2020
Establishing Eighth Amendment Protections Against Unprovoked Threats in Prison Settings Introduction In the landmark case of Fletcher Darnell Small v. Officer Brock (963 F.3d 539, 6th Cir. 2020), the...
Interpretation of "Different Location" in U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Hill

Interpretation of "Different Location" in U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Hill

Date: Jun 26, 2020
Interpretation of "Different Location" in U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Hill Introduction Case: United States of America v. Tramain Hill Court: United States Court of Appeals for the...
First Step Act Clarifies Retroactive Sentencing Adjustments: Analysis of United States v. Steven D. Flowers

First Step Act Clarifies Retroactive Sentencing Adjustments: Analysis of United States v. Steven D. Flowers

Date: Jun 24, 2020
First Step Act Clarifies Retroactive Sentencing Adjustments: Analysis of United States v. Steven D. Flowers Introduction United States of America v. Steven D. Flowers, 963 F.3d 492 (6th Cir. 2020),...
Rottmann v. Commissioner of Social Security: Affirming Substantial Evidence Standards in Disability Determinations

Rottmann v. Commissioner of Social Security: Affirming Substantial Evidence Standards in Disability Determinations

Date: Jun 20, 2020
Rottmann v. Commissioner of Social Security: Affirming Substantial Evidence Standards in Disability Determinations Introduction Joyce E. Rottmann v. Commissioner of Social Security is a pivotal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert