Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Court Upholds Strict Standard for Sentence Reduction Under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(1)(A)(i)

Court Upholds Strict Standard for Sentence Reduction Under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(1)(A)(i)

Date: Oct 9, 2021
Court Upholds Strict Standard for Sentence Reduction Under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(1)(A)(i) Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Michael R. Lemons, 15 F.4th 747 (6th Cir. 2021), the...
Price-Anderson Act Preemption Reinforced in Sixth Circuit

Price-Anderson Act Preemption Reinforced in Sixth Circuit

Date: Oct 7, 2021
Price-Anderson Act Preemption Reinforced in Sixth Circuit Introduction The case of James Matthews and Jennifer Brownfield Clark et al. v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al. adjudicated by the United States...
Double Jeopardy Implications in Multiple § 922(g) Convictions: Grant v. United States

Double Jeopardy Implications in Multiple § 922(g) Convictions: Grant v. United States

Date: Oct 2, 2021
Double Jeopardy Implications in Multiple § 922(g) Convictions: Grant v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Joshua T. Grant, 15 F.4th 452 (6th Cir. 2021), presents a significant...
Reaffirmation of Government Protection Standards in Asylum Claims Based on Gender-Based Violence: Ramos Rafael v. Garland

Reaffirmation of Government Protection Standards in Asylum Claims Based on Gender-Based Violence: Ramos Rafael v. Garland

Date: Sep 25, 2021
Reaffirmation of Government Protection Standards in Asylum Claims Based on Gender-Based Violence: Ramos Rafael v. Garland Introduction Ramos Rafael v. Garland is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Golf Village North v. City of Powell Sets New Standards for Takings Claims

Affirmation of Dismissal in Golf Village North v. City of Powell Sets New Standards for Takings Claims

Date: Sep 24, 2021
Affirmation of Dismissal in Golf Village North v. City of Powell Sets New Standards for Takings Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Golf Village North, LLC; Triangle Properties, Inc.; Golf...
Limitation of Business Interruption Insurance Coverage to Physical Loss: Sixth Circuit Decision in Santo's Italian Café v. Acuity Insurance

Limitation of Business Interruption Insurance Coverage to Physical Loss: Sixth Circuit Decision in Santo's Italian Café v. Acuity Insurance

Date: Sep 23, 2021
Limitation of Business Interruption Insurance Coverage to Physical Loss: Sixth Circuit Decision in Santo's Italian Café v. Acuity Insurance Introduction The case of Santo's Italian Café LLC v. Acuity...
Establishing Liability for Jail Policies: Brawner v. Scott County and the Deliberate Indifference Standard in Pretrial Detainee Claims

Establishing Liability for Jail Policies: Brawner v. Scott County and the Deliberate Indifference Standard in Pretrial Detainee Claims

Date: Sep 23, 2021
Establishing Liability for Jail Policies: Brawner v. Scott County and the Deliberate Indifference Standard in Pretrial Detainee Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Tammy M. Brawner v. Scott...
Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: Phillips v. Tangilag Establishes Rigorous Standards for Eighth Amendment Claims

Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: Phillips v. Tangilag Establishes Rigorous Standards for Eighth Amendment Claims

Date: Sep 18, 2021
Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: Phillips v. Tangilag Establishes Rigorous Standards for Eighth Amendment Claims Introduction In Phillips v. Tangilag (14 F.4th 524, 2021), the United...
Affirmation of 924(c) Convictions Under Pinkerton Liability and Double Jeopardy Protections: United States v. Antoine & Austin Woods

Affirmation of 924(c) Convictions Under Pinkerton Liability and Double Jeopardy Protections: United States v. Antoine & Austin Woods

Date: Sep 18, 2021
Affirmation of 924(c) Convictions Under Pinkerton Liability and Double Jeopardy Protections: United States v. Antoine & Austin Woods Introduction The case of United States of America v. Antoine Woods...
Affirming First Amendment Protections: Emotional Distress Claims Do Not Confer Standing

Affirming First Amendment Protections: Emotional Distress Claims Do Not Confer Standing

Date: Sep 16, 2021
Affirming First Amendment Protections: Emotional Distress Claims Do Not Confer Standing Introduction In the case of Marvin Gerber and Miriam Brysk v. Henry Herskovitz et al., the United States Court...
Establishing RICO Conspiracy: Agreement to Form Enterprise Suffices, Sixth Circuit Holds

Establishing RICO Conspiracy: Agreement to Form Enterprise Suffices, Sixth Circuit Holds

Date: Sep 14, 2021
Establishing RICO Conspiracy: Agreement to Form Enterprise Suffices, Sixth Circuit Holds Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Rich et al. (14 F.4th 489, 2021), the United States...
Strengthening Standing Requirements: Defining the Boundaries of Associational Standing in AAP&S v. FDA

Strengthening Standing Requirements: Defining the Boundaries of Associational Standing in AAP&S v. FDA

Date: Sep 10, 2021
Strengthening Standing Requirements: Defining the Boundaries of Associational Standing in AAP&S v. FDA Introduction The case of Association of American Physicians & Surgeons v. United States Food and...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Racial Discrimination Claim Against Fire Department: Major Smith, III v. City of Toledo

Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Racial Discrimination Claim Against Fire Department: Major Smith, III v. City of Toledo

Date: Sep 8, 2021
Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Racial Discrimination Claim Against Fire Department: Major Smith, III v. City of Toledo Introduction In Major Smith, III v. City of Toledo, the United States...
Affirming Probable Cause in Identification Requests: A Comprehensive Analysis of Barrera v. City of Mount Pleasant

Affirming Probable Cause in Identification Requests: A Comprehensive Analysis of Barrera v. City of Mount Pleasant

Date: Sep 4, 2021
Affirming Probable Cause in Identification Requests: A Comprehensive Analysis of Barrera v. City of Mount Pleasant Introduction In the realm of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, the balance between...
Sixth Circuit Establishes Stringent Standards for Racial Harassment Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981

Sixth Circuit Establishes Stringent Standards for Racial Harassment Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981

Date: Sep 3, 2021
Sixth Circuit Establishes Stringent Standards for Racial Harassment Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981 Introduction DeAnna Johnson v. Ford Motor Company, 13 F.4th 493 (6th Cir. 2021), represents a pivotal...
Clarifying the Scope of Garcetti and Heffernan: DeCrane v. Eckart Establishes Protections Against Retaliation Based on Perceived Employee Conduct

Clarifying the Scope of Garcetti and Heffernan: DeCrane v. Eckart Establishes Protections Against Retaliation Based on Perceived Employee Conduct

Date: Sep 2, 2021
Clarifying the Scope of Garcetti and Heffernan: DeCrane v. Eckart Establishes Protections Against Retaliation Based on Perceived Employee Conduct Introduction In the landmark case of Sean DeCrane v....
Revolutionizing ACCA Predicate Eligibility: Cartwright v. United States

Revolutionizing ACCA Predicate Eligibility: Cartwright v. United States

Date: Sep 1, 2021
Revolutionizing ACCA Predicate Eligibility: Cartwright v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of Raymond Cartwright Jr. v. United States of America, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Redefining Procedural Defaults on Public Trial Rights: Insights from Gibbs v. Huss

Redefining Procedural Defaults on Public Trial Rights: Insights from Gibbs v. Huss

Date: Aug 31, 2021
Redefining Procedural Defaults on Public Trial Rights: Insights from Gibbs v. Huss Introduction Phillip Charles Gibbs, the petitioner-appellant, appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition by...
Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons Standard in Compassionate Release: United States v. Hunter

Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons Standard in Compassionate Release: United States v. Hunter

Date: Aug 31, 2021
Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons Standard in Compassionate Release: United States v. Hunter Introduction United States of America v. Ronald Hunter, 12 F.4th 555 (6th Cir. 2021), serves as a...
Nonparty Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses under Ohio Law: AtriCure v. Meng

Nonparty Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses under Ohio Law: AtriCure v. Meng

Date: Aug 28, 2021
Nonparty Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses under Ohio Law: AtriCure v. Meng Introduction In the case of AtriCure, Inc. v. Jian Meng aka Larry Meng; Beijing Medical Scientific Co. Ltd. dba...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert