Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Sixth Circuit Affirms Drug-Trafficking Conspiracy Convictions: Batson Challenge and Law Enforcement Testimony Upheld

Sixth Circuit Affirms Drug-Trafficking Conspiracy Convictions: Batson Challenge and Law Enforcement Testimony Upheld

Date: Feb 3, 2022
Sixth Circuit Affirms Drug-Trafficking Conspiracy Convictions: Batson Challenge and Law Enforcement Testimony Upheld Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Clayton Hall and Gregory...
Federal Rules Supersede State Affidavit-of-Merit and Presuit-Notice Requirements in Diversity Medical Malpractice Cases

Federal Rules Supersede State Affidavit-of-Merit and Presuit-Notice Requirements in Diversity Medical Malpractice Cases

Date: Feb 1, 2022
Federal Rules Supersede State Affidavit-of-Merit and Presuit-Notice Requirements in Diversity Medical Malpractice Cases Introduction In the case of Sandra Albright v. Carl Christensen, M.D., et al.,...
Pleading Standards for Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Insights from Kinney v. McDonough

Pleading Standards for Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Insights from Kinney v. McDonough

Date: Jan 27, 2022
Pleading Standards for Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Insights from Kinney v. McDonough Introduction The case of Chantena Kinney v. Denis Richard McDonough, Secretary, Department of Veteran...
Non-Retroactive Judicial Decisions Do Not Qualify as Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons for Sentence Reduction Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A): United States v. McKinnie

Non-Retroactive Judicial Decisions Do Not Qualify as Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons for Sentence Reduction Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A): United States v. McKinnie

Date: Jan 27, 2022
Non-Retroactive Judicial Decisions Do Not Qualify as Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons for Sentence Reduction Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A): United States v. McKinnie Introduction The case of...
Reinforcing Chain of Distribution in Sentencing Enhancements under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C): United States v. Tempo and Sadler

Reinforcing Chain of Distribution in Sentencing Enhancements under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C): United States v. Tempo and Sadler

Date: Jan 22, 2022
Reinforcing Chain of Distribution in Sentencing Enhancements under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C): United States v. Tempo and Sadler Introduction The case of United States of America v. Kenneth Sadler and...
Remand for Duplication of Firearm Convictions in Drug Trafficking Cases: United States v. Lara Salas

Remand for Duplication of Firearm Convictions in Drug Trafficking Cases: United States v. Lara Salas

Date: Jan 21, 2022
Remand for Duplication of Firearm Convictions in Drug Trafficking Cases: United States v. Lara Salas Introduction In United States of America v. Fernando Rafael Lara Salas, the United States Court of...
Affirming Dismissal: Standing, Mootness, and Sovereign Immunity in Thompson v. Whitmer

Affirming Dismissal: Standing, Mootness, and Sovereign Immunity in Thompson v. Whitmer

Date: Jan 20, 2022
Affirming Dismissal: Standing, Mootness, and Sovereign Immunity in Thompson v. Whitmer Introduction The case of Thompson et al. v. Whitmer et al. addressed critical issues surrounding the legality of...
Direct Physical Loss and Insurance Coverage in Pandemic Context: Estes v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

Direct Physical Loss and Insurance Coverage in Pandemic Context: Estes v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

Date: Jan 13, 2022
Direct Physical Loss and Insurance Coverage in Pandemic Context: Estes v. Cincinnati Insurance Company Introduction The case of Ryan P. Estes, D.M.D., M.S., P.S.C. v. Cincinnati Insurance Company (23...
Cunningham v. Shoop: Reinforcing Juror Impartiality Standards in Habeas Proceedings

Cunningham v. Shoop: Reinforcing Juror Impartiality Standards in Habeas Proceedings

Date: Jan 11, 2022
Cunningham v. Shoop: Reinforcing Juror Impartiality Standards in Habeas Proceedings Introduction The case of Jeronique D. Cunningham v. Tim Shoop serves as a pivotal moment in the jurisprudence...
Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent Limiting Executive Authority Under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act: Blocking COVID-19 Contractor Vaccine Mandate

Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent Limiting Executive Authority Under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act: Blocking COVID-19 Contractor Vaccine Mandate

Date: Jan 6, 2022
Sixth Circuit Sets Precedent Limiting Executive Authority Under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act: Blocking COVID-19 Contractor Vaccine Mandate Introduction In a landmark decision,...
Greene v. Crawford County: Defining Deliberate Indifference Standards for Medical Care of Pretrial Detainees

Greene v. Crawford County: Defining Deliberate Indifference Standards for Medical Care of Pretrial Detainees

Date: Jan 5, 2022
Greene v. Crawford County: Defining Deliberate Indifference Standards for Medical Care of Pretrial Detainees Introduction In the landmark case Greene v. Crawford County (20-1741), adjudicated by the...
Article III Standing and Consent Judgments: Insights from Glennborough Homeowners Association v. USPS

Article III Standing and Consent Judgments: Insights from Glennborough Homeowners Association v. USPS

Date: Dec 23, 2021
Article III Standing and Consent Judgments: Insights from Glennborough Homeowners Association v. USPS Introduction The case of Glennborough Homeowners Association, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United...
Limitation of Vicarious Liability under Title II ADA: Sixth Circuit's Affirmation in Jones v. City of Detroit

Limitation of Vicarious Liability under Title II ADA: Sixth Circuit's Affirmation in Jones v. City of Detroit

Date: Dec 22, 2021
Limitation of Vicarious Liability under Title II ADA: Sixth Circuit's Affirmation in Jones v. City of Detroit Introduction Jones v. City of Detroit is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Sixth Circuit Establishes Precedent for Considering Non-Retroactive Sentencing Changes in Compassionate Release Motions

Sixth Circuit Establishes Precedent for Considering Non-Retroactive Sentencing Changes in Compassionate Release Motions

Date: Dec 18, 2021
Sixth Circuit Establishes Precedent for Considering Non-Retroactive Sentencing Changes in Compassionate Release Motions Introduction The case of United States of America v. David E. McCall, Jr. (20...
Preservation of Arguments in ERISA §502(a)(3) Cases: Sixth Circuit Affirms District Court on Equitable Lien Claim

Preservation of Arguments in ERISA §502(a)(3) Cases: Sixth Circuit Affirms District Court on Equitable Lien Claim

Date: Dec 18, 2021
Preservation of Arguments in ERISA §502(a)(3) Cases: Sixth Circuit Affirms District Court on Equitable Lien Claim Introduction In the case of Sheet Metal Workers' Health and Welfare Fund of North...
Mandatory Stay Under the Federal Arbitration Act: Arabian Motors Group W.L.L. v. Ford Motor Company

Mandatory Stay Under the Federal Arbitration Act: Arabian Motors Group W.L.L. v. Ford Motor Company

Date: Dec 4, 2021
Mandatory Stay Under the Federal Arbitration Act: Arabian Motors Group W.L.L. v. Ford Motor Company Introduction In the landmark case of Arabian Motors Group W.L.L. v. Ford Motor Company, 19 F.4th...
Clarifying Career Offender Enhancements: Interpretation of U.S.S.G. §4B1.1 in United States v. Rodney Hymes

Clarifying Career Offender Enhancements: Interpretation of U.S.S.G. §4B1.1 in United States v. Rodney Hymes

Date: Dec 4, 2021
Clarifying Career Offender Enhancements: Interpretation of U.S.S.G. §4B1.1 in United States v. Rodney Hymes Introduction The case of United States of America v. Rodney Hymes, 19 F.4th 928 (6th Cir....
Delegation Provisions in Arbitration Agreements and Minor’s Infancy Defense: In Re StockX Customer Data Security Breach Litigation

Delegation Provisions in Arbitration Agreements and Minor’s Infancy Defense: In Re StockX Customer Data Security Breach Litigation

Date: Dec 3, 2021
Delegation Provisions in Arbitration Agreements and Minor’s Infancy Defense: In Re StockX Customer Data Security Breach Litigation Introduction The case of In Re: StockX Customer Data Security Breach...
Impact of COVID-19 Safety Measures on Fair Trial Rights: U.S. v. Charles Ray Smith

Impact of COVID-19 Safety Measures on Fair Trial Rights: U.S. v. Charles Ray Smith

Date: Nov 30, 2021
Impact of COVID-19 Safety Measures on Fair Trial Rights: U.S. v. Charles Ray Smith Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Charles Ray Smith, the Sixth Circuit Court of...
Changed Country Conditions and Asylum Claims: 6th Circuit Affirms Denial in Mbonga v. Garland

Changed Country Conditions and Asylum Claims: 6th Circuit Affirms Denial in Mbonga v. Garland

Date: Nov 23, 2021
Changed Country Conditions and Asylum Claims: 6th Circuit Affirms Denial in Mbonga v. Garland Introduction In the case of Jonas Nsongi Mbonga v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, decided on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert