Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Defensive Assertions Do Not Allow Federal Removal: An Analysis of Tisdale v. UAW Local 704

Defensive Assertions Do Not Allow Federal Removal: An Analysis of Tisdale v. UAW Local 704

Date: Jun 10, 1994
Defensive Assertions Do Not Allow Federal Removal: An Analysis of Tisdale v. United Association of Journeymen Introduction The case of Donald C. Tisdale and Larron E. Hughes v. United Association of...
Reliability of Trained Drug Detection Dogs as Probable Cause: Diaz v. United States

Reliability of Trained Drug Detection Dogs as Probable Cause: Diaz v. United States

Date: Jun 7, 1994
Reliability of Trained Drug Detection Dogs as Probable Cause: Diaz v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. Modesto Diaz, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Equitable Correction of Bankruptcy Court Deadlines: The Isaacman Decision

Equitable Correction of Bankruptcy Court Deadlines: The Isaacman Decision

Date: Jun 4, 1994
Equitable Correction of Bankruptcy Court Deadlines: The Isaacman Decision Introduction The case In re Kenneth L. Isaacman, Debtor (26 F.3d 629, 1994) serves as a pivotal precedent in bankruptcy law,...
Application of Batson Standards in Racial Peremptory Challenges: Kelly v. Withrow

Application of Batson Standards in Racial Peremptory Challenges: Kelly v. Withrow

Date: Jun 3, 1994
Application of Batson Standards in Racial Peremptory Challenges: Kelly v. Withrow Introduction Leo Kelly, Jr. v. Pamela Withrow is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Undue Hardship Standard in Bankruptcy Discharge of Student Loans: In Re Cheesman Case Analysis

Undue Hardship Standard in Bankruptcy Discharge of Student Loans: In Re Cheesman Case Analysis

Date: Jun 3, 1994
Undue Hardship Standard in Bankruptcy Discharge of Student Loans: In Re Cheesman Case Analysis Introduction The case In Re Dallas R. Cheesman; Margaret J. Cheesman, Debtors (25 F.3d 356) adjudicated...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Qualified Immunity Standards for Public Employee Free Speech and Due Process Claims: Williams v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Qualified Immunity Standards for Public Employee Free Speech and Due Process Claims: Williams v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: May 27, 1994
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Qualified Immunity Standards for Public Employee Free Speech and Due Process Claims: Williams v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction In the landmark case Maggie Williams v....
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Foster Care Abuse Litigation: Lintz v. Skipski

Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Foster Care Abuse Litigation: Lintz v. Skipski

Date: May 26, 1994
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Foster Care Abuse Litigation: Lintz v. Skipski Introduction The case of Sherry Lintz et al. v. Linda K. Skipski presents a pivotal moment in the application of...
Single Filing Rule Affirmed in EEOC v. Wilson Metal Casket Company

Single Filing Rule Affirmed in EEOC v. Wilson Metal Casket Company

Date: May 24, 1994
Single Filing Rule Affirmed in EEOC v. Wilson Metal Casket Company Introduction The case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Wilson Metal Casket Company addressed significant issues...
Affirmation of At-Will Employment and Due Process Limitations in University Employment Termination: Donald v. Gregory

Affirmation of At-Will Employment and Due Process Limitations in University Employment Termination: Donald v. Gregory

Date: May 19, 1994
Affirmation of At-Will Employment and Due Process Limitations in University Employment Termination: Donald v. Gregory Introduction Donald V. Gregory v. James C. Hunt, et al., 24 F.3d 781 (6th Cir....
Eleventh Amendment Immunity Reinforced in O'Hara III v. Wigginton et al.

Eleventh Amendment Immunity Reinforced in O'Hara III v. Wigginton et al.

Date: May 19, 1994
Eleventh Amendment Immunity Reinforced in O'Hara III v. Wigginton et al. Introduction O'Hara III v. Wigginton et al. (24 F.3d 823, 6th Cir. 1994) is a pivotal case that underscores the boundaries of...
Limits on Personal Jurisdiction for Foreign Associations: Reynolds v. IAAF

Limits on Personal Jurisdiction for Foreign Associations: Reynolds v. IAAF

Date: May 18, 1994
Limits on Personal Jurisdiction for Foreign Associations: Reynolds v. IAAF Introduction Reynolds v. International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Red Cross Protective Order Violation: COLEMAN v. AMERICAN RED CROSS Analysis

Red Cross Protective Order Violation: COLEMAN v. AMERICAN RED CROSS Analysis

Date: May 17, 1994
Red Cross Protective Order Violation: COLEMAN v. AMERICAN RED CROSS Analysis Introduction The case of Cheryl Coleman; Gerry COLEMAN v. AMERICAN RED CROSS presented a significant legal debate...
No Obligation to Inform Defendants of Self-Representation Rights: United States v. Martin

No Obligation to Inform Defendants of Self-Representation Rights: United States v. Martin

Date: May 17, 1994
No Obligation to Inform Defendants of Self-Representation Rights: United States v. Martin Introduction The case of United States of America v. Erina S. Martin, 25 F.3d 293 (6th Cir. 1994), addresses...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Conde v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.: Reinforcing Standards for Expert Testimony and Product Liability

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Conde v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.: Reinforcing Standards for Expert Testimony and Product Liability

Date: May 17, 1994
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Conde v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.: Reinforcing Standards for Expert Testimony and Product Liability Introduction The appellate case of Conde v. Velsicol Chemical...
Qualified Immunity in Post-Answer Motions: Insights from English v. Dyke et al.

Qualified Immunity in Post-Answer Motions: Insights from English v. Dyke et al.

Date: May 14, 1994
Qualified Immunity in Post-Answer Motions: Insights from English v. Dyke et al. Introduction The case of John English v. Dennis Dyke; Terry Pitcher; Pamela Withrow; and Linda Flanagan, decided by the...
Establishing Standing Based on Threat of License Revocation: G V Lounge, Inc. v. Michigan Liquor Control Commission

Establishing Standing Based on Threat of License Revocation: G V Lounge, Inc. v. Michigan Liquor Control Commission

Date: May 13, 1994
Establishing Standing Based on Threat of License Revocation: G V Lounge, Inc. v. Michigan Liquor Control Commission Introduction G V Lounge, Inc. v. Michigan Liquor Control Commission is a...
Limitations on Interlocutory Appeals Under Rule 54(b): GenCorp v. Shearson Lehman Brothers

Limitations on Interlocutory Appeals Under Rule 54(b): GenCorp v. Shearson Lehman Brothers

Date: May 7, 1994
Limitations on Interlocutory Appeals Under Rule 54(b): GenCorp v. Shearson Lehman Brothers Introduction The case of General Acquisition, Inc. v. GenCorp, Inc. involves a complex interplay between...
Reaffirming Warrant Requirements and Municipal Liability: An In-Depth Analysis of O'Brien v. City of Grand Rapids

Reaffirming Warrant Requirements and Municipal Liability: An In-Depth Analysis of O'Brien v. City of Grand Rapids

Date: May 4, 1994
Reaffirming Warrant Requirements and Municipal Liability: An In-Depth Analysis of O'Brien v. City of Grand Rapids Introduction The case of Joseph J. O'Brien v. City of Grand Rapids, William Hegarty,...
Affirmation of Conspiracy and Obstruction of Justice Convictions in USA v. Mullins

Affirmation of Conspiracy and Obstruction of Justice Convictions in USA v. Mullins

Date: May 3, 1994
Affirmation of Conspiracy and Obstruction of Justice Convictions in United States of America v. Gene R. "Moon" Mullins Introduction United States of America v. Gene R. "Moon" Mullins is a pivotal...
Reversing the Exclusion of Firearm Evidence: United States v. Johnson

Reversing the Exclusion of Firearm Evidence: United States v. Johnson

Date: May 3, 1994
Reversing the Exclusion of Firearm Evidence: United States v. Johnson Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Lee Erwin Johnson (22 F.3d 674, 1994), the United States Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert