Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Sixth Circuit Upholds Nepotism Policy: No Violation of Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses

Sixth Circuit Upholds Nepotism Policy: No Violation of Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses

Date: Jul 14, 1995
Sixth Circuit Upholds Nepotism Policy: No Violation of Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses Introduction The case of Martha Sabol Wright and John C. Wright, Jr. v. MetroHealth Medical Center (58...
Extending Double Jeopardy Protections to Civil Forfeiture: Ursery v. USA

Extending Double Jeopardy Protections to Civil Forfeiture: Ursery v. USA

Date: Jul 14, 1995
Extending Double Jeopardy Protections to Civil Forfeiture: Ursery v. USA Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Guy Jerome Ursery, 59 F.3d 568 (6th Cir. 1995), the United...
Appellate Affirmation of RICO's Pattern Requirement: Columbia Natural Resources v. Tatum

Appellate Affirmation of RICO's Pattern Requirement: Columbia Natural Resources v. Tatum

Date: Jul 12, 1995
Appellate Affirmation of RICO's Pattern Requirement: Columbia Natural Resources v. Tatum Introduction The case of Columbia Natural Resources, Inc.; Stocker Sitler Oil Company v. Zachary Tatum...
HECK v. HUMPHREY: Establishing the Necessity of Conviction Invalidity in §1983 Claims

HECK v. HUMPHREY: Establishing the Necessity of Conviction Invalidity in §1983 Claims

Date: Jul 7, 1995
HECK v. HUMPHREY: Establishing the Necessity of Conviction Invalidity in §1983 Claims Introduction In the landmark case Gordon R. Schilling v. Edward L. White and Robert L. Massie, the United States...
Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections: Right to Access Affidavits Supporting Search Warrants

Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections: Right to Access Affidavits Supporting Search Warrants

Date: Jul 6, 1995
Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections: Right to Access Affidavits Supporting Search Warrants 1. Introduction The case of In re SEARCH WARRANTS ISSUED AUGUST 29, 1994. (No. MS-2-95-9) adjudicated by...
Defining 'Employer' under FLSA: Cole Enterprises, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Labor

Defining 'Employer' under FLSA: Cole Enterprises, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Labor

Date: Jul 1, 1995
Defining 'Employer' under FLSA: Cole Enterprises, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Labor Introduction In the landmark case of United States Department of Labor v. Cole Enterprises, Inc., the United States...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Prison Officials in Grievance-Related Transfer

Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Prison Officials in Grievance-Related Transfer

Date: Jun 30, 1995
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Prison Officials in Grievance-Related Transfer Introduction The case of Michael Charles Ward v. Dennis Dyke et al. addresses the issue of qualified immunity in the...
Affirmation of First Amendment Rights in Prison Settings: Rahman v. Michigan Department of Corrections

Affirmation of First Amendment Rights in Prison Settings: Rahman v. Michigan Department of Corrections

Date: Jun 22, 1995
Affirmation of First Amendment Rights in Prison Settings: Rahman v. Michigan Department of Corrections Introduction The case of Virgil Abdur-Rahman v. Michigan Department of Corrections is a...
Judicial Finality and Inadmissibility of Post-Decision Testimony: Perkins v. LeCureux

Judicial Finality and Inadmissibility of Post-Decision Testimony: Perkins v. LeCureux

Date: Jun 22, 1995
Judicial Finality and Inadmissibility of Post-Decision Testimony: Perkins v. LeCureux Introduction Perkins v. LeCureux, 58 F.3d 214 (6th Cir. 1995), is a landmark decision by the United States Court...
Affirmation of At-Will Employment and Limitations on Promissory Estoppel in Age Discrimination Claims: Snyder v. AG Trucking

Affirmation of At-Will Employment and Limitations on Promissory Estoppel in Age Discrimination Claims: Snyder v. AG Trucking

Date: Jun 15, 1995
Affirmation of At-Will Employment and Limitations on Promissory Estoppel in Age Discrimination Claims: Snyder v. AG Trucking Introduction In the landmark case of James R. Snyder v. AG Trucking, Inc.,...
Clarence Erwin Copeland v. Machulis & Stephens: Affirming Due Process and Equal Protection under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Clarence Erwin Copeland v. Machulis & Stephens: Affirming Due Process and Equal Protection under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: Jun 14, 1995
Clarence Erwin Copeland v. Machulis & Stephens: Affirming Due Process and Equal Protection under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction In the landmark appellate case of Clarence Erwin Copeland v. Mark...
Enforceability of Forum Selection Clauses in International Securities Transactions: West Shell Jr. v. R.W. Sturge, Ltd.

Enforceability of Forum Selection Clauses in International Securities Transactions: West Shell Jr. v. R.W. Sturge, Ltd.

Date: Jun 9, 1995
Enforceability of Forum Selection Clauses in International Securities Transactions: West Shell Jr. v. R.W. Sturge, Ltd. Introduction In the landmark case of West Shell Jr. and Andrew C. Hauck III v....
Establishing the Validity of Anticipatory Search Warrants and Guidelines Application in Drug Importation Convictions

Establishing the Validity of Anticipatory Search Warrants and Guidelines Application in Drug Importation Convictions

Date: Jun 8, 1995
Establishing the Validity of Anticipatory Search Warrants and Guidelines Application in Drug Importation Convictions Introduction In the appellate case titled United States of America v. Lucky A....
Discriminatory Harassment Policies and First Amendment Protections: Sixth Circuit Upholds Unconstitutionality in CMU Case

Discriminatory Harassment Policies and First Amendment Protections: Sixth Circuit Upholds Unconstitutionality in CMU Case

Date: Jun 6, 1995
Discriminatory Harassment Policies and First Amendment Protections: Sixth Circuit Upholds Unconstitutionality in CMU Case Introduction The case of Keith Dambrot, Plaintiff-Appellant, along with other...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Preliminary and Permanent Injunctions: An Analysis of Moltan Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Preliminary and Permanent Injunctions: An Analysis of Moltan Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries

Date: Jun 3, 1995
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Preliminary and Permanent Injunctions: An Analysis of Moltan Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries Introduction The case Moltan Company v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. (55 F.3d...
Distinguishing Statute of Repose and Limitations Periods in Construction Contract Claims: Garden City Osteopathic Hospital v. HBE Corp

Distinguishing Statute of Repose and Limitations Periods in Construction Contract Claims: Garden City Osteopathic Hospital v. HBE Corp

Date: Jun 2, 1995
Distinguishing Statute of Repose and Limitations Periods in Construction Contract Claims: Garden City Osteopathic Hospital v. HBE Corporation Introduction The case of Garden City Osteopathic Hospital...
Clarifying Work Product Privilege in Expert Witness Discovery: Insights from Haworth Inc. v. Herman Miller, Inc.

Clarifying Work Product Privilege in Expert Witness Discovery: Insights from Haworth Inc. v. Herman Miller, Inc.

Date: May 31, 1995
Clarifying Work Product Privilege in Expert Witness Discovery: Insights from Haworth Inc. v. Herman Miller, Inc. Introduction Haworth Inc. v. Herman Miller, Inc. is a significant judicial decision...
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations and Due Process Protections in §1983 Claims

Affirmation of Statute of Limitations and Due Process Protections in §1983 Claims

Date: May 26, 1995
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations and Due Process Protections in §1983 Claims Introduction LRL Properties, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, brought forth a legal action against Portage Metropolitan...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Clarification in Spirko v. Van Wert County Sheriff

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Clarification in Spirko v. Van Wert County Sheriff

Date: May 18, 1995
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Clarification in Spirko v. Van Wert County Sheriff Introduction The case of United States of America, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Stan D. Owens, Van Wert County Sheriff,...
Standing as a Beneficiary under ERISA: Sixth Circuit Upholds Denial in Lloyd v. Crawford

Standing as a Beneficiary under ERISA: Sixth Circuit Upholds Denial in Lloyd v. Crawford

Date: May 12, 1995
Standing as a Beneficiary under ERISA: Sixth Circuit Upholds Denial in Lloyd v. Crawford Introduction In the case of Lloyd v. Crawford, III, et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert