Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Defining "Substantial Limitation" Under the ADA: Insights from McKay v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing

Defining "Substantial Limitation" Under the ADA: Insights from McKay v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing

Date: Apr 9, 1997
Defining "Substantial Limitation" Under the ADA: Insights from McKay v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Introduction McKay v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, U.S.A., Inc. (110 F.3d 369) is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Dismissal for Failure to Comply with Discovery Obligations under FELA

Affirmation of Dismissal for Failure to Comply with Discovery Obligations under FELA

Date: Apr 8, 1997
Affirmation of Dismissal for Failure to Comply with Discovery Obligations under FELA Introduction The case of William Harmon v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (110 F.3d 364, 1997) presents a pivotal...
Choice of Law in Wrongful Death: Sixth Circuit Prioritizes Domicile Over Relationship Center

Choice of Law in Wrongful Death: Sixth Circuit Prioritizes Domicile Over Relationship Center

Date: Apr 4, 1997
Choice of Law in Wrongful Death: Sixth Circuit Prioritizes Domicile Over Relationship Center Introduction The case of Alexander MacDonald, et al. v. General Motors Corporation adjudicated by the...
ERISA's Felony Exclusion and Arbitrary and Capricious Review: Insights from Helton v. ACS Group

ERISA's Felony Exclusion and Arbitrary and Capricious Review: Insights from Helton v. ACS Group

Date: Mar 28, 1997
ERISA's Felony Exclusion and Arbitrary and Capricious Review: Insights from Helton v. ACS Group Introduction In the landmark case of Ralph E. Helton v. ACS Group, and J S Cafeterias of Pigeon Forge,...
Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from UNITED STATES v. URSERY

Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from UNITED STATES v. URSERY

Date: Mar 27, 1997
Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from UNITED STATES v. URSERY Introduction United States of America v. Guy Jerome Ursery, 109 F.3d 1129 (6th Cir. 1997), addresses critical issues...
Enforcement of Automatic Termination Clauses in License Agreements: Blue Cross Blue Shield Mutual of Ohio v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Enforcement of Automatic Termination Clauses in License Agreements: Blue Cross Blue Shield Mutual of Ohio v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Date: Mar 27, 1997
Enforcement of Automatic Termination Clauses in License Agreements: Blue Cross Blue Shield Mutual of Ohio v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Introduction The case of Blue Cross Blue Shield Mutual...
Nieman v. NLO, Inc. and NL Industries, Inc.: Establishing the Boundary for Continuing Trespass Claims Under the Price-Anderson Act

Nieman v. NLO, Inc. and NL Industries, Inc.: Establishing the Boundary for Continuing Trespass Claims Under the Price-Anderson Act

Date: Mar 20, 1997
Nieman v. NLO, Inc. and NL Industries, Inc.: Establishing the Boundary for Continuing Trespass Claims Under the Price-Anderson Act Introduction The case of Anthony J. Nieman vs. NLO, Inc. and NL...
Reversing Summary Judgment in Trademark Infringement: Sixth Circuit Reinforces Factual Inquiry on Consumer Confusion

Reversing Summary Judgment in Trademark Infringement: Sixth Circuit Reinforces Factual Inquiry on Consumer Confusion

Date: Mar 15, 1997
Reversing Summary Judgment in Trademark Infringement: Sixth Circuit Reinforces Factual Inquiry on Consumer Confusion Introduction In the landmark case of Daddy's Junky Music Stores, Inc. v. Big...
Sanctions under Rule 11 and Section 1927: Insights from Ridder v. Springfield

Sanctions under Rule 11 and Section 1927: Insights from Ridder v. Springfield

Date: Mar 15, 1997
Sanctions under Rule 11 and Section 1927: Insights from Ridder v. Springfield Introduction Ridder v. City of Springfield is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Intentional Wrongdoing Required for Bad Faith Claims: Big Yank Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.

Intentional Wrongdoing Required for Bad Faith Claims: Big Yank Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.

Date: Mar 13, 1997
Intentional Wrongdoing Required for Bad Faith Claims: Big Yank Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. Introduction Big Yank Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 125 F.3d 308 (6th...
Affirmation of Kentucky's Campaign Finance Law: Upholding First Amendment Protections

Affirmation of Kentucky's Campaign Finance Law: Upholding First Amendment Protections

Date: Mar 8, 1997
Affirmation of Kentucky's Campaign Finance Law: Upholding First Amendment Protections Introduction The case of Kentucky Right to Life, Inc.; Kentucky Right to Life Political Action Committee...
Retaliation Claims under Section 1983: Insights from Valot v. Southeast Local School District Board of Education

Retaliation Claims under Section 1983: Insights from Valot v. Southeast Local School District Board of Education

Date: Mar 7, 1997
Retaliation Claims under Section 1983: Insights from Valot v. Southeast Local School District Board of Education Introduction The case of Sally Ann Valot, Jean Hansen, Anna D. Roosa v. Southeast...
Defining Separate Criminal Episodes under 18 U.S.C. §922(e): Murphy v. United States

Defining Separate Criminal Episodes under 18 U.S.C. §922(e): Murphy v. United States

Date: Mar 5, 1997
Defining Separate Criminal Episodes under 18 U.S.C. §922(e): Murphy v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Calvin B. Murphy, 107 F.3d 1199 (6th Cir. 1997), is a pivotal case that...
Reaffirming the Omnibus Clause: Insights from United States v. Sanford I. Atkin

Reaffirming the Omnibus Clause: Insights from United States v. Sanford I. Atkin

Date: Mar 5, 1997
Reaffirming the Omnibus Clause: Insights from United States v. Sanford I. Atkin Introduction The case of United States of America v. Sanford I. Atkin, decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Failure to Establish Necessary Accommodation: Gaines v. USPS Sets Precedent

Failure to Establish Necessary Accommodation: Gaines v. USPS Sets Precedent

Date: Mar 4, 1997
Failure to Establish Necessary Accommodation: Gaines v. USPS Sets Precedent Introduction The case Gaines v. United States Postal Service (107 F.3d 1171, 6th Cir. 1997) addresses critical issues...
United States v. Jones (1997): Sentencing Guidelines and the Admissibility of Handwriting Analysis Post-Daubert

United States v. Jones (1997): Sentencing Guidelines and the Admissibility of Handwriting Analysis Post-Daubert

Date: Mar 4, 1997
United States v. Jones (1997): Sentencing Guidelines and the Admissibility of Handwriting Analysis Post-Daubert Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Kathleen Kremser...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under ERISA: Weiner v. Klais & Co. Analysis

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under ERISA: Weiner v. Klais & Co. Analysis

Date: Feb 27, 1997
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under ERISA: Weiner v. Klais & Co. Analysis Introduction The case of Alan Weiner, D.P.M., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Klais and Company, Inc., Defendant-Appellee...
Affirmation of Same-Sex Sexual Harassment under Title VII

Affirmation of Same-Sex Sexual Harassment under Title VII

Date: Feb 25, 1997
Affirmation of Same-Sex Sexual Harassment under Title VII Introduction In the landmark case of Terry L. Yeary v. Goodwill Industries-Knoxville, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Limits on Personal Jurisdiction in International Intellectual Property Disputes: A Comprehensive Analysis of International Technologies Consultants, Inc. v. Euroglas S.A. et al.

Limits on Personal Jurisdiction in International Intellectual Property Disputes: A Comprehensive Analysis of International Technologies Consultants, Inc. v. Euroglas S.A. et al.

Date: Feb 21, 1997
Limits on Personal Jurisdiction in International Intellectual Property Disputes: A Comprehensive Analysis of International Technologies Consultants, Inc. v. Euroglas S.A., Glas Trosch Holding A.G.,...
Statute of Limitations in Federal Civil Rights Actions: Merriweather v. City of Memphis

Statute of Limitations in Federal Civil Rights Actions: Merriweather v. City of Memphis

Date: Feb 21, 1997
Statute of Limitations in Federal Civil Rights Actions: Merriweather v. City of Memphis 1. Introduction In the landmark case of Deborah Merriweather v. City of Memphis, the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert