Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

“Post-Bruen Stability in Federal Firearms Law: The Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms
            the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(o) and 922(g)(1)”

“Post-Bruen Stability in Federal Firearms Law: The Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(o) and 922(g)(1)”

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Post-Bruen Stability in Federal Firearms Law: The Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(o) and 922(g)(1) Introduction In United States v. Greely, Branch & Burnett...
Post-Bruen Endurance of Federal Firearms Prohibitions: Sixth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of §§ 922(o) & 922(g)(1) and Clarifies Waiver of § 922(g)(3) Challenges

Post-Bruen Endurance of Federal Firearms Prohibitions: Sixth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of §§ 922(o) & 922(g)(1) and Clarifies Waiver of § 922(g)(3) Challenges

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Post-Bruen Endurance of Federal Firearms Prohibitions: Sixth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of §§ 922(o) & 922(g)(1) and Clarifies Waiver of § 922(g)(3) Challenges Introduction United States v....
When Forum-Selection Clauses Collide: The Sixth Circuit Limits Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissals Where Venue Agreements Are Factually Disputed

When Forum-Selection Clauses Collide: The Sixth Circuit Limits Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissals Where Venue Agreements Are Factually Disputed

Date: Jul 3, 2025
When Forum-Selection Clauses Collide: The Sixth Circuit Limits Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissals Where Venue Agreements Are Factually Disputed Introduction VCST International B.V. (“VCST”), a Belgian...

The Sixth Circuit’s “Element-by-Element” Mandate for Class Certification:
Speerly v. General Motors, LLC and the Re-Calibration of Rule 23 Analysis

The Sixth Circuit’s “Element-by-Element” Mandate for Class Certification: Speerly v. General Motors, LLC and the Re-Calibration of Rule 23 Analysis

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The Sixth Circuit’s “Element-by-Element” Mandate for Class Certification: Speerly v. General Motors, LLC and the Re-Calibration of Rule 23 Analysis 1. Introduction On 27 June 2025 the en-banc United...
United States v. Higgins: “Continuous-Dealer Residence Nexus” and Refreshed-Staleness Doctrine Fortified by the Sixth Circuit

United States v. Higgins: “Continuous-Dealer Residence Nexus” and Refreshed-Staleness Doctrine Fortified by the Sixth Circuit

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Higgins: “Continuous-Dealer Residence Nexus” and Refreshed-Staleness Doctrine Fortified by the Sixth Circuit Introduction Citation: United States v. Rodney Hamilton Higgins, Jr., No....
Escalating Racial Abuse, Physical Harm, and Threats as “Adverse Action”:  New Guidance on Retaliation & Equal-Protection Pleading Standards in Coleman v. Kent

Escalating Racial Abuse, Physical Harm, and Threats as “Adverse Action”: New Guidance on Retaliation & Equal-Protection Pleading Standards in Coleman v. Kent

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Escalating Racial Abuse, Physical Harm, and Threats as “Adverse Action”: New Guidance on Retaliation & Equal-Protection Pleading Standards in Coleman v. Kent 1. Introduction Charlie Omar Coleman, an...
United States v. Doyce Barnes: The Sixth Circuit Declares Pyramid Schemes Per Se Mail-Fraud and Unveils the “Emperor-Package” Investment-Contract Test

United States v. Doyce Barnes: The Sixth Circuit Declares Pyramid Schemes Per Se Mail-Fraud and Unveils the “Emperor-Package” Investment-Contract Test

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Doyce Barnes: The Sixth Circuit Declares Pyramid Schemes Per Se Mail-Fraud and Unveils the “Emperor-Package” Investment-Contract Test Introduction In United States v. Doyce Barnes...
Pyramid Schemes as Per Se Schemes to Defraud & Hybrid MLM “Packages” as Securities ―
            A Commentary on United States v. Doyce Barnes (6th Cir. 2025)

Pyramid Schemes as Per Se Schemes to Defraud & Hybrid MLM “Packages” as Securities ― A Commentary on United States v. Doyce Barnes (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Pyramid Schemes Are, by Definition, Federal Schemes to Defraud & Hybrid MLM Investments Can Be “Securities” — Detailed Commentary on United States v. Doyce Barnes, 84 F.4th ___ (6th Cir. 2025)...
Pyramid Schemes as Per-Se Mail Fraud & “Passive-Income” Packages as Securities: A Commentary on United States v. Faraday Hosseinipour

Pyramid Schemes as Per-Se Mail Fraud & “Passive-Income” Packages as Securities: A Commentary on United States v. Faraday Hosseinipour

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Pyramid Schemes as Per-Se Mail Fraud & “Passive-Income” Packages as Securities: Commentary on United States v. Faraday Hosseinipour, 82 F.4th 921 (6th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction United States v....
United States v. Faraday Hosseinipour – The Sixth Circuit Clarifies that “Pyramid Schemes” Are Not a Separate Federal Crime but Simply One Variety of Mail- or Securities-Fraud Conspiracy

United States v. Faraday Hosseinipour – The Sixth Circuit Clarifies that “Pyramid Schemes” Are Not a Separate Federal Crime but Simply One Variety of Mail- or Securities-Fraud Conspiracy

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Faraday Hosseinipour – The Sixth Circuit Clarifies that “Pyramid Schemes” Are Not a Separate Federal Crime but Simply One Variety of Mail- or Securities-Fraud Conspiracy Introduction...
United States v. Maike: Sixth Circuit Clarifies that Pyramid Schemes Are Per Se Mail-Fraud “Schemes to Defraud” and That High-Tier MLM Packages Qualify as Securities

United States v. Maike: Sixth Circuit Clarifies that Pyramid Schemes Are Per Se Mail-Fraud “Schemes to Defraud” and That High-Tier MLM Packages Qualify as Securities

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Maike Sixth Circuit Clarifies that Pyramid Schemes Are Per Se Mail-Fraud “Schemes to Defraud” and That High-Tier MLM Packages Qualify as Securities 1. Introduction This consolidated...
United States v. Maike: Pyramid Schemes as Per-Se Mail Fraud & “Emperor” Packages as Securities

United States v. Maike: Pyramid Schemes as Per-Se Mail Fraud & “Emperor” Packages as Securities

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Maike: Pyramid Schemes as Per-Se Mail Fraud & “Emperor” Packages as Securities 1. Introduction United States v. Richard Maike, Nos. 22-6114/6121/23-5029/5560/5561/5563 (6th Cir....
Anonymous Retention of Newborn Blood Spots Not a Constitutional Violation: Sixth Circuit Defines Limits of Parental Due Process and Fourth-Amendment Rights

Anonymous Retention of Newborn Blood Spots Not a Constitutional Violation: Sixth Circuit Defines Limits of Parental Due Process and Fourth-Amendment Rights

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Anonymous Retention of Newborn Blood Spots Not a Constitutional Violation: Sixth Circuit Defines Limits of Parental Due Process and Fourth-Amendment Rights Introduction In Adam Kanuszewski v....
“Minimal-Explanation Suffices” – The Sixth Circuit’s Clarification on Consecutive Revocation Sentences in United States v. Daniel Lamor Major

“Minimal-Explanation Suffices” – The Sixth Circuit’s Clarification on Consecutive Revocation Sentences in United States v. Daniel Lamor Major

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Minimal-Explanation Suffices” – The Sixth Circuit’s Clarification on Consecutive Revocation Sentences in United States v. Daniel Lamor Major Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s unpublished opinion in...
District-Court Discretion and Minimal-Explanation Standard in Post-Amendment 821 Motions – A Commentary on United States v. Paul Turner (6th Cir. 2025)

District-Court Discretion and Minimal-Explanation Standard in Post-Amendment 821 Motions – A Commentary on United States v. Paul Turner (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
District-Court Discretion and the Minimal-Explanation Standard in Post-Amendment 821 Sentence-Reduction Motions A Commentary on United States v. Paul Turner, 24-4011 (6th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction...
“Timely Medication as a Clearly-Established Right” – A Comment on Dennis Wiertella v. Lake County, Ohio

“Timely Medication as a Clearly-Established Right” – A Comment on Dennis Wiertella v. Lake County, Ohio

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Timely Medication as a Clearly-Established Right” – Detailed Commentary on Dennis Wiertella v. Lake County, Ohio (6th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Dennis Wiertella v. Lake County, Ohio, the United...
Porter v. Jackson Township: Sixth Circuit Clarifies the “Honest-Belief” Rule in FMLA Retaliation Litigation

Porter v. Jackson Township: Sixth Circuit Clarifies the “Honest-Belief” Rule in FMLA Retaliation Litigation

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Porter v. Jackson Township: Sixth Circuit Clarifies the “Honest-Belief” Rule in FMLA Retaliation Litigation 1. Introduction Shawn Porter, a nine-year employee of the Jackson Township Highway...
Reaffirming the “Crime-of-Violence” Status of Kentucky Assault-EED: A Commentary on United States v. Joshua Delmare Habern (6th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming the “Crime-of-Violence” Status of Kentucky Assault-EED: A Commentary on United States v. Joshua Delmare Habern (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Reaffirming the “Crime-of-Violence” Status of Kentucky Assault under Extreme Emotional Disturbance: United States v. Joshua Delmare Habern Introduction In United States v. Joshua Delmare Habern, the...
“Model or Miss the Boat” – Sixth Circuit Requires Site-Specific Hydrologic Modeling and Full Rule 26 Compliance for Flood-Causation Experts

“Model or Miss the Boat” – Sixth Circuit Requires Site-Specific Hydrologic Modeling and Full Rule 26 Compliance for Flood-Causation Experts

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Model or Miss the Boat” – Sixth Circuit Requires Site-Specific Hydrologic Modeling and Full Rule 26 Compliance for Flood-Causation Experts Introduction In Eugene Baker v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC, No....
Martinez v. Wayne County (2025): Sixth Circuit Defines the Outer Boundary of Next-of-Kin Due-Process Rights over Naturally Decomposed Remains

Martinez v. Wayne County (2025): Sixth Circuit Defines the Outer Boundary of Next-of-Kin Due-Process Rights over Naturally Decomposed Remains

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Martinez v. Wayne County (2025): Sixth Circuit Defines the Outer Boundary of Next-of-Kin Due-Process Rights over Naturally Decomposed Remains Introduction In Luis Antonio Martinez, Sr. v. Wayne...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert