Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying Qui Tam Jurisdiction: The 'Original Source' Requirement in United States ex rel. McKenzie v. BellSouth Telecommunications

Clarifying Qui Tam Jurisdiction: The 'Original Source' Requirement in United States ex rel. McKenzie v. BellSouth Telecommunications

Date: Aug 27, 1997
Clarifying Qui Tam Jurisdiction: The 'Original Source' Requirement in United States ex rel. McKenzie v. BellSouth Telecommunications Introduction In the landmark case of United States ex rel. Mary C....
Hanserd v. United States: Interpreting AEDPA's Restrictions on Successive §2255 Motions

Hanserd v. United States: Interpreting AEDPA's Restrictions on Successive §2255 Motions

Date: Aug 26, 1997
Hanserd v. United States: Interpreting AEDPA's Restrictions on Successive §2255 Motions Introduction In In re: Edward Hanserd, Movant, 123 F.3d 922 (6th Cir. 1997), the United States Court of Appeals...
Defining 'Prompt and Appropriate Corrective Action' in Title VII Co-Worker Sexual Harassment: Parke Care Centers, Inc. v. Blankenship

Defining 'Prompt and Appropriate Corrective Action' in Title VII Co-Worker Sexual Harassment: Parke Care Centers, Inc. v. Blankenship

Date: Aug 23, 1997
Defining 'Prompt and Appropriate Corrective Action' in Title VII Co-Worker Sexual Harassment: Parke Care Centers, Inc. v. Blankenship Introduction In the landmark case Leanna C. Blankenship v. Parke...
Sixth Circuit Establishes Strict Standards for Age Discrimination Claims in RIF Context under Elliott-Larsen Act

Sixth Circuit Establishes Strict Standards for Age Discrimination Claims in RIF Context under Elliott-Larsen Act

Date: Aug 19, 1997
Sixth Circuit Establishes Strict Standards for Age Discrimination Claims in RIF Context under Elliott-Larsen Act Introduction The case of Karl D. Brocklehurst v. PPG Industries, Inc. adjudicated in...
Ludwig v. Board of Trustees of Ferris State University: Defining Due Process Rights for At-Will Employees

Ludwig v. Board of Trustees of Ferris State University: Defining Due Process Rights for At-Will Employees

Date: Aug 19, 1997
Ludwig v. Board of Trustees of Ferris State University: Defining Due Process Rights for At-Will Employees Introduction In Ludwig v. Board of Trustees of Ferris State University, 123 F.3d 404 (6th...
Limits of Res Judicata and the Rejection of Virtual Representation in Class Actions: Insights from Bittinger v. Tecumseh Products Company

Limits of Res Judicata and the Rejection of Virtual Representation in Class Actions: Insights from Bittinger v. Tecumseh Products Company

Date: Aug 15, 1997
Limits of Res Judicata and the Rejection of Virtual Representation in Class Actions: Insights from Bittinger v. Tecumseh Products Company Introduction Bittinger v. Tecumseh Products Company, 123 F.3d...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Securities Fraud Litigation: Clarifying Materiality and Duty to Disclose under Rule 10b-5

Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Securities Fraud Litigation: Clarifying Materiality and Duty to Disclose under Rule 10b-5

Date: Aug 15, 1997
Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Securities Fraud Litigation: Clarifying Materiality and Duty to Disclose under Rule 10b-5 Introduction In the landmark case In re: Sofamor Danek Group, Inc., the...
Enhancements to Grand Jury Procedures in prosecutorial Conduct

Enhancements to Grand Jury Procedures in prosecutorial Conduct

Date: Aug 7, 1997
Enhancements to Grand Jury Procedures in Prosecutorial Conduct Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Gregory L. Myers (123 F.3d 350, 6th Cir. 1997), the United States Court of...
Application of APA's Six-Year Statute of Limitations to NEPA Claims: Analysis of Sierra Club v. Slater

Application of APA's Six-Year Statute of Limitations to NEPA Claims: Analysis of Sierra Club v. Slater

Date: Aug 7, 1997
Application of APA's Six-Year Statute of Limitations to NEPA Claims: Analysis of Sierra Club v. Slater Introduction In Sierra Club; Citizens for Buckeye Basin Parks, Inc.; Friends of Mulberry Park;...
ADA Title III Does Not Govern Employer-Provided Disability Insurance Plans: Analysis of PARKER v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Co.

ADA Title III Does Not Govern Employer-Provided Disability Insurance Plans: Analysis of PARKER v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Co.

Date: Aug 2, 1997
ADA Title III Does Not Govern Employer-Provided Disability Insurance Plans: Analysis of PARKER v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Co. Introduction In PARKER v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Company (121...
Refining the Standards for Access to Courts Under Section 1983: An Analysis of Swekel v. City of River Rouge

Refining the Standards for Access to Courts Under Section 1983: An Analysis of Swekel v. City of River Rouge

Date: Jul 24, 1997
Refining the Standards for Access to Courts Under Section 1983: An Analysis of Swekel v. City of River Rouge Introduction Swekel v. City of River Rouge, 119 F.3d 1259 (6th Cir. 1997), is a pivotal...
Discrimination in High School Athletics: Insights from McPherson v. Michigan High School Athletic Association

Discrimination in High School Athletics: Insights from McPherson v. Michigan High School Athletic Association

Date: Jul 24, 1997
Discrimination in High School Athletics: Insights from McPherson v. Michigan High School Athletic Association Introduction The case of Dion R. McPherson v. Michigan High School Athletic Association,...
Private Voluntary Arbitration Excluded from Anti-Injunction Act's State Court Proceedings: Six Clinics Holding Corp. II v. Cafcomp Systems

Private Voluntary Arbitration Excluded from Anti-Injunction Act's State Court Proceedings: Six Clinics Holding Corp. II v. Cafcomp Systems

Date: Jul 18, 1997
Private Voluntary Arbitration Excluded from Anti-Injunction Act's State Court Proceedings: Six Clinics Holding Corp. II v. Cafcomp Systems Introduction Six Clinics Holding Corporation II v. Cafcomp...
Qualified Immunity in Law Enforcement: Landmark Decision in Turner v. Scott

Qualified Immunity in Law Enforcement: Landmark Decision in Turner v. Scott

Date: Jul 17, 1997
Qualified Immunity in Law Enforcement: Landmark Decision in Turner v. Scott Introduction The case of Eva Turner v. Michael Scott represents a significant juncture in the application of the qualified...
Affirming the Broad Scope of the Discretionary Function Exception under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Rosebush v. United States

Affirming the Broad Scope of the Discretionary Function Exception under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Rosebush v. United States

Date: Jul 17, 1997
Affirming the Broad Scope of the Discretionary Function Exception under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Rosebush v. United States Introduction In Rosebush v. United States, the United States Court of...
ERISA Preemption and Qualified Domestic Relations Orders: A Comprehensive Analysis of Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Marsh

ERISA Preemption and Qualified Domestic Relations Orders: A Comprehensive Analysis of Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Marsh

Date: Jul 16, 1997
ERISA Preemption and Qualified Domestic Relations Orders: A Comprehensive Analysis of Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Marsh Introduction The case of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Marsh,...
Establishing Obstruction of Justice Through Forged Evidence: United States v. Collis

Establishing Obstruction of Justice Through Forged Evidence: United States v. Collis

Date: Jul 8, 1997
Establishing Obstruction of Justice Through Forged Evidence: United States v. Collis Introduction In the landmark case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RONALD COLLIS, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals...
Materiality in False Statements: Implications from United States v. John D. Rogers

Materiality in False Statements: Implications from United States v. John D. Rogers

Date: Jul 3, 1997
Materiality in False Statements: Implications from United States v. John D. Rogers Introduction United States of America v. John D. Rogers, 118 F.3d 466 (6th Cir. 1997), presents a significant...
Barrow v. United States: Appellate Insights on Record Supplementation and Jury Instructions

Barrow v. United States: Appellate Insights on Record Supplementation and Jury Instructions

Date: Jul 3, 1997
Barrow v. United States: Appellate Insights on Record Supplementation and Jury Instructions Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Tommy Joe Barrow, 118 F.3d 482 (6th Cir. 1997), the...
Affirmation of Collateral Estoppel in Political Employment Disputes: Smith v. Sushka

Affirmation of Collateral Estoppel in Political Employment Disputes: Smith v. Sushka

Date: Jul 3, 1997
Affirmation of Collateral Estoppel in Political Employment Disputes: Smith v. Sushka Introduction The case of Sandra S. Smith v. Ted W. Sushka involves a legal dispute concerning the termination of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert