Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Successor Liability: Johnson v. Ventra Group

Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Successor Liability: Johnson v. Ventra Group

Date: Sep 11, 1999
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Successor Liability: Johnson v. Ventra Group Introduction The case of John Johnson v. Ventra Group, Inc. and Ventratech Limited (191 F.3d 732) addresses critical...
Establishing the 'Totality of the Circumstances' Approach in Racial Hostile Work Environment Claims: Jackson v. Quanex Corporation

Establishing the 'Totality of the Circumstances' Approach in Racial Hostile Work Environment Claims: Jackson v. Quanex Corporation

Date: Sep 10, 1999
Establishing the 'Totality of the Circumstances' Approach in Racial Hostile Work Environment Claims: Jackson v. Quanex Corporation Introduction The case Linda Jackson v. Quanex Corporation (191 F.3d...
Clarifying the Applicability of 18 U.S.C. §201(c)(2) in Prosecutorial Sentencing Agreements

Clarifying the Applicability of 18 U.S.C. §201(c)(2) in Prosecutorial Sentencing Agreements

Date: Sep 8, 1999
Clarifying the Applicability of 18 U.S.C. §201(c)(2) in Prosecutorial Sentencing Agreements Introduction The case of United States of America v. Cheryl Ward, Earl Morris, and Larry Turnley...
Myers v. Copper Cellar Corp.: Clarifying Employee Classification and Tip Deduction Standards under the Fair Labor Standards Act

Myers v. Copper Cellar Corp.: Clarifying Employee Classification and Tip Deduction Standards under the Fair Labor Standards Act

Date: Sep 4, 1999
Myers v. Copper Cellar Corp.: Clarifying Employee Classification and Tip Deduction Standards under the Fair Labor Standards Act Introduction In Myers v. Copper Cellar Corporation, 192 F.3d 546 (6th...
Subpoenas Issued by Private Attorneys Do Not Qualify as State Action under §1983: Hahns v. Star Bank

Subpoenas Issued by Private Attorneys Do Not Qualify as State Action under §1983: Hahns v. Star Bank

Date: Sep 3, 1999
Subpoenas Issued by Private Attorneys Do Not Qualify as State Action under §1983: Hahns v. Star Bank Introduction In the case of Michael F. Hahn and Marie Hahn v. Star Bank, et al., decided by the...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Civil Rights Conspiracy Conviction: Key Insights on Miranda Rights, Peremptory Challenges, and Sentencing Guidelines

Sixth Circuit Affirms Civil Rights Conspiracy Conviction: Key Insights on Miranda Rights, Peremptory Challenges, and Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Sep 1, 1999
Sixth Circuit Affirms Civil Rights Conspiracy Conviction: Key Insights on Miranda Rights, Peremptory Challenges, and Sentencing Guidelines Introduction The case of United States of America v....
State Courts' Authority to Assess Costs Post-Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d)

State Courts' Authority to Assess Costs Post-Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d)

Date: Aug 31, 1999
State Courts' Authority to Assess Costs Post-Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d) Introduction The case of Lawrence and Wilson v. Chancery Court of Tennessee addresses a pivotal issue concerning the...
Defining 'Group' Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act: Insights from In re TELXON Corporation Securities Litigation

Defining 'Group' Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act: Insights from In re TELXON Corporation Securities Litigation

Date: Aug 26, 1999
Defining 'Group' Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act: Insights from In re TELXON Corporation Securities Litigation Introduction The case of In re TELXON Corporation Securities...
Reversal of Haftschrift Corpus in Lyons v. Stovall: Implications of Teague Doctrine and Exhaustion Requirements

Reversal of Haftschrift Corpus in Lyons v. Stovall: Implications of Teague Doctrine and Exhaustion Requirements

Date: Aug 25, 1999
Reversal of Habeas Corpus in Lyons v. Stovall: Implications of Teague Doctrine and Exhaustion Requirements Introduction In Lyons v. Stovall, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Strict Compliance Required for Timely Appeals: Insights from FHC Equities v. MBL Life Assurance Corp.

Strict Compliance Required for Timely Appeals: Insights from FHC Equities v. MBL Life Assurance Corp.

Date: Aug 19, 1999
Strict Compliance Required for Timely Appeals: Insights from FHC Equities v. MBL Life Assurance Corp. Introduction The case of FHC Equities, L.L.C. v. MBL Life Assurance Corporation (188 F.3d 678)...
Disability Definition under the ADA: Insights from Doren v. Battle Creek Health System

Disability Definition under the ADA: Insights from Doren v. Battle Creek Health System

Date: Aug 19, 1999
Disability Definition under the ADA: Insights from Doren v. Battle Creek Health System Introduction Doren v. Battle Creek Health System, 187 F.3d 595 (6th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case that examines...
Affirmation of Probable Cause Requirement in Civil Malicious Prosecution Claims: Hill v. White et al. (190 F.3d 427)

Affirmation of Probable Cause Requirement in Civil Malicious Prosecution Claims: Hill v. White et al. (190 F.3d 427)

Date: Aug 14, 1999
Affirmation of Probable Cause Requirement in Civil Malicious Prosecution Claims: Hill v. White et al. (190 F.3d 427) Introduction In the landmark case Hill v. White et al., decided by the United...
Clarifying Prima Facie Requirements in Disparate Treatment Claims: Hollins v. Atlantic Co., Inc.

Clarifying Prima Facie Requirements in Disparate Treatment Claims: Hollins v. Atlantic Co., Inc.

Date: Aug 14, 1999
Clarifying Prima Facie Requirements in Disparate Treatment Claims: Hollins v. Atlantic Co., Inc. Introduction Eunice Hollins v. Atlantic Company, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Right to Intervention in Affirmative Action Admission Cases under FRCP Rule 24(a)

Sixth Circuit Affirms Right to Intervention in Affirmative Action Admission Cases under FRCP Rule 24(a)

Date: Aug 11, 1999
Sixth Circuit Affirms Right to Intervention in Affirmative Action Admission Cases under FRCP Rule 24(a) Introduction The landmark decision in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger has had...
Williams v. Ford Motor Co.: Reinforcing the Standards for Employment Test Validation in Discrimination Litigation

Williams v. Ford Motor Co.: Reinforcing the Standards for Employment Test Validation in Discrimination Litigation

Date: Aug 10, 1999
Williams v. Ford Motor Co.: Reinforcing the Standards for Employment Test Validation in Discrimination Litigation Introduction Williams v. Ford Motor Co., 187 F.3d 533 (6th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal...
Affirmation of Probable Cause and Drug Detection Reliability in United States v. Navarro-Camacho

Affirmation of Probable Cause and Drug Detection Reliability in United States v. Navarro-Camacho

Date: Aug 7, 1999
Affirmation of Probable Cause and Drug Detection Reliability in United States v. Navarro-Camacho Introduction United States v. Heriberto Navarro-Camacho, 186 F.3d 701 (6th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal...
Sixth Circuit Defines AEDPA’s One-Year Limitation and Successive Petition Standards in Brown v. O'Dea

Sixth Circuit Defines AEDPA’s One-Year Limitation and Successive Petition Standards in Brown v. O'Dea

Date: Aug 6, 1999
Sixth Circuit Defines AEDPA’s One-Year Limitation and Successive Petition Standards in Brown v. O'Dea Introduction James H. Brown III, the petitioner-appellant in Brown v. O'Dea, sought relief...
Totality of Circumstances in Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII: Williams v. General Motors

Totality of Circumstances in Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII: Williams v. General Motors

Date: Aug 6, 1999
Totality of Circumstances in Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII: Williams v. General Motors Introduction Marilyn H. Williams vs. General Motors Corporation is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Prison Medical Staff in Eighth Amendment Indifference Claims

Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Prison Medical Staff in Eighth Amendment Indifference Claims

Date: Aug 5, 1999
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Prison Medical Staff in Eighth Amendment Indifference Claims Introduction In the landmark case Ruth Ann Williams v. T.N. Mehra; Dr. Cabrera; Dr. Rodriguez, the United...
Clarifying the Limits of Jury Selection Challenges under Ovalle: A Comprehensive Review of United States v. Spearman

Clarifying the Limits of Jury Selection Challenges under Ovalle: A Comprehensive Review of United States v. Spearman

Date: Aug 3, 1999
Clarifying the Limits of Jury Selection Challenges under Ovalle: A Comprehensive Review of United States v. Spearman Introduction United States of America v. Marktray Spearman (186 F.3d 743, 6th Cir....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert